Karnataka High Court
Nandi Infrastructure Corridor … vs Sundeep Aurora on 29 July, 2026
1 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
®
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1214 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
C/W
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1230 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1287 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1300 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1305 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1307 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1308 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1310 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1312 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1313 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1314 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1315 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
Digitally
signed by WRIT APPEAL NO. 1316 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
VASANTHA
KUMARY B K WRIT APPEAL NO. 1317 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
Location:
HIGH WRIT APPEAL NO. 1318 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
COURT OF
KARNATAKA WRIT APPEAL NO. 1319 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1320 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1323 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1327 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1329 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1335 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1392 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
2 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1395 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1397 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1401 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1402 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1405 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1408 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1410 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1416 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1417 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1418 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1429 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1432 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1434 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1435 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1439 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1457 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1459 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1643 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1651 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1653 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1658 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1659 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1663 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1664 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1679 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1680 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1683 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1685 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1903 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1986 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
3 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
WRIT APPEAL NO. 2011 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 2077 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 2097 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 2109 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 33 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 76 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 577 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 586 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 621 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 626 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 629 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 656 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 660 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 663 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 672 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 679 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 718 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 719 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 839 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 848 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 866 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 870 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 874 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 875 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 876 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 881 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
4 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
WRIT APPEAL NO. 885 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 887 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 890 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 891 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 894 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 895 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 896 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 904 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 913 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
WRIT APPEAL NO. 915 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)
IN WA No. 1214/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH, MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH, MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. GOPAL SHANKAR NARAYAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
5 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. M/S A M R HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
NO.305/66, II FLOOR, 40TH CROSS,
ABOVE SBM BANK, 8TH BLOCK,
JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
SRI P. MANJUNATHA REDDY
2. BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY,
2ND FLOOR, GATE NO.4, M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE 560 001
BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY
3. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT
N.R. SQUARE, CORPORATION CIRCLE,
BENGALURU 560 002,
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
4. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER,
BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANGARA PALIKE,
BOMMANAHALLI ZONE, BEGUR MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 068
5. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.14/3, I FLOOR
MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVANA,
CFC BUILDING, NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
6. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES,
VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
6 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
7. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-1
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT
BOARD I FLOOR, SCST DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION BUILDINGS,
NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
8. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS,
COMMUNICATIONS AND BUILDINGS,
VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.S.SATYANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4;
R2 SERVED;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5 AND R7;
PROF. RAVI VARMA, SENIOR ADVOCATE ALONG WITH
SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG & SIDDHARATH BABU RAO SPL.
COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT. FOR R6 AND R8;)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No.50634/2014 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No.50634/2014, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1230/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH, MANGALORE
7 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH, MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. PRAVEEN KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
S/O. LATE MANCHALAL THANMAL
NO.129, 28TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR
7TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 011
REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY
2. MR.NILESH BHANDARI
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
S/O. MANOHAR LAL BHANDARI,
NO.431, 7TH B MAIN ROAD,
JAYANAGAR 4TH BLOCK,
BENGALURU-560 011.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES,
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
4. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
(GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA UNDERTAKING),
NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR, R.P. BUILDING,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001
8 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
REPRESENTED BY ITS
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
5. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.3/2, KINI BUILDING, 1ST CROSS
GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 009
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI RANGA. S, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SUMANA NAGANAND, FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A. AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R3;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE
FOR R4 AND R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 18209/2013 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 18209/2013, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1287/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
9 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED
SIGNATORY MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. S B MATHAPATI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SUMAN BANSAL
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
W/O. SUBHASH CHANDER BANSAL
NO.62, I.PS COLONY, RIVER VIEW AVENUE,
MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI- 620 125
REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY
MR. SUBHASH BANSAL
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
S/O. LATE MOHANLAL BANSAL.
2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
KIADB NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR
RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
M S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB)
1ST FLOOR, MAHARASHI ARAVIDN BHAVAN,
NRUAPTHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND
INDUSTRIES, M S BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V.ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
10 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R2 & R3;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO. 34138/2016 AND CONSEQUENTLY,
DISMISS WP NO.34138/2016, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1300/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED
SIGNATORY MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. K. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
SON OF LATE K. SURYANARAYANA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.2/9, 8TH MAIN,
2-A CROSS, NAGENDRA BLOCK,
BSK 1ST STAGE, BANASHANKARI,
BANGALORE NORTH-560050.
2. KRISHNE GOWDA
S/O RANGE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.212, 4TH CROSS,
NEAR 7 DAY MARKET, KASTURI NAGAR,
KALYANNAGAR POST,
11 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BANASWADI VILLAGE,
BANGALORE-560043
3. L P VENKATESH
S/O LATE PUTTAPPA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
R/AT NO.43 MARUTHI NAGAR, 5TH CROSS
NETHRAVATHI ROAD
CHANDRA LAYOUT, NAGARBHAVI
BANGALORE NORTH-560072
4. B M SRIMATHI KUMARI
W/O PUTTARAJU R
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
R/AT 5/1, BAIRAPPA LANE,
RANASINGHE PETE CHICKPET
BANGALORE SOUTH-560053
5. BOREGOWDA
S/O NINGEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
R/AT NO.528, 4TH CROSS,
2ND MAIN ROAD, SVG NAGAR
NAGARBHAVI,
BANGALORE NORTH-560072
6. M NARASIMHA MUPPALA
S/O VENKATANARASIMHA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
R/AT 23, 5TH MAIN 2ND CROSS,
NEAR GAGNA BAKERY, CPV BLOCK
GANGA NAGAR,
BANGALORE NORTH-560032
7. B S DYAVEGOWDA
S/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
R/AT 8, 2ND MAIN
SUBBANNA GARDEN
GOVINDARAJAN NAGAR
VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE-560040
12 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
8. RAMACHANDRA RAO D
S/O DEVOJI RAO
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
R/AT NO.73 SAI NIVAS,
4TH CROSS
URYODAYA LAYOUT,
R K HEGDENAGAR,
DR SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560077
9. KAMALA S N
W/O B S DYAVEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/AT NO 8, 2ND MAIN,
KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK,
KASABA HOBLI,
AGRAHARA HOBLI,
KRISHNARAJAPETE
MANDYA 571426
10. KRISHNAPPA M
S/O MUNIYAPPA M
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT NO.188,
AYAPPA TEMPLE ROAD,
NEAR SHANIMAHATHMA TEMPLE,
CHOLANAYAKAHALLI, R T NAGAR,
BANGALORE NORTH 560032
11. LATE T VATSALA GOPINATH
SINCE DECEASED BY
T K GOPINATH
S/O KRISHNAMURTHY RAO T R
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
R/AT 348, 15TH CROSS,
OPP PLV PRIDE,
SARASWAHI NAGAR,
VIJAY NAGAR
BANGALORE NORTH
BANGALORE 560040
12. VENKATA KRISHNAIAH D S
S/O LATE V SEETHARAMIAH
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
13 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
R/AT NO 24 RURAL,
10TH CROSS
YELLAPPA GARDEN
MALLESWARAM
BANGALORE 560003
13. K NARASIMHA
S/O K C MARAKALA,
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
R/AT NO 353/357,
NANDIKESHWARA,
ANUGRAHA, IRODY,
BRAHMAVARA TALUK,
KANYANA GRAMA,
UDUPI 576226
14. JAYAMMA
W/O NARASEGOWDA
AGED 70 YEARS
R/AT NO 9/22, 8TH MAIN ROAD
TATA SILK FARM,
TYAGARAJANAGAR
BANGALORE 560028
15. R SHANTHA KUMARI
C/O LATE C PURUSHOTHAM
AGED 66 YEARS
R/AT NO 04,
NEAR KAMI RAJANNA
COMPOUND 1ST CROSS
HESARGHATTA MAIN ROAD
CHIKKASANDRA DASARAHALLI
BENGALURU 560057
16. H G VENKATRAMAN
S/O H T GOPAL RAO
AGED 66 YEARS
R/AT HANDIGODU MALALURU
THIRTHAHALLI, SHIVAMOGGA
PIN CODE 8077738902
17. SHUBA B A
W/O GANESH S
AGED 47 YEARS, R/AT NO 005,
14 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NANDI FOREST VIEW APARTMENT
BDA LINK ROAD, CHANNA SANDRA
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR
BANGALORE 560098
18. A VIJAY KUMAR
S/O ASHWATHA NARAYANA RAO
AGED 71 YEARS,
R/AT NO 20,
VASANTHA MADHVA NILAYA,
9TH CROSS, KAMAKYA LAYOUT,
BANASHANKARI, 3RD STAGE
ADJACENT TO WINDSOR AMBICA
APARTMENT
19. C A ROHINI
W/O C A AIYANNA
AGED 76 YEARS
R/AT NO 35/2-4,
DEVANTHA CHAR STREET
5TH MAIN,
NEAR SYNDICATE BANK
S P R BRANCH, CHAMARAJAPET
BANGALORE 560018
20. LATE M V PADMA
SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
SREEIVASA PRASAD M D
S/O DORESWAMY IYENGAR
AGED 62 YEARS
R/AT NO 542, SRIVARI, 9TH MAIN,
HEMAVATHI SCHOOL ROAD
T K LAYOUT, 4TH STAGE,
MYSORE, SARASWATHI PURAM
MYSORE 570009
21. B S VIJAYALAKSHMI
W/O SUBRAMANYA BHATT T S
AGED 73 YEARS
R/AT NO 13, 5TH MAIN ROAD,
SRI KANTESHWAR NAGAR ,
NANDINI LAYOUT POST
MAHALAKHMI LAYOUT,
BANGALORE 96
15 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
22. IRAPPA B GOLAPPANVR
S/O BASAPPA V
AGED 52 YEARS
R/AT NO 2, BELAKU FIRST CROSS,
APC LAYOUT, THINDLU
VIDYARANYAPURAM
BANGALORE 560097
23. SHEELA
W/O K S SUBRAMANYA
AGED 66 YEARS
R/AT NO 30/3-2,
DEVANTHA STREET
DASAPPA GARDEN
CHAMRJAPET BANGALORE 560018
24. USHA M G
D/O M S GUNDU RAO
AGED 69 YEARS
R/AT 108C, 7TH A MAIN, 3RD BLOCK,
NEAR DATTATREYA TEMPLE, THAYGARAJANGAR
BANGALORE SOUTH 560028.
