― Advertisement ―

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS – RESEARCH ASSOCIATE (LAW AND TECHNOLOGY)

CALL FOR APPLICATIONSRESEARCH ASSOCIATE (LAW AND TECHNOLOGY)About the OpportunityNational Law University Delhi (NLUD) invites applications for the position of Full-time Research Associate on a...
HomeSanjeet Yadav @ Sanjeet Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand ..... ......

Sanjeet Yadav @ Sanjeet Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand ….. … … on 13 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Jharkhand High Court

Sanjeet Yadav @ Sanjeet Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand ….. … … on 13 April, 2026

Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

                       ( 2026:JHHC:10523 ) )




IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
               A. B. A. No. 1546 of 2026

          1. Sanjeet Yadav @ Sanjeet Kumar, aged about 30 years, son of Mahesh
               Yadav, resident of At Kusvatad, P.O. Kaura, P.S. Pratappur, District-
               Chatra, State-Jharkhand
          2. Satendra Singh @ Satendra Ganjhu, aged about 42 years, son of
               Jaglal Ganjhu, resident of village Eghara Falenda, P.O. Kaura, P.S.
               Pratappur, District-Chatra, State-Jharkhand
                                                  ...... ...     Petitioners
                                Versus
The State of Jharkhand                                  .....    ...      Opposite Party
                            --------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners :Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate
For the State : Mrs. Nehala Sharmain, Spl.P.P

02/ 13.04.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

SPONSORED

counsel for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with

Manatu P.S. Case No. 27/2025, N.D.P.S. No. 21/2025 registered under

sections 18, 29, of N.D.P.S. Act and section 33 of Indian Forest Act,

pending in the Court of learned Special Judge under NDPS Act, Palamau.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that false allegation

is made of cultivation of poppy plant in the forest area. He next submits that

the said land is not belonging to the petitioners and petitioners have got no

criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 21 of the petition. On these

grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of

anticipatory bail.

4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits

that allegations are there of cultivation of poppy plant in the forest area.

5. Considering that land is of the forest department and petitioners

have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 21 of the petition

and in that view of the matter, the petitioners are directed to surrender

before the learned court within two weeks from today and the learned court

shall release the petitioners on terms and conditions and sureties as learned
( 2026:JHHC:10523 ) )

court deems fit and proper.

6. This anticipatory bail application is disposed of.

Dt.13.04.2026                                    ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
satyarthi-
 



Source link