SEBI (LODR) Amendment Regulations, 2026

The SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations, 2026, notified on 20 January 2026, raised the threshold for a High Value Debt Listed Entity (HVDLE) from Rs 1,000 crore to Rs 5,000 crore of outstanding listed non-convertible debt securities. The change takes roughly two-thirds of current HVDLEs out of the corporate governance regime that was built for equity-listed companies, while entities that still hold Rs 5,000 crore or more of listed debt keep their board, committee and disclosure obligations. Entities that fall below the new line because of the revised threshold are also released from the usual requirement to keep complying for three more years.

This article sets out what the SEBI (LODR) Amendment 2026 changed for high value debt listed entities, which companies leave the framework, and what compliance still applies above the Rs 5,000 crore line.

SPONSORED

A High Value Debt Listed Entity is a company that has no listed equity shares but has raised money through listed non-convertible debt securities above a notified size. SEBI created the category in 2021 to bring bond-funded companies under the governance discipline that already applied to equity-listed firms, on the view that debenture holders deserve comparable protection.

The threshold decides who carries that discipline. At Rs 1,000 crore it caught a wide band of issuers, including many non-banking financial companies and other regulated lenders whose debt programmes are routine rather than systemically significant. Raising the line to Rs 5,000 crore narrows the category to the largest debt issuers.

The amendment is one piece of a wider SEBI simplification drive across its listing and securities frameworks in early 2026. What follows is drawn from the notified text and SEBI’s own consultation record, with the regulation references given as each point arises.

What changed under the SEBI (LODR) Amendment Regulations, 2026?

The SEBI (LODR) Amendment Regulations, 2026 raised the HVDLE classification threshold from Rs 1,000 crore to Rs 5,000 crore of outstanding listed non-convertible debt securities. SEBI notified the change on 20 January 2026, and the consolidated Listing Regulations now carry the label “last amended on 22 January 2026”.

The applicability rule sits in Regulation 15(1A) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. That sub-regulation is what pulls a debt-only issuer into the corporate governance provisions once its listed debt crosses the line, and the 2026 amendment simply substitutes the higher figure into it.

SEBI framed the change as an ease-of-doing-business measure rather than a change of principle. In its consultation paper of 27 October 2025, the regulator estimated that lifting the threshold to Rs 5,000 crore would cut the number of HVDLEs from about 137 to about 48, a reduction of roughly 64 per cent. The reasoning was that the Rs 1,000 crore mark had swept in routine debt issuances, particularly by non-banking financial companies and other regulated financial institutions, without a matching level of systemic risk.

The amendment did not arrive on its own. It came alongside a run of SEBI rewrites in the same window, including the same simplification impulse that produced the rewritten SEBI stock brokers rulebook notified earlier in January 2026. For a company that funds itself through listed bonds, the practical question is narrow but immediate: does the outstanding value of its debt still put it above the new Rs 5,000 crore line, and if not, what falls away.

How did the HVDLE threshold move from Rs 500 crore to Rs 5,000 crore?

The HVDLE threshold has climbed in three steps since 2021, from Rs 500 crore to Rs 1,000 crore and now to Rs 5,000 crore. Each step narrowed the set of debt issuers subject to equity-style governance.

The category began with a SEBI notification dated 7 September 2021, which inserted Regulation 15(1A) into the Listing Regulations. Any entity with outstanding listed non-convertible debt securities of Rs 500 crore or more, reckoned as on 31 March 2021, became a High Value Debt Listed Entity. At the start, the corporate governance provisions in Regulations 16 to 27 applied to these entities on a “comply or explain” basis until 31 March 2023, meaning a company could either follow a requirement or disclose why it had not. That soft-launch window was later extended more than once.

The framework was recast in March 2025. The SEBI (LODR) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025, notified on 27 March 2025, gave HVDLEs a dedicated home in a new Chapter VA of the Listing Regulations, running from Regulation 62A to Regulation 62Q. That amendment did two things at once. It raised the threshold from Rs 500 crore to Rs 1,000 crore, and it converted the governance norms from comply-or-explain into mandatory obligations, so the discipline that had been optional-with-disclosure became binding.

The January 2026 amendment is the third step. It leaves the Chapter VA architecture in place and moves only the number, from Rs 1,000 crore to Rs 5,000 crore. Readers who want the underlying governance regime in full will find it set out in our note on LODR regulations and corporate governance.

Which entities stop being HVDLEs after the 2026 amendment?

Entities whose outstanding listed non-convertible debt securities fall between Rs 1,000 crore and Rs 5,000 crore stop being HVDLEs after the 2026 amendment. These are the companies that were caught by the old threshold but sit below the new one, and they form the bulk of SEBI’s estimated reduction from about 137 entities to about 48.