25. ANDAL KANNAPPA
W/O KANNAPPA
AGED 70 YEARS
R/AT NO 793, 12TH B CROSS,
2ND PHASE, J P NAGAR,
BANGALORE 560078
26. LALITHA MOHAN
W/O N CHANDRA MOHAN
AGED 68 YEARS
R/AT NO 145, VAIBHAVA, 5TH CROSS,
1ST BLOCK, VISHWAPRIYA NAGAR
BEGURU, BANGALORE 560068
27. RUKMINIYAMMA
W/O M B HONNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO 3/1,
2ND CROSS,
MURIREDDY PLAYA,
16 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
UPPAVANALLI VENKATAPPA BLOCK,
BANGALORE 560006
28. G SOMESHWARI
W/O M PURVA LINGAM,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO 17, NORTH POST LANE,
ITI COLONY DOORVANINAGAR,
BANGALORE 560016
29. SHIVA PRASAD
SON OF LATE H S BASAVARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.2,
BYRAVESHWARA NILAYA,
LOTTEGOLLA HALLI,
NEAR RAILWAY COLONY,
RMV EXTENSION 2ND STAGE,
4TH CROSS,
ANJANA MURTHY LAYOUT,
BANGALORE-560094.
30. SHANTHA K M
WIFE OF SIDDARAMU,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.110,
2ND CROSS,
BASAVESHWAR HBCS LAYOUT,
VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560040
31. R SUBHADRA VISWAN
W/O LATE K.P.VISHWAMBHARAN,
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.520,
15TH MAIN,
15TH CROSS,
NEAR GANESHA TEMPLE,
MANJUNATH NAGAR,
RAJAJINAGAR,
BANGALORE-560010
32. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY
17 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES,
M S BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001.
33. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560002.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
34. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560002
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI.S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT FOR R32;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P. ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R33 & R34)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.6439/2023 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.6439/2023, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1305/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS, OFF
MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED
18 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED
SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. S.B. MATHAPATI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. A M SHARATH CHANDRA
SON OF A.C. MUNIVENKATA GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
NO. P-2, ALUNGOOR GROVE,
23RD MAIN ROAD, 16TH CROSS,
5TH PHASE, JP NAGAR,
BENGALURU 560078
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
AND SECRETARY
3. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR
RASHTROTHANA PARISHAT BUILDING,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
19 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
KIADB (BMICAPA) NO. 14/3,
RASHTROTHANA PARISHAT BUILDING,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. LOHITASWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. ASHOK N NAYAK AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 5437/2022 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 5437/2022, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1307/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY,
MR SRINATH MANGALORE.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. K V SHIVAKUMAR
S/O LATE K VISHWANATH,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
NO.3, CHURCH ROAD,
20 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BASAVANGUDI,
BENGALURU-560004
2. SHREYAS K SHIVAKUMAR
S/O K V SHIVAKUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
NO.3, CHURCH ROAD,
BASAVANGUDI,
BENGALURU-560004
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
4. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
IST FLOOR, RASHTROTHANA
PARISHATH BUILDING,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
5. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KIADB (BMICP)
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R3;
Ms. MONICA PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
21 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
JUDGE IN WP NO.6144/2021 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.6144/2021, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1308/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED
SIGNATORY MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VIDHUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. MANJUNATHA REDDY
SON OF PAPA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
NO.25, YELLUKUNTE ITI LAYOUT
MANGAMANAPALYA
BENGALURU - 560068
2. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES,
BENGALURU - 560001
BY ITS SECRETARY.
3. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
4. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
22 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA
ROAD BENGALURU - 560009
...RESPONDENTS
(R1 SERVED;
BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. K SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.6116/2023 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.6116/2023, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1310/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS OFF
MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. D.L.N. RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE ALONG WITH
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SUNDEEP AURORA
SON OF KRISHNA KUMAR AURORA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
23 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
RESIDING AT ADARSH NO.411,
KORAMANGALA BENGALURU- 560 034
REPRESENTED BY HIS
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
MR. NOSHIR B. SHROFF
SON OF BUJOR D. SHROFF
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RESIDING AT PHARMED GARDENS,
WHITEFIELD BENGALURU - 560 048
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES, VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001
3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE,
VIDHAN SOUDHA
BENGALURU 560 001
4. THE MEMBER SECRETARY
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT
BOARD, NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
5. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.N.PHANEENDRA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SMT. VAISHALI HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND SIDDARTH
BABURAO SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT. FOR
R2 AND R3;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R4
AND R5)
24 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-63678/2016
(LA-KIADB) AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE
WP No-63678/2016, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1312/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. D HANUMANTHASA
S/O LATE SRI MUNISWAMISA,
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS,
2. SRI D H ISWARASA
S/O LATE SRI D HANUMATHASA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
3. SRI D H NARAYANASA
S/O LATE SRI D HANUMATHASA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
(PETITIONER NOS. 1 TO 3 DO NOT
CLAIM THE BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZEN)
REP BY THEIR GPA HOLDER
SRI M G SRINIVASA
S/O SRI D GANGADHARSA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
25 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
R/AT NO. 27, C.K.CHENNAPPA LAYOUT,
MISSION ROAD, CROSS,
BENGALURU - 560 027.
4. VIJAY S MAGAJI
SON OF MG SRINIVASA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
5. MK NITYANANDA
SON OF MG KESHAVA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
6. MV NAGABHUSHAN
SON OF MG VASUDEVA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT 29/2,
2ND C MAIN, CHENAPPA GARDEN,
MISSION ROAD CROSS,
BENGALURU 560027
7. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
8. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
RASHTRODHANA BUILDINGS
N.R.ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
9. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.1, MID-FORD HOUSE,
MID-FORD GARDENS,
OFF M G ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
26 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
10. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
(BMICP) NO. 3/2,
KHENY BUILDING,
1ST CROSS,
GANDHINAGARA,
BENGALURU - 560 009.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A. AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R7;
SRI K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R8 TO R10)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-51369/2016
(LA-KIADB) AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS
WP No-51369/2016, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1313/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED,
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS OFF
MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
27 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M. NAGABHUSHAN
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
S/O. LATE M. KRISHNAIAH
RESIDING AT AVANTHI FARMS
SY. NO. 71,
MADANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE
DASANAPURAHOBLI,
BENGALURU NORTH,
BENGALURU 562162
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES,
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
VIKAS SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU 560001
4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
VIKAS SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU 560001
5. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
1ST FLOOR, MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
28 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
6. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001
7. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK (WEST)
BENGALURU 560020
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
8. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT,
KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560009
9. THE TAHSILDAR,
NORTH TALUK,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT,
KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560009
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A. AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2 TO R4, R8 AND R9;
BY SRI. H.N.SHASHIDHARA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.H.S.SUHAS., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R5 AND R6)
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 13956/2022 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS WRIT PETITION No. 13956/2022,
ETC.
