Bitish Kumar vs Union Of India Through N.C.B., Patna. on 16 March, 2026

    0
    37
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Heard Ms. Soni Kumari, learned counsel for the

    petitioners and Ms. Shail Kumari, learned Central

    SPONSORED

    Government Counsel for the Union of India.

    2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

    09.03.2024 in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No.28 of 2024,

    arising out of N.C.B. Case No. 04 of 2024, registered for the

    offence punishable under Sections 20(B)(II) (C), 25 & 29 of

    N.D.P.S. Act read with Section 8(C) of NDPS Act.

    3. Recovery is of 243 Kg. of Ganja.

    4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

    the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been

    implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46931 of 2025(4) dt.16-03-2026

    FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not

    committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Learned counsel

    for the petitioner next submits that the petitioner has not been

    found or caught in the truck from which 240 Kg. Ganja in 24

    packets was recovered. In fact the petitioner was arrested

    from a Marazzo Car which was running behind the truck and

    nothing incriminating article was recovered from the Car in

    question and the petitioner has been made accused in the

    present case merely on the basis of suspicion.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here