Sharanamma W/O Parappa Hatti vs The State Of Karnataka on 19 May, 2026

    0
    29
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Karnataka High Court

    Sharanamma W/O Parappa Hatti vs The State Of Karnataka on 19 May, 2026

    Author: H.T.Narendra Prasad

    Bench: H.T.Narendra Prasad

                                                     -1-
                                                                  NC: 2026:KHC-D:6552
                                                               WP No. 104083 of 2026
    
    
                           HC-KAR
    
    
    
    
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
    
                               DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2026
    
                                               BEFORE
    
                          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
    
                           WRIT PETITION NO. 104083 OF 2026 (KLR-REG)
    
    
                          BETWEEN:
    
                          SHARANAMMA W/O PARAPPA HATTI,
                          AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
                          R/O. SOMANAL VILLAGE, TQ. KARATAGI,
                          DIST. KOPPAL-583 231.
    
                                                                         ... PETITIONER
                          (BY SRI. SADIQ N. GOODWALA, ADVOCATE)
    
    
                          AND:
    
                          1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                               DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
    Digitally signed by
    CHANABASAPPA
                               VIKAS SOUDA, BENGALURU-560 001,
    K KALLUR
    Location: High
    Court of
    Karnataka,
                               REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
    Dharwad Bench
    
    
    
    
                          2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
                               KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583 231.
    
                          3.   THE TAHSILDAR,
                               KARATAGI, DIST. KOPPAL-583 324.
    
                          4.   THE REVENUE INSPECTOR,
                               KARATAGI, DIST. KOPPAL-583 231.
    
                          5.   THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                               KARATAGI POLICE STATION,
                                -2-
                                           NC: 2026:KHC-D:6552
                                       WP No. 104083 of 2026
    
    
    HC-KAR
    
    
    
    
         KARATAGI, DIST. KOPPAL-583 324.
    
    6.   YENKANAGOUDA S/O HANUMANTAPPA HERUR,
         AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
         R/O. SOMANAL VILLAGE,
         TQ. KARATAGI,
         DIST. KOPPAL-583 231.
    
    7.   DEVENDRAPPA S/O YEMANAPPA BOMMANAL,
         AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
         R/O. MAILAPUR VILLAGE,
         TQ. KARATAGI,
         DIST. KOPPAL-583 231.
    
    8.   HAMPAMMA W/O DEVENDRAPPA BOMMANAL,
         AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
         R/O. MAILAPUR VILLAGE,
         TQ. KARATAGI,
         DIST. KOPPAL-583 231.
    
    9.   SHAMBANNA S/O HANUMANTHAPPA HERUR,
         AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
         R/O. SOMANAL VILLAGE,
         TQ. KARATAGI,
         DIST. KOPPAL-583 231.
    
                                               ... RESPONDENTS
    
          THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
    227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A WRIT IN
    THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER
    DATED 09.09.2024 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 IN NO. NIL
    IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED VIDE ANNEXURE-D.
    
          THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
    THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
    
    
    CORAM:    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
                                    -3-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC-D:6552
                                            WP No. 104083 of 2026
    
    
     HC-KAR
    
    
    
    
                              ORAL ORDER

    In this writ petition, the petitioner called in question order

    dated 09.09.2024 passed by Deputy Commissioner Koppal under

    SPONSORED

    Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

    2. At outset, learned Government Advocate submitted

    that petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy of appeal

    under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

    3. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion

    on the merit of the case, the above writ petition is disposed of

    reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate

    authority under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

    4. If such an appeal is filed along with that application

    for stay, the competent authority is directed to consider the

    same in accordance with law.

    Sd/-

    (H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD)
    JUDGE

    SSP
    CT:BCK
    LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 56

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here