Himachal Pradesh High Court
Rajender Sharma vs . Dinesh Sharma on 7 April, 2026
Author: Chief Justice
Bench: Chief Justice
Rajender Sharma vs. Dinesh Sharma
C.R. No. 3/2024
.
7.4.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Respondents No. 1 & 2 ex-parte.
Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for respondents No.
3 & 4.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel of the
parties, list on 27.4.2026.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
7.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Roshan Lal (deceased) through his LRs vs. Bhupinder Pal
RSA No. 27/2026
.
7.4.2026 Present: Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate, vice counsel for
the appellants.
RSA No. 27/2026 & CMP No. 2869/2026
Issue notice to the respondent on substantial
of
questions of law No. 2 and 3 returnable within four weeks on
taking steps within three days from today. In the meantime,
operation, implementation and execution of the impugned
rt
judgments and decrees are stayed till next date of hearing.
List after four weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
7.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Dr. Vijay Kumar Sharma vs. Gian Sagar Negi
COPC No. 204/2026
.
7.4.2026 Present: Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, vice Mr. Rakesh
Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
It is contended by learned counsel for the
of
respondent that in pursuance to the judgment, as passed by
the Court, necessary steps are being taken and he seeks time
to comply with the judgment.
rt At his request, list after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
7.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Dr. Randhir Singh Ranta vs. Gian Sagar Negi
COPC No. 203/2026
.
7.4.2026 Present: Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, vice Mr. Rakesh
Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
It is contended by learned counsel for the
of
respondent that in pursuance to the judgment, as passed by
the Court, necessary steps are being taken and he seeks time
to comply with the judgment.
rt At his request, list after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
7.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Kiran vs. Rajesh Kumar @ Manga
CMPMO No. 146/2026
.
7.4.2026 Present: Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yug
Singhal & Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocates, for
the petitioner.
CMPMO No. 146/2026 & CMP No.6769/2026
Issue dasti notice for the service of the
of
respondents returnable for 21.4.2026 on taking steps during
the course of the day.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
7.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Deepak Sood (deceased) through LR vs. Swaran Kanta Sood (deceased)
through LR a/w connected matter
.
C.R. No. 124/2024 a/w C.R. No. 133/2024
7.4.2026 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajeet
Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner in C.R. No.
124/2024 and for the respondent in C.R. No.
133/2024.
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent
in C.R. No. 124/2024 and for the appellant in
of
C.R. No. 133/2024.
In pursuance to the order passed by this Court,
rt
the parties are present in person. It is agreed upon by the
respective parties that an endeavour can be made to
reconcile the matter between them.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, Mr. S. C. Sharma, learned Senior Advocate and a
trained Mediator of this Court, is appointed as Mediator to
interact with the parties and to make an endeavour to
reconcile the matter.
The parties are directed to appear before the
learned Mediator today itself at 11.00 A.M. in the Mediation
Centre of this Court.
Learned Mediator is requested to submit his
report within a period of four weeks.
List thereafter.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
7.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Harpreet vs. Anil Kumar a/w connected matter
CMPMO No. 186/2024 a/w CMPMO No.
.
576/2023
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Vijay Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
petitioner in CMPMO No. 186/2024 and for the
respondent in CMPMO No. 576/2023.
Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent in CMPMO No. 186/2024 and for the
of
petitioner in CMPMO No. 576/2023.
After hearing for some time, the parties are
rt
directed to remain present in the Court on the next date of
hearing.
List on 23.4.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
The State of H.P. vs. Ajay Kumar
RSA No. 257/2025
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the
appellants/State.
On 9.1.2926, Mr. Devender K. Sharma,
Advocate, had put in appearance on behalf of respondents
of
No. 1 to 3.
Today, the case was taken up in pre-lunch
session, however none appeared for respondents No. 1 to 3.
rt
In the post-lunch session also, nobody has appeared for
respondents No. 1 to 3. Consequently, respondents No. 1 to 3
are proceeded ex-parte.
List for consideration on 10.4.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Yusuf vs. Nirmla Devi
RSA No. 7/2025
.
6.4.2026 Present: Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, as legal-aid
counsel, for the appellant.
Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
RSA No. 7/2025
of
Heard. Admit on the following substantial
question of law:
rt Whether the ld. First Appellate Court has
misread, misinterpreted and misconstrued the
oral as well as documentary evidence especiallystatement of DW2 Noor Deen and DW3 Gulam
Mustafa and document Ext. DW5/A report of
Field Kanungo, which has materially prejudicedthe case of the appellant?
List in due course.
CMP No. 630/2025
Heard. The present application is disposed of
with a direction that the respondent shall not alienate the
suit property during the pendency of the appeal.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
(pankaj)::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Union of India vs. Laxmi DuttArb. Appeal No. 128/2025
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice counsel for
respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondent No.
of
3.
Heard. Admit. Send for the records.
List in due course.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
H.A. & P.D. vs. Dharam Chand @ Dharam Singh
Arb. Appeal No. 173/2025
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondents No.
2 and 3.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
appellant, list after four weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
H.A. & P.D. vs. Roshini Devi
Arb. Appeal No. 192/2025
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Rohan, Advocate, vice counsel for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondents No.
of
2 and 3.
Heard. Admit. Send for the records.
List in due course.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
H.A. & P.D. vs. Beli Ram
Arb. Appeal No. 251/2025
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondents No.
2 and 3.
In sequel to order dated 6.1.2026, consequential
of
steps for bringing on record legal representatives of deceased
respondent No.1 have not been taken till date. Accordingly,
rt
the instant appeal is abated qua respondent No.1.
List for consideration after four weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
M/s Shrishti Technologies vs. N. Balaram
CMPMO No. 258/2025
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Rajat Awasthy, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Naveen, Advocate, vice counsel for the
respondent.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
of
respondent, list next week.
(Romesh Verma)
rt
6.4.2026
Judge
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Inder Singh
CMPMO No. 288/2025
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for the
petitioners.
Ms. Uma Manta, Advocate, for the respondent.
Send for the records.
of
List after two weeks.
rt
6.4.2026
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
M/s Naveen Auto Store Sole Proprietary vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
Arb. Case No. 814/2024
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Ms.
Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Mohit, Advocate, vice counsel for the
respondents.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
of
respondents, list on 16.4.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Dev Raj vs. The Executing Engineer
Ex. Pet. No. 16/2025
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek
Negi, Advocate, for the decree holder.
Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G. for the
judgment debtor.
of
Learned counsel for the decree holder submits
that he has filed an affidavit in sequel to the previous order.
Faced with the situation, learned Additional
rt
Advocate General prays for and is granted 10 days’ time to
respond to the counter calculations, as submitted by the
decree holder.
List on 17.4.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Sher Singh (deceased) through his LRs
OMP (M) No. 463/2025
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant.
Ms. Neelam Kaplas, Advocate, vice Mr. J. R.
Poswal, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
applicant, list on 17.4.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Hader Ali vs. Mohammad Rafik
CMPMO No. 778/2025
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. G. R. Palsra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the persuasive request of the learned counsel
for the petitioner, two weeks’ further time is granted to take
of
appropriate steps for service of the respondent.
List after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
rt
6.4.2026
Judge
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Suresh Chand vs. Sanjay Verma
RSA No. 444/2019
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Y. P. Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Virender Kumar Verma, Advocate, for
respondents No. 1 to 4.
Mr. R. K. Bawa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhinav
Thakur, Advocate, for proposed-respondent-Smt.
of
Sudha Paur.
At the request of learned counsel for the
appellant, list on 7.4.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Sandeep Kumar Thakur vs Madhubala
CMP No. 31672/2025 in CMPMO No. 162/2019
.
6.4.2026 Present: Mr. Y. P. Sood, Advocate, for the applicant.
None for the non-applicants.
The instant application has been filed in a
decided case i.e. CMPMO No. 162/2019, which stands
of
disposed of on 21.7.2025. It has been averred in the
application that during the pendency of the aforesaid
rt
petition, non-applicant had deposited a sum of Rs.30,000/-
in the registry of this Court, therefore, prayer has been made
for the release of the said amount.
Since the petition stands already disposed of,
therefore, in view of the averments, as made in the
application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the
same is allowed. Consequently, the amount lying deposited in
the Registry of this Court, along with upto date interest, is
ordered to be released in favour of the applicant by remitting
the same to her bank account, details whereof have been
given in para 3 of the application.
Application stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Chande Ram vs. Ramesh Kumar
CMPMO No. 576/2025
.
2.4.2026 Present: Mr. B. L. Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R. S. Chandel & Ms. Kiran, Advocates, for
respondents No. 1 to 10.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the respondent-
State.
of
Respondents No. 13 to 22 are ex parte.
List on 6.4.2026.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Yakub Mohammad vs. Union of India
Arb. A. No. 6/2026 a/w Arb. A. No. 44/2026
.
2.4.2026 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the
appellant(s).
None for respondent No.1.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No. 2 and 3-NHAI.
of
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for
respondent No.4-State.
At the request of learned counsel for the
rt
appellant(s), list after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Jamil Akhtar vs. Union of India
Arbitration Appeal No. 7/2026
.
2.4.2026 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the
appellant.
None for respondent No.1.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No. 2 and 3.
of
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for
respondent No.4.
At the request of learned counsel for the
rt
appellant, list after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Jasbir Kaur vs. Onkar Dass
CMPMO No. 115/2026
.
2.4.2026 Present: Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate, (through V.C.) for
the petitioner.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for the respondent.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, has put in appearance
of
for the respondent by filing memo of appearance, which is
taken on record. He seeks and is granted 10 days’ time to
complete the record.
rt List for consideration after 10 days.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Satish Kumar (deceased) through LRs vs. Vinod Gupta
RSA No. 51/2023
.
2.4.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Hemant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1
& 2.
Heard in part. List on 9.4.2026.
of
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
rt
2.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Ravi Kumar vs. Veena Kumari
CMPMO No. 739/2025
.
2.4.2026 Present: Ms. Rameshwari Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioners.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the
respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
petitioners, list on 16.4.2026.
Registry to reflect name of Mr. Divya Raj Singh,
rt
Advocate, appearing for the respondents, in the cause list,
henceforth.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Jagat Prakash (deceased) through LRs vs. Gopal Chand (deceased)
through LRs
.
RSA No. 189/2023
2.4.2026 Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, for the respondents.
In the interest of justice, list after two weeks.
of
(Romesh Verma)
rt Judge
2.4.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Prabhu Ram (deceased) through LRs vs. Shankar (deceased) through LRs
CMPMO No. 672/2019
.
2.4.2026 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioners.
Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(i), 1(ii), 1(iii)(a) to 1(iii)(c), 1 (v) to 1(ix), 1(xi)
to 1 (xiii), 6 and 8.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
petitioners, list after 10 days.
(Romesh Verma)
rt
2.4.2026
Judge
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Milap Singh @ Milap Chand vs. Khem Singh (deceased) through LRs
RSA No. 11/2025
.
16.3.2026 Present: Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Shivani Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr.
Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
In sequel to the order dated 9.3.2026, the parties
are present in person. Respondent No.1 Rajinder Singh,
submits that respondents No. 2 to 4 are not available today.
rt
He seeks and is granted two weeks’ time to obtain power of
attorney on behalf of respondents No. 2 to 4 or to produce
them before this Court on the next date of hearing in order to
make statement(s) in CMP No. 31688/2025.
