Pintu Thakur @ Dilip Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 March, 2026

    0
    35
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

    learned A.P.P. for the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

    registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148,

    149, 341, 323, 379, 353, 307, 332, 333, 337, 427, 120B, 504,

    506 of IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the Sound Pollution Act and

    Section 9 of the Loud Speaker Act

    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

    petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant

    alleges that on eve of immersion of goddess Sarswati, the

    accused persons including the petitioner were playing loud

    music and dancing, thus were creating nuisance and when

    informant tried to stop them, the accused persons assaulted the

    police force causing injury.

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here