Shankar Giri vs State Of Uttarakhand on 31 March, 2026

    0
    39
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Uttarakhand High Court

    Shankar Giri vs State Of Uttarakhand on 31 March, 2026

                                                                                   COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
                  Office Notes,
                 reports, orders
                 or proceedings
    SL.
          Date    or directions
    No
                 and Registrar's
                    order with
                   Signatures
                                                                                          2026:UHC:2255
    
                                   BA1 No. 467 of 2026
    
                                   Shankar Giri                   --Applicant
    
                                                   Versus
    
                                   State of Uttarakhand          --Respondent
    
                                   Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J.
    

    Mr. Mukul Dangi, learned legal Aid Counsel for the
    Applicant.

    2. Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned A.G.A. for the State of
    Uttarakhand.

    SPONSORED

    3. The present Bail Application has been moved by the
    Applicant – Shankar Giri, aged about 56 years, S/o Kanhaiya Giri,
    R/o Baroda, Tehsil Gohana, District Sonipat, Haryana. The
    Applicant is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime
    No. 82 of 2025, registered at Police Station Laxmanjhula, District
    Pauri Garhwal, under Sections 8/22/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and
    Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the
    NDPS Act“).

    4. Heard Mr. Mukul Dangi, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the
    Applicant, and Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned A.G.A. for the State.
    Perused the record.

    5. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant
    has been falsely implicated in the present case and is in judicial
    custody since 18.12.2025. It is further submitted that there are no
    independent witnesses to the alleged recovery or the proceedings
    leading to the lodging of the FIR. It is also contended that there is
    non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of Sections 50, 52A,
    and 57 of the NDPS Act. It is further submitted that the co-accused,
    namely Manish, has already been granted bail by this Court on
    27.02.2026, and on the ground of parity, the present Applicant is
    also entitled to be released on bail.

    6. Learned State Counsel has opposed the Bail Application.

    7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
    particularly the fact that the co-accused has already been granted
    bail, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case,
    this Court is of the view that the Applicant is entitled to be released
    on bail at this stage.

    8. Accordingly, the Bail Application is allowed.

    9. Let the Applicant be released on bail upon his executing a
    personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like
    amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

    10. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

    (Ashish Naithani, J.)
    31.03.2026
    Shiksha



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here