Shiva Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:11900) on 12 March, 2026

    0
    36
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Order

    12/03/2026

    SPONSORED

    Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present case

    bail bonds were already accepted by the Investigating Agency

    while he was released on bail, however, subsequently due to

    political pressure, non-bailable offences were added in order to

    put the petitioner behind Bars. It is submitted that thereafter on

    an application being filed by the State, learned Sessions Judge,

    proceeded to forfeit the bail-bonds.

    The petitioner has challenged the order dated 04.02.2026.

    It is submitted that merely because non-bailable offence has

    been added, cannot be a ground for cancellation of bail.

    Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment

    passed by this Court in Sunil Bhatia & Anr. Vs. State of

    Rajasthan & Anr. (S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.855/2026,

    decided on 18.02.2026).

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here