Madhya Pradesh High Court
Radhi Bai @ Radha Bai vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 July, 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:19146
1 MCRC-30184-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH
ON THE 16th OF JULY, 2026
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 30184 of 2026
RADHI BAI @ RADHA BAI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Appearance:
Shri Anendra Singh Parihar - Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Hemant Sharma - Government Advocate appearing on behalf of
Advocate General for State of M.P.
ORDER
Heard with the aid of case diary / challan papers.
2. This is first bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 for enlargement of the applicant on regular bail in connection with
crime No.159/2026 registered at Police Station Manpur, District Indore,
Mandsaur (M.P.) for offence punishable under Sections 74, 75(2), 76, 79,
82(2), 296(B), 115(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 67 and 67(A)
of I.T. Act. The applicant is in custody since 25.05.2026.
3. As per the prosecution case on 21/04/2026 at 7.51 PM the
complainant alleges that she was married with Ramesh since last eight nine
years. That, it is alleged that the husband of the complainant Ramesh has
married with another lady Gauri. That, it has also been alleged that on
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: BASANT KUMAR
SHRIVAS
Signing time: 16-07-2026
19:50:07
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:19146
2 MCRC-30184-2026
18/04/2021 at about 2 P.M the husband Ramesh, second wife Gauri and
mother in-law quarreled with complainant and torn her clothes and cut her
hairs. That, it is also alleged that the husband of complainant on 21/04/2026
has sent obscene video of the complainant to her brother. That, in the video it
is alleged that present applicant and second wife Gauri helped the husband
Ramesh cut her hairs and torn her clothes. That, applicant has been
implicated as an accused for offence under 43 section 74, 75(2), 76, 79,
82(2), 296(B), 115(2) 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS and section 67 and 67(A) IT
Act in Crime No.159/2026.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has
been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no possibility of his
absconding and there is no possibility of tampering with the witness. He has
no criminal past and has been in custody since 25.05.2026. Conclusion of
trial is likely to take sufficient time. Hence, he prays that the applicant
deserves to be enlarged on bail.
5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent/State opposes the
prayer for grant of bail.
6. On due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for
the parties and the fact that the applicant has no criminal past, this Court is
inclined to allow this application.
7. Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the
application is allowed. It is directed that applicant be released on bail upon his /
her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand
Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the
concerned court / JMFC for his / her regular appearance before the trial Court
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: BASANT KUMAR
SHRIVAS
Signing time: 16-07-2026
19:50:07
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:19146
3 MCRC-30184-2026
during trial with a condition that he / she shall remain present before the
concerned Court on all the dates fixed by it during trial. He / She shall abide by
all the conditions enumerated under Section 480 (3) of BNSS /Section 437 (3) of
Cr.P.C.
8. This order shall be effective till the end of the trial. However, in case of
bail jump and breach of any of the conditions of bail, it shall become ineffective.
Certified copy as per rules.
(GAJENDRA SINGH)
JUDGE
bks
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: BASANT KUMAR
SHRIVAS
Signing time: 16-07-2026
19:50:07
