Satpal Singh vs National Investigation Agency Nia on 19 March, 2026

    0
    22
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of regular bail by the Special Judge, NIA, vide order
    dated 02.06.2025, the appellant had come up before this Court by filing the present appeal
    under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008.

    SPONSORED

    2. In paragraph 31 of the appeal, the accused declares that he has no criminal
    antecedents.

    1 of 7

    CRA-D-924-2025 (O&M) -2-

    3. The appellant’s counsel submits that the appellant would have no objection
    whatsoever to any stringent conditions that this Court may impose, including that if the
    appellant repeats the offense or commits any non-bailable offense which provides for a
    sentence of imprisonment for more than seven years, the State may file an application to
    revoke this bail before the concerned Court having jurisdiction over this FIR, which shall
    have the authority to cancel this bail, and to which the appellant shall have no objection.
    Counsel for the appellant further submits that he shall not use his right of speech and
    expression beyond what is permitted under Article 19 of the Constitution of India. Counsel
    for the appellant further submits that there are 92 witnesses and out of whom, only 24 have
    been examined and it is likely to take massive time and appellant’s further custody is not
    justiciable.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here