List on 20.4.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
16.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Suraj Bahadur vs. M. C. Shimla
CMPMO No. 957/2019
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. R. S. Chandel,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
It has been informed by the learned vice counsel
for the respondent that the Hon’ble Supreme Court is seized
of the matter and the order of status quo has been passed.
rt
He further submits that tentative date of hearing before the
Hon’ble Supreme Court is fixed for today. At his request, list
the matter after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Kishori Lal vs. Arvind @ Pinku
RSA No. 256/2019
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Paras Dhaulta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh
Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 & 2.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list on 23.4.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 241/2022
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. G. R.
Palsra, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list after two weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 244/2019
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Paras Dhaulta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Karun
Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list on 22.4.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Amba Shakti vs. Jagdev Singh
RSA No. 47/2019
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. K. S. Kanwar,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Jyotirmay
Bhatt, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list next week.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 354/2018
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajesh
Mandhotra, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. S.D.
Vasudeva, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list after three weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Surjit Singh vs. Rattan Chand Verma along with
connected matter
.
RSA No. 13/2019 a/w RSA No. 270/2019
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant (s).
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Vaishali
Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list after two weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
M/s Sethi Enterprises vs. M.D. Enterprises
RSA No. 91/2019
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar,
Advocate, for appellants No. 1 & 2.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Anand
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list after two weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Tule Ram vs. Chet Ram
RSA No. 92/2019
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. G. R.
Palsra, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list after three weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Suresh Chand (deceased) through LRs vs. Kuldeep Chand
RSA No. 1/2018 a/w RSA No. 135/2025
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Het Ram Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellant in RSA No. 1/2018
and for the respondents in RSA No. 135/2025.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Ms. Garima
Kuthiala, Advocate, for respondent No.1 (b) in
RSA No. 1/2018 and for appellant in RSA No.
of
135/2025.
CMP No. 2929/2026 in RSA No.135/2025
rt The present application has been filed for
deletion of name of respondent No.1(a) Radha Kapila alias
Rachna Kapila, who is stated to have expired on 3.9.2025 on
the ground that her estate is duly represented by her son
and daughters, who are already on records as respondent
No. 1b) to 1(d).
For the reasons stated in the application, which
is duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed
and consequently, name of deceased No.1(a) is ordered to be
deleted from array of the respondents subject to all just
exceptions. Registry is directed to carry out necessary
correction. Application stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Onkar Singh vs. Ranjit Singh
RSA No. 261/2022 a/w cross objections No.33/2022
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Arush Matlotia,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Ms. Sanjay
Jaswal, Advocate, for respondent No.1/Cross-
Objector.
CMP (M) No. 142/2026 in Cross Objections
No.33/2022
of
The present application has been filed by the
applicant/non-objector in Cross-Objections No.33/2022 under
rt
Order 22 Rule 4 read with Section 151 CPC for bringing on
record the legal representatives of deceased non-objector,
namely, Onkar Singh, who is stated to have expired on
13.10.2025. Relevant copy of death certificate has been
appended as Annexure A.
For the reasons stated in the application, which is
duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and
consequently, the legal representatives of deceased non-
objector, as mentioned in para 3 of the application, are ordered
to be brought on record as non-objectors No. 1(a) to 1(d).
Amended memo of parties filed with the application is taken on
record. Application stands disposed of.
RSA No. 261/2022
Learned vice counsel for the appellant seeks and is
granted three weeks’ further time, by way of last and final
opportunity, to take appropriate steps on account of death of
the appellant, failing which adverse order shall follow.
List after three weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Kamlesh Kumar vs. Trilok
RSA No. 360/2022
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Pawnish K.
Shukla, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Ram
Gopal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.7 ex parte.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellants seeks
and is granted three weeks’ further time to comply with the
rt
order dated 22.12.2025, failing which adverse order shall
follow.
List after three weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Tilak Raj vs. Bachitar Singh
RSA No. 69/2023
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Rakesh Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Jai Ram
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No. 2878/2023
of
Interim order dated 15.12.2025 is made absolute
during the pendency of the appeal. Application stands
rt
disposed of.
RSA No. 69/2023
List in due course.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Vice Chancellor, Central University of H.P. vs. M/s Mebric Security
Agency & ors.
.
Arb. A. No. 113/2024
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Narender Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Rajesh
Kashyap, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Respondent No.2 ex parte.
OMP No. 1548/2025
rt The respondent No.1/applicant has filed the
instant application for release of the award amount in Arb.
Appeal No.113/2024, which was disposed of by this Court
vide judgment dated 8.9.2025.
Time was granted to the non-applicant to file
reply to the application and the matter was posted on
5.1.2026 when following order came to be passed:-
“The appellant/non-applicant has again not
bothered to file reply to the application. At the
request made by learned counsel for theappellant/non-applicant, two weeks’ further time
is granted for filing reply. It is made clear that
aforesaid shall be the final opportunity for the
purpose. Prayer for release of the deposited
amount in terms of the decision already rendered
in the main case, shall be considered on the next
date. List on 13.03.2026.”
Today again, the non-applicant seeks further
time to file reply and it is contended that the non-
applicant/University is in process of filing an appeal before
the Hon’ble Supreme Court. However, the learned vice
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
counsel for the non-applicant has failed to furnish any
details or particulars of the aforesaid appeal.
.
In the attending facts and circumstances,
being a decided matter, the instant application is allowed
and the awarded amount as also earnest money, as
deposited in the Registry of this Court, along with upto
of
date interest accrued thereon, is ordered to be released in
favour of the applicant by remitting the same to his bank
rt
account, details whereof have been given in para 4 of the
application. However, it is made clear that release of the
aforesaid amount shall be subject to final outcome of the
SLP, if any, filed by the non-applicant. Application stands
disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
M/s Naveen Auto Store Sole Proprietary vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
Arb. Case. No. 814/2024
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Surya Chauhan,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Ms. Kusum
Lata, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list on 17.3.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Yugal Kishore vs. Jiwan Lal
CMP (M) No. 2133/2024
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajeet Singh
Jaswal, Advocate, for applicant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr.
Rupesh Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list after three weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Champa Devi
OMP (M) No. 50/2025
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr.
Yuyutsu Singh Thakur, Advocate, for
respondent No.1.
of
OMP No. 1529/2025
rt The applicant is exempted to file English
translation of Annexure A-1 appended with OMP (M) No.
477/2025. Application stands disposed of.
OMP (M) Nos. 477/2025 & 478/2025
By medium of OMP(M) No. 478/2025, the
applicant has sought condonation of delay in filing OMP(M)
No. 477/2025, for bringing on record the legal
representatives of deceased respondent No. 2, namely Kishori
Lal, who is stated to have expired on 9.3.2021. Relevant
copy of legal heir certificate has been appended with OMP (M)
No. 477/2025 as Annexure A-1.
For the reasons stated in OMP(M) No. 478/2025,
more particularly in paras 2 and 3 thereof, coupled with the
fact that one of the legal representatives of deceased
respondent No.2, namely Champa Devi is already on record
as respondent No. 1 and right to sue survives in favour of
remaining legal heirs, I find sufficient reasons to condone the
aforesaid delay. Ordered accordingly. Consequently, the legal
representatives of deceased respondent No.2, namely Arpit,
Aman & Veena Kumari, as mentioned in para 3 of OMP(M)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
No. 477/2025 are ordered to be brought on record as
respondents No. 2(a) to 2(c). Amended memo of parties filed
.
with the application(s) is taken on record. Both applications
stand disposed of.
OMP (M) No. 50/2025
Issue notice to the newly added respondents No.
of
2(a) to 2(c) returnable within six weeks on taking steps within
three days from today.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Project Director NHAI vs. Sandeep Kumar
Arb. A. No. 63/2025
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr.
Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
of
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for
respondents No.3 & 4/State.
rt As per report of the Registry, award amount has
not been deposited till date. Consequently, interim
protection granted to the appellant, vide order dated
7.5.2025, is vacated.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
UOI vs. Budh Ram
Arb. Appeal No. 133/2025
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr.
Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
of
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for
respondent No.2/State.
In sequel to the previous order, Mr. Naveen K.
rt
Bhardwaj, Advocate, has not filed the power of attorney till
date. Two weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to do
the needful.
Heard. Admit.
List in due course.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Bhagwan Singh vs. Babu Ram
RSA No. 243/2025
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Nishant Khidtta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Baldev Negi, Addl. A.G. for respondent
No.5/State.
In sequel to the order dated 24.2.2026,
of
appropriate steps for representation of respondents No. 11(ii)
to 11(iv) as also consequential steps on the death of
rt
respondent No.13 have not been taken. Three weeks’ further
time, by way of last opportunity, is granted to the appellants
to do the needful, failing which adverse order shall follow.
List after three weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Highway Administrator and Project Director vs. Gaytri Prakash
Arb. Appeal No. 265/2025
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Baldev Negi, Addl. A.G. for respondents No.2
& 3.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellant, list after four weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Maheshwari Devi
OMP (M) No. 287/2025
.
13.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anurag, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj
Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr.
Kaushiky, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Baldev Negi, Addl. A.G. for respondent No.2.
OMP (M) No. 287/2025
rt Heard. The present application has been filed for
condonation of delay of 158 days in filing the present appeal.
The appellant/applicant has assigned the
reasons in paras 2 to 4 of the application, which seem to be
plausible and reasonable. Therefore, keeping in view the
averments as made in the application, which is duly
supported by an affidavit and taking into consideration the
submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I
find sufficient reasons to condone the aforesaid delay.
Ordered accordingly. Application stands disposed of.
Appeal be registered.
Arb. Appeal No. /2026
Heard. Admit.
OMP No. /2026
Heard. Be registered. Subject to the
appellant/applicant's depositing entire award amount
along with upto date interest in the Registry of this Court
within a period of eight weeks from today, operation,
implementation and execution of the impugned judgment,
dated 02.09.2024, as passed by the learned District Judge,
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Mandi, is ordered to be stayed during the pendency of the
appeal. Application stands disposed of.
.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
13.3.2026
(pankaj)
of
rt
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Prem Singh (deceased) through his LRs vs. State of
H.P.
.
RSA No. 38/2026
12.3.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Baldev Negi, Addl. A.G. for the respondent.
of
CMP No. 3908/2026
Heard. The parties are directed to maintain
rt
status quo qua nature and possession of the suit land
during the pendency of the appeal. Application stands
disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
12.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Pawan Kumar vs. Prithi Singh
CMP (M) No. 1211/2025 in RSA No. 471/2018
.
12.3.2026 Present: Mr. B. S. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Munish Dhatwalia, Advocate, for
appellant/applicant No.1.
Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arun
Kumar, Advocate, for appellants Nos. 2 and
of
3/applicants.
Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the
respondent/non-applicant.
rt From the pleadings of the parties, following
issues are framed:-
1. Whether the non-applicant/respondent has
violated the order dated 27.06.2019 passed bythis Court in CMP No. 10916/2018 in RSA No.
471/2018? OPA
2. Relief.
No other issue arises nor claimed. List the case
for leading evidence of respective parties before the Registrar
(Judicial) on a date to be fixed by him.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
12.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar Rao vs. Ravinder Kumar Gupta
Arb. Case No. 35/2026
.