In practice, this band is populated heavily by mid-sized non-banking financial companies, housing finance companies and other regulated lenders. SEBI’s own reasoning in the consultation paper was that debt of this size, issued by entities that are already supervised by a sectoral regulator, is routine funding rather than a signal of systemic importance. Lifting the line was meant to match the governance burden to the risk.

The threshold is measured by the outstanding value of an entity’s listed non-convertible debt securities, and the framework has reckoned that value with reference to the position as on 31 March of the financial year since the category was created. An issuer therefore tests itself against the Rs 5,000 crore line on that annual basis rather than on any single day’s balance. A company that has repaid or refinanced its way below Rs 5,000 crore, or that never crossed it, is outside the HVDLE net once the amendment takes effect.

One point is worth stating plainly, because it is easy to assume otherwise. Leaving the HVDLE category does not switch off every obligation a debt-listed company has. The general listing conditions and disclosure duties that attach to any entity with listed debt continue to apply. What falls away is the heavier, equity-style corporate governance layer that Chapter VA imposes.

What corporate governance obligations does an HVDLE still have?

An HVDLE that still holds Rs 5,000 crore or more of listed debt carries the full corporate governance load in Regulations 16 to 27 of the Listing Regulations, applied through Chapter VA. These are the same obligations that bind equity-listed companies, which is the whole point of the category.

What must an HVDLE’s board look like?

The board composition rules in Regulation 17 continue to apply, including the requirement for an appropriate mix of executive, non-executive and independent directors and the associated limits on board size and meetings. Independent directors carry particular weight here, because they are the mechanism through which debenture holders, who have no vote at general meetings, get an independent check inside the boardroom. The role of independent directors under SEBI’s LODR amendments is a useful companion on how that check is meant to work, and LawSikho’s guide to the role of independent directors in listed-company governance covers the framework from the director’s side.

Which board committees must an HVDLE constitute?

An HVDLE must constitute the same board committees as an equity-listed company. That means an audit committee under Regulation 18, a nomination and remuneration committee under Regulation 19, a stakeholders relationship committee under Regulation 20, and a risk management committee under Regulation 21 where the size tests are met. Each committee carries its own composition and meeting requirements, and the audit committee in particular sits at the centre of oversight over financial reporting and related-party dealings. Our explainer on the nomination and remuneration committee under the LODR Regulations sets out how one of these committees is built and how its role compares with the Companies Act position.

How are related-party transactions and disclosures handled?

Related-party transactions are governed by Regulation 23, which requires audit committee approval and, above specified limits, the approval of debenture holders, along with periodic disclosure of such transactions. Alongside this, an HVDLE files the corporate governance report and makes the disclosures required under Regulations 24A and 27, and complies with the secretarial audit requirement. The 2026 amendment aligned several of these mechanics with the equity-listed timeline, a point taken up in the next section but one.

Do entities that cease to be HVDLEs get transition relief?

Entities that cease to be HVDLEs solely because of the higher threshold do get transition relief, and this is one of the more practically important features of the 2026 amendment. Ordinarily an entity does not exit the framework the moment its debt dips below the line.

The standard rule is a continuation lock-in. Once classified, an entity continues to be treated as an HVDLE until the outstanding value of its listed non-convertible debt securities stays below the threshold for three consecutive financial years. The design prevents a company from stepping in and out of the governance regime as its debt balance fluctuates around the boundary.

The 2026 amendment adds a proviso that switches this off for the entities affected by the threshold change itself. A company that ceases to be an HVDLE only because the line moved from Rs 1,000 crore to Rs 5,000 crore does not have to serve out the three-year continuation period. The cessation is treated as effective with the amendment rather than three years down the line, so an entity that drops out on 22 January 2026 is not locked into a further three years of Chapter VA compliance.

The relief matters because the alternative would have defeated the purpose of raising the threshold. If the roughly ninety entities leaving the category still had to comply for three years, the ease-of-doing-business gain would have been deferred well into the future. The proviso lets the benefit land immediately for entities that qualify.

What else did the 2026 amendment change for debt-listed entities?

Beyond the threshold, the 2026 amendment tightened investor-service timelines and brought several HVDLE governance mechanics into line with the norms for equity-listed companies. These are smaller changes than the threshold move, but they affect every entity that stays inside the framework.

On investor servicing, SEBI reinforced that transfers, transmission and transposition of securities are processed only in dematerialised form, closing off the physical route. It also set a service standard requiring the credit of securities in demat form within thirty days of a request for actions such as sub-division, consolidation, exchange or the issue of duplicate securities. For a large bond issuer with a wide holder base, a fixed thirty-day clock is an operational obligation rather than a formality.