29 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 1314/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. MOHAMMAD ABDUL KAREEM FAISAL,
SON OF MOHAMMAD ALOHAZI,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 301,
GARVEBHAVIPALYA,
HONGASANDRA, BEGUR HOBLI,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF SECRETARY
30 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
4. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.14/3, I FLOOR
MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVANA,
CFC BUILDING,
NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560002
5. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-1
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD II FLOOR,
RASTHROTHANA PARISHAD BUILDING,
NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 002
6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BENGALURU URBAN, K.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 009
7. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
KG ROAD BENGALURU 560009
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R4
AND R5;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT, FOR R2, R3, R6 AND R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
31 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.723/2014 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.723/2014, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1315/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. DLN RAO, SENIOR ADVOCATE ALONG WITH
SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. N. SHEKAR
SON OF LATE NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
2. G.N. MUNENDRA
SON OF LATE NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
3. G.N. BALA KRISHNA
SON OF LATE NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
32 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ALL ARE RESIDING AT GOTTIGERE VILLAGE,
KEMBATHANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
BEHIND APPOLLO PHARMACY
BENGALURU -560 083
4. G.N. PADMA BAI
WIFE OF GIRIAPPA NAGAPPA ASHIVAD
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
5. G.N. RAMESH
SON OF GIRIAPPA NAGAPPA ASHIVAD
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R4 & R5 ARE R/AT No.3
JAMUNAGIRI, 2ND CROSS, LAKSHMI ROAD,
SHANTHINAGAR, WILSON ROAD,
BENGALURU-560027
6. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT),
MS BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001
BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
7. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARTISHAT,
2ND FLOOR NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY
SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
8. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT
BOARD (BMICP) 1ST FLOOR, MARASHI ARVIND
BHAVAN, NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B RAMESH., ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3;
R4 & R5 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
33 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SRI. RAVINDRA.V.REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR R6;
SRI. B.B.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R7 AND R8)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-35635/2024 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE
WP No-35635/2024, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1316/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. PRASHANTH G
SON OF G.S.GUDDANNA,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
No.53, 3RD CROSS,
BANNERGHATTA ROAD, GOTTIGERE
BENGALURU-560 083.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT)
M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
34 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO 14/3, RASHTROTAHNA PARISHAT
2ND FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROD
BENGALURU 560001
REP BY SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR, MARASHI ARVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE
FOR R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-14973/2022
(LA-KIADB) AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WP, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1317/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS OFF
MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
35 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. GOWRAMMA
WIFE OF LATE VENKATESH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
NO. 29, VASANTHAPPA GARDEN,
DOOPANAHALLI SHANTHINAGAR,
H.A.L. II STAGE, BENGALURU
2. MUNIVENKATAPPA
SON OF LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
NO.1, SANJAY GANDHI NAGAR,
OLD BAIYANAPPANHALLI
MARUTHI SEVANAGAR
BENGALURU 560 033
3. THYAGARAJU
SON OF LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
NO. 34, NEAR KARUMMARIYAMMA TEMPLE
IMMEDIHALLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK
BENGALURU 560 066
4. MUNIRAJU
SON OF LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
5. CHINNAPPA
SON OF LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
6. MUNIYAPPA
SON OF LATE MUNISWAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
7. JAYAPPA
SON OF LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
8. MARIYAPPA
SON OF LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
36 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
CHIKKATHOGUR VILLAGE
DODDATHOGUR MAIN ROAD
NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE
ELECTRONIC CITY POST
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK
BENGALURU - 560 100
9. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
10. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
NO.14/3, MAHARSHI
ARAVINDA BHAVAN,
1ST FLOOR NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
11. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 14/3, MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVAN,
1ST FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
12. THE SPECIAL LAND
ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO. 14/3, MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVANA,
1ST FLOOR NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R9;
SRI. BHADRINATH R., ADVOCATE FOR C/R4;
37 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R10, R11 AND R13)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 4363/2019 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS WRIT PETITION No. 4363/2019,
ETC.
IN WA NO. 1318/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED
SIGNATORY MR.SRINATH
MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. S.B.MATHAPATI AND HIREMATH
PRAVEEN SHEKHARAYYA, ADVOCATE)
38 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. D PADHAMAVATHI
D/O. DEVARAJ
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
2. S. VASANTHA
D/O. DEVARAJ
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
3. D. ANBALAJI
D/O. DEVARAJ
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
4. KUMAR
D/O. DEVARAJ
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
5. D. SHYAMARAJ
S/O. DEVRAJ
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
6. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE,
M S BUILDING,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU-560 001
7. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO.14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH,
2ND FLOOR,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY
SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
8. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR,
39 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
MARASHI ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 009
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1-R5;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG & SIDDHARATH
BABU RAO SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT. FOR R6;
SRI. VAIBHAV MALIMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R7 & R8)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-18824/2022 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WP, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1319/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI
ROAD BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI SRI SRI TIRUCHI MAHASWAMIGALU,
BY HIS SUCCESSOR
SRI JAYENDRAPURI SWAMIJI,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
SRI KAILASH ASHRAM,
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU
2. R. SHANKARAPPA,
SON OF LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
40 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
RESIDING AT NO. 31, KENCHENAHALLI,
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR,
BENGALURU
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES, VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
4. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
5. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
I FLOOR, MAHASHRI
ARAVINDA BHAVANA,
NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG & SIDDHARATH
BABU RAO SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT FOR R3;
SRI. K. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R4 & R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 61418/2016
(LA-KIADB) AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS WRIT PETITION
No. 61418/2016, ETC.
41 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 1320/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE ALONG WITH
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. DR. MUNISWAMAPPA KUPPAHALLI
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
SON OF LATE NANJUNDAPPA
NO. 414, 5TH MAIN ROAD
4TH CROSS,
KENGERI UPANAGAR
BENGALURU- 560 060
ALSO AT NO. 475, 6TH MAIN,
11TH CROSS NEAR SWIMMING POOL
SADASHIVANAGAR,
BENGALURU 560 080
42 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES,
VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
BY ITS SECRETARY
3. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO. 49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR
EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER (BMICP)
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
14/2, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 009
5. THE THASILDAR
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK
KANDHAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD
BENGALURU 560 009
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE
FOR ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2 AND R5;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R3 AND R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.22341/2022 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.22341/2022, ETC.
43 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 1323/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO 1, MIDFORD GARDEN
OFF MG ROAD BENGALURU 560001
RPRESETNED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMI CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO 1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFFMAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU 560001
REP BY ITS AUTHORISED
SIGNATORY MR SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR ALONG WITH
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. VINITHA M REDDY
W/O SHRI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT NO 82,
ALAHALLI ANJANAPURA POST,
J P NAGAR, 9TH PHASE,
BENGALURU 560062
REPRESENTED BY HER
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
MADHUSUDHAN REDDY
S/O S P NAGI REDDY
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
R/AT NO 82 ALAHALLI
ANJANAPURA POST,
J P NAGAR, 9TH PHASE,
BENGALURU 560062
44 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
VIKASA SOUDHA
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU 560001
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY THE
SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU 560001
5. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU 560009
6. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(BMICP) KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
7. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER 1(BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
45 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560001
8. BANGALORE MYSORE
INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY (BMICAPA)
NO 2 ANJANEYA BUILDING,
5 LOOP ROAD,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU 560009
...RESPONDENTS
(BY MS. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A. AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE
GOVT. FOR R2, R3 & R4;
SRI. K SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI.P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R5,
R6 & R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-10037/2024 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WP No-10037/2024, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1327/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
46 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
MANGALORE
MR.SRINATH
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ANEL KUMAR M. K.
SON OF M. KRISHNAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
NO. A4-110, GOKULAM APARTMENT
DODDAKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU 560062
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU 560001
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY THE
SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
47 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
5. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU 560009
6. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
7. THE SPECIAL LAND
ACQUISITION OFFICER -1 (BMICP),
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
8. BANGALORE MYSORE
INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY,
NO.2, ANJANEYA BUILDING,
5 LOOP ROAD, RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU 560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
...RESPONDENTS
(BY MS. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A. AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARATH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE
GOVT. FOR R2, R3 & R4;
SRI. K SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI.P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R5,
R6 & R7)
48 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-11646/2024 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WP, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1329/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. JAYAMMA
DAUGHTER OF LATE CHIKKAGANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
CHIKKAKODIGEHALLI VILLAGE,
KODIGEHALLI POST
YESHWANTPURA HOBLI
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK.
49 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT)
MS BUILDLING,
BENGALURU - 560001
3. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
No.14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARTISHAT,
2ND FLOOR, NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SPECIAL
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR,
MARASHI ARVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B RAMESH., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND SIDDHARATH
BABU RAO SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT FOR R2;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R3
AND R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.10234/2022 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.10234/2022, ETC.
50 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 1335/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. HIREMATH PRAVEEN SHEKHARAYYA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. A M SHARATH CHANDRA
SON OF A.C.MUNIVENKATA GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
M/S. DUO ASSOCIATES
NO. 18, G-1, ROYAL HERITAGE
MAGARATH ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 025
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES, MS BUILDING,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001
51 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND MEMBER SECRETARY
1ST FLOOR, MAHARSHI ARABIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
4. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
BOARD(BMICP), 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARABIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
5. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
NO. 3/2, KHENY BUILDING 1ST CROSS,
GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU 560 009.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SRI. RAVINDRA.V.REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT FOR R2;
SRI. VAIBHAV MALIMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R3, R4
AND R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 2641/2021 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 2641/2021, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1392/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
52 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT SUNANDAMMA
WIFE OF LATE CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
2. RANI MANJUNATH ARADHYA
DAUGHTER OF LATE CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
3. LATHA C.
DAUGHTER OF LATE CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
4. C. KALAVATHI
DAUGHTER OF LATE CHANDRAPPA
5. JAYASHARI
DAUGHTER OF LATE CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO. 617,
GANGADHARESHWARA NILAYA,
MAGADI MAIN ROAD,
GANESHA LAYOUT ANJANA NAGARA,
VISHWANEEDAM
BENGALURU- 560 091
53 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
6. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
MS BUILDING
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
7. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY THE
SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA, MS BUILDING,
DR. BR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
8. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
EXECUTIVE MEMBER BMICP,
KHANIJA BHAVAN
BENGALURU 560 009
9. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(LAND ACQUISITION)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD BMICP,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
10. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 14/3 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA KATTIMANI, ADVOCATE FOR
C/R1-R5;
PROF. RAVI VARMA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R6 AND R7;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
54 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P.ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R8,
R9 & R10)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.24420/2023 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.24420/2023, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1395/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. H JAYARAMA REDDY
SON OF LATE HANUMAPPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 2/1B,
NEAR INFOSYS GATE NO.6,
KONAPPANA AGRAHARA,
55 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ELECTRONIC CITY POST,
BENGALURU 562 100.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
3. THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
4. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
REPTD. BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KANIJA BHAVAN,
BENGALURU 560 009.
5. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
(LAND ACQUISITION),
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001.
6. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T.N.VISWANATHA., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI S.A.AHMED, AAG &
SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE
GOVT. FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
56 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R4,
R5 & R6)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN W.P. No. 11618/2025 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS W.P No. 11618/2025, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1397/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR SRINATH MANGALORE
2. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LTD.,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN, OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED Y ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SARASWATHAMMA
WIFE OF P.V. GOPALA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
(SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
RESIDING AT NO.198,
SUDARSHAN NILAYA
KONAPPANA AGRAHARA,
ELECTRONIC CITY POST,
BENGALURU 562100
57 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU -560 001.
3. THE SECRETARY TO
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU- 560 001
4. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KANIJA BHAVAN,
BENGALURU - 560 009.
5. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
(LAND ACQUISITION),
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU -560 001
6. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER(BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T.N.VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A. AHMED, AAG AND
SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2 AND R3;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR &
58 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R4,
R5 & R6)
THE WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-12011/2025 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WP No-12011/2025, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1401/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SHEENAPPA
SON OF LATE RANGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
2. SMT. KENCHAMMA
WIFE OF KARIKENCHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
59 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT LINGAPURA VILLAGE
TIPPUR DAKHALE, K. GOLLAHALLI
KENGERI HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560 060
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
4. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-1
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
1ST FLOOR, MAHARSHI ARVINDA BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA KATTIMANI M., ADVOCATE FOR
R1 & R2;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R3;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR &
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.56809/2017 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.56809/2017, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1402/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
60 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. K V SHIVAKUMAR
S/O LATE VISHWANATH
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
2. K.S. SINDHU
DAUGHTER OF K.V. SHIVAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. 217,
15TH MAIN, NEAR INDIAN BANK,
BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU 560 004
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT),
MS BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001
4. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
1ST FLOOR,
RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH BUILDING,
61 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
5. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT
BOARD (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR, MARASHI ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B RAMESH., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALAHAR RAO, AAG AND
SRI. RAVINDRA V.REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R3;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA PA ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R4 & R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-16444/2024
(LA-KIADB) AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE
WP No-16444/2024, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1405/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
62 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. NANDI ECONOMIC
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MANGALORE MR. SRINATH
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI K T NARAYANSWAMY
SON OF LATE THOUTAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
NO. 28/116, 4TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN,
CAVERY NAGAR MAIN ROAD
BSK III STAGE, BENGALURU- 560 085
2. SMT. SUGUNA
WIFE OF K.T. NARAYASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
NO. 28/116, 4TH CROSS,
6TH MAIN, CAVERY NAGAR MAIN ROAD
BSK III STAGE BENGALURU-560 085
3. SMT. K.M.SHASHIKALA
WIFE OF LATE SHIVARAM
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
NO. 185, 7TH CROSS ROAD,
BAPUJI LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU- 560 040
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
63 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
5. THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
M.S. BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
6. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
KHANIJA BHAVAN
BENGALURU- 560 009
7. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(LAND ACQUISITION)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001
8. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T.N.VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1-R2;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALAHAR RAO, AAG AND
SRI. RAVINDRA V.REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R4 & R5;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P.ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R6, R7 & R8)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.11063/2025 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.11063/2025, ETC.
64 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 1408/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M THYAGARAJ
SON OF LATE B. MUNISWAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 32/1,
KONANAKUNTE,
BANGALORE-560 062.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES,
DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY.
3. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO. 49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS,
EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN,
BENGALURU-560 001,
REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN.
4. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
V.I.T.C. BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR,
65 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
VISVESWARAIAH MUSEUM BUILDING,
KASTURBA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001,
REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG &
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-5468/2021 (LA-KIADB) AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WP, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1410/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE.
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
66 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
MR. SRINATH
MANGALORE.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. B SURESH
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
SON OF LATE SHRI. BYRAPPA,
NO. 73, 6TH CROSS,
KATHRIGUPPE VILLAGE,
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE,
BENGALURU-560 085.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
3. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001.
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE DEPARTMENT,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
5. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB)
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
67 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
6. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001.
7. THE SPECIAL LAND
ACQUISITION OFFICER-1 (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB),
14/3, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
8. BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY (BMICAPA)
NO.2, ANJANEYA BUILDING,
5 LOOP ROAD,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 009,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY MS. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
R2, R3 & R4;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R5, R6, R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 12964/2024 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 12964/2024, ETC.
68 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 1416/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE.
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR SRINATH MANGALORE.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. S B MATHAPATI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. S VENKATARAM REDDY
S/O SHRI LATE J SRINIVAS REDDY,
AEGD ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT NO.88 ALAHALLI, ANJANAPURA PO,
J P NAGAR, 9TH PHASE,
BENGALURU-560062.
2. S JAYARAM REDDY
S/O LATE J SURENDRA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
APARTMENT D SONA GARDEN APARTMENTS,
NO.18, ALEXANDRIA STREET,
RICHMOND TOWN,
BENGALURU-560025
69 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. S PRATAP REDDY
S/O LATE J SURENDRA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
APARTMENT D SONA
GARDEN APARTMENTS,
NO.18, ALEXANDRIA STREET,
RICHMOND TOWN,
BENGALURU-560025
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
5. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
6. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY THE
SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001.
7. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB)
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER
KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU 560009.
8. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.14/3, IST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
70 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
9. THE SPECIAL LAND
ACQUISITION OFFICER -1 (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB)
14/3, IST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
10. BANGALORE-MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY,
(BMICAPA)
NO.2, ANJANEYA BUILDING,
5, LOOP ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY Ms. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE FOR
C/R1 TO C/R3;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R4 TO R6;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R7,
R8 AND R9)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.12959/2024 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.12959/2024, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1417/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
71 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. S B MATHAPATI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. A KRISHNAPPA
SON OF AGADURAPPA
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS
NO.55/3A, KONAPPANAAGRAHARA,
GOVINDASHETTY PALYA ROAD
ELECTRONIC CITY POST
BENGALURU-562100
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
3. THE SECRETARY TO
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
4. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER
72 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
KHANIJA BHAVAN
BENGALURU-560009
5. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUISITION)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
14/3, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALULRU-560001
6. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T.N.VISHWANATHA FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA ROA, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT, FOR R2 AND R3;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R4
AND R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-12013/2025 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WP No-12013/2025, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1418/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
73 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTRED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
ODD MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED
SIGNATORY MR. SRINATH
MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. S B MATHAPATHI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. T JAGANNATHA
SON OF LATE THIMMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
FLAT NO.G-06, B BLOCK, JYOTHI
G. T. ENCLAVE APARTMENT
CHIKKAKANNAHALLI, SARJAPUR
ROAD, BENGALURU-562125
2. VISHALA
WIFE OF LATE T. VIJAY KUMAR
FLAT NO.G-06, B BLOCK, JYOTHI
G T ENCLAVE APARTMENT
CHIKKAKANNAHALI, SARJAPUR
ROAD, BENGALURU-562125
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560001
74 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
4. THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
5. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE
MEMBER KHANIJA BHAVAN
BENGALURU-560009
6. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(LAND ACQUISITION)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
14/3, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
7. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
14/3, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI.MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R3, R4;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R5 & R6;
SRI. T.N.VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 13420/2025 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 13420/2025, ETC.
75 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 1429/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY,
MR SRINATH MANGALORE.
