Prashant Bansal Son Of Shri Shiv Dayal … vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 May, 2026

    0
    3
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

    Prashant Bansal Son Of Shri Shiv Dayal … vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 May, 2026

    [2026:RJ-JP:19836]
    
            HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                        BENCH AT JAIPUR
    
            S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7460/2022
    
    1.       Prashant Bansal Son Of Shri Shiv Dayal Gupta, Resident
             Of 65 Shiva Colony, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur.
    2.       Surendra Kumar Bansal Son Of Shri Prem Chand Bansal,
             Resident Of 47 Shripuram Colony, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur.
                                                                       ----Petitioners
                                        Versus
    1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
    2.       Kavita Pareek Wife Of Shri Radhakrishan Pareek, Aged
             About 46 Years, Resident Of 5-D-12, Second Floor,
             Government Multi Story Building, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur
             (Rajasthan).
                                                                     ----Respondents

    Connected With
    S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7256/2023
    Kavita Pareek W/o Radhakrishan Pareek, Aged About 51 Years,
    Resident Of 5-D-12, Second Floor, Multistory Flats, Gandhi
    Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

    —-Petitioner
    Versus
    State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

    SPONSORED
                                                                     ----Respondent
    
    
    For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg
                                    Mr. Ghanshyam Das Bansal
    For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav PP
                                    Ms. Chhaya Sharma for
                                    Mr. T.P. Singh Parmar
    
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
                                         Order
    
      1.   Arguments Concluded On:                                    30/04/2026
    
      2.   Judgment Reserved On:                                      30/04/2026
    
    

    3. Full Judgment/Operative Part Pronounced: Full Judgment

    4. Pronounced On: 15.05.2026

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (2 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    ,dyihB fofo/k vkijkf/kd ;kfpdk la[;k 7460@2022 o ,dyihB
    vkijkf/kd fofo/k ;kfpdk la[;k 7256@2023 ,d&nwljs ls lacaf/kr gksus
    vkSj muesa leku i{kdkj gksus ds dkj.k ls nksuksa ;kfpdkvksa dks ,d lkFk
    bl vkns’k esa fu.khZr fd;k tkuk U;k;laxr mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
    vkijkf/kd fofo/k ;kfpdk la[;k 7460@2022 esa ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDr.k
    us izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 dfork ikfjd }kjk ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) ntZ
    izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 240@2019 iqfyl Fkkuk izrkiuxj t;iqj flVh]
    iwoZ dks ;kfpdk esa vafdr vk/kkjksa ij vikLr djus gsrq izLrqr dh gSA
    ;kfpdk la[;k 7256@2023 ;kph@ifjokfn;k dfork ikfjd }kjk
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 240@2019
    iqfyl Fkkuk izrkiuxj ftyk t;iqj flVh ¼iwoZ½ us fof/kuqlkj Lora= o
    fu”i{k vuqla/kku djus ds fy, lhch&lhvkbZMh ds }kjk fd, tkus gsrq
    ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
    ;kfpdk la[;k 7460@2022 ds ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k iz’kkar caly
    vkSj lqjsUnz dqekj caly ds fo}ku vfHkHkk”kd dk cgl ds nkSjku ;g rdZ
    jgk gS fd izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 dfork ikfjd us ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds
    fo#) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 240@2019 iqfyl Fkkuk izrkiuxj t;iqj]
    flVh] iwoZ esa ntZ djkbZ Fkh] ftlesas izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 us
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk vU; O;fDr;ksa dks vkjksfir djrs gq, bl
    vk’k; dh fjiksVZ ntZ djkbZ fd ifjokfn;k vfHk;qDr la[;k 1 dks vius
    iqjkus ?kj dk iM+kslh gksus ds ukrs fiNys 15 o”kZ ls tkurh gSA vfHk;qDrx.k
    ifjokfn;k ds xka/khuxj fLFkr irs ij mlds ifr dks C;kt ij fn;s #i;s
    okfil ysus ds] ifjokfn;k o mlds ifr ds ikl #i;ksa dh O;oLFkk ugha
    gksus ds dkj.k ls rFkk ifjokfn;k ds ljdkjh deZpkjh gksus ds dkj.k ls
    vfHk;qDr la[;k 2 us ifjokfn;k ls 2 pSd dze’k% 992283] 992284 o jde
    dze’k% 10]00]000@&#i, vkSj 100 #i, ds flD;ksfjVh isVs izkIr fd, vkSj
    ifjokfn;k ds IykWV la[;k 44 ‘;ke fogkj dkWyksuh ‘;ksiqj] gYnh?kkVh ekxZ]
    izrkiuxj] t;iqj dks 10]00]000@&#i, dh lkbZ isVs fodz; djokus
    dh ,d fy[kkoV nh vkSj ifjokfn;k ls [kkyh LVkai ij vfHk;qDrx.k us
    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (3 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    gLrk{kj djok fy, vkSj mlds ifr ls Hkh 10&12 fjDr pSd ij rFkk [kkyh
    LVkai o ikbZ isij ij gLrk{kj djok fy,A uksVcanh ds ckn #i, ugha gksus
    ds dkj.k ls tc ifjokfn;k ds ifr }kjk #i, ykSVk, ugha x, rks
    vfHk;qDrx.k us ifjokfn;k }kjk fn;k x;k 10]00]000@&#i, dk pSd
    dzekafdr 992283 dks vius cSad esa yxkdj vuknfjr djok fy;k vkSj pSd
    vuknj.k dh dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh vkSj ekg] tqykbZ] 2018 esa vfHk;qDrx.k
    us ifjokfn;k ds ?kj dk rkyk rksM+dj dCtk dj fy;k vkSj QthZ nLrkostksa
    ds vk/kkj ij izrkiuxj fLFkr IykWV ij fctyh foHkkx ds deZpkfj;ksa ls
    feyhHkxr djds Lo;a ds uke ls fctyh dk dusD’ku ys fy;k vkSj
    vfHk;qDrx.k us ifjokfn;k ds f[kykQ ekuljksoj Fkkus esa IykWV dh jftLVªh
    muds uke ugha djkus dh >wBh ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- Hkh fy[kok nhA tcfd
    ifjokfn;k us vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk mDr IykWV dks cspus dk dksbZ bdjkj
    ugha fd;k] u gh dksbZ LVkai dz; fd;k] bR;kfn fjiksVZ ij iqfyl }kjk /kkjk
    420] 406] 467] 468] 380 ,oa 120ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa vUos”k.k dj
    vafre fjiksVZ la[;k 83@2019 vne odw flfoy uspj esa izLrqr dhA
    rRi’pkr vij flfoy U;k;k/kh’k ,oa egkuxj eftLVªsV dze la[;k 2
    t;iqj] egkuxj ds vkns’k fnukad 18-02-2020 ls iqu% iqfyl us vuqla/kku
    dj vafre fjiksVZ U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dhA iqfyl us ;g ekuk fd ifjokfn;k
    us oknxzLr IykWV ds laca/k esa bdjkjukek ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDr.k ds i{k esa
    fu”ikfnr fd;k gS rFkk ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk bdjkukek] jlhn o vU;
    dksbZ nLrkost QthZ ugha crk;k gSA vUos”k.k ds nkSjku fooknjfgr nLrkostksa
    dks fookfnr gLrk{kjksa ls ,Q,l,y ijh{k.k gsrq fHktok;k x;kA fof/k foKku
    iz;ksx’kkyk dh fjiksVZ esa Hkh ifjokfn;k }kjk nLrkost vkSj jlhn fu”ikfnr
    fd;k tkuk crk;k x;k gSA ftl ij vuqla/kku dj Fkkukf/kdkjh iqfyl Fkkuk
    izrki uxj iwoZ us iqu% vafre fjiksVZ la[;k 67@2024 vne odw vne >wB
    ¼frrEck½ esa izLrqr dhA

