Shri. Elipsing Lawai vs The State Of Meghalaya Represented By on 25 March, 2026

    0
    29
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. Heard Ms. D.M. Wajri, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the

    applicants/convicts, who has submitted that the applicants/convicts has preferred

    SPONSORED

    an appeal before this Court against the impugned judgment dated 02.06.2025

    and related order of sentence dated 09.06.2025 passed by the Court of the learned

    Additional Deputy Commissioner (Judicial), East Khasi Hills, Shillong in

    Sessions Case No. 43 (T) 2022 under Section 323/343/376-D IPC.

    2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 216 days has

    occurred, the reason being that the family members/relatives of the

    applicants/convicts are economically backward and illiterate, and has no means

    to engage a private counsel, as such, they could not prefer an appeal within the

    statutory period. Thus, legal aid was sought for, and accordingly, this application

    was processed through Legal Aid Counsel. It is therefore prayed that the delay

    be condoned and the appeal be admitted.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here