Samman Capital Limited vs Pranay Chouradia on 26 May, 2026

    0
    28
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Chattisgarh High Court

    Samman Capital Limited vs Pranay Chouradia on 26 May, 2026

    Author: Narendra Kumar Vyas

    Bench: Narendra Kumar Vyas

                                          1
    
    
    
    
                                                    2026:CGHC:23496
                                                                   NAFR
    
              HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
    
    
                                WP227 No. 556 of 2026
    
    
    1 - Samman Capital Limited (Previously Known As Indiabulls Housing
    Finance Limited) Through Rajesh Chauhan S/o S.P. Singh Chauhan
    Aged About 50 Years Working As Legal Manager, Having Registered
    Address At 5th Floor, Building No. 27, K.G. Marg , Connaught Palace
    New Delhi -110001 (Present Correct Name And Address)
                                                        ... Petitioner(s)
    
    
                                       versus
    
    
    1 - Pranay Chouradia Pro. Kreeti Ventures Shop No. 111, 1st Floor,
    Ambuja Mall Vidhan Sabha Road Mowa, Raipur (C.G.) A L S O A T
    House No. 63, Avani Avenue Daldal Seoni, Mowa Raipur (C.G.)
    
    
    2 - Praneeta Chouradia House No. 63, Avani Avenue Daldal Seoni,
    Mowa Raipur (C.G.) A L S O A T Municipal No. 26, Commercial Unit No.
    Ccrp 0417 4th Floor, Ambuja Mall City Center Raipur, Khasra No. 773,
    774/1, 941, 942, P H No. 109/44 Kusha Bhau Thakre, Ward No. 26
    Vidhan Sabha Road Near Saddu Nala Mouja Mowa Raipur C.G.
    
    
    3 - Yamini Karnik House No. 63 Avani Avenue Daldal Seoni Mowa,
    Raipur C.G. (Respondent Present Correct Name And Address) Party

    S.N. Correctly
    DigitallyMentioned
    by SUGUNA
    signed

    SUGUNA DUBEY
    DUBEY Date:

    SPONSORED
            2026.05.26                                  ... Respondent(s)
               16:52:03 +0530
                                           2
    
     For Petitioner(s)             :   Mr.Ritesh Sharma, Advocate through VC
     For Respondent(s)             :   None present.
    
    
    

    (Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas)

    Order on Board

    26/05/2026

    Heard on admission.

    2. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India

    has been preferred by the petitioner/Finance Company seeking a

    direction to the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur, to

    expeditiously decide the application filed by the petitioner under Section

    14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

    Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, “the SARFAESI

    Act“).

    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had

    extended financial assistance to the private respondents and, upon

    default in repayment of the loan amount, the account was classified as

    Non-Performing Asset (NPA). Thereafter, proceedings under the

    provisions of the SARFAESI Act were initiated and an application under

    Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act was filed before the competent

    authority on 22/03/2025 seeking assistance for taking physical

    possession of the secured asset.

    4. It is further submitted that though Section 14 of the SARFAESI

    Act contemplates disposal of such application within a stipulated period
    3

    of 30 days, extendable up to 60 days for reasons to be recorded, the

    application is still pending consideration before the learned Additional

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur. It is contended that such prolonged

    pendency defeats the very object of the SARFAESI Act, which has been

    enacted for expeditious recovery of secured debts.

    5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the

    judgment of the Apex Court in R.D. Jain and Company Vs. Capital

    First Limited and Others, reported in (2023) 1 SCC 675, as also the

    orders passed by this Court in similar matters directing expeditious

    consideration of applications preferred under Section 14 of the

    SARFAESI Act.

    6. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for

    the petitioner and upon perusal of the material available on record,

    without entering into the merits of the controversy, this Court deems it

    appropriate to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the

    learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur, to consider and

    decide the petitioner’s application filed under Section 14 of the

    SARFAESI Act, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as

    possible, preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of

    production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal

    impediment.

    7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on

    the merits of the case and the concerned authority shall decide the
    4

    matter independently in accordance with law.

    8. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present petition

    stands disposed of.

    Sd/-

    (Narendra Kumar Vyas)
    Judge



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here