    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk”kd dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS
    fd oLrqr% izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 dfork ikfjd }kjk vkijkf/kd d`R; fd;k x;k
    gS vkSj mlds }kjk oknxzLr IykWV dk bdjkjukek fu”ikfnr djus ij

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (4 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    15]50]000@& #i, oknxzLr IykWV dh cspku jkf’k ds :i esa ysus ij rFkk
    IykWV dk vkf/kiR; ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks nsus ij Hkh mlds }kjk fodz;
    i= fu”ikfnr ugha djk x;kA izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 dfork ikfjd us fodz; i=
    fu”ikfnr djus esa csbZekuh djhA laiw.kZ izfrQy jkf’k izkIr djus ds
    ckotwn ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds i{k esa jftLVªh ugha djus ds dkj.k vkSj
    jftLVªh dk lkjk [kpkZ ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds }kjk ogu djus ds fy,
    rS;kj o rRij jgus ds ckotwn ifjokfn;k la[;k 2 dfork ikfjd us
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDr.k ds i{k esa oknxzLr IykWV dh jftLVªh ugha djkbZ] ftl
    ij ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k us izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 ifjokfn;k dfork ikfjd ds
    fo#) izFke lwpuk la[;k 671@2018 iqfyl Fkkuk ekuljksoj esa izLrqr dhA
    izR;FkhZ la[;k 2@ifjokfn;k dfork ikfjd }kjk oknxzLr IykWV dh
    jftLVªh ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDr.k ds i{k esa ugha djkus ij
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDr.k us izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 dfork ikfjd ds fo#) fo}ku
    vij ftyk U;k;k/kh’k dze la[;k 19 t;iqj egkuxj] t;iqj ds le{k
    fof’k”V vuqikyuk bdjkjukek fnukad 07-10-2015 o LFkk;h fu”ks/kkKk dk
    okn izLrqr fd;k Fkk] tks orZeku esa U;k;ky; ds le{k yafcr gSA
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k us ;g okn fnukad 26-02-2019 dks izLrqr fd;k vkSj
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk okn izLrqr fd, tkus ds i’pkr lksp&le>dj
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ij ncko cukus ds fy, dk;Zokgh dh tk jgh gSA
    ;kphx.k ds }kjk okn izLrqr djus ds i’pkr izR;FkhZ la[;k 2@ifjokfn;k
    }kjk ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) fnukad 28-02-2019 dks ;g izFke
    lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 240@2019 >wBh ntZ djkbZ xbZ gS] ftlesa iqfyl us Hkh
    vafre fjiksVZ esa izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 }kjk ;kphx.k ds fo#) >wBh fjiksVZ ntZ
    fd;k tkuk ekuk gSA fof/k foKku iz;ksx’kkyk dh fjiksVZ esa Hkh ;g lkeus
    vk;k gS fd izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 dfork ikfjd us oknxzLr IykWV fodz; djus ds
    laca/k esa bdjkjukek vkSj jlhn vkSj vU; nLrkost ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k
    ds i{k esa fu”ikfnr fd, Fks rFkk ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k us dksbZ QthZ
    bdjkukek vkSj LVkai fu”ikfnr ugha fd;k gSA izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 ifjokfn;k us
    flfoy izdj.k dks vkijkf/kd jax nsus ds fy, fcuk fdlh U;k;laxr mfpr
    vk/kkj ds izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) ntZ djk nh
    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (5 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    gS ftlesa 2 ckj iqfyl us vuqla/kku fd;k gS rFkk nksuksa ckj iqfyl us vafre
    fjiksVZ izLrqr dhA vr% ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ
    la[;k 240@2019 iqfyl Fkkuk izrkiuxj t;iqj flVh ¼iwoZ½ rFkk mlls
    mn~Hkwr vU; vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks tkjh j[kuk] U;k; ds mn~ns’; dks
    foQy djus vkSj U;k; dh izfdz;k dk nq#i;ksx djus ds leku gSA bl
    laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; vkSj ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;
    us Hkh dbZ fofu’p;ksa esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd tgka nksuksa i{kksa esa
    flfoy izd`fr dk ekeyk yafcr gks vkSj flfoy izd`fr ds ekeys dks
    vkijkf/kd jax fn;k x;k gks rks ,slh fLFkfr esa /kkjk 482 naM izfdz;k lafgrk
    ds varxZr varfuZfgr ‘kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, U;k;ky; ds }kjk izFke
    lwpuk fjiksVZ vkSj mlls mn~Hkwr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks vikLr fd;k tkuk
    pkfg,A

