Ratnawali Vanshwati vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 March, 2026

    0
    47
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the
    Constitution of India challenging impugned order dated 21.6.2021 contained
    in Annexure P/1 passed by Commissioner, Institutional Finance, Bhopal.

    2. Petitioner was trapped by Lokayukta in bribery case and later on
    was convicted under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
    and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 4 years with fine of Rs.
    25,000/- and Sections 13(i) (d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption

    SPONSORED

    Act, 1988 and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 5 years with fine
    of Rs. 25,000/-. Thereafter, action was taken against the petitioner under
    Rule 10(ix) of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Classification Control
    and Appeal) Rules, 1966 (hereinafter referred to ‘Rules of 1966’) and he was
    dismissed from service. Petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the
    ground that opportunity of hearing was not provided to petitioner before

    NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:21721

    2 WP-20253-2022
    passing of the impugned order. Criminal Appeal against conviction of
    petitioner is pending in Court, therefore, judicial proceeding has not attained
    finality. No departmental enquiry was conducted before imposing penalty
    upon petitioner.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here