Om Prakash vs State Of Haryana on 7 March, 2026

    0
    43
    ADVERTISEMENT

    The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panckhula while dealing

    with a complaint, filed by the respondent-State through Drug Control Officer,

    SPONSORED

    has observed that a prima facie case for framing of charge for the commission

    of offence punishable under Sections 28, 27(b) (ii) and 28-B of Drug and

    Cosmetics Act 1940 is made out against the petitioner. The petitioner is

    aggrieved of the above mentioned order, hence the present petition under

    Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of aforementioned order.

    2. In nut-shell the facts emerging from record are that on 31.08.2015

    the accused a team of police officials received a tip-off from a source that the

    petitioner was carrying some narcotic substance. As per the case projected, by

    the police acting upon the above mentioned information the accused was

    apprehended along with a polythene bag and when the contents of the bag

    were checked it was found that in the above mentioned polythene bag there

    1 of 10

    were narcotic drugs, currency notes and other medicines. According to the

    case set-out by the prosecution during the course of above mentioned recovery

    process/investigation, the petitioner-accused, hereinafter being referred to as

    ‘petitioner’ only, fled from the spot. In view of above mentioned happening

    two cases were registered against the petitioner; one case was vide FIR No.175

    dated 01.09.2015, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 22

    of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, hereinafter being

    referred to as NDPS Act, and the another was vide FIR i.e. FIR No.176 dated

    02.09.2015 for the commission of offence punishable under Section 224, 225,

    420 IPC and Section 181 of Motor Vehicles Act.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here