Shri. Kyrmenskhem Kharngi vs State Of Meghalaya on 16 March, 2026

    0
    37
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Meghalaya High Court

    Shri. Kyrmenskhem Kharngi vs State Of Meghalaya on 16 March, 2026

                                                                2026:MLHC:181
    
     Serial No. 08
     Regular List
    
    
    
                            HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
                                AT SHILLONG
    
    Crl.M.C. No.30 of 2026                          Date of Order: 16.03.2026
           Shri. Kyrmenskhem Kharngi
           Son of Smti. Bisona Kharngi
           Resident of Kharngoi Village,
           Sohiong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya
                                                       ..... Applicant
                              -VERSUS-
           1. State of Meghalaya, represented by the
           Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya
           Home (Police) Department, Shillong.
    
           2. The Officer-in-Charge, Mawngap Police Station,
           East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
    
           3. The Investigating Officer, Women Police Station,
           Shillong East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
                                                       .....Respondents

    Coram:

    Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge

    Appearance:

    For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. M.L. Nongpiur, Adv with
    Ms. R. Fancon, Adv

    For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl.Sr.GA

    (ORAL)
    Heard Mr. M.L. Nongpiur, learned counsel appearing for the
    applicant and also Mr. S.Sengupta, learned Addl.Sr.GA appearing for the
    respondents.

    By this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the
    applicant has prayed for condonation of delay of 29 days in preferring the

    SPONSORED

    Page 1 of 2
    2026:MLHC:181

    connected revision application against the impugned order dated
    03.11.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge, East Khasi Hills District
    in Special (POCSO) Case No.26 of 2025.

    The reason for the delay in preferring the accompanying criminal
    revision petition has been stated to be due to the personal grounds of the
    counsel representing the applicant before the trial court, which accounted
    for the delay in obtaining a certified copy of the impugned order.

    The learned Addl. Sr. GA appearing for the State-respondents has
    no serious objection to the prayer for condonation.

    In view of the above, the reason stated in the application is found
    to be satisfactory and accordingly, the delay of 29 days in preferring the
    accompanying criminal revision petition is hereby condoned.

    Registry to diarize the criminal revision petition and list it on
    18.03.2026.

    The application stands allowed and disposed of.

    Judge

    Meghalaya
    16.03.2026
    “Shrity,PS”

    Signature Not Verified
    Digitally signed by SHRITY
    CH MOMIN Page 2 of 2
    Date: 2026.03.16 16:47:26 IST

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here