Sambit Padhy @ Padhi vs Revenue Divisional ….. Opposite … on 13 March, 2026

    0
    32
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. By filing the present writ application under Article 226

    and 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has approached

    SPONSORED

    this court with a prayer for quashing of the impugned order dated

    30.05.2025 at Annexure-1 by the RDC (CD), Cuttack-Opposite

    Party No.1 in Arms Appeal No.2 of 2023 thereby affirming order

    dated 28.03.2023 issued by the Additional District Magistrate,

    Khordha-Opposite Party No.3, cancelling the arms license of the

    Petitioner at Annexure-2. The Petitioner has also prayed for a

    direction to the Opposite Parties to renew the Arms License

    No.6/2019 issued in his favor by the competent authority under the

    Arms Act, 1959.

    2. The factual background of the present writ application,

    bereft of all unnecessary details, in short, is that the Petitioner,

    who is a businessman of repute in the district of Khordha, he had

    applied for an arms license to the District Magistrate, Khordha in

    the year 2019, due to his necessity. The A.D.M, Khordha, after

    following the procedure as prescribed in the Arms Act and the

    rules framed thereunder, issued the arms license authorizing the

    Petitioner to keep arms for his personal security. Ever since, the

    petitioner has never misused his arms against which a license has

    been issued by the competent authority.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here