Pawan Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 25 March, 2026

    0
    31
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Supreme Court – Daily Orders

    Pawan Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 25 March, 2026

    Author: Dipankar Datta

    Bench: Dipankar Datta

                                   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
    
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL No.        /2026
                             [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.14553/2025]
    
    
                             PAWAN AGRAWAL                   APPELLANT
    
    
                                                    VERSUS
    
    
                             STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
                             AND ANR.                                 RESPONDENTS
    
    
    
    
                                                  ORDER
    

    1. Leave granted.

    2. The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, by

    SPONSORED

    the impugned judgment and order dated 21st

    August, 2025, has rejected the appellant’s prayer

    for bail in anticipation of arrest.

    3. Appellant figures as an accused in FIR No.300

    of 2025 dated 05th May, 2025 registered at Police

    Signature Not Verified
    Station Balco, District Korba, Chhattisgarh under
    Digitally signed by
    SWETA BALODI
    Date: 2026.03.28
    13:14:14 IST
    Reason: Crl. Appeal @ SLP (Crl.) No.14553/2025 1
    Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal

    Code, 18601 with Sections 120-B and 34 of IPC, 1860

    added later on.

    4. We have heard learned counsel appearing for

    the parties.

    5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent

    submits that chargesheet has not been filed and the

    investigation is still continuing.

    6. It is not in dispute that the appellant has joined

    investigation in terms of the earlier orders of this

    Court.

    7. In such view of the matter and having regard to

    the nature of allegations, we are of the considered

    opinion that the appellant’s detention for custodial

    interrogation is not necessary and that he may be

    admitted to an order for grant of bail in anticipation

    of arrest.

    8. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned

    judgment and order.

    1 IPC

    Crl. Appeal @ SLP (Crl.) No.14553/2025 2

    9. It is directed that in the event of the appellant

    being arrested, he shall be released on bail on terms

    and conditions to be imposed by the trial court.

    10. Since the investigation is yet to conclude, we

    direct that if the investigating officer calls upon the

    appellant to join the investigation, he shall do so by

    attending the police station failing which liberty is

    granted to bring any such omission to the notice of

    the trial court and seek cancellation of bail.

    11. Needless to observe, the appellant shall not,

    directly or indirectly, by making inducement, threat

    or promise, dissuade any person acquainted with

    the facts of the case from disclosing such facts to

    any police officer or to the court.

    12. We repeat, if the appellant breaches any of the

    terms and conditions for grant of bail, the trial court

    shall be free to cancel the same.

    13. We clarify that the observations made in this

    order and grant of bail to the appellant in

    anticipation of arrest will not be treated as findings

    Crl. Appeal @ SLP (Crl.) No.14553/2025 3
    on the merits of the case.

    14. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed on the

    aforesaid terms.

    15. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed

    of.

    ……………………………………..J.
    (DIPANKAR DATTA)

    ……………………………………..J.
    (SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA)

    New Delhi;

    March 25, 2026.

    Crl. Appeal @ SLP (Crl.) No.14553/2025 4
    ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.8 SECTION II-C

    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

    Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)
    No.14553/2025

    [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order
    dated 21-08-2025 in MCRCA No.1269/2025 passed by
    the High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur]

    PAWAN AGRAWAL Petitioner

    VERSUS

    STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR. Respondents

    I.A. No.234126/2025-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF
    THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
    I.A. No.234125/2025-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
    I.A. No.332934/2025-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

    Date : 25-03-2026 This matter was called on for
    hearing today.

    CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
    HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

    For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Rajesh Pandey, Sr. Adv.

    Ms. Ayushi Pandey, Adv.

    Mr. Rishabh, Adv.

    Ms. Aswathi M.K., AOR

    Crl. Appeal @ SLP (Crl.) No.14553/2025 5
    For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sugandha Jain,
    Standing Counsel, Adv.

    Mr. Prabodh Kumar, AOR

    Mr. Kushagra Sinha, AOR
    Mr. Kushagra Sinha, Adv.

    UPON hearing the counsel the Court made
    the following
    O R D E R

    1. Leave granted.

    2. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order.

    3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

    (MANIK KUMAR) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA)
    SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
    (Signed order is placed on the file)

    Crl. Appeal @ SLP (Crl.) No.14553/2025 6



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here