12.3.2026 Present: Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
two weeks on taking steps within two days from today.
of
List for consideration on 2.4.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
12.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
M/s Modgil Construction vs. Vinod Kumar Shandil a/w connected
matter
.
RSA No. 52/2025 a/w RSA No. 53/2025
11.3.2026 Present: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Anuj
Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant(s).
Mr. Vijay K. Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.3 in RSA No. 52/2025 and for respondent
of
No.4 in RSA No. 53/2025.
As per report of the Registry, M/s Khosla
rt
Developer and Infrastructure, which is respondent No.2 in
RSA No. 52/2025 and respondent No.3 in RSA No. 53/2025
has been served through publication and none has put in
appearance on its behalf. Therefore, the aforesaid
respondent is proceeded ex-parte in both the appeals.
List for consideration after three weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Hans Raj
OMP (M) No. 170/2025
.
11.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant.
Mr. Rishabh Negi, Advocate, vice Mr. Aman
Parth Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents
except respondents No.11 and 23.
of
Mr. Baldev Negi, Addl. A.G. for respondent
No.23.
Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is
rt
granted one week’s further time, by way of last and final
opportunity, to take steps for the service of respondent
No.11.
List thereafter.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Chetu alias Chet Ram (deceased) through LRs
vs. Chukhri (deceased) through LRs
.
RSA No. 248/2024
11.3.2026 Present: Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Abhishek, Advocate, for respondents No. 1(a) to
1(c).
of
None for respondents No. 2 and 3.
At the request of learned counsel for respondents
rt
No. 1(a) to 1(c), list next week.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Vipan Kumar vs. Rakesh Kumar
RSA No. 2/2025
.
11.3.2026 Present: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Respondent No.1 ex-parte.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl.A.G. for
of
respondents No. 2 to 4/State.
Admit on the following substantial question of
law:-
rt
Whether the impugned judgments and decreesare result of mis-appreciation of oral as well as
documentary evidence, thereby vitiating the
impugned judgments and decrees?
Send for the records. List in due course.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Brij LalArb. Appeal No. 6/2025
.
11.3.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Yuyutsu
Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Heard. Admit.
List in due course.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Govind Ram (deceased) through LRs
RSA No. 46/2025
.
11.3.2026 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
Send for the records.
List after four weeks.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
The Highway Administrator & Project Director vs. Chaman Lal
Arb. Appeal No. 410/2025
.
11.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No.
2 & 3.
of
Respondent No.1 ex parte.
In sequel to the order dated 02.09.2025, the
appellant has failed to deposit the award amount in the
rt
Registry of this Court. Consequently, interim protection
granted to the appellant is vacated.
List in due course.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
The Highway Administrator & Project Director vs. Sibi
Arb. Appeal No. 332/2025
.
11.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No.
2 & 3.
of
In sequel to the order dated 18.08.2025, the
appellant has failed to deposit the award amount in the
rt
Registry of this Court. Consequently, interim protection
granted to the appellant is vacated.
List in due course.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
M/s Kahan Chand & Sons Agencies Pvt. Ltd. vs. Ravi Chand Sood
CMPMO No. 418/2025
.
11.3.2026 Present: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhinav
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Seema Sood, Advocate, for respondents No. 1
to 3.
of
Mr. Anil Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.
Mr. Tejasvi Dogra, Advocate, for respondent
rt No.5.
None for respondent No.6.
At the request of learned counsel for the
petitioner, list on 17.03.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Het Ram
Arb. Appeal No. 431/2025
.
11.3.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellant.
None for respondent No.1.
of
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, undertakes to
take appropriate steps for service of un-served respondent(s)
positively within two days from today, failing which adverse
rt
order shall follow.
List after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Mohan (deceased) through LRs vs. NHAI
Arb. Appeal No. 442/2025
.
11.3.2026 Present: Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, vice Ms.
Suchitra Sen, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellants, list after two weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Vinod Kumar vs. Nimmo Devi
.
CMPMO No. 8/2026
11.3.2026 Present: Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Notice issued to the sole respondent is still
of
awaited.
List next week.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Arun Kanti Roy vs. Ritika Ahuja
COPC No. 1020/2025
.
11.3.2026 Present: Ms. Vandana Misra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Y. P. Sood, Advocate, for the respondents.
Rejoinder is stated to have been filed in the
of
Registry on 09.03.2026. If in order, the same be taken on
record.
rt List after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
11.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Seema Devi vs. Hemant Kumar Sharma
CMPMO No. 97/2026
.
10.3.2026 Present: Mr. Dhale Ram, Advocate, for the petitioner.
CMPMO No. 97/2026 & CMP No. 3804/2026
of
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
two weeks on taking steps within two days.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Ramesh Chand vs. State of H.P.
Civil Revision No. 175/2023
.
10.3.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for
respondent No.1/State.
of
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents No. 7, 8(a) to 8(d), 9, 10(a), 16 and
19.
rt Respondents No. 2 to 5, 11 to 16, 20 to 23 and
25 to 30 ex-parte.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioners that during the pendency of petition, respondent
No.50 has expired. He seeks and is granted three weeks’
time to take consequential steps for bringing on record the
legal representatives of the aforesaid deceased respondent.
List after three weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Onkar Chand vs. Rajesh Kumar
RSA No. 277/2020
.
10.3.2026 Present: Mr. Het Ram, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to
3.
Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate, vice Ms. Ragini
Dogra, Advocate, as Court Guardian, for
of
respondent No.8(f).
Mr. Lalit Kumar Sehgal, Advocate, for
respondents No. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (b) to 8 (e) and 14.
rt CMP (M) No. 213/2026
The present application has been filed for bringing
on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent
No.3, Kesari Chand, who is purported to have expired on
23.11.2025. Copy of death certificate has been appended with
the application as Annexure A-1.
For the reasons stated in the application and in
view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the
applicant, the present application is allowed and the legal
representatives of the deceased respondent No.3, as mentioned
in para 2 of the application, are ordered to be brought on record
as respondents No. 3(a) to 3(c). Application stands disposed of.
RSA No. 277/2020
Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to
file amended memo of parties within two days. Issue notice to
the newly added respondents No. 3(a) to 3(c) returnable within
three weeks on taking steps within three days.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Ramesh Chand vs. State of H.P.
Civil Revision No. 175/2023
.
10.3.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for
respondent No.1/State.
of
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents No. 7, 8(a) to 8(d), 9, 10(a), 16 and
19.
rt Respondents No. 2 to 5, 11 to 16, 20 to 23 and
25 to 30 ex-parte.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioners that during the pendency of petition, respondent
No.50 has expired. He seeks and is granted three weeks’
time to take consequential steps for bringing on record the
legal representatives of the aforesaid deceased respondent.
List after three weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Shyam Dass vs. Ram Dayal (deceased) through LRs
RSA No. 241/2024
.
10.3.2026 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sudhir
Bhatnagar, Advocate for proposed LRs of
deceased respondents No.1 and respondents
of
No.2 to 4.
CMP (M) Nos. 1586/2025 & 1587/2025
rt By medium of CMP(M) No. 1587/2025, the
applicant has sought condonation of delay of 256 days in
filing CMP(M) No. 1586/2025, for bringing on record the
legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1, namely
Ram Dayal, who is stated to have expired on 28.07.2024.
Relevant copy of death certificate has been appended with
CMP (M) No. 1586/2025 as Annexure A-1.
The non-applicants have resisted both the
applications by stating that since there is delay in bringing
on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent
No.1, therefore both the applications deserve to be dismissed.
For the reasons stated in CMP(M) No.
1587/2025, more particularly in paras 2 to 4 thereof, couple
with the fact that two legal representatives of deceased
respondent No.1, namely Yog Raj and Anup are already on
record as respondents No. 3 and 4 and right to sue survives
in favour of remaining legal heirs, I find sufficient reasons to
condone the aforesaid delay and set aside the abatement, if
any. Ordered accordingly. Consequently, the legal
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
representatives of deceased respondent No.1, namely Puni
Devi, Maina and Begi as mentioned in para 2 of CMP(M) No.
.
1586/2025 are ordered to be brought on record as
respondents No. 1(a) to 1(c). Amended memo of parties filed
with the application(s) is taken on record. Both applications
stand disposed of.
of
RSA No. 241/2024
Heard. Admit on the following substantial
rt
question of law:-
“Whether the learned Courts below have
misread and misconstrued the oral as well as
documentary evidence placed on record?
Records be requisitioned.
CMP No. 16787/2024
Heard. The parties are directed to maintain
status quo qua nature and possession of the suit land
during the pendency of the appeal. Application stands
disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Babu Ram Gupta (deceased)
through LRs.
RSA No. 2/2026
10.3.2026 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for the
appellants.
Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.
2, 3(a) to 3(c), 4, 6 and 7.
of
Send for the records. List after three weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
M/s Kamdhenu Textiles vs. State Bank of India
RSA No. 9/2026
.
10.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anand Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Karan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
Learned counsel for the appellants submits thaton account of financial constraints, order dated 06.01.2026
rt
could not be complied with, therefore, he seeks and isgranted six weeks’ further time to do the needful.
List after six weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Sohan Lal vs. Harbans SinghRSA No. 21/2026
.
10.3.2026 Present: None for the appellant.
Ms. Prajwal Busta, Advocate, for the respondent.
Records of both the courts below be
of
requisitioned.
List after four weeks.
rt
(Romesh Verma)Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Harvinder Singh vs. ShankuntlaRSA No. 31/2026
.
10.3.2026 Present: Mr. P. S. Goverdhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for the respondent.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for theparties, list after four weeks.
rt Records be requisitioned.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Harvinder Singh vs. ShankuntlaRSA No. 33/2026
.
10.3.2026 Present: Mr. P. S. Goverdhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for the respondent.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for theparties, list after four weeks.
rt Records be requisitioned.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
DAV Public School vs. Vijay Laxmi VermaRSA No. 35/2026
.
10.3.2026 Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
At the request of learned counsel for therespondent, list after two weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
UOI vs. Surajmani
Arb. Appeal No. 81/2026
.
10.3.2026 Present: Ms. Ritu Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for
respondent No.3-State.
of
At the request of learned counsel for theappellants, list after three weeks.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Pritam Chand (deceased) through his LRs vs. Chanchla DeviCOPC No. 692/2024
.
10.3.2026 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajinder
Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
It is submitted by the learned counsel for therespondent that his client is trying to reconcile the matter
with the petitioner, therefore, some time may be given to
rt
him.
List after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge10.3.2026
(pankaj)::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Rattan LalOMP (M) No. 234/2024
.
10.3.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellant/applicant.
None for the respondents.
of
On 09.01.2025, the report was received thatrespondent No. 3 has expired and on the said date, time was
granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to take
rt
consequential steps for bringing on record the legalrepresentatives of deceased respondent No.3. Thereafter,
matter was listed on 18.03.2025, 25.04.2025, 11.07.2025,
29.08.2025 and 03.12.2025, but till date no steps have
been taken by the applicant.
On the persuasive request made by the learned
counsel for the applicant, two weeks’ further time, by way of
last opportunity, is granted to take the aforesaid
consequential steps, failing which, the instant application
shall be dismissed for want of non-prosecution without
further reference to the Court.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Lalit KumarOMP No. 1549/2025 in Arb. Case No. 75/2021
.