On governance mechanics, the amendment harmonised HVDLE requirements with the equity-listed regime in several places. It aligned the treatment of director age, so that continuing a director beyond seventy-five years needs shareholder approval, and it moved various reckoning points onto a financial-year basis. It also aligned the secretarial audit requirement with the equity timeline, applying from the 2026-27 financial year, and adjusted the related-party framework with carve-outs for certain statutory payments and public-sector transactions. Separately, the amendment provided for unclaimed amounts to be transferred to the designated investor protection fund after seven years from the date they fall due.

Taken together, these changes point in the same direction as the threshold move. SEBI is treating the debt-listed governance regime less as a separate rulebook and more as an extension of the equity-listed one, applied to a smaller and larger set of issuers. For anyone tracking how financial regulation reshapes board and compliance duties, this alignment is the quieter but more durable half of the reform.

Compliance steps for entities near the Rs 5,000 crore threshold

Entities sitting close to the Rs 5,000 crore threshold should start by measuring their position precisely, because everything else follows from which side of the line they fall on. The outstanding value of listed non-convertible debt securities, reckoned on the financial-year basis the framework uses, is the number that decides HVDLE status.

An entity that lands below Rs 5,000 crore because of the revised threshold should document that it qualifies for the cessation proviso and confirm that its exit is effective now rather than after a three-year wait. It can then plan the orderly wind-down of obligations that no longer apply, while remembering that the baseline disclosure duties attaching to any debt-listed entity continue. An entity that stays above the line should treat the position as unchanged in substance and keep its board composition, committees, related-party approvals and disclosures fully in place, while absorbing the harmonised timelines the amendment introduced.

Directors of entities on either side of the line should be clear about where their duties come from. The Chapter VA governance obligations sit on top of, not in place of, the general duties of directors under Section 166 of the Companies Act, 2013, which continue regardless of HVDLE status. For professionals who advise on when these listed-company governance requirements bite, Skill Arbitrage’s explainer on when independent director requirements apply is a practical reference on the applicability tests.

The safe default for a borderline entity is to keep governance structures intact until its status for the financial year is settled, rather than dismantling committees on the strength of a mid-year debt figure. Reinstating a committee after a wrong call is more disruptive than maintaining one that turns out not to be required.

Frequently asked questions

What is the new HVDLE threshold under the SEBI LODR Amendment 2026?

The threshold is Rs 5,000 crore of outstanding listed non-convertible debt securities, raised from Rs 1,000 crore by the SEBI (LODR) (Amendment) Regulations, 2026. An entity is a High Value Debt Listed Entity only if its listed debt is at or above that figure.

When did the SEBI (LODR) Amendment Regulations, 2026 come into force?

SEBI notified the amendment on 20 January 2026, and the consolidated Listing Regulations reflect it as last amended on 22 January 2026. It came into force on publication in the Official Gazette rather than on a later appointed date.

Does an entity below Rs 5,000 crore still have to follow LODR corporate governance norms?

No, not the HVDLE-specific corporate governance layer in Chapter VA. An entity below the Rs 5,000 crore threshold exits that regime, though the general listing and disclosure obligations that apply to any entity with listed debt continue.

What is Chapter VA of the LODR Regulations?

Chapter VA is the dedicated set of provisions for High Value Debt Listed Entities, running from Regulation 62A to Regulation 62Q. It was introduced by the March 2025 amendment and houses the corporate governance obligations that apply to HVDLEs.

If a company stops being an HVDLE, must it keep complying for three years?

Normally an entity continues as an HVDLE until its debt stays below the threshold for three consecutive financial years. The 2026 amendment waives this for entities that cease to qualify only because of the higher Rs 5,000 crore threshold, so they exit without serving the three-year period.

References

Regulations and primary sources

• SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations, 2026, notification SEBI/NRO-GN/2026/295, dated 20 January 2026
• SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (last amended on 22 January 2026), Regulation 15(1A) and Chapter VA (Regulations 62A to 62Q); corporate governance provisions in Regulations 16 to 27
• SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025, dated 27 March 2025, introducing Chapter VA and raising the threshold from Rs 500 crore to Rs 1,000 crore
• SEBI notification dated 7 September 2021 inserting Regulation 15(1A), creating the High Value Debt Listed Entity category at a Rs 500 crore threshold
• SEBI consultation paper on relaxation of the HVDLE threshold, Department of Debt and Hybrid Securities, dated 27 October 2025

This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice on a specific listing or compliance question, consult a qualified professional.