Piyush Ranjan vs State Of Karnataka on 3 July, 2026

    0
    8
    ADVERTISEMENT

    The petitioner – defacto complainant is before the Court

    calling in question an order of the Additional District and

    SPONSORED

    Sessions Judge and Special Judge for POCSO Cases (FTSC-II),

    Bengaluru Rural dated 20-02-2024, by which the concerned

    Court declines to summon the Magistrate for examining the

    veracity of the statement made by the victim under Section

    164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (‘Code’ for short).

    2. Heard the learned counsel Ms. Spoorthi Cotha

    appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Rashmi Patel, learned

    High Court Government Pleader appearing for the 1st

    respondent.

    3. Facts adumbrated are as follows:



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here