10.3.2026 Present: Mr. S. D. Vasudeva & Ms. Ayushi Negi, Deputy
Advocate General, for the non- applicants
/objectors.
Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the applicant.
of
At the request of learned Deputy AdvocateGeneral, list 11.03.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Nand Lal
OMP (M) No. 16/2026
.
10.3.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellant/applicant.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
of
four weeks on taking steps within three days from today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Atma Ram
OMP (M) No. 17/2026
.
10.3.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellant/applicant.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
of
four weeks on taking steps within three days from today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Ram Krishan
OMP (M) No. 18/2026
.
10.3.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellant/applicant.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
of
four weeks on taking steps within three days from today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
.
CMP (M) No. 478 & 479/2023
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the
applicant.
Mr. Azmad Hayat Mohd. Khan, Advocate, vice
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for theof
respondent.
The present applications have been filed for
rt
condonation of delay in filing the appeals against thejudgments and decrees dated 13.07.2022 in C.A. No.
06/2020 and C.A. No. 07/2020, as passed by the learned
Additional District Judge, Sarkaghat, District Mandi,
respectively. It has been averred that after procuring copy of
the judgment dated 13.07.2022, as passed by the learned
first appellate court, the applicant(s) came to Shimla in the
second week of October, 2022 to meet her counsel at
Shimla. Since the applicant(s) had only brought certified
copy of the judgment dated 13.07.2022, the counsel at
Shimla instructed her to get the entire case file. The
applicant(s), after procuring the entire case file, contacted
her counsel in the third week of January 2023 on telephone
and she was told that on account of winter vacation, the
counsel was out of station and she was advised to come to
Shimla in the first week of February 2023. When the
applicant(s) came to Shimla in the 3rd week of March, 2023,
she was told by the counsel that there was no certified copy
of the judgment of the learned trial court. Thereafter, the
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
applicant(s) procured the certified copy of the judgmentdated 31.12.2019 and accordingly, appropriate steps were
.
taken for filing of the present appeal.
2 Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submits that
the delay in filing of the present application(s) is neither
intentional nor willful, but the same has occurred owing to
of
unavoidable circumstances. Learned counsel for theapplicant(s) further submits that the applicant(s) is a lady
rt
and being a rustic villager, she is not aware about theintricacies of law and on that account, the present
applications deserve to be allowed.
3 The applications have vehemently been opposed
by the learned counsel for the non-applicant(s) on the
ground that the sufficient cause has not been furnished in
the application(s) for the aforesaid delay and the same being
highly belated deserve to be dismissed.
4 The learned counsel for the applicant in order to
support his contention has placed reliance upon the
judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil
Appeal Nos. 8435-8436 of 2024, titled as Mool Chandra
vs. Union of India & anr., decided on 5th August, 2024,
more particularly para 20 thereof, which reads as under:-
20. Be that as it may. On account of liberty having
been granted to the appellant to pursue his
remedy in accordance with law, yet another O.A.
No.2066 of 2020 along with an application for
condonation of delay came to be filed. The delay
was not condoned by the Tribunal on the ground::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
that it was filed more than one year after the
impugned order came to be passed. No litigant.
stands to benefit in approaching the courts
belatedly. It is not the length of delay that would
be required to be considered while examining the
plea for condonation of delay, it is the cause for
delay which has been propounded will have to be
of
examined. If the cause for delay would fall within
the four corners of “sufficient cause”, irrespective
of the length of delay same deserves to be
condoned. However, if the cause shown is
rt insufficient, irrespective of the period of delay,
same would not be condoned.”
5 From the perusal of the contents of the
applications, more particularly, paras 3 to 7 thereof, which
are duly supported by an affidavit(s) and taking into
consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel
for the parties, I find sufficient reasons to condone the
aforesaid delay, but subject to payment of costs of Rs.2500/-
in each application, to be paid to the respondent by the
applicant/appellant on or before 16.04.2026. Ordered
accordingly.
Applications stand disposed of.
RSA Nos. /2026
Appeals be registered.
List for consideration on 16.4.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Ravinder Singh Thapa vs. Baldev Singh Thapa
CMPMO No. 191/2024
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for the respondent.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Rajeev Sharma vs. Ram Devi
Revision Petition No. 13/2021
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. B. S. Attri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mota, Advocate, for
respondents No. 1, 2(a) 2(c), 4 and 5.
Ms. Tanu Sharma, Advocate, as Court Gaurdian,
of
for respondents No. 6 and 7.
Learned counsel for the petitioner to have
rt
instructions on the next date of hearing.
List on 10.3.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Satpal (deceased) through Lrs. Vs. Mohan Lal
RSA No. 255/2023
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Peeyush Verma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anuj
Bali, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
Admit on the following substantial questions of
law:
rt 1. When there was dispute of title between the
parties to the suit and defendants-appellantsstaked their claim on the basis of purchase
through a registered document and plaintiff-
respondent having failed in the proceedingsbefore the Rent Controller claiming the status of
defendants-appellants to be the tenant, has not
Lower Appellate Court committed grave error oflaw and jurisdiction in refusing to allow the
application for leading additional evidence filed
by defendants- appellants which application thevarious documents were annexed recording the
ownership of defendants-appellants with respect
to the suit property?
2. When plaintiff- respondent has admitted to have
acquired title by conferment of proprietary
rights over the land, was not it incumbent for
plaintiff -respondent to establish his title by
producing on record such documents showing
any part of the Sunny Dale Cottage to be under
his tenancy? Have not both the Courts below in
absence of such evidence assumed wrongly the
title of plaintiff -respondent qua the structure
standing on Sunny Dale Cottage property, when::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
no tenancy was pleaded by plaintiff -respondent
under the owners of Sunny Dale Cottage?
.
List in due course.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
of
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Seetu @ Sita Ram vs. Sandeep Kumar
RSA No. 65/2019
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sat Parkash, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
of
parties, list after three weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Lekh Ram
OMP (M) No. 47/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
of
four weeks on taking steps within three days from today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Jeet Ram
OMP (M) No. 48/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
of
four weeks on taking steps within three days from today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Roshan Lal
OMP (M) No. 35/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
of
four weeks on taking steps within three days from today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Jagdish Kumar @ Jagdish Chand
OMP (M) No. 31/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Issue notice to the respondents returnable
of
within four weeks on taking steps within three days from
today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Rajesh Kumar
OMP (M) No. 34/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Issue notice to the respondents returnable
of
within four weeks on taking steps within three days from
today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Soma Devi
OMP (M) No. 46/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Issue notice to the respondents returnable
of
within four weeks on taking steps within three days from
today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Baldev Singh
.
OMP (M) No. 29/2026
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Issue notice to the respondents returnable
of
within four weeks on taking steps within three days from
today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Kishori Lal
OMP (M) No. 49/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Issue notice to the respondents returnable
of
within four weeks on taking steps within three days from
today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Pawan Kumar
OMP (M) No. 50/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Issue notice to the respondents returnable
of
within four weeks on taking steps within three days from
today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Inder Kumar
OMP (M) No. 53/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
of
four weeks on taking steps within three days from today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
The Highway Administrator and vs. Dharam Pal
Project Director PIU, Mandi
.
Arb. A. No. 203/2025
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondents
No.2 and 3.
rt Heard. Admit.
List in due course.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Gujju Ram vs. Devi Ram
CMP (M) No. 1625/2025
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents
of
No.2 & 3/State.
CMP (M) No. 1625/2025
rt The present application has been filed through
legal-aid counsel for condonation of delay of 166 days in
filing the present regular second appeal.
The appellant/applicant has assigned the
reasons in paras 2 to 4 of the application, which seem to be
plausible and reasonable. Therefore, keeping in view the
averments as made in the application, which is duly
supported by an affidavit and taking into consideration the
submissions made by the learned counsel for the
respondents, I find sufficient reasons to condone the
aforesaid delay. Ordered accordingly. Appeal be registered.
Application stands disposed of.
RSA No. /2026
Heard. Admit on the following substantial
questions of law:
1. Whether the learned First Appellate Court has
committed jurisdictional error in granting relief
qua Khasra No. 176 directing respondents No.2
and 3 to grant nautor to the plaintiff, which is
beyond the scope of pleading and relief sought
by the plaintiff?
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
2. Whether the learned First Appellate Court has
created an illegality by partly allowing the
.
appeal without returning the findings on the
core issue of adverse possession?
Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to
supply a copy of entire paper book to learned counsel for
of
respondent No.1 during the course of the day. Records be
requisitioned.
rt CMP No. /2026
Be registered. The appellant/applicant seeks
and is granted permission to withdraw the application filed
under Order 41 Rule 5 CPC with liberty to file the same
afresh under the relevant provisions of law. Application
stands disposed of.
CMP No. /2026
Be registered. The instant application is disposed
with a direction to the applicant to file translated copy of
Annexure A-1 within four weeks from today.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
The Principal Secretary Revenue to the Govt of H.P. vs. Budhu
.
CMP (M) No. 1892/2025
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the
appellants/applicants.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
CMP (M) No. 1892/2025
The present application has been filed for
rt
condonation of delay of 233 days in filing the present regular
second appeal.
The appellants/applicants have assigned the
reasons in para 3 of the application, which seem to be
plausible and reasonable. Therefore, keeping in view the
averments as made in the application, which is duly
supported by an affidavit and taking into consideration the
submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondent,
I find sufficient reasons to condone the aforesaid delay.
Ordered accordingly. Appeal be registered.
Application stands disposed of.
RSA No. /2026
List along with RSA No. 112/2024 on 13.3.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Project Director, NHAI vs. Rakesh Kumar
OMP (M) No. 54/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Ms. Ritu Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant/applicant.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. A.g. for respondent
No.2.
of
Notice. Mr. Manish Thakur, learned Deputy
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf ofrt respondent No.2. Issue separate notice to
respondent No.1 returnable within four weeks on taking
steps within one week from today.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Chaman Lal
OMP (M) No. 55/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Ms. Ritu Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant/applicant.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
of
four weeks on taking steps within one week from today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Shukar Deen vs. Subhash Chand
CMP (M) No. 220/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the
appellant/applicant.
Issue notice to the respondents returnable within
of
four weeks on taking steps within three days from today.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
The Government of H.P. vs. Jagar Nath
CMP (M) No. 221/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
appellants/applicants.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
of
four weeks on taking steps within one week from today.
(Romesh Verma)
rt Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
C.S. No. 4/2026
.
9.3.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate, for defendants
No. 1, 2 and 4.
of
Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.3.
OMP No. 112/2026
rt Since the case has been taken up for
consideration, therefore, the instant application has
become infructuous and is disposed of as such.
OMP No. 21/2026
The learned counsel for the defendants/non-
applicants undertakes to complete the pleadings on or
before the next date of hearing.
List for consideration on 16.3.2026
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
9.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Deepak Kumar Chopra (deceased) through LRs vs. Rajni Devi
RSA No. 158/2005
.
7.3.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
List for further hearing on 16.03.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
rt Judge
7.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Bhola Ram vs. Param Dev
.
RSA No. 45/2026
6.3.2026 Present: Ms. Seema Azad, Advocate, for the appellant.
RSA No. 45/2026
Issue notice to the respondents returnable within
of
four weeks, on taking steps within two days.