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY,
MR SRINATH MANGALORE.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. S GAYATHRI
W/O K V SHIVA KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
R/AT NO.3, RAJATHA CHURCH ROAD,
BASAVANAGUDI,
BENGALURU-560004
2. B M SUHAS
S/O B P MAHABALA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
3. B M SUNIL
S/O B P MAHABALA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
76 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
4. SUNITHA S
W/O B M SUNIL,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R2 TO R4 ARE R/AT NO.91,
RAILWAY PATALLEL ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560001
5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT)
M.S.BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY THE
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
6. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO.14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH,
2ND FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
7. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (B M I C P)
IST FLOOR, MAHARSHI ARVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-570001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B RAMESH., ADVOCATE FOR R1, R3 & R4;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG &
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT FOR R5;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA PA DITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R6 & R7)
77 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
THIS WRIT IS APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 16447/2024 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 12964/2024, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1432/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR ADVOCATE FOR ALONG WITH
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. N RAMASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
RESIDING AT
2. P. RANI RAMASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
WIFE OF M. RAMASWAMY,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
NO. 239, C-CROSS,
'B' 1ST MAIN ROAD,
78 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN,
BENGALURU 560 060
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES,
VIKAS SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY THE
ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
M. S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY THE
ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
5. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
E-WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT,
K.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 009
7. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
(B.M.I.C.P),
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 14/3, ARVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 570 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ZULFIKAR SHAFI AND S.LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY,
ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH S.A.AHMED AAG &
SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
79 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
STATE GOVT. FOR R3, R4 & R6;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN W.P No. 34693/2017 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS W.P No. 34693/2017, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1434/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH, MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. MR KARI HANUMAIAH
S/O LATE THAMMAYANNA
AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS
2. MR. T. NARASAPPA
S/O LATE THAMMAYANNA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
3. MRS. SAROJA. R
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
W/O LATE T. GOPALA KRISHNA
4. MR. T. NARAYANA
SON OF LATE THAMMAYANNA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
80 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ALL ARE R/AT: NO.58,
AVALAHALLI
MYSURU ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 026.
5. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE, M.S. BUILDING
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU- 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
6. STATE OF KARNATAKA
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
7. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
8. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 1ST
FLOOR, MAHARSHI ARAVIND
BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU- 560 001
9. BANGALORE-MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY
IN THE PREMISES OF DIRECTOR
OF TOWN PLANNING,
M S BUILDING
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. NISHANTH.A.V, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
81 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE
GOVT. FOR R5 & R6;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PRURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R7 & R8)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-31426/2018 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WP No-34126/2018, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1435/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. RATNA NAGARAJ
W/O MR M S NAGARAJ RAO
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
REPRESENTED BY HER G P A HOLDER
A V RAMAMOORTHY
S/O LATE ANANTHA SASTRY
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
R/AT NO.732, 13TH CROSS,
8TH MAIN J P NAGAR IIND PHASE,
BANGALORE 560078
82 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
BANGALORE 560001
3. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
NO.32, KINI BUILDING,
M S BUILDING ,
GANDHINAGAR,
BANGALORE 560009
4. THE DIRECTOR
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICE-1,
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE 560009
5. SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
FOR LAND ACQUISITION
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVEVLOPMENT BOARD,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE 560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R3, R4 AND R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.14633/2017 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.14633/2017, ETC.
83 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 1439/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. D C ANUPAMA
DAUGHTER OF D.L. CHANDRA SHEKAR
WIFE OF LOKESH KUMAR. N
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
NO. 28/116, 4TH CROSS,
GONIPURA VILLAGE
KENGERI HOBLI,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK
BENGALURU- 560 082
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
84 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
EAST WING,
KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU- 560 009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
4. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD 14/3, 2ND FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001
5. BANGALORE- MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY
(BMICAPA) OFFICE AT NO.2,
ANJANEYA BUILDING,
5 LOOP ROAD,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH, SEI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE
GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R3 AND R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-9441/2025(LA-KIADB) AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WP, ETC.
85 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 1457/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. D.C. ANUPAMA
DAUGHTER OF D.L. CHANDRA SHEKAR
WIFE OF LOKESH KUMAR. N
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
NO. 28/116, 4TH CROSS,
GONIPURA VILLAGE
KENGERI HOBLI
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK
BENGALURU-560 082
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES,
VIKASA SOUDHA
86 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
3. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
EAST WING,
KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU-560 009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
4. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
14/3, 2ND FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
5. BANGALORE- MYSORE
INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY (BMICAPA)
OFFICE AT NO.2,
ANJANEYA BUILDING
5 LOOP ROAD,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU 560 009
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.9485/2025 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.9485/2025, ETC.
87 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 1459/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH, MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. MR KARI HANUMAIAH
S/O LATE THAMMAYANNA
AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS
2. MR. T. NARASAPPA
S/O LATE THAMMAYANNA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
3. MR. G. GIRISH
S/O LATE T. GOPALA KRISHNA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
4. MRS. SAROJA. R
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
W/O LATE T. GOPALA KRISHNA
5. MR. G. CHETAN
S/O LATE T. GOPALA KRISHNA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
6. MR. G. JAGADISH
S/O LATE T. GOPALA KRISHNA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
88 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
7. MR. T. NARAYANA
SON OF LATE THAMMAYANNA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT NO.58,
AVALAHALLI
MYSURU ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 026.
8. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE,
M.S. BUILDING
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU- 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY
9. STATE OF KARNATAKA
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
10. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
11. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
12. BANGALORE-MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY
IN THE PREMISES OF DIRECTOR
OF TOWN PLANNING,
MS BUILDING,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
89 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. NISHANTH.A.V, ADVOCATE FOR RC/R2;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT FOR R5 AND R6;
SRI K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R7
& R8)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-57287/2016 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WP No-57287/2016, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1643/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF M.G ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF M. G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
90 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. CHANNABASANAGOUDA PATIL
SON OF LATE SHIVARUDRAPPAGOUDA PATIL,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 9/10, BCMC LAYOUT,
RAGHUVANAHALLI, THALAGHATAPURA POST,
BANGALORE - 560109
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001
BY CHIEF SECRETARY
3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT),
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU -560001
4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU 560001
5. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND MEMBER SECRETARY,
KIADB, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR,
EAST WING,
KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560001
6. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
FOR LAND ACQUISITION, KIADB (BMICP),
1ST FLOOR, MARASHI ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560001
91 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
7. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARTISHAT,
2ND FLOOR,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
8. BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY,
NO. 5, 2ND FLOOR, LOOP LANE,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU -560009
9. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE
REGARDING NICE PROJECT,
KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU -560001
10. THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
OF THE CABINET
SUB-COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED
UNDER THE OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM
DATED 05.10.2021,
BEARING NUMBER
SHAMSHA 33 CSC 2021,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU 560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. SURESH DESAI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE
GOVT. FOR R2, R3 AND R4, R9, R10;
SRI. K SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R5,
R6 & R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
92 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
JUDGE IN WP No. 1357/2024 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 1357/2024, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1651/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO 1 MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENNS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHIROAD
BENGALURUL 560001
REP BY ITS AUTHOURISED SIGNATORY
MR SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO 1 MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGLURU 560001
REP BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SAROJAMMA
W/O LATE P KRISHNAPPA
AGE ABOUT 63 YEARS
RESIDING AT DODDATHOGURU VILLAGE
BEGUR HOBLI.
2. NAGARAJ
S/O LATE P KRISHNAPPA
AGE ABOUT 49 YEARS
RESIDING AT DODDATHOGURU VILLAGE
BEGUR HOBLI.
3. GUNDA VARAPU ANANTH KUMAR
S/O G VENKAT SUBBA RAO
93 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AGE ABOUT 38 YEARS
PLOT NO 427, SRINIVASA NAGAR
BANK COLONY, VIJYAWADA
ANDHRA PRADESH 52008
4. TANUKU SITA MAHALAKSHMI
W/O TNVM KISHORE
AGE ABOUT 40 YEARS
D 401 PURVI MITHILA APARTMENTS
VICTORIA, MEADOWS ROAD,
MARATHAHALLI, BENGALURU 560037
5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT )
MS BUILDING,
BENGALURU 560001
6. THE KARNATKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO 14/3
RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH,
2ND FLOOR,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
REPRESENTED BY
SPECIAL DEPUTYCOMISSIONER
7. THE SPECIAL LAND AXQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR,
MARASHI ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.RAMESH., ADVOCATE FOR C/R3 AND C/R4;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT
FOR R5;
94 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R6
& R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 2448/2020 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No.2448/2020, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1653/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
No.11, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
No.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ERAMMA
WIFE OF LATE REVANNA SIDDAIAH @
REVENA SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
NO. 116, GONIPURA VILLAGE
95 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
KUMBALAGODU
KENGERI HOBLI
BENGALURU -560 060
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE M S BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001
3. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO. 14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH,
2ND FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER
4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR, MARASHI ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P AIDTHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R3 AND R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-16027/2024 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WP No-16027/2024, ETC.
96 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 1658/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SANJAY R
S/O LATE N. RAMACHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 'SHRIRAM SHREYAS'
G2-408, KODIGEHALLI,
VIDYARANYAPURA, BANGALORE-560097
2. R. ANJANA
W/O LATE NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
F18, 2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS,
VIDYARANYAPURA, MYSORE 570 008.
