Navdeep Dhingra vs Union Territory Through Drug on 30 March, 2026

    0
    42
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench

    Navdeep Dhingra vs Union Territory Through Drug on 30 March, 2026

                                                     S. No.163
                                                     Regular List
     HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                    AT SRINAGAR
                               CRM(M)/142/2026
                                CrlM/336/2026
    NAVDEEP DHINGRA                                          Petitioner(s)...
    
    Through: Mr. Varut Kr. Gupta, Advocate.
    
                            Vs.
    UNION   TERRITORY    THROUGH     DRUG                  ...Respondent(s)
    INSPECTOR KHAG / MAGAM / BERRWAH
    Through:
    
    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI JUDGE
                                    ORDER
    

    30.03.2026

    1. By reference to pronouncement of judgment of this Court in the

    SPONSORED

    case of “Mohd. Iqbal Mir versus State of Jammu &

    Kashmir” in CRMC No. 329/2017 decided on 8th April 2022,

    on the point of maintainability of a criminal complaint under

    Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 before a Judicial Magistrate

    instead of before a Court of Sessions, the petitioner-Navdeep

    Dhingra, the purported proprietor and license holder of License

    Oscar Remedies Johron, Himachal Pradesh, has come forth with

    a challenge to the institution of a criminal complaint by the

    Drug Inspector Budgam, before the Court of Chief Judicial

    Magistrate, Budgam on file No. 578/2018 which came to be

    taken cognizance, instead of being referred to the Court of

    Sessions, Budgam, by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Budgam

    in terms of order dated 29th October 2018.

    2. The petitioner is invoking the inherent powers of this Court as

    reserved under Section 561-A of the Jammu and Kashmir Code

    of Criminal Procedure Samvat 1989, read with Section 482 of

    Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and now under Section 528

    of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023.

    3. Issue notice to the respondent-Drug Inspector, Budgam.

    4. Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, learned Deputy Advocate General,

    accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

    5. Send for the scanned record of the criminal complaint on file

    No. 578/2018, titled “State through Drugs Inspector Office

    Budgam versus Managing Director Oscar Remedies, Johron

    and others” from the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, CJM

    Budgam.

    6. In the meantime, further proceedings in the case shall remain

    stayed. This direction is subject to objections from other side.

    7. Register Judicial, Srinagar to requisition the scanned record of

    the criminal complaint on file No. 578/2018 titled “State

    through Drug Inspector Office Budgam v/s Managing

    Director, Oscar Remedies, Johron and others” from the

    Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, CJM Budgam.

    8. List on 04.05.2026.

    (RAHUL BHARTI)
    JUDGE
    SRINAGAR
    30.03.2026
    Hilal

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here