    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk”kd dk cgl ds nkSjku ;g
    Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd iqfyl us ;kphx.k ds fo#) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa nks
    ckj vuqla/kku fd;k gS vkSj nksuksa ckj vuqla/kku esa iqfyl us
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) dksbZ vkijkf/kd d`R; fd, tkus ds rF;
    ugha ik, gSaA fof/k foKku iz;ksx’kkyk dh fjiksVZ esa Hkh
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk dksbZ vkijkf/kd d`R; fd;k tkuk ugha crk;k
    x;k gS ,slh fLFkfr esa ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) Lora= vkSj fu”i{k
    vuqla/kku djus ds fy, izR;FkhZ la[;k 2@ifjokfn;k }kjk tks ;kfpdk
    izLrqr dh xbZ gS mDr ;kfpdk dks vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkos
    rFkk ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk izLrqr ;kfpdk dks Lohdkj fd;k tkdj
    muds fo#) ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ vkSj mlls mn~Hkwr dk;Zokgh dks fujLr
    fd;k tkosA
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk”kd us vius rdksZa ds leFkZu
    esa fuEu fofu’p; izLrqr fd, gSa%&
    1: “Sarabjit Kaur Vs State of Punjab & Anr.” Criminal Appeal

    No. 581 of 2023 order dated: 01.03.2023

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (6 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    2: “Usha Chakraborty & Anr. Vs State of West Bengal &

    Anr.” SLP (Crl.) 5866 of 2022 order dated: 30.01.2023

    3: “Mahmood Ali & Ors. Vs State of U.P. & Ors.” SLP (Crl.)

    12459 of 2022 order dated: 08.08.2023

    4: “Pradeep Kumar & Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors.” S.B

    Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1635/2022 order dated:

    18.05.2022

    5: “Narendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors.” S.B.

    Criminal Writ Petition No. 262/2019 Order dated: 02.08.2022

    6: “R. Nagender Yadav Vs The State of Telangana” SLP (Crl)

    No. 004629-/2021 Order dated: 15.12.2022

    ;kfpdk la[;k 7256@2023 dh ;kph@ifjokfn;k dfork ikfjd ds
    fo}ku vfHkHkk”kd dk cgl ds nkSjku ;g rdZ jgk gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k us
    ;kph@ifjokfn;k ds ifr dks C;kt ij #i, m/kkj fn, Fks vkSj dksfoM dh
    ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa C;kt ij #i, fn, tkus esa vleFkZrk gksus ds dkj.k ls
    vfHk;qDrx.k us QthZ bdjkjukek rS;kj dj fy;k [kkyh LVkai ij vkSj pSd
    ij ifjokfn;k vkSj mlds ifr ds gLrk{kj djok fy,A iqfyl us
    vfHk;qDrx.k ls feydj mlds }kjk ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k
    240@2019 iqfyl Fkkuk izrkiuxj t;iqj] flVh iwoZ esa vafre fjiksVZ izLrqr
    dj nhA ifjokfn;k us bl laca/k esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izkFkZuk i=
    izLrqr fd;k] ftl ij fo}ku vij flfoy U;k;k/kh’k dze la[;k 30 t;iqj
    egkuxj us fnukad 18-02-2020 dks vkns’k ikfjr dj Fkkukf/kdkjh iqfyl
    Fkkuk izrkiuxj t;iqj dks izdj.k esa vfxze vuqla/kku dj viuh fjiksVZ
    U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd, tkus gsrq vknsf’kr fd;k] mlds ckotwn iqfyl }kjk
    dksbZ vulqa/kku ugha fd;k x;k] ftl ij ;kph@ifjokfn;k }kjk fo}ku
    fopkj.k U;k;ky; ls fuosnu fd;k x;k vkSj l{ke U;k;ky; ds le{k
    Fkkukf/kdkjh o vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh ds fo#) voekuuk ;kfpdk izLrqr dh
    rFkk /kkjk 210 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr izkFkZuk i= Hkh izLrqr fd;kA