3. SRI RANJAN RAMACHANDRA
S/O N. RAMACHANDRA
97 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.231, 4TH MAIN ROAD,
NEAR BMTC TERMINUS, SHARADA COLONY,
BASAVESHVARANAGARA,
BANGALORE NORTH
BANGALORE-560 079
4. SRI U RAMESH UDUPA
S/O NARAYANA UDUPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
NO.317, TRISHUL', 3RD CROSS,
RAJAGOPALANAGAR, PEENYA 2ND STAGE,
BANGALORE NORTH 560 058 (S. NO.4)
5. SMT LIZERANI JOSE MALIAKKAL
W/O LATE JOSE M MALLAKKAL,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.2/1, MARIA COTTAGE,
KHB ROAD, 1ST CROSS,
BEHIND PUSHPANJALI THEATRE,
SULTANPALYA, R.T. NAGAR,
BANGALORE NORTH
BANGALORE 560 032 (S.NO.5 AND 29)
6. SMT. S. SAVITHA
W/O P. SUBRAMANYAM
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
NO.204, KALANJALI APARTMENTS,
9TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS, K.G. COLONY,
G.M. PALYA, NEW THIPPASANDRA,
BANGALORE 560 075 (S.NO.6)
7. SMT NIGGY JOBY @ LIGY JOBY
C/O MAZHUVANCHERRY JOBY
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.10/24(A),
MAZHUVANCHERRY HOUSE,
THURUTHIPURAM, VADAKKEKARA VTC
MOOTHAKUNNAM, SUB-DST PARAVUR,
ERNAKULAM DST.,
KERALA 683516 (S.NO.7)
8. SMT. M. SHANKUNTALA
W/O NARASIMHA REDDY
98 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.1032,
4TH CROSS, 13TH MAIN,
INDIRANAGAR 2ND STAGE,
BANGALORE-560 068 (S.NO.8 AND 9)
9. SRI SHAMANTH KUMAR M
S/O MUNISWAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.64/1,
2ND CROSS, 9TH MAIN,
7TH BLOCK, GURURAJA LAYOUT,
BSK 3RD STAGE,
BANGALORE-560 085
10. SMT M. NAVYA
D/O. MUNISWAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.64/1,
2ND CROSS, 9TH MAIN,
7TH BLOCK, GURURAJA LAYOUT,
BSK 3RD STAGE,
BANGALORE-560 085
11. SRI MANJUNATH
A.V S/O LATE VISHWANATH SETTY
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
RESIDING AT VILLA NO.09
VISHWANATHA NILAYA,
SKANDA NIRVANA,
BEHIND SHIVA TEMPLE
PANATHUR BANGALROE-560 103
12. SMT. PADMAVATHAMMA
W/O LATE VISHWANATH SETTY
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
RESIDING AT VILLA NO.09
SKANANDA NIRVANA,
BEHIND SHIVA TEMPLE PANATHUR
BANGALORE-560 103
13. SRI LAKSHMINARAYANA KATH
S/O SHUDAR JOO KATH
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
99 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
RESIDING AT FLAT NO.1001,
TOWER T2, ROYAL APARTMENTS,
TALAB, TILLO JAMMU,
HAZURI BAGH, JAMMU CITY,
JAMMU AND KASHMIR 180 002
14. SRI N. RAVINDRANATH
S/O LATE RAMACHANDRAIAH SETTY,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 10-326,
KAMMA STREET, MADANAPALLE,
CHITTOOR DST.,
ANDHRA PRADESH-517 325
15. SMT. M. UMADEVI
W/O D.N. REDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
7/16, 1ST C CROSS, 5TH MAIN,
5TH BLOCK, 3RD STAGE,
3RD PHASE,
BANGALORE-560 085
16. SRI D.N.NARAYANASWAMY
S/O NARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
RESIDING AT DODDAMALADODDI,
SRINIVASAPURA TALUK,
KOLAR DST.
JN. THIMMASANDRA
PIN 563 135
17. SMT. D.R.MALINI
W/O SRI MUNISWAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
NO.64/1, (3/17), 2ND CROSS,
9TH MAIN, GURURAJA LAYOUT,
7TH BLOCK, BSK 3RD STAGE,
BANGALORE-560 085
18. SRI MEDA ATMARAM
S/O MEDA ADISHESAIAH
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 13-2-540,
RAMACHANDRANAGAR,
100 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ANANTAPUR,
ANDRA PRADESH-517 325
19. SRI GUNDLAPALLI SREERAMULU
S/O GUNDLAPALLI ANJANEYALU,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 5-76-1,
PAPAMPETA VYSYA BANK COLONY,
ANANTAPUR ANDRA PRADESH-515 004
20. SRI ANANDAPPA BABU GUNDLAPALLI
S/O G. PEDDA OBULAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
NO.2-145, OC COLONY,
D CHENNEPALLI,
KAMBADUR MANDAL,
KARTHANAPARTHI,
ANANTHAPURA,
ANDRA PRADESH 515 787
21. SRI. A M MALLESH
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
S/O LATE MALLEGOWDA,
REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER
SRI. RAVIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
NO.8, DWARAKAMAYI NILAYA,
5TH BLOCK, 2ND STAGE,
NAGARABHAVI,
BANGALORE-560 072
22. SRI PATAPATI LAKSHMIPATHI
S/O HEMADRI NAIDU,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 103,
M/S. AMAZING GRACE APT.
1ST MAIN ROAD,
SANGAM ENCLAVE,
GUBBI CROSS,
OPP TO SALARPURIA
SATVA GOLD SUMMIT APT. KOTHANUR,
DR. SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR,
BANGALORE
101 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
23. SRI B.MAHESHWARAN
S/O BANGARA NAIDU,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
NO.18, CHOWDESHWARI NILAYA,
2ND CROSS, ILTTAMADU MAIN ROAD,
MARUITINAGAR, BSK 3RD STAGE,
BANGALORE-560 085
24. SMT KANTALAKSHMI
W/O M. NANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.255,
9TH MAIN ROAD, NEAR GEO HOTEL,
S.R. NAGAR, VTC,
BANGALORE SOUTH
BANGALORE-560 085
25. SRI M. NANJAPPA
S/O MARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.255,
9TH MAIN ROAD,
NEAR GEO HOTEL, S.R. NAGAR,
VTC, BANGALORE SOUTH,
BANGALORE-560 085
26. SMT RAMA DEVI
W/O SUBBA RAO E.
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
REP BY HER GPA HOLDER,
SRI SRINIVASA RAO E
RESIDENTS OF NO.33,
SREE GIRI RESIDENCY
2ND CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
HANUMAGIRINAGARA,
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
SUBRAMANYAPURA,
BANGALORE SOUTH,
BANGALORE 560 061
27. SRI SRINIVASA RAO EDUPUNGANTI
S/O SUBBA RAO E,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
RESIDENTS OF NO.33,
102 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
SREE GIRI RESIDENCY
2ND CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
HANUMAGIRINAGARA,
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
SUBRAMANYAPURA,
BANGALORE SOUTH,
BANGALORE 560 061
28. SRI RAMAKRISHNA
S/O RAMDAS CHOWDARY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 12-907, 4TH CROSS,
SAI NAGAR, VTC ANANTAPUR,
ANANTAPUR,
ANDRA PRADESH-515 001
29. SRI CHINNI BHAGAVAN PRASAD GUPTA
S/O LATE CHINNI RAMALINGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 15-5-17/A2
RRN COLONY, MADANAPALLE,
CHITTOOR DST.,
ANDRA PRADESH-517 E325
30. SMT SHOBA SURESH
W/O SURESH,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
FLAT NO.309, BLOCK A',
DWARAKAMAI OLIVE,
NEAR KAMAT YATRI NIVAS,
HOODI,
BANGALORE-560 048.
31. SRI V. SURESH REDDY
S/O LATE CHIKKA VENKATASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
NO.9, 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS,
5TH BLOCK, 3RD STAGE,
3RD PHASE,
BANGALORE-560 085
32. SMT LAKSHMI.N
W/O SURESH REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
103 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
REP BY HER GPA HOLDER,
SRI AMAREESH REDDY.N
33. SRI AMAREESH REDDY N
S/O LATE NARASIMHA REDDY D.N.
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
PETITIONERS NOS. 32 & 33
ARE RESIDENTS OF NO.9, 1ST MAIN,
2ND CROSS, 5TH BLOCK,
3RD STAGE, 3RD PHASE,
BANGALORE-560 085
34. SRI BANDARU SRINIVASA CHAKRAVATHY
S/O LATE BANDARU RADHAKRISHNA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 5-62 NAGILLA,
VARIPALLI NAGILLA, PEDDAPURA PALLE,
CHITTOOR DST. ANDRA PRADESH-517 257
35. SRI PASALA DWARAKANATHA REDDY
S/O LATE PASALA CHINNA REDDEPPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 15-3-5, CTM ROAD,
R.R.N. COLONY, MADANAPALLE,
CHITTOOR DST.
ANDRA PRADESH-517 325
36. SRI S.MAHABOOB BASHA
S/O SHEIK HUSSAIN SAHEB,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 1910-19-11,
HAPPY HOMES FORTUNA, UPPARPALLY,
NEAR PILLER NO.175, ATTAPUR,
K.V. RANGA REDDY, TELANGANA-500 048.
37. SRI MADAGALA BABU
S/O LATE MADAGALA KANNAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 15-5-13-4-2,
RRN COLONY, MADANAPALLE,
CHITTOOR DST.,
ANDRA PRADESH-517 325
104 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
38. SRI. K. VASU
S/O LATE K.NARASIMHULU CHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 10-325,
KAMMA STREET, MADANAPALLE,
CHITTOOR DST.,
ANDRA PRADESH-517 325
39. SMT BIBI NAFISA KOBATTE
W/O SYED MAQBOOK PEERAZADE,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.16-8-504/63,
BALMATTA ROAD,
MISSION COMPOUND,
KANKANADY, MANGALORE (D.K),
MANGALORE 02.
