Advertisement
Advertisement

― Advertisement ―

HomeShafiq Ahmed Son Of Shri Mumtaz Khan vs State Of Rajasthan ......

Shafiq Ahmed Son Of Shri Mumtaz Khan vs State Of Rajasthan … on 23 March, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Shafiq Ahmed Son Of Shri Mumtaz Khan vs State Of Rajasthan … on 23 March, 2026

[2026:RJ-JP:11968-DB]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

 D.B. Criminal Misc. Application (For Suspension Of Sentence) No.
                                     141/2026

                                           In

                   D.B. Criminal Appeal No.231/2025

1.       Shafiq Ahmed S/o Shri Mumtaz Khan, Aged About 30
         Years, Resident Of village Miyan-Ki-Dhani, Police Station,
         Ranoli, District Sikar, (Raj.).
2.       Sharif Ahmed S/o Shri Mumtaz Khan, Aged About 37
         Years, Resident Of village Miyan-Ki-Dhani, Police Station,
         Ranoli, District Sikar, (Raj.).
         (Both Applicants are Presently Lodged In Central Jail At
         Bikaner)
                                                           ----Accused-Appellants
                                       Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

—-Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Swadeep Singh Hora with
Mr. T.C. Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, P.P.
For Complainant(s) Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv. assisted by
Mr. Amar Kumar

SPONSORED

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

Judgment / Order

23/03/2026

This suspension of sentence application under Section 430 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by

the accused-applicants (for brevity, “the applicants”) alongwith the

appeal. The applicants have been convicted and sentenced by the

learned Additional Sessions Judge No.4, Sikar (for short, ‘the

learned trial Court’) vide judgment dated 29.04.2025 passed in

(Uploaded on 23/03/2026 at 04:43:59 PM)
(Downloaded on 23/03/2026 at 08:28:26 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:11968-DB] (2 of 4) [SOSA-141/2026]

Sessions Case No.141/2015 (BT No.16/2016) (CIS No.208/2015)

as under:-

1. Under Section 148 IPC: One year’s simple imprisonment and

fine of ₹1,000/- each; in default whereof, seven days’ additional

simple imprisonment.

2. Under Section 341 IPC: One month’s simple imprisonment

and fine of ₹500/- each; in default whereof, five days’ additional

simple imprisonment.

3. Under Section 323/149 IPC: Six months’ simple

imprisonment and fine of ₹1,000/- each; in default whereof, seven

days’ additional simple imprisonment.

4. Under Section 325/149 IPC: Four years’ simple

imprisonment and fine of ₹5,000/- each; in default whereof, one

month’s additional simple imprisonment.

5. Under Section 302/149 IPC: Life imprisonment and fine of

₹20,000/- each; in default whereof, six months’ additional simple

imprisonment.

All the substantive sentences to run concurrently.

Learned counsel for the applicants contends that they have

falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that they have

convicted inter alia under Section 302 IPC with the aid of Section

149 IPC and substantive sentence of similarly situated co-accused

persons namely Smt. Sayra Bano @ Guddi, Subhash Chand,

Mohammad Hanif @ Idu and Mumtaz Khan have already been

suspended by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated

09.01.2026 and prays for suspension of substantive sentence

awarded to them vide judgment impugned dated 29.04.2025

during pendency of the appeal.

(Uploaded on 23/03/2026 at 04:43:59 PM)
(Downloaded on 23/03/2026 at 08:28:26 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:11968-DB] (3 of 4) [SOSA-141/2026]

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor though, opposed the

prayer but, could not dispute that the case of the applicants is not

distinguishable from the case of the co-accused who have already

been extended benefit of suspension of sentence.

Learned Senior Counsel for the complainant opposing the

prayer, stated that the weapon of offence has been recovered on

the disclosure statement made by the applicant-Shafiq Ahmed and

therefore, he is disentitled for benefit of suspension of sentence.

Heard. Considered.

A perusal of the order dated 09.01.2026 passed by a

coordinate Bench of this Court whereby, the suspension of

sentence applications filed by the co-accused were allowed and

the material on record reflects that the case of the applicants is

not distinguishable from the case of the co-accused who have

already been extended benefit of suspension of sentence by this

Court. In view thereof, we deem it just and proper to allow the

application for suspension of sentence filed by the applicants.

Accordingly, the suspension of sentence application is

allowed. Substantive sentences awarded to the applicants by the

learned trial Court vide judgment dated 29.04.2025 shall remain

suspended during pendency of the appeal and the applicants-1.

Shafiq Ahmed S/o Shri Mumtaz Khan & 2. Sharif Ahmed

S/o Shri Mumtaz Khan shall be released on bail provided each

of them furnish bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial

Court to the effect that they shall appear before this Court on or

before 23.04.2026 and as and when called upon to do so till

disposal of the appeal and subject to the following conditions:-

(Uploaded on 23/03/2026 at 04:43:59 PM)
(Downloaded on 23/03/2026 at 08:28:26 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:11968-DB] (4 of 4) [SOSA-141/2026]

1. That they will appear before the
learned trial Court in the month of January of
every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicants change the place
of residence, they will give in writing their
changed address(es) to the learned trial Court as
well as to their learned counsel in the High Court
who shall, in turn, inform this Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their
address(es), they will give in writing their
changed address to the learned trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicants in a separate file(s). Such file(s) be

registered as Criminal Misc. Case relating to original case in which

the accused-applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file(s) shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of the case in the learned trial

Court. In case, the said accused-applicants do not appear before

the learned trial Court, the learned trial Judge shall report the

matter to the High Court for cancellation of benefit extended by

this order.

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

Manish/15

(Uploaded on 23/03/2026 at 04:43:59 PM)
(Downloaded on 23/03/2026 at 08:28:26 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link