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (7 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    U;k;ky; us dbZ ckj iqfyl ls fjiksVZ Hkh eaxokbZ] ysfdu iqfyl }kjk dksbZ
    dk;Zokgh ugha dh xbZA iqfyl vfHk;qDrx.k ls feydj u rks dksbZ dk;Zokgh
    dj jgh gS vkSj u gh fu”i{k vkSj Lora= vuqla/kku ugha dj jgh gSA ,slh
    fLFkfr esa izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks lhch&lhvkbZMh esa Lora= vkSj fu”i{k
    vuqla/kku ds fy, varfjr fd;k tkos rFkk vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) vkjksfir
    vijk/k izFken`”V~;k cuuk ik, tkus ds dkj.k ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds
    }kjk izLrqr ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 482 naM izfdz;k lafgrk vLohdkj dj
    [kkfjt dh tkosA
    nksuksa ;kfpdkvksa ij mHk;i{kksa dks lquk x;k rFkk i=koyh dk
    voyksdu fd;k x;kA

    ;kph@ifjokfn;k dfork ikfjd ds }kjk ;kfpdk la[;k 7460@2022
    esa vafdr ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDr.k ds fo#) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k
    240@2019 iqfyl Fkkuk izrkiuxj t;iqj flVh] iwoZ esa ntZ djkbZ xbZ gSA
    mDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ij iqfyl us vuqla/kku dj ;g ik;k fd oknxzLr
    IykWV ds fodz; dk bdjkjukek ifjokfn;k Jherh dfork ikfjd us fnukad
    07-10-2015 dks vfHk;qDrx.k ds i{k esa fu”ikfnr fd;k FkkA bdjkjukek
    fnukad 07-10-2015 esa vafdr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij bdjkukes esa vafdr IykWV
    dk 15 yk[k 50 gtkj #i, esa ifjokfn;k dfork ikfjd us vfHk;qDrx.k dks
    fodz; dj laiw.kZ izfrQy jkf’k izkIr dj yh vkSj dCtk vfHk;qDrx.k dks ns
    fn;k vkSj vfHk;qDr.k }kjk pkgs tkus ij iathd`r fodz; i= fu”ikfnr djus
    ls budkj dj fn;kA mDr bdjkjukek fnukad 07-10-2015 dks mlds lkFk
    jlhn fnukad 08-10-2015] iqfyl us fof/k foKku iz;ksx’kkyk esa ijh{k.k ds
    fy, HkstkA ftl ij fof/k foKku iz;ksx’kkyk dh fjiksVZ esa ;g rF; vk;k
    fd bdjkjukek vkSj jlhn ij ifjokfn;k ds gLrk{kj gSa vkSj mDr
    bdjkjukek vkSj jlhn dwVjfpr ugha gSaA mDr bdjkjukek ds uksVsjh ifCyd
    Jh ?ku’;ke flag ds Hkh iqfyl us c;ku fy,A ftlesa nksuksa i{kksa dk mlds
    le{k mifLFkr gksus vkSj nksuksa i{kksa dh QksVks yxh gksuk] uksVsjh ifCyd dh

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (8 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    lhy eksgj yxk gksuk Hkh ik;k vkSj ;g ik;k fd bdjkjukek fnukad
    07-07-2015 vfHk;qDrx.k ds i{k esa fu”ikfnr gksus vkSj mudk dCtk gksus ds
    vk/kkj ij vfHk;qDrx.k us fo|qr dusD’ku izkIr fd;k gS vkSj muds }kjk
    dksbZ vkijkf/kd d`R; ugha fd;k x;k gSA fof/k foKku iz;ksx’kkyk dh fjiksVZ
    esa Hkh nLrkost dwVjfpr gksuk ugha ik;k x;kA ml ij iqfyl us vafre
    fjiksVZ la[;k 83@2019 vne odw flfoy uspj esa izLrqr dhA rRi’pkr
    fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns’k ls izdj.k iqu% vuqla/kku ds fy,
    vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh dks Hkstk x;kA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns’k ls
    iqfyl us iqu% izdj.k esa vuqla/kku fd;k vkSj vafre fjiksVZ la[;k 67@2024
    vne odw vne >wB frrEck esa ikbZ xbZ vkSj ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk
    dksbZ vkijkf/kd d`R; fd;k tkuk ugha ik;k x;kA ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k us
    ifjokfn;k dfork ikfjd ds fo#) ,d izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k
    671@2018 iqfyl Fkkuk ekuljksoj t;iqj flVh] nf{k.k esa izLrqr dh] mlesa
    Hkh iqfyl us vafre fjiksVZ la[;k 372@2018 vne odw flfoy uspj esa
    izLrqr dh gSA ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;ky; dze
    la[;k 19 t;iqj egkuxj] t;iqj esa izLrqr okn ckcr fof’k”V vuqikyuk
    bdjkjukek fnukad 07-10-2015 o LFkk;h fu”ks/kkKk dk okn izLrqr fd;k x;k
    rFkk mDr okn fnukad 26-02-2019 dks fo}ku vfrfjDr ftyk U;k;ky; esa
    lafLFkr fd;k x;kA mDr okn U;k;ky; esa lafLFkr gksus ds i’pkr
    ifjokfn;k us izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 240@2019 iqfyl Fkkuk izrkiuxj
    t;iqj flVh] iwoZ esa ntZ djkbZ gSA vuqla/kku ds nkSjku tqVkbZ xbZ lk{;]
    lk{khx.k ds /kkjk 161 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds c;ku] fof/k foKku iz;ksx’kkyk
    dh fjiksVZ] bdjkjukek vkSj jlhn vkSj leLr nLrkost ds voyksdu ls ;g
    Li”V ugha gksrk gS fd ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k us ifjokfn;k ds IykWV la[;k
    44 ‘;ke fogkj dkWyksuh] ‘;ksiqj] gYnh?kkVh ekxZ izrkiuxj dk >wBk uqekb’kh
    QthZ bdjkjukek rS;kj dj ifjokfn;k ds IykWV dks gM+idj mDr IykWV esa
    j[ks lkeku dks pksjh dj ifjokfn;k dks lnks”k gkfu ;k Loa; dks lnks”k ykHk
    igqapk;k gksA ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (9 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    240@2019 esa vafdr Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 420] 406] 467] 468]
    380 vkSj 120ch dk vijk/k izFke n`”V~;k cuuk ugha ik;k tkrk gSA
    bdjkjukek fnukad 07-10-2015 ds fofufnZ”V vuqikyuk vkSj fu”ks/kkKk dk
    okn ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k us ifjokfn;k ds fo#) izLrqr dj j[kk gS] tks
    l{ke U;k;ky; ds le{k fopkjk/khu gSA nksuksa i{kksa ds e/; flfoy izd`fr
    dk fookn gS] tks l{ke U;k;ky; esa yafcr gksus ds dkj.k ls
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ] mls vkijkf/kd jax
    nsus ds mn~ns’; ls izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
    bl çdj.k ls lEcafèkr fofu’p;ksa ds lqlaxr Hkkx dks ;gk¡ m)`r
    djuk U;k;ksfpr çrhr gksrk gSA
    ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fofu’p; “Sarabjit Kaur
    Vs State of Punjab & Anr.” Criminal Appeal No. 581 of 2023

