Pallorbund Tea Limited vs Union Of India And Ors on 6 August, 2026

    0
    12
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. This writ application has been preferred praying for direction to restrain

    the respondent nos.2 and 3 being the Employees State Insurance

    SPONSORED

    Corporation (ESIC) authorities from giving effect to the notice dated 5 th

    December, 2019 (received by the petitioner on 6 th December, 2019)

    bearing no.N/Ins.I/41000614330001002/6791 and 6792.

    2. Vide the impugned notice dated 5 th December, 2019, the Deputy Director

    of ESI Corporation passed a reasoned order in compliance with the

    Hon’ble Court’s order dated 26.08.2019, in WP No.356(W) of 2019,

    wherein the authority held as follows:-

    “The authorized representative, Shri Kamalesh
    Prakash Gupta appeared before the authorized officer
    for Personal Hearing on 31.10.2019 and submitted a
    letter dated 30.10.2019. But Shri Gupta did not
    produce any other records. The employer in their
    letter dated 30.10.2019 stated that the Company is
    only carrying the business of manufacturing of tea
    which is fully exempted as per Section 1(4) read with
    2(19A) of the ESI Act. In their letter, the employer also
    stated that their Registered Office situated at 3B, Lal
    Bazar Street, 2nd Floor, Kolkata-700 001 is
    established solely for the purpose of administrative
    activities i.e. office purpose of the tea estate at Assam
    and as such no manufacturing process or commercial
    activities is being carried out. The office of the Estate
    situated at above mentioned address has been
    covered under Sec. 1(5) of the E.S.I. Act. 1948 with
    effect from 01.04.2013 on the basis of the strength of
    employment of 18 employees.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here