Ramu And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 7 August, 2026

    0
    20
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Allahabad High Court

    Ramu And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 7 August, 2026

    
    
    
    
    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
     
     
    
    
    Neutral Citation No. - 2026:AHC:165442
     
    
     
    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 
     
    APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25899 of 2024   
     
       Ramu And 4 Others    
     
      .....Applicant(s)   
     
     Versus  
     
       State of U.P. and Another    
     
      .....Opposite Party(s)       
     
       
     
      
     
    Counsel for Applicant(s)   
     
    :   
     
    Raghubir Singh   
     
      
     
    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)   
     
    :   
     
     Atul Kumar, G.A.   
     
         
     
     Court No. - 81
     
       
     
     HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J.      
    

    1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants in the Court today is taken on record.

    2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State as well as perused the entire material available on record.

    SPONSORED

    3. This application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to quash the cognizance/summoning order dated 18th August, 2023 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 23646 of 2023 (State VS. Ramu & Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 73 of 2023 under Sections 147, 323, 325, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Barhan, District-Agra, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Agra, on the basis of compromised so arrived at between the parties.

    4. While entertaining the present criminal application, a Coordinate Bench of this Court passed the order dated 19th December, 2024 directing the office to send the compromise so entered into between the parties to the trial court for its verification and the trial court was inturn directed to verify the same.

    5. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the trial court vide order dated 28th May, 2025 has verified the compromise so arrived at between the parties, a copy of which has been brought on record as Annexure No. S.A.-1 to the supplementary affidavit filed today.

    6. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that since the compromised so arrived at between the parties and the same has also been verified by the court below, the entire proceedings of the aforesaid criminal case be may be quashed by this Court.

    7. Learned A.G.A. for the State and the learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 have no objection, if the proceedings in the aforesaid case are quashed.

    8. This Court is not unmindful of the following judgements of the Apex Court:

    (i). B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and Another; (2003)4 SCC 675,

    (ii). Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation; (2008) 9 SCC 677,

    (iii). Manoj Sharma Vs. State and Others; (2008) 16 SCC 1,

    (iv). Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab; (2012); 10 SCC 303,

    (v). Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab; ( 2014) 6 SCC 466,

    (vi).Dimpey Gujral W/o Vivek Gujral & Others Vs. Union Territory Thru. Administrator Chandigarh & Others; (2013) 11 SCC 497,

    (vii). H.N. Pandakumar Vs. State of Karnataka; 2025 SCC OnLine SC 38 , and

    (viii). Naushey Ali & Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another; (2025) 4 SCC 78.

    9. In the aforesaid judgments, the Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another; 2013 (83) ACC 278. in which the law expounded by the Apex court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail.

    10. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, the court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose shall be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned criminal case as the parties have already settled their dispute.

    11. Accordingly, the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 23646 of 2023 (State VS. Ramu & Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 73 of 2023 under Sections 147, 323, 325, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Barhan, District-Agra, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Agra are hereby quashed.

    12. The present appeal is, accordingly, allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.

    (Madan Pal Singh,J.)

    August 7, 2026

    Sushil/-

     

     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here