    order dated: 01.03.2023 ds iSjk Øekad 12 o 13 dks ;gk¡ mYysf[kr
    djuk U;k;ksfpr çrhr gksrk gS;

    “12. There is nothing on record to suggest that any notice was
    issued by the respondent No.2 or the vendee to the appellant to
    get the sale deed registered just either before expiry of the last
    date fixed for executed of sale deed or immediately thereafter.
    No civil proceedings were also initiate rather the respondent
    No.2 proceeded only by filing complaints with the police two of
    which were earlier filed. Had there been any civil proceedings
    initiated, the question of readiness and willingness of the vendee
    is also an aspect to be examined by the Court. 13. A breach of
    contract does not give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating
    unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the
    beginning of the transaction. Merely on the allegation of failure
    to keep up promise will not be enough to initiate criminal
    proceedings. From the facts available on record, it is evident
    that the respondent No.2 had improved his case ever since the
    first complaint was filed in which there were no allegations
    against the appellant rather it was only against the property
    dealers which was in subsequent complaints that the name of the
    appellant was mentioned. On the first complaint, the only
    request was for return of the amount paid by the respondent
    No.2. When the offence was made out on the basis of the first
    complaint, the second complaint was filed with improved version
    making allegations against the appellant as well which was not
    there in the earlier complaint. The entire idea seems to be to
    convert a civil dispute into criminal and put pressure on the
    appellant for return of the amount allegedly paid. The criminal
    Courts are not meant to be used for settling scores or pressurise
    parties to settle civil disputes. Wherever ingredients of criminal

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (10 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    offences are made out, criminal courts have to take cognizance.
    The complaint in question on the basis of which F.I.R. was
    registered was filed nearly three years after the last date fixed
    for registration of the sale deed. Allowing the proceedings to
    continue would be an abuse of process of the Court”.

    blh Øe esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fofu’p; “Usha
    Chakraborty & Anr. Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.” SLP

    (Crl.) 5866 of 2022 order dated: 30.01.2023 ds iSjk Øekad 10 o 11

    dks ;gk¡ mYysf[kr djuk U;k;ksfpr çrhr gksrk gS;

    “10. By non-disclosure the respondent has, in troth, concealed
    the existence of a pending civil suit between him and the
    appellants herein before a competent civil court which obviously
    is the causative incident for the respondent’s allegation of
    perpetration of the aforesaid offences against the appellants. We
    will deal with it further and also its impact a little later. There
    cannot be any doubt with respect to the position that in order to
    cause registration of an F.I.R. and consequential investigation
    based on the same the petition filed under Section 156(3),
    Cr.P.C., must satisfy the essential ingredients to attract the
    alleged offences. In other words, if such allegations in the
    petition are vague and are not specific with respect to the alleged
    offences it cannot lead to an order for registration of an F.I.R.
    and investigation on the accusation of commission of the offences
    alleged. As noticed hereinbefore, the respondent alleged
    commission of offences under Sections 323, 384, 406, 423, 467,
    468, 420 and 120B, IPC against the appellants. A bare perusal of
    the said allegation and the ingredients to attract them, as
    adverted to hereinbefore would reveal that the allegations are
    vague and they did not carry the essential ingredients to
    constitute the alleged offences. There is absolutely no allegation
    in the complaint that the appellants herein had caused hurt on
    the respondent so also, they did not reveal a case that the
    appellants had intentionally put the respondent in fear of injury
    either to himself or another or by putting him under such fear or
    injury, dishonestly induced him to deliver any property or
    valuable security. The same is the position with respect to the
    alleged offences punishable under Sections 406, 423, 467, 468,
    420 and 120 B, IPC. The ingredients to attract the alleged
    offence referred to hereinbefore and the nature of the allegations
    contained in the application filed by the respondent would
    undoubtedly make it clear that the respondent had failed to make
    specific allegation against the appellants herein in respect of the
    aforesaid offences. The factual position thus would reveal that
    the genesis as also the purpose of criminal proceedings are
    nothing but the aforesaid incident and further that the dispute
    involved is essentially of civil nature. The appellants and the
    respondents have given a cloak of criminal offence in the issue.
    In such circumstance when the respondent had already resorted
    to the available civil remedy and it is pending, going by the
    decision in Paramjit Batra (supra), the High Court would have