CMP No. 3613/2026
rt Heard. Subject to the appellant/applicant’s
depositing entire decretal amount along with upto date
interest in the registry of this Court within a period of four
weeks from today, operation, implementation and
execution of the impugned judgments and decrees passed
by both the learned courts below are stayed during the
pendency of the appeal. Application stands disposed of.
CMP No. 3614/2026
The application is disposed of with a direction to
the applicant to file certified copy of the impugned
judgment and decree as passed by the learned trial court
within a period of four weeks from today.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Satish Kumar (deceased) through LRs vs. Vinod
Gupta
.
RSA No. 51/2023
6.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Hemant Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.
1 and 2.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
appellants, list after two weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Ram Pal vs. Mehar Chand
RSA No. 280/2024
.
6.3.2026 Present: Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. A. S.
Rana, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
CMP No. 23752/2025
In sequel to the orders dated 17.10.2025,
11.11.2025, 05.12.2025 and 22.12.2025, reply has not
rt
been filed till date. On the persuasive request made by
the learned vice counsel for the appellants/non-
applicants, four weeks’ further time, by way of last and
final opportunity, is granted to file reply, failing which
right to file the same shall be closed.
List after four weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Abhinav Singal vs. Priyanka
CMPMO No. 74/2026
.
6.3.2026 Present: Mr. Parikshit Kaushik, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
petitioner, list next week.
(Romesh Verma)
rt Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Bahadur vs. Bratiya
RSA No. 8/2003
.
6.3.2026 Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Debinder Ghosh, Advocate, vice Mr. C. P.
Sood, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
of
respondents, list next week.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Ramesh Chand vs. State of H.P.
Civil Revision No. 175/2023
.
6.3.2026 Present: Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A. G. for
respondent No.1/State.
of
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents No. 7, 8(a) to 8 (d), 9, 10(a), 16 and
19.
rt Respondents No. 2 to 5, 11 to 16, 20 to 23 and
25 to 30 ex-parte.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
petitioners, list on 10.03.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Dharamveer vs. Raj Krishan
CMPMO No. 677/2025
.
6.3.2026 Present: Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek
Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
petitioner, list next week along with CMPMO No.
608/2025.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Krishan Murari (deceased) through his LRs. Vs. Shiv Mandir and Shiv
Bari Development and Welfare Society
.
RSA No. 211/2018
6.3.2026 Present: Ms. Tamana Sharma, Advocate, vice Ms. Garima
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Het Ram, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for the respondents.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellants, list after four weeks.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Raj Thakur vs. Piar Chand
RSA No. 3/2019
.
6.3.2026 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
respondent, list after three weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Ram Saran vs. Parbhat Singh
RSA No. 109/2018
.
6.3.2026 Present: Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arun
Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
respondents, list after three weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
CMPMO No. 682/2025
.
6.3.2026 Present: Mr. Y. P. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for respondent
No.7.
Mr. Ranvir Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
of
No.8.
At the request of learned counsel for the
petitioner, list after two weeks.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Chet Ram vs. Neter Singh
RSA No. 44/2026
.
6.3.2026 Present: Mr. G. R. Palsra, Advocate, for the appellants.
Send for the records.
List after four weeks.
of
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Ghanshyam @ Ghanshyam Dass
OMP (M) No. 52/2026
.
6.3.2026 Present: Ms. Ritu Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
four weeks on taking steps within two days from today.
of
List after four weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
rt Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Ashwani Kumar
OMP (M) No. 51/2026
.
6.3.2026 Present: Ms. Ritu Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant.
Issue notice to the respondents returnable within
four weeks on taking steps within two days from today.
of
List after four weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
rt Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Roshan Chaudhary vs. Kiran Aggarwal
CMP (M) No. 203/2026
.
6.3.2026 Present: Mr. J. R. Poswal, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. J. P. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 3 to 5.
Notice. Mr. J. P. Sharma, Advocate, appears
of
and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 3
to 5. Issue separate notice to respondents No. 1, 2 and 6
rt
returnable within a period of four weeks, on taking steps
within two days.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
6.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Tilak Raj vs. Kamla Devi
RSA No. 262/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Prikshit Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Mukul
Sood, Advocate, for the respondents.
RSA No. 262/2025
of
Heard. Admit on following substantial questions
of law:
rt 1. Whether the judgments and decrees
passed by the learned courts below are on
asaccount of mis-appreciation and mis-
construction of the oral as well as
documentary evidence, placed on record?
2. Whether the application under Order 26 Rule
9 CPC for appointment of the Local
Commissioner a revenue expert to demarcatethe suit land to ascertain the boundary has
wrongly been rejected, when boundary
dispute has been raised by therespondents/defendants and as such the
impugned judgments and decrees are liable
to be set aside.
Call for the records.
CMP No. 28470/2025
Heard. In the interim, the parties are directed to
maintain status quo qua ownership and possession of the
suit land till next date of hearing.
List on 21.4.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
M/s Lokpriya Buidwell Pvt. Ltd. vs. Puneet Singh
RSA No. 90/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. P. S. Goverdhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
of
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
rt
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Bishanu (deceased) through LRs. Vs. Ram Krishan
Civil Revision No. 118/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioners.
Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
of
No.3.
At the request of learned counsel for the
rt
petitioners, list on 06.03.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Hem Raj
RSA No. 210/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G., for the
appellants.
Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
Call for the records. List after four weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Chet Ram
Arb. A. No. 429/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Ms. Ritu Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for
respondent No.2.
of
Heard. Admit. List in due course.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Achhru Ram
Arb. A. No. 458/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya
Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
Heard. Admit. List in due course.
(Romesh Verma)
rt Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
The Executive Engineer vs. M/s TCM Steel (India)
Arb. A. No. 491/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Mr. Navlesh Verma, Addl. A.G. for the appellant.
Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned Additional Advocate General seeks and
of
is granted four weeks’ time to file an appropriate
application. List thereafter.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Madan Lal
Arb. A. No. 493/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya
Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
Heard. Admit. List in due course.
(Romesh Verma)
rt Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Harjeet Kaur
Arb. A. No. 514/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya
Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents ex-parte.
Heard. Admit. List in due course.
of
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
rt
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Hema Devi vs. Jaswant Singh
CMPMO No. 47/2026
.
3.3.2026 Present: Mr. H. K. S. Thakur, Advocate, for the
petitioners.
Mr. J. S. Bagga, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMPMO No. 47/2026 & CMP No. 1946/2026
of
Mr. J. S. Bagga, Advocate, has put in appearance
on behalf of the respondent. He seeks and is granted two
days’ time to file reply.
rt List on 16.03.2026. Pleadings be completed in
the meanwhile.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Jagdish Chand vs. State of H.P.
RSA No. 12/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl. A.G. for the
respondents/ State.
Learned counsel for the appellants seeks and is
of
granted four weeks’ time to inspect the record. List
thereafter.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Surender Kumar vs. Pankaj Bansal a/w connected matter
CMPMO No. 173/2023 a/w CMPMO No. 238/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Aditya
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Priskshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vipin
Pandit, Advocate, for the respondent(s).
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
petitioner(s), list after ten days.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Om Prakash Garg vs. Rakesh Kapila
CMPMO No. 593/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
CMP (M) No. 184/2026
The present application has been filed by the
applicants for bringing on record the legal representatives of
of
deceased petitioner No.1, namely Om Prakash Garg, who has
expired on 16.10.2025. Relevant death certificate has been
appended with the application as Annexure A-1.
rt In view of the averments made in the application,
which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed
and consequently, the proposed legal representatives of
deceased petitioner No.1, as mentioned in para 3 of the
application, are ordered to be brought on record. Registry is
directed to carry out necessary corrections. Application stands
disposed of.
CMPMO No. 593/2025 & CMP No. 24442/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to
file amended memo of parties within two days.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable within
three weeks on taking steps during the course of the day. In the
meanwhile, further proceedings pending before the learned
Civil Judge, Court No.5, Shimla in Civil Suit No. 70-1/2015,
titled as Rakesh Kapila vs. Om Prakash are stayed till next date
of hearing. List after three weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Parma Nand vs. Gurdayal Singh
CMP (M) No. 2208/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate, for the
appellants/applicants.
Mr. O. P. Negi, Advocate, for respondents No. 1
to 4.
Mr. Baldev Negi, Addl. A.G. for respondent No. 5.
of
CMP (M) No. 2208/2025
The present application has been filed for
rt
condonation of delay of 23 days in filing the present regular
second appeal.
For the reasons stated in the application, more
particularly in paras 3 and 4 thereof, which is duly
supported by an affidavit, I find sufficient reasons to
condone the aforesaid delay. Ordered accordingly.
Applications stands disposed of.
RSA No. /2026
Be registered. Admit on following substantial
questions of law:
1. Whether the learned Courts below erred in law in
decreeing the suit without appreciating that
the same was not maintainable in view of the
provisions of the Forest Rights Act, 2006 which
provided a special statutory forum to adjudicate
upon tribal and customary rights, thereby
ousting the jurisdiction of the Civil Court?
2. Whether the learned Courts below erred in law
in decreeing the suit for permanent prohibitory
injunction in favour of the plaintiffs/respondents
without proof of actual infringement of their legal
rights, contrary to settled law that injunction
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
cannot be granted on mere apprehension or in
.
absence of evidence?
Call for the records.
CMP No. 2026
Be registered. Learned counsel for the applicants
of
seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the instant
application filed under Order 41 Rule 5 read with Section
rt
151 CPC to file it afresh under the relevant provisions of
law. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Yadav Nandan vs. Ishani Kumari @ Asha Devi
CMP (M) No. 1027/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Ms. Tanu Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant.
Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice Mr. Naveen K.
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is
of
granted three weeks’ further time to file rejoinder. List
thereafter.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 138/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Mr. G. R. Palsra, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the
respondents.
CMP No. 14136/2025
of
Heard. Interim order, as passed by this Court on
24.06.2025, is made absolute during the pendency of the
appeal. Application stands disposed of.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Vinay Kumar vs. Naveen Kumar
RSA No. 104/2025
.
3.3.2026 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Sameer Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Mohit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Manish
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
List before another Bench at the pleasure of
Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
3.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 267/2025
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the appellants.
Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr.
Bhupinder Ahuja, Advocate, for respondents No.
1 to 6.
Respondents No. 7 and 8 are ex-parte.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for
respondents No. 1 to 6, list after four weeks.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Kuldeep vs. Raghuvir Singh (deceased)
through his LRs
.
RSA No. 220/2022
2.3.2026 Present: Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate, vice Mr.
Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellants, list after three weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Jhabe Ram vs. Mamta
CMPMO No. 371/2025
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the
respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
respondent, list after two weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Vidya Devi
Arb. Appeal No. 478/2025
.
2.3.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Yuyutsu Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
appellant, list after eight weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Lekh Ram
Arb. Appeal No. 508/2025
.
2.3.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
appellant, list after eight weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Roshan Lal
Arb. Appeal No. 512/2025
.
2.3.2026 Present: Ms. Ritu Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Nandita, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondent
No.2.
of
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
appellant that the awarded amount stands deposited before
rt
the CALA. For the said purpose, she has placed on record
communication dated 7.1.2026 issued by respondent No.2.
In case the amount in question has been
deposited before the CALA, the same be requisitioned and be
deposited in the Registry of this Court.
