Rakesh Kumar @ Manu Kumar @ Manu … vs The State Of Bihar on 6 July, 2026

    0
    6
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Rakesh Kumar @ Manu Kumar @ Manu … vs The State Of Bihar on 6 July, 2026

    Author: Ashok Kumar Pandey

    Bench: Ashok Kumar Pandey

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32250 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2026 Thana- Bikramganj Excise District- Rohtas
                     ======================================================
                     Rakesh Kumar @ Manu Kumar @ Manu Chaudhary @ Monu Chaudhary @
                     Monu Kumar @ Monu S/O Paras Chaudhary @ Paras Nath Choudhary R/O
                     Vill.- Koath Bazar (KOATH), P.S.- Dawath, Dist.- Rohtas.
                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                     The State of Bihar                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ravi Shankar Pathak, Advocate
                     For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    2   06-07-2026

    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

    APP for the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been

    filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with

    Bikramganj Excise P.S. Case No. 79 of 2026 instituted for the

    offence under Sections 30(a), 30(e), 33, 34, 36, 41 and 62 of Bihar

    Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act.

    3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the

    house of one Arun Kumar altogether 380.47 litres of illicit liquor

    was recovered.

    4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

    nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

    It has further been submitted that on being asked, Arun Kumar

    disclosed that the petitioner is his associate. Learned counsel for

    the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is not
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32250 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026
    2/2

    concerned in any way with the alleged recovery. It has further

    been submitted that the name of this petitioner has surfaced only

    on the basis of statement of co-accused. It has lastly been

    submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

    5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

    the bail of the petitioner.

    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in

    the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court

    is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is

    directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four

    weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in

    connection with Bikramganj Excise P.S. Case No. 79 of 2026 he

    will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

    (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

    to the satisfaction of learned court of Exclusive Special Judge,

    Excise court no.-1, Rohtas at Sasaram subject to the conditions as

    laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

    7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands

    allowed.

    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
    durgesh/-

    U      T
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here