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (11 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    quashed the criminal proceedings to prevent the abuse of the
    process of the Court but for the concealment.

    11. In the aforesaid circumstances, coupled with the fact that in
    respect of the issue involved, which is of civil nature, the
    respondent had already approached the jurisdictional civil court
    by instituting a civil suit and it is pending, there can be no doubt
    with respect to the fact that the attempt on the part of the
    respondent is to use the criminal proceedings as weapon of
    harassment against the appellants. The indisputable facts that
    the respondent has filed the pending title suit in the year 2015, he
    got no case that he obtained an interim relief against his removal
    from the office of Secretary of the School Managing Committee
    as also the trusteeship, that he filed the stated application for an
    order for investigation only in April, 2017 together with absence
    of a case that despite such removal he got a right to get informed
    of the affairs of the school and also the trust, would only support
    the said conclusion. For all these reasons, we are of the
    considered view that this case invites invocation of the power
    under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR registered based on
    the direction of the Magistrate Court in the afore-stated
    application and all further proceeding in pursuance thereof.
    Also, we have no hesitation to hold that permitting continuance
    of the criminal proceedings against the appellants in the
    aforesaid circumstances would result in abuse of the process of
    Court and also in miscarriage of justice”.

    ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fofu’p; “Sarabjit Kaur Vs
    State of Punjab & Anr.” Criminal Appeal No. 581 of 2023 order

    dated: 01.03.2023 ds iSjk Øekad 12 o 13 dks ;gk¡ mYysf[kr djuk
    U;k;ksfpr çrhr gksrk gS;

    “12. At this stage, we would like to observe something important.
    Whenever an accused comes before the Court invoking either the
    inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
    Procedure (CrPC) or extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226
    of the Constitution to get the FIR or the criminal proceedings
    quashed essentially on the ground that such proceedings are
    manifestly frivolous or vexatious or instituted with the ulterior
    motive for wreaking vengeance, then in such circumstances the
    Court owes a duty to look into the FIR with care and a little more
    closely. We say so because once the complainant decides to
    proceed against the accused with an ulterior motive for wreaking
    personal vengeance, etc., then he would ensure that the
    FIR/complaint is very well drafted with all the necessary
    pleadings. The complainant would ensure that the averments
    made in the FIR/complaint are such that they disclose the
    necessary ingredients to constitute the alleged offence. Therefore,
    it will not be just enough for the Court to look into the averments
    made in the FIR/complaint alone for the purpose of ascertaining
    whether the necessary ingredients to constitute the alleged
    offence are disclosed or not. In frivolous or vexatious
    proceedings, the Court owes a duty to look into many other
    attending circumstances emerging from the record of the case
    over and above the averments and, if need be, with due care and

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (12 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    circumspection try to read in between the lines. The Court while
    exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the CrPC or
    Article 226 of the Constitution need not restrict itself only to the
    stage of a case but is empowered to take into account the overall
    circumstances leading to the initiation/registration of the case as
    well as the materials collected in the course of investigation. Take
    for instance the case on hand. Multiple FIRs have been registered
    over a period of time. It is in the background of such
    circumstances the registration of multiple FIRs assumes
    importance, thereby attracting the issue of wreaking vengeance
    out of private or personal grudge as alleged. 13. In State of
    Andhra Pradesh v. Golconda Linga Swamy
    , (2004) 6 SCC 522, a
    two-Judge Bench of this Court elaborated on the types of
    materials the High Court can assess to quash an FIR. The Court
    drew a fine distinction between consideration of materials that
    were tendered as evidence and appreciation of such evidence.
    Only such material that manifestly fails to prove the accusation in
    the FIR can be considered for quashing an FIR. The Court held:-

    “5. …Authority of the court exists for advancement of justice and
    if any attempt is made to abuse that authority so as to produce
    injustice, the court has power to prevent such abuse. It would be
    an abuse of the process of the court to allow any action which
    would result in injustice and prevent promotion of justice. In
    exercise of the powers court would be justified to quash any
    proceeding if it finds that initiation or continuance of it amounts
    to abuse of the process of court or quashing of these proceedings
    would otherwise serve the ends of justice. When no offence is
    disclosed by the complaint, the court may examine the question of
    fact. When a complaint is sought to be quashed, it is permissible
    to look into the materials to assess what the complainant has
    alleged and whether any offence is made out even if the
    allegations are accepted in toto.