List after four weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Bhag Chand Jain vs. HPSIDC
CMPMO No. 554/2025
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek
Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
petitioner, list after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
rt Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Dr. Kusum Chauhan vs. Gian Sagar Negi
COPC No. 686/2025
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Dilip Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
respondent, list on 19.3.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Mohinder Singh vs. Kadam Sandeep Vasant
COPC No. 1126/2025
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the
respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is
of
granted three weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 21/2026
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Ms. Prajwal Busta, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
appellant, list after one week.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Mohan Dutt vs. Lok Nath
CMPMO No. 61/2026
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Lonveesh Kanwar, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Tarun Garla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMPMO No. 61/2026 & CMP No. 2568/2026
of
Pleadings, as prayed for, be completed within
three weeks.
rt List for hearing on 24.3.2026. In the meanwhile,
both the parties are directed to maintain status quo qua
ownership and possession of the suit land comprised in
Khasra Nos. 21 & 75 till next date of hearing.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
NHAI vs Sukh Dev
OMP(M) No. 409/2025
.
2.3.2026 Present: Ms. Ritu Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant/applicant.
Mr. Munish Dhatwalia, Advocate, for
respondents No. 1 to 9.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list after three weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Koullan Devi (deceased) through LRs vs. Gurdittu (deceased)
through LRs
.
CMPMO No. 289/2021
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Ms.
Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents
No. 1(a) to 1(c).
of
Respondents No. 2 to 5 & 7 to 15 ex-parte.
It is submitted by Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate,
rt
that he wants to reconstruct the case file and thereafter he
will be able to assist this Court. He prays for and is granted
three weeks’ time to do the needful. List thereafter.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Santosh Kumar vs. Brij Bala Sood
RSA No. 224/2022
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Prashant Chauhan, Advocate, vice
Ms. Bhavna Dutta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellants, list after four weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 39/2024
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Lovneesh Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondents.
Admit on following substantial question of law:
of
Whether the First Appellate Court has
committed a grave illegality in reversing a well-
rt reasoned judgment of the trial court by
misreading and misinterpreting the provisions
as well as settled principles of law?
Records be requisitioned. List in due course.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge2.3.2026
(pankaj)::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Parkash ChandRSA No. 56/2025
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the appellants.
Mr. Vivek Chandel, Advocate, for the
respondent.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
of
parties, list after four weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Shobha Ram vs. Mehar Chand
CMPMO No. 208/2025
.
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Mukul
Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Ms.
Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
petitioner, list after three weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Gurdial Singh vs. The District Collector, Una a/w
connected matter
.
RSA No. 266/2020 a/w RSA No. 267/2020
RSA No. 266/2020
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellants.
of
Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G. for
respondent No.1.
Mr. R.K. Bawa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay
rt Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
RSA No. 267/2020
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. R.K. Bawa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay
Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
RSA No. 266/2020 & RSA No. 267/2020
Heard. Admit on following substantial question
of law:
Whether both the learned Courts below have
misread and mis-appreciated the pleadings of
the parties as also the evidence on record, both
oral and documentary, and on account of such
misreading and mis-appreciation of the pleadings
and evidence, the findings of both the Courts
below are vitiated and deserve to be set aside ?
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
M/s A. D. Hydro Power Ltd. vs. Rajesh KumarCMPMO No. 183/2021
.
2.3.2026 Present: Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
petitioner, list on 9.3.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 320/2022
.
2.3.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanket
Sankhyan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Somesh Raj, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod
Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 1
to 3.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellant, list after two weeks.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Sunit Singh vs. Surjit Singh a/w connected matter
.
RSA No. 139/2024 a/w RSA No. 141/2024
2.3.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the appellant, in both
appeals.
Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate, (through VC) for
respondents No. 1 and 2.
of
RSA No. 139/2024 & RSA No. 141/2024
Heard. Admit on following substantial question
of law:
rt
Whether both the learned Courts erred inappreciating the provisions of law applicable,
pleadings of the parties and evidence adduced
by them in its right perspective and in turnimpugned judgments and decrees in law stand
vitiated?
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.3.2026
(pankaj)::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Dharam Dass (deceased) through LRs vs. Inder SinghRSA No. 491/2006
.
28.2.2026 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Tejasvi Dogra, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
of
None for respondents No. 4(a), 4(b), 2, 3, 5 to 14
and 16 to 21.
rt Arguments heard. Judgement reserved.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.2.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Amar Chand vs. Banarsi Dass
RSA No. 356/2009
.
2.1.2026 Present: Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No. 3
to 5, 9 and 10.
Respondent No.8 ex-parte.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the parties,
list on 9.1.2026.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Kashmir Singh vs. Sain Dass
RSA No. 576/2016
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for
respondents No. 1(a) to 1(g).
CMP No. 30824/2025
of
Learned counsel for the non-applicant submits
that he has filed reply to the application today itself.
However, the same is not record. Registry to trace and place
rt
the aforesaid reply on record.
List thereafter.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Purshottam Dev
RFA No. 409/2018 & RFA No.411/2018
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. R. S. Verma, Addl. A.G. for the appellant(s).
Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents in RFA No. 409/2018.
Ms. Mamta, Advocate, for the respondents in
RFA No. 411/2018.
of
At the request of Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate,
list in the first week of March, 2026.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Desh Raj vs. Vinod Kumar
RSA No. 477/2009
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the
respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
appellants, list on 9.1.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 61/2010
.
2.1.2026 Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.
1 and 2.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
respondent, list on 9.1.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 477/2009
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the
respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
appellants, list on 9.1.2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Manmohan Singh vs. State of H.P. a/w
connected matter
.
RFA No. 150/2017 a/w RFA No. 6/2019
RFA No. 150/2017
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Dhatwalia, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Ms. Avni Kochhar, Dy. A.G. for respondents No.
of
1 and 2.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondent
No.10.
rt RFA No. 6/2019
Ms. Avni Kochhar, Dy. A.G. for the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents
No. 1 to 6.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list on 13.3.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Raju vs. Pawan Kajor
RSA No. 292/2010
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Arush Matoltia, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. S. D. Vasudeva, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
appellant, list in the last week of March, 2026.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 244/2010
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate, vice Mr.
Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list after ensuing winter vacation.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
RSA No. 116/2014
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. R. L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the
respondents.
CMP No. 32675/2025
of
The present application has been filed by the
applicant for deletion of name of respondent No.1, namely,
rt
Shanti Devi, from the array of the parties on the ground that
her legal representatives are already on record as
respondents No. 2 (a) to 2(d) and 3.
In view of the averments made in the application,
which is duly supported by an affidavit, the present
application is allowed and name of respondent No.1 is
ordered to be deleted from array of the parties subject to all
just exceptions. Registry is directed to carry out necessary
corrections.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP (M) Nos. 1450 & 1451/2025
By medium of CMP (M) No. 1451/2025, the
applicant has sought condonation of delay of 4 years 3
months and 28 days in filing CMP (M) No. 1450/2025, for
bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased
respondent No.2, namely Pawan Kumar, who is stated to
have expired on 30.12.2019. Relevant copies of death
certificate and pariwar register have been appended with the
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
CMP (M) No. 1450/2025 as Annexures A-1 and A-2
.
respectively.
For the reasons stated in CMP(M) No.
1451/2025, more particularly in paras 3 and 4 thereof, I
find sufficient reason to condone the aforesaid delay.
of
Accordingly, delay in filing of application for bringing on
record the legal representatives of respondent No.2 is
rt
condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside. Consequently,
taking into consideration the death certificate and pariwar
register of the deceased respondent No.2, Annexures A-1 &
A-2 respectively, the legal representatives of respondent No.2,
as mentioned in para 3 of CMP (M) No. 1450/2025 are
ordered to be brought on record.
Both applications stand disposed of.
RSA No. 116/2014
Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to
file fresh amended memo of parties within a period of two
weeks from today. Let notices be issued to the newly added
respondents in main appeal on taking steps within one week
returnable after eight weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Roshan Lal (deceased) through LRs. Vs. Birbal
RSA No. 337/2012
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. N. K. Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karan
Veer Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, seeks and is
granted two weeks’ further time to file power of attorney in
terms of previous order.
rt List thereafter.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Parveen Kumar vs. Naresh Kumar
RSA No. 89/2013
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for the
respondents except respondent No.3.
CMP No. 5/2026
of
The present application has been filed by the
applicants for deletion of name of appellant No. 7, namely,
rt
Kamla Devi, from the array of the parties.
It has been averred in the application that legal
heirs of deceased appellant No.7 are already on record as
appellants No. 1 to 6.
In view of the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the
present application is allowed and name of appellant No.7 is
ordered to be deleted from array of the parties. Registry is
directed to carry out necessary corrections. The application
stands disposed of.
CMP No. 4/2026
The present application has been filed by the
applicants for deletion of name of respondent No.3, namely,
Manoj Kumar, from the array of the parties, though in the
cause title of the application it has been averred that name
of appellant No.7 be deleted, however the learned counsel for
the applicants submits that it is a typographical mistake
and as a matter of fact, the application should be read to
have been filed for deletion of name of respondent No.3.
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
The learned counsel for the applicants is
.
permitted to carry out necessary correction in the cause title
of the application and mark his initial in the presence of the
Court Master.
In view of the averments made in the
of
application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the
present application is allowed and name of respondent No.3
rt
is ordered to be deleted from array of the parties since he
was unmarried and died issueless, subject to all just
exceptions. Registry is directed to carry out necessary
corrections. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No. 89/2013
Learned counsel for the appellants undertakes to
file fresh amended memo of parties within two weeks from
today.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Sant Ram vs. Amar Chand
RSA No. 101/2013 a/w C.O. No. 4024/2013
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Het Ram, Advocate, for the proposed legal
representatives of appellant.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No. 32603/2025
of
The applicants are exempted from filing typed/
translation of vernacular documents, Annexure A-2.
rt Application stands disposed of.
CMP.M No. 2391/2025
The present application has been filed by the
applicants for bringing on record the legal representatives of
deceased sole appellant, namely Sant Ram, who has expired
on 24.6.2025. Relevant death certificate has been appended
with the application as Annexure A-1.
In view of the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the
same is allowed and consequently, after condoning the
delay, the proposed legal representatives of deceased sole
appellant, as mentioned in para 3 of the application, are
ordered to be brought on record as appellants No. 1(a) to 1(f)
and abatement, if any, is set aside. Registry is directed to
carry out necessary corrections.
Application stands disposed of.
RSA No. 101/2013
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that
he has filed power of attorney on behalf of appellants No.
1(a) to 1(c). He undertakes to file power of attorney on behalf
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
of remaining appellants and fresh amended memo of parties
.
within three weeks from today.
List thereafter.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
of
(pankaj)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Nanak Chand (deceased) through his Lrs vs. Meena Kumari
RSA No. 110/2013
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Sana Rana, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Priyanka, Advocate, vice Mr. G. R. Palsra,
Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 6.
Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for respondents
of
No. 7 to 10.
CMP No. 31924/2025
rt For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and the main appeal is ordered to be listed
for final hearing in the last week of March, 2026.
Application stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Lekh Ram vs. Prem Lal
RSA No. 196/2013
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Bhairav
Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellant
undertakes to take steps for service of respondents No. 2(a)
to 2(h) within a period of three weeks from today. In case
rt
needful is done, issue notice to the said respondents
returnable after six weeks.
