Raju @ Rajeev S/O Ramchandra vs The State Of Rajasthan … on 17 March, 2026

    0
    38
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

    Raju @ Rajeev S/O Ramchandra vs The State Of Rajasthan … on 17 March, 2026

    [2026:RJ-JP:11184]
    
            HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                        BENCH AT JAIPUR
    
         S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13017/2025
    
    Raju @ Rajeev S/o Ramchandra, R/o Intka, Police Station
    Sikandra, District Dausa Rajasthan (At Present Confined In Sub
    Jail Kolana Dausa)
                                                               ---Accused-Petitioner
                                        Versus
    The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
                                                                     ----Respondent
    For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. G L Sharma
    For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
    
    
    
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
    
                                         Order
    
    17/03/2026
    
    

    1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483

    BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was

    SPONSORED

    arrested in connection with FIR No. 290/2025 registered at Police

    Station Bandikui District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections

    420, 406 of IPC and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences

    under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of IPC dismissed the bail

    application before it.

    2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that

    applicant is 35 years of age and he is sole bread earner of the

    family. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed in the

    instant matter and that the matter is triable by Magistrate. It is

    submitted that the applicant is behind bars ever-since 06.09.2025.

    3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has objected to the

    grant of bail. It is submitted that the applicant was closely

    (Uploaded on 19/03/2026 at 01:30:52 PM)
    (Downloaded on 24/03/2026 at 08:44:30 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:11184] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13017/2025]

    associated as submitted with the concerned Ministers and there

    are strong criminal antecedents, approximately eight, of similar

    nature whereby general public is looted, under the garb of grant of

    employment.

    4. Heard and considered.

    5. Considering the overall facts and taking note of the fact that

    there are strong criminal antecedents, approximately eight, of

    similar nature registered against the applicant, this Court is not

    inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail.

    6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is

    dismissed.

    (SAMEER JAIN),J

    DEEPAK /7

    (Uploaded on 19/03/2026 at 01:30:52 PM)
    (Downloaded on 24/03/2026 at 08:44:30 PM)

    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here