Jammu & Kashmir High Court
Nirmal Vaid vs Kumar Rajeev Ranjan & Ors on 20 April, 2026
Author: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
Bench: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
2026:JKLHC-JMU:1079
Sr. No. 192
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CCP (S) No. 244/2025
Nirmal Vaid .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Rishav Vaid, Advocate
v/s
Kumar Rajeev Ranjan & Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Assisting counsel to
Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER
20.04.2026
1. By this petition, petitioner has alleged non-compliance/willful
disobedience of order dated 12.03.2025 passed by this Court in case
titled “Nirmal Vs. UT of J & K & Ors.” bearing WP (C) No.
248/2024, whereby the writ petition (supra) has been disposed of
with the following directions:
“In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of
by directing the Deputy Commissioner, Jammu/Respondent
No. 2 herein to decide the application filed by the petitioner
for providing Fard Intikhab Jambandi, taking into
consideration the report dated 03.05.2024 submitted by the
Tehsildar, Bahu, Jammu. The entire exercise shall be
completed by the respondents within a period of thirty days
from the date a copy of this order is made available with
respondent No. 2.”
2. Compliance report stands filed by the respondents, wherein it is
stated that the claim of the petitioner for providing Fard Intikhab
Jamabandi has been examined by the respondents, however, since
the kind of soil of the land in question is recorded as Gair Mumkin
2026:JKLHC-JMU:1079
2 CCP (S) No. 244/2025
Khad, as such, Fard for such lands cannot be issued at this point of
time.
3. Ms. Chetna Manhas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondents states that the claim of the petitioner has been
considered and rejected, which stands conveyed to him vide order
dated 09.02.2026.
4. In view of the above, proceedings in the instant contempt
petition are closed and rule, if any, framed against the
respondents, be discharged. However, liberty is granted to the
petitioner to approach this Court, if the cause survives, otherwise.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi)
Judge
JAMMU
20.04.2026
Manan