    6. In R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866 : 1960 Cri
    LJ 1239, this Court summarised some categories of cases where
    inherent power can and should be exercised to quash the
    proceedings : (AIR p. 869, para 6) (i) where it manifestly appears
    that there is a legal bar against the institution or continuance e.g.
    want of sanction; (ii) where the allegations in the first
    information report or complaint taken at its face value and
    accepted in their entirety do not constitute the offence alleged;

    (iii) where the allegations constitute an offence, but there is no
    legal evidence adduced or the evidence adduced clearly or
    manifestly fails to prove the charge.

    7. In dealing with the last category, it is important to bear in mind
    the distinction between a case where there is no legal evidence or
    where there is evidence which is clearly inconsistent with the
    accusations made, and a case where there is legal evidence
    which, on appreciation, may or may not support the accusations.
    When exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code, the
    High Court would not ordinarily embark upon an enquiry
    whether the evidence in question is reliable or not or whether on
    a reasonable appreciation of it accusation would not be
    sustained. That is the function of the trial Judge. Judicial process,
    no doubt should not be an instrument of oppression, or, needless
    harassment. Court should be circumspect and judicious in
    exercising discretion and should take all relevant facts and

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (13 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    circumstances into consideration before issuing process, lest it
    would be an instrument in the hands of a private complainant to
    unleash vendetta to harass any person needlessly. At the same
    time the section is not an instrument handed over to an accused to
    short-circuit a prosecution and bring about its sudden death…..”
    (Emphasis supplied)”.

    bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB ds }kjk ikfjr fofu’p; “Pradeep
    Kumar & Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors.” S.B Criminal

    Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1635/2022 order dated: 18.05.2022 ds

    iSjk Øekad 8 dks ;gk¡ mYysf[kr djuk U;k;ksfpr çrhr gksrk gS;

    “8. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and
    considering the material on record, this Court is of the
    prima facie view that real dispute between the parties is
    of civil nature which cannot be adjudicated by a criminal
    court, hence the attempt of the complainant to get the
    civil dispute resolved by resorting to invoking jurisdiction
    of a criminal court amounts to abuse of the process of the
    Court. In Murari Lal Gupta’s case (supra), identical issue
    was there before the Court as to whether the facts of
    breach of an agreement to sell property makes out a case
    of fraudulent intention. Like, Murari Lal’s case (supra), it
    is not the case of the respondent herein that the
    petitioners do not have the property or the petitioners
    were not competent to enter into an agreement to sale the
    said property or could not have transferred the title to the
    respondent. Merely because the petitioners failed to
    honour the agreement, it cannot be said that the
    petitioners had cheated to the respondent. Moreover, it
    was known to the complainant, the intervening
    circumstances of pendency of writ petition before the
    High Court for deciding revenue claim of the same
    property and pendency of the mutation matter. The
    complainant was aware of the legal notices sent to him by
    the petitioners through registered post disclosing details
    of the developments of the pending matter but respondent
    No.2 did not choose to send a reply and kept mumtill
    petitioners sold some of the property which was subject
    matter of agreement to some other person after expiry of
    period of six months as agreed in the agreement.
    Therefore, no ingredient of offence alleged under Section
    420
    IPC is made out. There is no case of the prosecution
    that any document was forged by the petitioner. Forgery
    is defined under Section 463 IPC which includes making
    of false document as defined under Section 464IPC and
    use of that forged document punishable under Section471
    IPC. There is no averment at all that the petitioners were
    involved in making any false document or used the said
    forged document as genuine document. Therefore, offence
    under Sections 468, 469, 471 and 120-B IPC are also
    not made out. The complainant had separately entered
    into an agreement with all the petitioners knowing the
    fact well that the petitioners have transferable right in the

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (14 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    property, the legal notices sent by the petitioners
    separately through registered post to the complainant
    shows that they were always willing and ready to perform
    their part of the agreement. Thus, totality of the material
    available on record discloses the ingredients of none of
    offences for which the FIR was registered, therefore, the
    FIR is not sustainable, for this reason also”.

    ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fofu’p; “”R. Nagender
    Yadav Vs The State of Telangana & Anr.” SLP (Crl) No. 4629 of

    2021 Order dated: 15.12.2022 ds iSjk Øekad 18 dks ;gk¡ mYysf[kr
    djuk U;k;ksfpr çrhr gksrk gS;

    “18. We therefore allow this appeal, set aside the
    impugned order of the High Court and quash the criminal
    proceedings of Criminal Complaint No. 1029 of 2015. We
    clarify that this will not come in the way of instituting
    appropriate proceedings in future in case the Civil Court
    comes to the conclusion that the disputed sale deed dated
    29.12.2010 is forged. We refrain ourselves from
    expressing any opinion as regards the genuineness or
    otherwise of the sale deed in question as this question is
    wide open before the Civil Court. The Civil Court shall
    decide the civil suit pending between the parties on its
    own merits and on the basis of the evidence that may be
    led by both the sides. It shall be open to the Civil Court to
    take the opinion of the hand writing expert as regards the
    signature of the complainant on the disputed sale deed”.

    ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fofu’p; “State of Haryana
    Vs Bhajan Lal
    ” (1992 Supp (1) SCC 335) ds iSjk Øekad 102
    dks ;gk¡ mYysf[kr djuk U;k;ksfpr çrhr gksrk gS;

    “102. In the backdrop of the interpretation of the various
    relevant provisions of the Code under Chapter XIV and of
    the principles of law enunciated by this Court in a series
    of decisions relating to the exercise of the extraordinary
    power under Article 226 or the inherent powers under
    Section 482 of the Code which we have extracted and
    reproduced above, we have given the following
    categories of cases by way of illustration wherein such
    power could be exercised either to prevent abuse of the
    process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of
    justice, though it may not be possible to lay down any
    precise, clearly defined and sufficiently channelised and
    inflexible guidelines or rigid formulae and to give an
    exhaustive list of myriad kinds of cases wherein such
    power should be exercised.

