Niksrang Ch Marak vs State Of Meghalaya & Ors on 9 April, 2026

    0
    42
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Meghalaya High Court

    Niksrang Ch Marak vs State Of Meghalaya & Ors on 9 April, 2026

    Serial No. 04
    Daily List               HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
                                   AT SHILLONG
    
             Crl.Petn. No. 12 of 2025
                                                     Date of order: 09.04.2026
             Niksrang Ch marak    vs            State of Meghalaya & ors
             Coram:
                   Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice
             Appearance:
             For the Petitioner      : P.T. Sangma, Adv. with
                                       Ms G.Ch. Marak, Adv.
             For the Respondents     : Mr H. Abraham, Addl PP with

    Mr S. A. Sheikh, Adv. [for R5]

    This is a petition seeking quashing of the proceeding

    SPONSORED

    under the POCSO Act, 2012 with consent of the parties i.e., the

    petitioner No. 1 (accused) and the respondent No. 5 (victim).

    2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the

    petitioner and the respondent No. 5, the relationship between

    the two was consensual. It is submitted that at the relevant time,

    the respondent No. 5 was 17 years 8 months of age and the

    petitioner was around 21 years of age. It is further submitted

    that from the said relationship, there is a child born who is 2

    years of age. It is informed that the parties are living together as

    husband and after marriage would be living with the parents of

    the respondent No. 5, since as per the custom. The parents of

    both the petitioner and the respondent No. 5 are present. All of
    Page 1 of 2
    them to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services

    Committee today to enable the her to record the statement of the

    respondent No. 5 whether the consent is an informed consent,

    whether the respondent No. 5 wants to go back to school and

    continue her education, whether she and the child have received

    any benefits either from the State of Central Government, etc.

    The said report to be submitted on the next date.

    3. The respondent No. 5 has filed her affidavit giving her ‘no

    objection’ to the quashing of the proceeding. She is present in

    person. When questioned, she reiterates what is stated by her in

    the affidavit i.e., she has ‘no objection’ to the quashing of the

    proceeding against the petitioner since they are living together

    and have a child from the said relationship.

    4. Stand over to 24th April, 2026.

    5. Interim relief granted earlier, to continue till the next date.

    (Revati Mohite Dere)
    Chief Justice
    Meghalaya
    09.04.2026
    “Sylvana PS”

    Page 2 of 2



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here