Ravi Sharma vs Hirdesh Kumar Singh on 30 April, 2026

    0
    16
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jammu & Kashmir High Court

    Ravi Sharma vs Hirdesh Kumar Singh on 30 April, 2026

                                                                       Sr.No. 67
    
             HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                             AT JAMMU
    
    CJ Court
    
                               Case: CPSW No. 366/2017 in
                                     SWP No. 3069/2015
    Ravi Sharma                                        ..... Appellant/Petitioner(s)
    
                            Through: None
    
                      Vs
    
    Hirdesh Kumar Singh, Secy. UDD                                 ..... Respondent(s)
    
                           Through: None
    Coram:       HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                         ORDER
    

    30.04.2026
    Vide this petition, the petitioner seeks initiation of contempt
    proceedings against the respondent-Authorities for willful disobedience of the
    order dated December, 22, 2016, rendered in SWP No. 3069/2015 (Ravi Kumar
    Vs State of J&K & Anr.
    ).

    A bare reading of the order referred to above shows that aggrieved by
    the order dated June 30, 2015, vide which the petitioner was compulsory retired
    from service, he had approached this Court. And, the writ Court vide detailed
    order and judgment dated December 22, 2016 (ibid.) had set aside the impugned
    order and the petitioner was directed to be reinstated with all consequential
    benefits.

    SPONSORED

    The statement of facts submitted on behalf of the respondents show
    that the appeal preferred by the respondent-Authorities against the decision of
    the learned Single Judge was dismissed and resultantly, the petitioner was
    reinstated and the decision rendered by this Court was implemented, subject
    however, to the outcome of the SLP that the department was contemplating to
    file.

    The matter is pending since 2017 and nearly a decade has gone by.
    None is present either on behalf of the petitioner to clarify if anything actually
    survives in the matter or whether the decisions rendered by this Court were even
    assailed by way of appeal in the Supreme Court.

    2

    Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, in the event
    any dispute/cause of action/interest still survives, the petitioner shall be at liberty
    to move an appropriate application to seek restoration of the present petition and
    its decision on merits.

                                  (                                 (ARUN PALLI)
                                                                   CHIEF JUSTICE
    
    Jammu
    30.04.2026
    Suraj K. Singh
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here