    (1) Where the allegations made in the first information
    report or the complaint, even if they are taken at their
    face value and accepted in their entirety do not prima

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (15 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    facie constitute any offence or make out a case against
    the accused.

    (2) Where the allegations in the first information report
    and other materials, if any, accompanying the FIR do not
    disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation
    by police officers under Section 156(1) of the Code
    except under an order of a Magistrate within the purview
    of Section 155(2) of the Code.

    (3) Where the uncontroverted allegations made in the FIR
    or complaint and the evidence collected in support of the
    same do not disclose the commission of any offence and
    make out a case against the accused.

    (4) Where, the allegations in the FIR do not constitute a
    cognizable offence but constitute only a non-cognizable
    offence, no investigation is permitted by a police officer
    without an order of a Magistrate as contemplated under
    Section 155(2) of the Code.

    (5) Where the allegations made in the FIR or complaint
    are so absurd and inherently improbable on the basis of
    which no prudent person can ever reach a just conclusion
    that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the
    accused.

    (6) Where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any
    of the provisions of the Code or the concerned Act (under
    which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the
    institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or
    where there is a specific provision in the Code or the
    concerned Act, providing efficacious redress for the
    grievance of the aggrieved party.

    (7) Where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended
    with mala fide and/or where the proceeding is
    maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for
    wreaking vengeance on the accused and with a view to
    spite him due to private and personal grudge”.

    Fkkukf/kdkjh@vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh iqfyl Fkkuk izrkiuxj }kjk
    vuqla/kku dj ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) ntZ izdj.k vne odw >wB
    flfoy uspj esa ik;k x;kA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns’k ls iqfyl us
    iqu% izdj.k esa vfxze vuqla/kku dj iqu% ;g ik;k fd
    ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k us dksbZ vkijkf/kd d`R; ugha fd;k gSA fof/k foKku
    iz;ksx’kkyk dh fjiksVZ ls ;g rF; lkeus vk;k gS fd tks oknxzLr IykWV dk
    bdjkjukek vkSj jlhn fu”ikfnr dh xbZ gS og QthZ vkSj cukoVh ugha gSA
    rFkk ml ij ifjokfn;k ds gLrk{kj gSaA QthZ LVkai [kjhnk x;k gks ,slk
    dksbZ rF; Hkh vuqla/kku ds nkSjku lkeus ugha vk;k gSA
    Fkkukf/kdkj@vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh iqfyl Fkkuk] izrkiuxj us izdj.k dk
    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:19836] (16 of 16) [CRLMP-7460/2022]

    fu”i{k Lora= vuqla/kku ugha fd;k gks ;k vuqla/kku esa dksbZ dfe;ka j[kh gksa
    ;k Fkkukf/kdkjh@vUos”k.k vf/kdkjh dh ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ls feyhHkxr
    gks ,slk dksbZ rF; lkeus ugha vk;k gSA

    ,slh fLFkfr esa ;kph@ifjokfn;k dfork ikfjd dh ;kfpdk la[;k
    7256@2023 esa okafNr vuqrks”k ds vuq:i izdj.k Lora= vkSj fu”i{k
    vuqla/kku ds fy, lhchlhvkbZMh dks varfjr fd, tkus dk dskbZ U;k;laxr
    mfpr vk/kkj ugha gSA nksuksa i{kksa esa flfoy izd`fr dk fookn gS tks l{ke
    U;k;ky; ds le{k flfoy fookn ds :i esa yafcr gSA flfoy izd`fr ds
    fookn dks vkijkf/kd jax nsus ds fy, izFke lwpuk fjiskVZ ntZ dh xbZ gSA
    iqfyl }kjk vuqla/kku ds mijkar vafre fjiksVZ izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ftlesa
    mUgksaus ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds }kjk dksbZ vkijkf/kd d`R; fd;k tkuk
    ugha crk;k gSA blds vfrfjDr fof/k foKku iz;ksx’kkyk dh fjiksVZ esa Hkh
    bdjkjukek jlhn vkSj LVkai QthZ gksuk lkfcr ugha gq, gSaA laiw.kZ i=koyh
    ds voyksdu ls ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa
    vafdr vkjksfir vijk/k izFke n`”V~;k lkfcr ugha gksrs gSaA

    ,slh fLFkfr esa ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) ntZ izFke lwpuk
    fjiksVZ la[;k 240@2019 izrkiuxj t;iqj flVh] iwoZ ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k
    iz’kkar caly vkSj lqjsUnz dqekj dh gn rd (Up to the Extent of the
    Petitioners) vkSj mlls mn~Hkqr leLr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh vikLr dh
    tkrh gSA mDr foospu ds vk/kkj ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk izLrqr
    ;kfpdk la[;k 7460@2022 Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA

    mijksDr foospu ds vk/kkj ij ;kph@ifjokfn;k }kjk izLrqr ;kfpdk
    7256@2023 vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA

    (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

    KISHAN SONI /Res.

    (Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:34:43 PM)
    (Downloaded on 06/07/2026 at 10:55:49 PM)

    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here