Chattisgarh High Court
Rajesh Kumar Sahu vs Smt. Seema @ Tejasvani Sahu on 21 July, 2026
Author: Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench: Parth Prateem Sahu
1
CGHC010147252026 2026:CGHC:31828-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA(MAT) No. 175 of 2026
1 - Rajesh Kumar Sahu S/o- Haridas Sahu Aged About 50 Years Resident Of
Shradha Nivas, Sindhiya Nagar, East Durg, Post S.A.F. Line, Tehsil And District-
Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
Versus
1 - Smt. Seema @ Tejasvani Sahu Daughter Of D.R. Sahu, Aged About 48 Years
Resident Of Model Town, Near Atta Chakki, P.O. Motilal Nehru Nagar, Bhilai,
District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. (Wife)
2 - Raja @ Aditya, Aged About 21 Years Resident Of C/o- D.R. Sahu, Model Town,
Near Atta Chakki, P.O. Motilal Nehru Nagar, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Rudranath Mukherjee, Advocate
For Respondents : Mr. U.K.S. Chandel, Advocate
D.B. Hon’ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Hon’ble Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Judge
JUDGMENT ON BOARD
Per Parth Prateem Sahu J.
21/07/2026
1. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2026 which is an application for condonation of delay in
filing of the appeal.
2
2. On due consideration of the submissions made by the counsel for the
appellant as also, the reasons assigned in the application, I.A. No. 01/2026 is
allowed. Delay in filing of the appeal is condoned.
3. With the consent of parties, case is heard finally at the motion stage.
4. The appellant has filed this appeal under Section 19 (1) of the Family Court
Act, 1984 challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 31.01.2023
passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Janjgir, District – Janjgir –
Champa in Civil Suit Case No. 326A/2022 (Rajesh Kumar Sahu Vs. Smt.
Seema @ Tejasvani Sahu) whereby, the application filed under Section 13
(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the parties was allowed and learned
Family Court dissolved the marriage by decree of divorce.
5. The provision under sub-section 2 of Section 19 provides that ‘no appeal
shall lie from a decree or order passed by the Family Court with the consent
of parties’. In the aforementioned facts of the case, when the impugned
judgment and decree is passed with the consent of parties under Section 13
(B) of the Act, 1955, the appeal filed is not maintainable.
6. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu) (Sachin Singh Rajput)
Judge Judge
Digitally
SHUBHAM signed by
DEY SHUBHAM
DEY
Dey