List thereafter.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Daulat Ram vs. State of H.P.
RSA No. 72/2014
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. K. R.
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Avni Kochhar, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents.
CMP No. 18298/2025
of
Learned Deputy Advocate General seeks and is
granted four weeks’ time to file reply. In the meantime, the
rt
parties are directed to maintain status quo qua nature and
possession of the suit land till next date.
List on 20.3.2026.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Balak Ram (deceased) through LRs vs. Paras Ram
RSA No. 104/2014
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Sana Rana, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Priyanka, Advocate, vice Mr. G. R. Palsra,
Advocate, for the respondents.
of
CMP No. 8291/2025
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
respondents, list for consideration on 6.3.2026.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Kanta Devi vs. Onkar Singh (deceased)
through LRs
.
RSA No. 256/2014
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood and Mr. Het Ram, Advocates
vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Sana Rana, Advocate, for respondents No. 1(b)
of
and 1(c).
CMP No. 29731/2025
rt The present application has been filed by the
respondents/applicants with prayer to allow them to cut
trees in question from the suit land on the premise that the
said trees are quite old and they require immediate cutting
from the suit land in order to avoid any eventuality.
During the course of the arguments, it was
submitted by the learned counsel for the non-applicant that
the Divisional Forest Officer, Amb, District Una, can be
directed to ascertain the status of the trees in question over
the suit land, which requires immediate cutting.
Accordingly, the DFO Amb is directed to visit the
suit land in the presence of both the parties and to take
assistance from the respective parties, in case need so arises.
This order is specifically being passed in order to
ascertain whether any immediate cutting of the ‘Khair’ trees
or miscellaneous trees is required or not. The DFO
concerned shall furnish the report to this Court within four
weeks from today.
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Copy of this order be sent to the DFO concerned
.
through e-mail and through office of the Learned Advocate
General.
List for further orders on 13.3.2026.
[
of
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
rt
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Mast Ram vs. Kewal Krishan Kumar
RSA No. 139/2014
.
2.1.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the respondents including
respondent No.1(a).
of
CMP (M) No. 317/2025
At the request of learned counsel for the parties,
list for consideration in the month of March, 2026.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
2.1.2026
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Gorakh Ram vs. Mansha Devi
RSA No. 4349/2013
.
19.12.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list on 2.1.2026.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
19.12.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Gopal Lal vs. Ravi Dutt (deceased) through his LRs
RSA No. 156/2006
.
19.12.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for the respondents No.1 (a) to 1(e).
On 23.9.2024, CMP (M) No. 1075/2024 was
of
allowed for bringing on record legal representatives of the
sole respondent, who expired on 8.4.2021. Notices were
rt
issued to the proposed legal representatives and Mr.
Hitender Verma, Advocate, appeared for the said proposed
legal representatives and sought time for filing power of
attorney. Till date, power of attorney on behalf of the
respondents No. 1(a) to 1(e) has not been filed.
As a matter of indulgence and by way of last
opportunity, two weeks’ further time is granted to do the
needful, failing which adverse order shall follow.
List thereafter.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
19.12.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Purshottam Dev
RFA No. 409/2018 & RFA No. 411/2018
.
19.12.2025 Present: Mr. R. S. Verma, Addl. A.G. for the appellant(s).
Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents in RFA No. 409/2018.
Ms. Mamta, Advocate, for the respondents in
RFA No. 411/2018.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
respondents, list on 2.1.2026.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
19.12.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Lila Devi vs. Sarla Devi
RSA No. 244/2010
.
12.12.2025 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate, vice
Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list on 26.12.2025.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
12.12.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Vinod Raj Khanna vs. Balraj Khanna
RSA No. 22/2014
.
12.12.2025 Present: Mr. Gautam Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1 already ex-parte.
Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
of
At the request of learned counsel for respondent
No.2, list on 19.12.2025.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
12.12.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Nikko Devi vs. Thakri
RSA No. 506/2014
.
12.12.2025 Present: Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate, vice Mr. Parv
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. George, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
of
appellant, list on 19.12.2025.
(Romesh Verma)
rt
12.12.2025
Judge
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Manmohan Singh vs. State of H.P. a/w
connected matter
.
RFA No.150/2017 a/w RFA No. 6/2019
RFA No. 150/2017
12.12.2025 Present: Mr. B. S. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Munish Datwalia, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. R. S. Verma, Addl. A.G. for respondents
of
No.1 and 2.
Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
rt RFA No. 6/2019
Mr. R. S. Verma, Addl. A.G. for the appellants.
Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No. 1
to 6.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list on 19.12.2025.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
12.12.2025
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Karam Chand vs. State of H.P.
RSA No. 206/2008
.
12.12.2025 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. R. S. Verma, Addl. A.G. for respondents No.
1 and 2.
Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
of
No.3.
At the request of learned counsel for respondent
rt
No.3, list on 19.12.2025.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
12.12.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Dayanand (deceased) vs. Chuni Lal & ors.
RSA No. 410/2014
.
12.12.2025 Present: Mr. B. L. Soni & Mr. Nitin Soni, Advocates, for
the applicants.
CMP (M) Nos. 2022/2025 & 2023/2025
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
appellants/applicants, list after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
rt
12.12.2025
Judge
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Dayanand (deceased) vs. Chuni Lal & ors.
RSA No. 410/2014
.
5.12.2025 Present: Mr. B. L. Soni & Mr. Nitin Soni, Advocates, for
the applicants.
CMP (M) Nos. 2022/2025 & 2023/2025
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
appellants/applicants, list on 12.12.2025.
(Romesh Verma)
rt
5.12.2025
Judge
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Surinder Kumar vs. Sita Ram a/w connected matters
.
RSA No. 609/2012 a/w RSA Nos. 298 &
299/2005
28.11.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the appellants
in RSA No. 609/2012 and for the respondents in
RSA No. 298 & 299/2005.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tarun
of
Brakta, Advocate, for the appellants in RSA No.
298 & 299/2005 and for respondents in RSA No.
609/2012.
rt RSA Nos. 298 & 299/2005
It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the
appellant(s) that during the pendency of the appeals,
appellant No.6 Pooja in both the appeals, has expired.
Learned counsel for the appellants seeks and is
granted three weeks’ time to take consequential steps for
bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased
appellant No.6 in these appeals.
List thereafter.
RSA No. 609/2012
List along with RSA No. 298/2005.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Singhoo Ram vs. Onkar Singh
.
RSA No. 300/2014
28.11.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Hakam Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Anuj Nag,
Advocate, for respondents No. 5 to 9.
of
CMP No. 9795/2024
The present application has been filed by the
appellant/applicant for making necessary correction in
rt
the memo of parties. This Court vide its order dated
24.3.2025 had directed the first Appellate Court to carry
out necessary correction in the cause title. The necessary
correction was carried out by the first Appellate Court
and the record of the first Appellate Court was remitted to
this Court.
In view of aforesaid, the present application is
disposed of.
CMP (M) No. 1238/2024
The present application has been filed by the
applicants for bringing on record the legal representatives of
deceased respondent No.1 Balbir Singh, who has expired on
12.10.2023 after condonation of delay of 154 days in filing
the same. Relevant death certificate has been appended with
the application as Annexure A-1.
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants
submits that by inadvertence, the deceased respondent has
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
been mentioned as respondent No.1(a) instead of respondent
No.1.
.
In view of the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I find
sufficient reason to condone the aforesaid delay and set aside
abatement, if any. Ordered accordingly. Consequently, the
of
legal representatives of deceased respondent, Balbir Singh,
as mentioned in para 3 of the application are ordered to be
rt
brought on record. Registry is directed to carry out
necessary corrections. Application stands disposed of.
RSA No. 300/2014
Learned counsel for the appellants undertakes to
file fresh amended memo of parties within three weeks. If in
order, be taken.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.11.2025
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
HPSIDC Limited vs. Kewal Solvent Limited
RFA No. 53/2024
.
28.11.2025 Present: Mr. Chandan Goel, Advocate, for the appellant.
CMP No. 28613/2025
The present application has been filed by the
of
applicant for deletion of names of respondents No. 3, 3(a)
and 4 from the array of the parties.
rt At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant
submits that he restricts his prayer qua deletion of name of
respondent No.3 Sh. Darshan Singh and respondent No. 4
Smt. Swaran Kaur.
In view of the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the
present application is allowed and names of respondents No
3 and 4 are ordered to be deleted from array of the parties.
Registry is directed to carry out necessary corrections. The
application stands disposed of.
RFA No. 53/2024
Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to
file fresh amended memo of parties within three weeks. If in
order, be taken on record.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Kehar Singh (deceased) through is LRs vs. Ramesh Chand
RSA No. 443/2014
.
28.11.2025 Present: Mr. Kulwant Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No. 27604/2025
of
After hearing for some time, learned counsel for
the applicants seeks permission to withdraw the instant
rt
application with liberty to file an appropriate application
in accordance with law. Permission granted. The
application stands dismissed, as withdrawn, with liberty
as aforesaid.
RSA No. 443/2014
As prayed, list for final hearing after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Kesho Ram vs. State of H.P.
RSA No. 273/2014
.
28.11.2025 Present: Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Vidushi Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellants/plaintiffs.
Mr. R. S. Verma, Addl. A.G. for respondent
No.1/State.
of
Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for proposed
respondent No.4 in CMP No. 21465/2025.
rt CMP No. 21465/2025
Learned counsel for the applicant seeks
permission to withdraw the instant application.
Permission granted. The application stands dismissed,
as withdrawn.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Parkash Chand (deceased) through his LRs vs. Neelam
RSA No. 390/2012
.
28.11.2025 Present: Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, for the
applicants.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
CMP (M) Nos. 2064/2024 & 2066/2024
of
On the request of learned counsel for the
applicants, list after two weeks.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Dev Raj (deceased) through his LRs vs. Satya Devi
RSA No. 157/2007
.
28.11.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev
Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Trigun Singh Negi, Advocate, vice
Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 8, 10 to 22, 24 to 27, 29
and 30.
of
On the request of learned counsel for the parties,
list after two weeks.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Krishna Devi vs. Pawan Kumar
RSA No. 338/2007
.
28.11.2025 Present: Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocate, vice
Mr.Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate, for respondents
No. 1 to 3 and 5.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellant, the case is adjourned.
rt List after three weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Dhain Chand vs. Gur Piari a/w connected matter
RSA No. 597/2007 a/w RSA No.598/2007
.
28.11.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the
appellant(s).
Mr. Ashok Sharma, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Anubhuti Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No. 1, 4 and 5 in RSA No. 597/2007 and for
respondent No.1 in RSA No. 598/2007
of
CMP (M) No. 2032/2025 in RSA No. 597/2007
CMP (M) No. 2033/2025 in RSA No. 598/2007
These applications have been filed for bringing on
rt
record the legal representatives of the sole appellant, Dhian
Chand, who has expired on 25.6.2025 leaving behind the legal
representatives, as mentioned in para 2 of the application(s).
Relevant death certificate has been appended with the
application(s) as Annexure A-1.
In view of the averments made in these
applications, which are duly supported by affidavit(s), the
present applications are allowed and the legal representatives,
as named in para 2 of the applications, are ordered to be
brought on record as appellants No. 1(a) to 1(d) in both appeals.
Amended memo of parties accompanying the applications are
taken on record.
