Shajahan Akand vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 29 April, 2026

    0
    28
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Gauhati High Court

    Shajahan Akand vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 29 April, 2026

                                                                           Page No.# 1/4
    
    GAHC010101122024
    
    
    
    
                                                                    undefined
    
                                  THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
       (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
    
                                     Case No. : Crl.Pet./594/2024
    
                SHAJAHAN AKAND
                S/O LATE NUR SADIN AKAND, R/O VILL- BASHMURA, P.S.-FAKIRAGANJ,
                DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM
    
    
    
                VERSUS
    
                THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
                REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
    
                2:MAHMUDA KHATUN
                 D/O HOSSAIN ALI
                 R/O BASHMURA
                 P.S.-FAKIRGANJ
                 DIST- DHUBRI
                ASSAM
                 PIN NO. 783301. AT PRESENT R/A VILL- SUNDARPARA PART-IV
                 P.O.-AIRKATA
                 P.S.-FAKIRGANJ
                 DIST- DHUBRI
                ASSAM
                 PIN-78333
    
    Advocate for the Petitioner   : MRS. S ROY,
    
    Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. SARFRAZ NAWAZ, AMICUS CURIAE (R-2)
                                                                             Page No.# 2/4
    
    
    
    
                                      BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
    
                                           ORDER
    

    Date : 29.04.2026

    Heard Mrs. S. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Also heard
    Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of
    Assam and Mr. S. Nawaz, learned Amicus Curiae representing the respondent
    No.2.

    SPONSORED

    2. By filing the present application under Section 482 of Code of Criminal
    Procedure, 1973, the petitioner is seeking quashment of FIR registered as
    Fakiganj P.S. Case No. 125/2022 under Sections 376/294/323/506 of IPC. The
    further challenge made in this petition is order dated 26.09.2023 by which
    cognizance of offences under Sections 419/376/506 of IPC has been taken by
    the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhubri in PRC Case No. 1384/2023.

    3. The informant lodged the FIR before the Fakirganj Police Station on the
    allegation that the petitioner and the informant/respondent No.2 had love affairs
    since about 3 years prior to the date of FIR and on the pretext of marriage,
    against her consent, forcibly had sexual intercourse with her multiple times. On
    08.07.2022, the petitioner and the other persons named in the FIR physically
    assaulted her and used slang language. Although a village meeting was called
    but the persons named in the FIR did not turn up and sent the petitioner to
    some other place.

    4. The material available on record shows that the informant in Fakirganj P.S.
    Case No. 125/2022 had filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of
    Page No.# 3/4

    Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the Court of learned Chief
    Judicial Magistrate, Dhubri which was registered as CR (DV) Case No. 764/2022.

    5. In the aforesaid petition, the informant has described her as married wife
    of respondent No. 1 and according to her, such marriage was solemnized as per
    Mahamadan Law and Shariat by executing marriage kabirnama on 21.07.2022.
    On the other hand, prior to that on 09.07.2022, the impugned FIR was lodged
    inter alia, alleging that, the petitioner had sexual intercourse with her on the
    pretext of promise to marry her. From the undisputed document of the DV Case
    (supra), it is clear that according to the informant herself, the marriage was
    solemnized on 21.07.2022 i.e. after lodging of F.I.R. on 09.07.2022.

    6. In the case of Ajeet Singh -Vs- State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors
    rendered in 2024 LiveLaw (SC) 18 the Hon’ble Apex Court was seized of a
    similar matter wherein it was found that the allegation that the physical
    relationship was maintained due to false promise of marriage was without basis,
    as their relationship led to solmonization of marriage and therefore, the
    allegations made in the FIR were such that on the basis of the statements, no
    prudent person can ever reach a conclusion that there is sufficient ground for
    proceeding against the accused.

    7. The present case, in view of the above admitted facts also stand on the
    same footing and therefore the present FIR as well as the subsequent criminal
    proceedings deserved to be quashed.

    8. Accordingly, the FIR in Fakiganj P.S. Case No. 125/2022 as well as the
    proceedings in PRC Case No. 1384/2023 pending before the learned Chief
    Judicial Magistrate, Dhubri are hereby quashed.

    Page No.# 4/4

    9. The criminal petition stands disposed of.

    JUDGE

    Comparing Assistant



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here