Palledi Sahithi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 8 April, 2026

    0
    40
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

    Palledi Sahithi vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 8 April, 2026

    APHC010186402026
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                     AT AMARAVATI
                              (Special Original Jurisdiction)
    
                  WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
                    TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
    
                                   PRESENT
    
            THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
    
                        WRIT PETITION NO: 9331 OF 2026
    
    Between:
    
    1. Palledi Sahithi,, d/o Palledi Raju, aged 11 years, Minor, being
    represented by her natural father Palledi Raju, s/o Palledi Trinadha
    Rao, aged about 37 years, r/o C-21, Kuridi Village, Dumbriguda
    Mandal, Alluri Seetharamaraju District-531151.
                                                                ...Petitioner
    
                                      AND
    
    1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary,
    Social Welfare (TW) Department, Secretariat Building, Velgapudi,
    Amaravathi, Guntur District-522239.
    2. The District Collector, Alluri Seetharamaraju District-531151.
    3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Alluri Seetharamaraju District.
    4. The Tahsildar, Dumbriguda Mandal, Alluri Seetharamaraju District-
    531151.
    5. Union of India, rep., by its Secretary, Ministry of Defence, South
    Block, Parliament Street, New Delhi-110011.
    6. Sainik School, Korukonda, rep.        by its Principal, Korukonda,
    Vizianagaram District-535214
                                                            ...Respondents

    Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that
    in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High
    2

    Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an ORDER,
    DIRECTION or WRIT more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF
    MANDAMUS inaction on the part of the Respondents No.1 to 4 for
    issuance of provisional community certificate of Kondakapu of ST to
    the petitioner forthwith so as to submit it before the 6th Respondent in
    the ensuing counselling for admission to VI Class consequent upon
    being passed in the entrance examination conducted by them as
    illegal, arbitrary, bad in law, discriminatory, violative of Art.14, 15, 16,
    21
    and 342 of the Constitution of India and as per the orders dt.6-2-
    2026 in W.P.No.42618 of 2022 on the file of this Honble Court and
    consequently direct the Respondents No.1 to 4 to issue provisional
    community certificate of Kondakapu of ST to the petitioner forthwith so
    as to submit it before the 6th Respondent in the ensuing counselling
    for admission to VI Class commencing from 6-4-2026 onwards
    consequent upon being passed in the entrance examination
    conducted by them and pass such
    IA NO: 1 OF 2026

    SPONSORED

    Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the
    circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the
    High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the
    Respondents No.1 to 4 to issue provisional community certificate of
    Kondakapu of ST to the petitioner forthwith so as to submit it before
    the 6th Respondent in the ensuing counselling for admission to VI
    Class commencing from 6-4-2026 onwards consequent upon being
    passed in the entrance examination conducted by them forthwith and
    pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit
    and proper in the circumstances of this case, pending disposal of the
    above writ petition and to pass such
    Counsel for the Petitioner: THOTA S V L NARASIMHASWAMY

    Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the
    Respondents:GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

    The Court made the following order:

    3

    THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

    WRIT PETITION NO: 9331/2026

    O R DE R:

    The Writ Petition is filed questioning the inaction of the

    Respondents in issuing the provisional Community Certificate of

    Kondakapu of ST to the Petitioner to enable her to join 6th Class in the

    Respondent No.6 School as illegal and arbitrary.

    2. The facts leading to filing of the present Writ Petition are as

    follows:

    The Petitioner was born on 19.06.2014 and is currently studying

    5th class in local school at Kuridi Village, Dumbriguda Mandal, Alluri

    Seetharamaraju District. It is stated that the Petitioner’s surname is

    ‘Palledi’ and belongs to the Kondakapu Community Schedule Tribe

    Community. The father of the Petitioner by name, Sri Trinadha Rao,

    was issued a Community Certificate belonging to the Kondakapu ST

    Community and the entries in the school records of the Petitioner also

    reflect the fact that the Petitioner belongs to the Kondakapu ST

    Community.

    3. The Petitioner had appeared for the All India Sainik Schools

    Entrance Examination 2026 and was called upon to attend the

    counseling. The father of the Petitioner thereupon approached the
    4

    respondents Nos. 3 and 4 to issue Community Certificate to the

    Petitioner so as to enable her to participate in the counseling process.

    4. It is stated that the Community Certificate issued to the members

    of the ‘Kondakapu Community’ was cancelled pursuant to a report

    submitted by the Director, Tribal Cultural Research and Training

    Institute, Hyderabad (for short, T.C.R. & T.I.), by the District Collector.

    Questioning the same, appeals were filed under Section 7 of the

    Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Backward

    Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 (for

    short, ‘the Act, 1993’), and the same are pending for consideration. It is

    also stated that vide Memo No. 1587000/CV.2/2021, dated

    18.01.2022, the Appellate Authority/State Government passed an

    interim order of stay of the cancellation of Community Certificates to

    the members of the ‘Kondakapu Community.’ In that context, the

    Petitioner seeks the issuance of a provisional Community Certificate

    so as to enable the Petitioner to participate in the counseling process.

    5. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, while relying on the judgment

    of this Court in W.P.No.42618 of 2022 dated 06.02.2026 on the similar

    subject, submits that the Petitioner is willing to repay all the differential

    amounts in the event the appeals filed under Section 7 of the Act,

    1993, questioning the cancellation of the Caste Certificates granted to
    5

    the members of ‘Kondakapu Community’, are dismissed.

    6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that in light of

    the cancellation of the Community Certificate to the members of ‘

    Kondakapdu Community’ following detailed research by the TCR&TI,

    the issuance of a provisional community certificate in favour of the

    petitioner would only further the wrong being perpetrated by persons

    who do not belong to the ST community.

    7. Considering the fact that the Orders of the cancellation of the

    Community Certificates were stayed by the State Government, being

    the Appellate Authority under Section 7 of the Act, 1993, in the event

    the appeals are allowed, the Petitioner would be losing out a chance to

    seek for admission in the Sainik School and would suffer loss of

    opportunity.

    8. Considering the submissions made and following the Judgment

    passed by this Court in W.P.No.42618 of 2022, dated 06.02.2026, the

    Writ Petition is disposed of with the consent of both parties with the

    following directions:

    i) The Respondent Authorities are directed to issue provisional

    Community Certificate in favour of the Petitioner provided as per Rules

    19 of the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and

    Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act,
    6

    1993, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight

    weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

    ii) It is made clear that the Provisional Community Certificate

    would be subject to the outcome of the appeals filed by the Appellate

    Authority/State Government.

    iii) In the event the appeals filed under Section 7 of the Act,

    1993, were dismissed, cancelling the Community Certificate of the

    members of Kondakapu Schedule Tribe Community by the Appellate

    Authority/State Government, the natural guardian of the Petitioner

    shall pay the differential fee as directed by the Respondents.

    iv) There shall be no order as to costs.

    As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this
    Petition shall stand closed.

    _______________________
    JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

    Date: 08.04.2026

    Note: Issue CC today.

    B/o
    eha
    7

    THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

    WRIT PETITION NO: 9331/2026

    Dated: 8.04.2026

    eha



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here