The applications stand disposed of.
RSA Nos. 597/2007 & 598/2007
At the request of learned counsel for the
appellant(s), list for final hearing on 19.12.2025.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Ameshwar Singh (deceased) through his LRs vs. Nand Lal (deceased)
through LRs
.
RSA No. 605/2007
28.11.2025 Present: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellant(s).
Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for respondents
No. 3 and 4.
of
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
rt No. 9 to 11.
On the request of learned counsel for the
appellants, the case is adjourned.
List after three weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Baba Gurumukh Dass (deceased) through Lrs. vs. State of H.P.
RSA No. 77/2017
.
28.11.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. R. S. Verma, Addl. A.G. for respondent No.1.
of
On the request of learned counsel for the
appellant, list on 5.12.2025.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
28.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Rajinder Dinesh vs. Cantonment Board Sabathu
RSA No. 4331/2013
.
14.11.2025 Present: Mr. Trigun Singh Negi, Advocate, vice Ms.
Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, CGC, for the respondent.
CMP No. 25652/2025
of
This application has been filed by the respondent
for listing of the main appeal at an early date. For the
rt
reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed
and the appeal is ordered to be listed for final hearing in
the month of March 2026.
Application stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
14.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Balak Ram (deceased) through LRs. Vs. Paras
Ram
.
RSA No. 104/2014
14.11.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. G. R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
CMP No. 8291/2025
On the request of learned counsel for the parties,
rt
list after two weeks to enable them to place on record
material documents to substantiate their contentions
with respect to determination of the instant application.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
14.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Manish Thakur vs. Shanti Devi
RSA No. 116/2014
.
14.11.2025 Present: Mr. R. L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the
respondents.
CMP (M) Nos. 1450 & 1451/2025
of
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, has put in
appearance
rt for the proposed LRs No. 2(a) to 2(c). He
submits that the power of attorney on behalf of the said
legal representatives has been filed in the registry of the
Court. He stated that proposed LR 2(d), Shanti, has
expired. His statement is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks and is
granted two weeks’ time to take appropriate steps for
bringing on record the LRs of the said respondent.
List thereafter.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
14.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Mast Ram vs. Kewal Krishan Kumar
RSA No. 139/2014
.
14.11.2025 Present: Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents including
respondent No.1(a).
of
CMP (M) No. 317/2025
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, seeks and is
rt
granted two weeks’ time to file power of attorney on
behalf of respondent No.1(a).
List for consideration after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
14.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Deep Shikha vs. Jai Parkash
RSA No. 308/2014
.
14.11.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Vishwash Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents
No. 1 to 4.
Respondents No. 5 to 9 & 11 proceeded against
ex-parte.
Ms. Reetika Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Bhairav
of
Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
Ms. Divya Rajta, Advocate, vice Mr. Ashok K.
Tyagi, Advocate, for respondent No.12.
rt CMP (M) Nos. 1906/2025 & 1907/2025
By medium of CMP (M) No. 1907/2025, the
applicant has sought condonation of delay of 280 days in filing
CMP (M) No. 1906/2025, for bringing on record the legal
representatives of deceased respondent No.11.
For the reasons stated in CMP(M) No. 1907/2022,
more particularly in para 3 thereof, I find sufficient reason to
condone the aforesaid delay. Accordingly, delay in filing of
application for bringing on record the legal representatives of
respondent No.11 is condoned and abatement, if any, is set
aside. Consequently, taking into consideration the death
certificate and legal heirs certificate of the deceased respondent
No.11, Annexures P-1 & P-2 respectively, the legal
representatives of respondent No.11, as mentioned in para 4 of
CMP (M) No. 1906/2025 are ordered to be brought on record.
Amended memo of parties accompanying the application is
taken on record. Both applications stand disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
14.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Vikrant Singh vs. Guddo Devi
RSA No. 326/2014
.
14.11.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant
Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
List before another Bench at the pleasure of
Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
14.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Cantonment Board Kasauli vs. Rajesh Kapoor
CMP No. 2974/2020 in RSA No. 642/2008
.
14.11.2025 Present: Mr. Lokender Pal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel,
for the applicant.
Mr. Het Ram, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for respondent No.1/non-applicant.
CMP No. 26781/2025
of
The present application has been filed by the
appellant/applicant
rt for effecting service of respondent
No. 2 through substituted mode of service.
For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and the applicant is permitted to serve
the said respondent by means of publication in the
vernacular local newspaper i.e. Amar Ujala within six
weeks, on taking necessary steps and depositing the
publication charges within a period of one week from
today.
The application stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
14.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar vs. Alka Sood
RSA No. 67/2023
.
14.11.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.
1 to 4, 6,8, 10 and 11.
CMP No. 27029/2025
of
The present application has been filed by the
appellants/applicants for effecting service of respondents
rt
No. 5, 7 and 9 through substituted mode of service.
From the perusal of the record, it reveals that the
said respondents were earlier also served by means of
substituted service vide order dated 10.10.2023.
For the reasons stated in the application and
keeping in view the fact that earlier also respondents No.
5, 7 and 9 were served by substituted service, the
present application is allowed and the applicants are
permitted to serve the said respondents by means of
publication in the vernacular local newspaper i.e. Amar
Ujala, returnable within six weeks, on taking necessary
steps and depositing the publication charges within a
period of one week from today.
The application stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
14.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Shastra vs. Kimtu Devi along with connected matters
RSA No. 603/2015, C.S. No. 2/2023 & C.S. No. 10/2023
.
RSA No. 603/2015
14.11.2025 Present: Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay
Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
C.S. No. 2/2023
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay
Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
rt Mr. R. S. Verma, Addl. A.G. for the defendant-
State.
Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, for defendant
No.3.
C.S. No. 10/2023
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay
Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. R. S. Verma, Addl. A.G. for the defendant-
State.
Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, for defendants
No.4 and 5.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for the proposed
defendants.
Learned Additional Advocate General seeks and
is granted three weeks’ time, being last opportunity, to
file reply to CMP No. 17754/2023 in RSA No. 603/2015,
which has been filed by the respondent/applicant for
release of the use and occupation charges, within a
period of four weeks from today.
List thereafter.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
14.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Baba Gurumukh Dass (deceased) through LRs.
Vs. State of H.P.
.
RFA No. 77/2017
7.11.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Tamana Sharma & Ms. Sana Rana,
Advocates, for the appellant.
Mr. R. S. Verma, Addl. A.G. for respondent No.1.
of
At the request of learned Additional Advocate
General, list on 14.11.2025.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
7.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Muni Lal vs. Vikram Singh
.
RSA No. 61/2010
7.11.2025 Present: Mr. Pavinder, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh
Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
At the request of learned counsel for the
of
appellant, list on 21.11.2025.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
7.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Nanak Singh (deceased) through LRs
vs. Mast Ram (deceased) through LRs
.
RSA No. 258/2011
7.11.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Tamana Sharma & Ms. Sana Rana,
Advocates, for the appellant.
Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
of
Mr. Rajneesh K. Lal, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
rt Arguments heard. Judgement reserved.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
7.11.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Kuldeep Singh Thakur a/w
connected matter
.
RFA No. 3/2017 a/w RFA No. 397/2017
17.10.2025 Present: Mr. J. S. Guleria, Dy.A.G. for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent(s).
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
respondent(s), list after two weeks.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
17.10.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Lila Devi vs. Sarla Devi
.
RSA No. 244/2010
17.10.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the parties,
of
list on 31.10.2025.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
17.10.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
.
RSA No. 272/2012
17.10.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for respondent
No.10.
of
List before another Bench at the pleasure of
Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
17.10.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Dhani Ram vs. Bhago Devi
.
RSA No. 168/2014
17.10.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
None for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that
of
since the case has come up for hearing after elapse of
more than 11 years, therefore,
rt he wants to have
instructions in the matter to enquire about the status of
the parties as also to file power of attorney as the original
counsel has been designated as Senior Advocate.
List on 14.11.2025.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
17.10.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Kushal Chand vs. Kanchan Devi
.
RSA No. 90/2016
17.10.2025 Present: Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. C. N. Singh, Advocate, for respondents No. 1
and 2.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
of
appellant, list on 7.11.2025.
rt (Romesh Verma)
Judge
17.10.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Meena Kumari vs. Kranti Kumar
.
RSA No. 214/2017
17.10.2025 Present: Mr. Aman Hansretta, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek
Negi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. P. K. Verma, Advocate, vice K. B. Khajuria,
Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. J. S. Guleria, Dy.A.G. for respondent No.3-
State.
of
Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.
rt At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellant, list after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
17.10.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Hira Singh a/w connected matters
.
RFA No. 47/2019 a/w RFA Nos. 16, 17 and 48
of 2019
17.10.2025 Present: Mr. J. S. Guleria, Dy.A.G. for the appellant/State
in RFA Nos. 47/2019 and 48/2019 and for
respondent-State in RFA Nos. 16 and 17 of 2019.
respondent No.2-State.
Mr. K. S. Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Tek Chand,
of
Advocate, for the respondent(s) No. RFA No. 47 &
48/2019 and for the appellant(s) in RFA
Nos. 16 & 17/2019.
rt At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list on 14.11.2025.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
17.10.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Prema Devi
.
RFA No. 385/2017
17.10.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. H. R. Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev
Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. J. S. Guleria, Dy.A.G. for respondent No.2-
State.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for
respondent No.1, list on 14.11.2025.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
17.10.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Narain Singh vs. Raj Kumar
.
RSA No. 40/2019
10.10.2025 Present: None.
List before another Bench at the pleasure of
Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
of
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.10.2025
rt
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Yoginder Chand
.
RSA No. 454/2018 a/w 382/2018
10.10.2025 Present: Mr. I.N. Mehta, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. J. S.
Guleria, Dy.A.G. for the appellant(s).
Mr. H. C. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent
in RFA No. 454/2018.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent in
RFA No. 382/2018.
of
At the request of learned Deputy Advocate
General, list on 7.11.2025.
rt
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.10.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
Jalam Singh vs. Tarlochan Singh
.
RSA No. 369/2010
10.10.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Rathore, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP (M) No. 1720/2025
of
The present application has been filed under
Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in
rt
filing the application under Order 22 Rule 3 read with
Section 151 CPC on account of death of appellant No.1,
Jalam Singh, who has expired on 10.9.2022. The
respondents/non-applicants do not have any objection
in allowing the application.
Keeping in view the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the
same is allowed and the delay in filing the application
under Order 22 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC is
condoned and the abatement, if any, is set aside.
CMP (M) No. 1719/2025
The present application has been filed under
Order 22 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for bringing on
record the legal representatives of appellant No.1, Jalam
Singh, who has expired on 10.9.2022. Relevant death
certificate has been appended with the application as
Annexure A-1 and in para 2 names of the proposed LRs
have been mentioned.
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
In view of the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the
.
present application is allowed and the persons, named in
para 2 of the application, are ordered to be brought on record
as appellants No. 1(a) to 1(d). Amended memo of parties
accompanying the application is taken on record.
of
RSA No. 369/2010
Mr. Virender Rathore, Advocate, submits that
rt
the power of attorney on behalf of the newly added appellants
stands filed in the registry of the Court.
List in due course.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge
10.10.2025
(pankaj)
::: Downloaded on – 08/04/2026 20:33:28 :::CIS