40. SRI MUNISWAMAIAH
S/O GANGIAH,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.64/1,
2ND CROSS, 9TH MAIN,
7TH BLOCK, GURURAJA LAYOUT,
BSK 3RD STAGE,
BANGALORE-560 085.
41. SMT VIDYA BRAHMAPPA
W/O BRAHMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.189, 1ST CROSS,
BYRASANDRA,
JAYANAGARA 1ST BLOCK EAST,
JAYANAGARA 3RD BLOCK,
BANGALORE-560 011.
42. SRI MUSAQ AHMED DIWANJI
S/O D.ABDUL SALAM,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.118,
8TH MAIN ROAD,
DOLLARS COLONY, J.P. NAGAR,
4TH PHASE,
BANGALORE SOUTH,
BANGALORE-560 078
105 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
43. SRI D. NISAR AHMED
S/O D. ABDUL SALAM,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.118,
8TH MAIN ROAD,
DOLLARS COLONY,
J.P NAGAR, 4TH PHASE,
BANGALORE SOUTH,
BANGALORE-560 078.
44. SMT SHAMEEM BANU
W/O ZAHEER R.M.
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
NO.1417, 23RD CROSS, 12TH MAIN,
NEAR SWIMMING POOL,
JAYANAGAR 3RD BLOCK EAST,
BANGALORE-560 011.
45. SMT D. MUNAVAR SULTANA
W/O D. MUKTHER AHMED,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
NO.5/Q, 2ND FLOOR,
SARASWATHIPURAM,
BTM LAYOUT, 6TH STAGE,
2ND PHASE, 2ND BLOCK,
BANGALORE-560 076.
(44 AND 45 ARE JOINT OWNERS)
46. SMT SHAHEEN ARA DIWANJI
W/O MUSTAQ AHMED DIWANJI,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.118, 8TH MAIN ROAD,
DOLLARS COLONY,
J.P. NAGAR, 4TH PHASE,
BANGALORE SOUTH,
BANGALORE-560 078.
47. SMT BYSANI USHA RANI
W/O NARAYANA MURTHY
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 11/125,
NEHRU BAZZAR,
BYSANI SUPER MARKET,
106 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
MADANAPALLE,
CHITTOOR DST.,
ANDRA PRADESH-517 325.
48. SMT BYSANI.V.MANJULA DEVI
W/O VENKATESH
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 8/188 SASTRI STREET,
MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DST.,
ANDRA PRADESH-517 325.
SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED
49. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
50. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
OPP TO RESERVE BANK OF INDIA,
BANGALORE-560 002
REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
51. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
OFFICE-1, KIADB (BMICP) NO.14/3,
1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001
52. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560 001
REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
53. THE COMMISSIONER BBMP,
HEAD OFFICE, HUDSON CIRCLE,
BANGALORE-560 002.
107 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
54. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
BBMP, WARD NO.159, KENGERI,
BANGALORE-560 060.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.M.HEMANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R49 & R52;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R50 & R51)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No-1735/2024 (LA-KIADB) AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WP No-1735/2024, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1659/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. D SRIDHAR
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
S/O. LATE DASARI MUNISWAMY NAIDU
NO.1, 1ST A CROSS, 24TH MAIN, II PHASE
J.P. NAGAR BENGALURU 560 078
108 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES, M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
3. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
(KIADB) NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR
RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH BUILDING,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB) 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.K.VASANTH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 46327/2016 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 46327/2016, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1663/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISED LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
109 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SHRI ANEL KUMAR M. K
S/O SHRI M. KRISHNAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT NO.A4-110, GOKULAM APARTMENT,
KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD,
DODDAKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU-560062
2. SHRI KANDIKUNTA CHIDANANDA
S/O SHRI K.V. THIMMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/AT NO, FLAT NO.005,
GROUND FLOOR,
MALLIKARJUNA RESIDENCY,
80 FEET ROAD, GUBBALAL,
SUBRAMANYAPURA POST,
BENGALURU-560061.
3. SMT KANDIKUNTA MALAVIKA
W/O SHRI ABHISHEK MAYAKUNTIA,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
R/AT. PLOT NO.3-546, FLAT-304,
DEVI NILAYAM, STREET NO.8,
110 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NEAR SAIBA BABA TEMPLE,
AYYAPPA SOCIETY MADHAPUR,
KV RANGAREDDY, TELENGANA-500081.
4. SHRI VINAYAKA I ANAND
S/O SHRI ANAND I.D.,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
R/AT FLAT NO.403, HOUSE NO.29/2,
SAHAJA PRIDE APARTMENT,
6TH CROSS DEAD END, BALAJI LAYOUT,
NEAR TO HUYSALA COMMANDER RETREAT
APTS. KODIGEHALLI,
BENGALURE-560092
5. SMT. RADHA R
W/O SHRI LG RAMAKANTHA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT NO.89, NEW NO.204,
RAGHAVENDRANILAYAM, MSR NAGAR,
MSRIT, BENGALURU-560054.
6. SHRI MANJUNATH BABU R
S/O SHRI RAMALAH SHETTY SR
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/AT NO.7, MANJUNATHA NILAYA,
2ND FLOOR, 1ST CROSS, 4TH MAIN,
VENKATAPPA LAYOUT,
NEAR DAFFODILS SCHOOL,
SANJAYNAGAR, RMV EXTENSION
2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560094.
R2 TO R6 ARE REPRESENTED BY
THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER,
SHRI ANEL KUMAR M.K.
S/O SHRI M. KRISHNAMURTHY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/AT NO.A4-110, GOKULAMAPARTMENT,
KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD,
DODDAKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU-560062.
7. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
111 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
8. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001.
9. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY
TO INDUSTRIES AND C
OMMERCE DEPARTMENT,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001.
10. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALUU-560009
11. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (BMICP),
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001.
12. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER-1 (BMICP),
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001.
112 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
13. BANGALORE-MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING
AUTHORITY (BMICAPA),
NO.2, ANJANEYA BUILDING,
5 LOOP ROAD,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
...RESPONDENTS
(BY MS.MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1-R6;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R7, R8 & R9;
SRI. K SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R10, R11 AND R12)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.18770/2024 AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS
WP NO.18770/2024, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1664/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISED LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR.
SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
113 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. LAKKAMMA
WIFE OF MUNITHIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS
THALAGHATTAPURA VILLAGE
UTTARAHALLI HOBLI
KANAKAPURA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 062
2. STATE BY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
MS BUILDING,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KIADB OFFICE-2, NO. 14/3,
1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVAN,
CFC BUILDING,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 009
4. MANAGING DIRECTOR
KARNATAKA PUBLIC LAND
CORPORATION LIMITED, 2ND FLOOR,
AT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER'S BUILDING,
NEAR CITY CIVIL COURT,
KEMPEGOWDA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 009
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KALYAN.R., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
114 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.15728/2016 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.15728/2016, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1679/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M GAYATHRI
WIFE OF LATE G. VENKATESH REDDY,
RESIDING AT NO.1/13,
115 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
KONAPPANA AGRAHARA,
ELECTRONIC CITY POST,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
2. M NEELAMMA
WIFE OF LATE G. CHANDRA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
VENKATESH REDDY LAYOUT,
NEAR INFOSYS GATE NO.7,
KONAPPANA AGRAHARA POST,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
3. G NAGARAJ
SON OF GURAPPA REDDY,
NO.1/13, KONAPPANA AGRAHARA VILLAGE,
ELECTRONIC CITY POST,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
5. THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT.
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
6. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KANIJA BHAVAN,
BENGALURU 560 009.
7. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
(LAND ACQUISITION),
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
116 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
8. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
(BMICP) KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 14/3,
1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T.N. VISHWANATHA AND T.N.RAMESH,
ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 TO R3;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R4 AND R5;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA PA DITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R6 TO R8)
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 12014/2025 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 12014/2015, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1680/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISED LIMITED
NO 1 MIDFORE HOUSE
MIDFORE GARDENS
OFF M G ROAD
BENGALURU 560001
REP BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNOTORY
MR SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
117 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. T MUNIYAPPA
S/O LATE THAYAPPA
AGE ABOUT 61 YEARS
2. MUNIRAJU S
S/O LATE T SANJEEVAPPA
AGE ABOUT 38 YEARS
3. MANJULA S
D/O T SANJEEVAPPA
AGE ABOUT 34 YEARS
4. MUNIYAPPA,
SON OF LATE MUTTAPPA,
AND NANJAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
5. MARIYAPPA
S/O LATE MUTTAPPA
AND NANJAMMA
AGE ABOUT 59 YEARS
ALL ARE R/A 79/A/1 VIDYAPEETHA ROAD
2ND MAIN ROAD, KOTE KENGERI
BANGALORE 560060
6. THE STATE OF KARNATKA
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE, M S BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE 560001
7. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO.49 KHANIJA BHAVAN
EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR, RACE COURSE ROAD
BANGALORE 560001
8. THE SPECIAL LAND
ACQUISITIN OFFICER
KARNATKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
118 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NO 49 KHANIJA BHAVAN,
EAST WING,
5TH FLOOR,
RACE COURSE ROAD
BANGALORE 560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. H.V.T. GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R6;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R7 & R8)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 14154/2023 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 14154/2023, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1683/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISED LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
119 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR. SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. AKKAMMA
W/O LATE GOVINDAPPA
AGE ABOUT 74 YEARS
GOTTIGERE VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560083
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
M S BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001
3. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO 14/3, RASTROTHANA PARISHATH
2ND FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SPECIAL DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER
4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
HE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 1ST FLOOR
MAHARASHI ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T N VISWANATHA., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R3 AND R4)
120 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 7840/2024 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 7840/2024, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1685/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI
ROAD BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR.SRINATH MANGALORE
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VIDUR NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. RAJASHEKHARA REDDY
SON OF VENKATARAMANA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
NO. 57/3A, 3RD MAIN, 5TH CROSS,
BEHIND ANUGRAHA HOSPITAL
KONAPPANA AGRAHARA
G.S. PALYA ROAD
ELECTRONIC CITY POST
BENGALURU 560 100
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
3. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB)
NO. 14/3, 2ND FLOOR,
121 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T.N.VISHWANATHA., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR
R3 AND R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 2642/2025 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 2642/2025, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1903/2025
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.49 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR
RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH BUILDING
NRUPTHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURUP-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
122 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS,
4TH 5TH FLOOR
EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU.560001
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, BMICP
NO.14/3 2ND FLOOR
RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH BUILDING
NRUPTHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
NO.14/3 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVIDNA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE-560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. ASHOK NARAYAN NAYAK.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. A M SHARATH CHANDRA
S/O A C MUNIVENKATA GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT P-2 ALUNGOOR, GROVE
23RD MAIN ROAD, 16TH CROSS
5TH PHASE, JP NAGAR
BENGALURU-560078
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDL.
CHIEF SECRETARY AND
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF
INDUSTRIES COMMERCE,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560001
123 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURES PVT LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
OFF MG ROAD-560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE
FOR ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP No. 5437/2022 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS WP No. 4437/2022, ETC.
IN WA NO. 1986/2025
BETWEEN:
1. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1 MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR SRINATH MANGALORE
2. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE, MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
MR SRINATH M ANGALORE
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE)
124 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. SMT RATHNAMMA
D/O LATE ANNAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
2. A MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE ANNAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
3. SMT KAMALA
D/O LATE ANNAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
4. SMT KOMALA
D/O LATE ANNAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R1 TO R4 ALL ARE
R/AT GOTTIGERE BANNERGHATTA ROAD
UTTARHALLI, BENGALURU-560083
5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT)
M S BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001
6. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO.14/3, RASTROTHANAPARISHATH
2ND FLOOR,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER
7. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
(BMICP)
1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN
125 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR COUNSEL
ALONG WITH SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, SPL.
COUNSEL ALONG WITH S.A. AHMED, AAG FOR R5;
SRI. K SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P. ADITHYA, ADVOCATE FOR R6)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 31/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.22903/2024 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.22903/2024, ETC.
IN WA NO. 2011/2025
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR,
RASTHROTHANA PARISHAD BUILDING,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560002.
NOTE: THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO 49,
KHANIJA BHAVAN EAST WING,
4TH FLOOR,
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE
AND EXECITVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
SECOND FLOOR,
RASTHROTHANA PARISHAD BUILDING,
126 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560002
NOTE: THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI MOHAMMAD ABDUL KAREEM FAISAL
S/O MOHAMMAD ALOHAZI,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/AT NO.301, GARVEBHAVIPALYA,
HONGASANDRA, BEGUR HOBLI,
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK 560068
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.AMEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560001
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560001.
4. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE URBAN, K.G.ROAD,
BANGALORE-560009.
5. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUKA,
127 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
K.G.ROAD,
BANGALORE-560009.
6. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED,
REP. BY ITS MANAGER
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDEN,
MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001,
7. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED,
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001,
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
SRI. RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT FOR R2 TO R5;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD ADVCOATE FOR R6 AND R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 723/2014 (LA-KIADB) BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE THIS HONBLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 2077/2025
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR./
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PRESENTLY
4TH AND 5TH FLOOR,
128 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001.
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001
CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
NO.14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING,
NRUPTHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE - 560001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. ASHOK NARAYAN NAYAK., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. K S RAMACHANDRA RAO
SON OF LATE K. SURYANARAYANA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.2/9, 8TH MAIN,
2-A CROSS, NAGENDRA BLOCK,
BSK 1ST STAGE, BANASHANKARI,
BANGALORE NORTH-560050.
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
2. R. KRISHNE GOWDA
S/O RANGE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.212,
4TH CROSS, NEAR 7 DAY MARKET,
KASTURI NAGAR, KALYANNAGAR POST,
BANASWADI VILLAGE,
BANGALORE-560043.
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
129 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. L P VENKATESH
S/O LATE PUTTAPPA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
R/A NO.43 MARUTHI NAGAR,
5TH CROSS, NETHRAVATHI ROAD,
CHANDRA LAYOUT, NAGARBHAVI,
BANGALORE NORTH-560072
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
4. B M SRIMATHI KUMARI
W/O PUTTARAJU R
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
R/A 5/1, BAIRAPPA LANE
RANASINGHEPETE, CHICKPET,
BANGALORE SOUTH-560053
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
5. BOREGOWDA
S/O NINGEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
R/A NO.528, 4TH CROSS,
2ND MAIN ROAD, SVG NAGAR
NAGARBHAVI, BANGALORE NORTH-560072
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
6. M NARASIMHA MUPPALA
S/O VENKATANARASIMHA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
R/A 23, 5TH MAIN,
2ND CROSS, NEAR GAGNA BAKERY
CPV BLOCK GANGA NAGAR,
BANGALORE NORTH-560032
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
7. B S DYAVEGOWDA
S/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
R/A 8, 2ND MAIN, SUBBANNA GARDEN
GOVINDARAJAN NAGAR,
VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560040
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
8. RAMACHANDRA RAO D
S/O DEVOJI RAO,
130 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
R/A NO.73 SAI NIVAS,
4TH CROSS, SURYODAYA LAYOUT,
R K HEGDENAGAR,
DR SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR
BANGALORE-560077
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
9. KAMALA S N
W/O B S DYAVEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 8, 2ND MAIN
KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK,
KASABA HOBLI AGRAHARA HOBLI,
KRISHNARAJAPETE
MANDYA 57426
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED.
10. KRISHNAPPA M
S/O MUNIYAPPA M,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 188, AYAPPA TEMPE ROAD,
NEAR SHANIMAHATHMA TEMPLE,
CHOLANAYAKAHALLI, R T NAGAR,
BANGALORE NORTH 560032
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED.
LATE T VATSALA GOPINATH
SINCE DEAD BY LRS,
11. T K GOPINATH
S/O KRISHNAMURTHY RAO T R
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
R/AT 348, 15TH CROSS,
OPP PLV PRIDE SARASWAHI NAGAR,
VIJAYNAGAR BANGLAORE NORTH,
BANGALORE 560003
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED.
12. VENKATA KRISHNAIAH D S
S/O LATE V SEETHARAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 24 RURAL,
10TH CROSS,
131 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
YELLAPPA GARDEN MALLESWARM,
BANGALORE 560003.
13. K NARASHIMA
S/O K C MARAKALA,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 353/357,
NANDIKESHWARA
ANUGRAHA IRODY BRAHMAVARA TALUK,
KANYANA GRAMA UDUPI 576226.
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED.
14. JAYAMMA
W/O NARASEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 9/22,
8TH MAIN ROAD,
TATA SILK FARM TYAGARAJANAGAR,
BANGALORE 560028.
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED.
15. S SHANTHA KUMARI
C/O LATE C PURUSHOTHAM,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 04,
NEAR KAMI RAJANNA COMPOUND,
1ST CROSS,
HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD,
CHIKKASANDRA DASARAHALLI,
BENGALURU 560057.
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED.
16. H G VENKATARAMAN
S/O H T GOPAL RAO,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
R/AT HANDIGODU MALALURU
THIRTHAHALLI SHIVAMOGGA 577432
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED.
17. SHUBA B A
W/O GANESH S ,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 005, NANDI FOREST VIEW
APARTMENT BDA LINK ROAD,
132 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
CHANNA SANDRA
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR,
BANGALORE 560098
18. A VIJAY KUMAR
S/O ASHWATHA NARAYANA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 20,
VASANTHA MADHAVA NILAYA,
9TH CROSS, KAMAKYA LAYOUT,
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE,
ADJACENT TO WINDSOR AMBICA
APARTMENT BANGALROE SOUTH 560085
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED.
19. C A ROHINI
W/O C A AIYANNA
AGED 78 YEARS
R/AT NO 35/2-4,
DEVANTHA CHAR STREET
5TH AMIN NEAR, SYNDICATE BANK
S P R BRANCH, CHAMARAJAPET
CHAMRAJPET BANGALORE 560018
SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED
LATE M V PADMA
SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
20. SREEIVASA PRASAD M D
S/O DORESWAMY IYENGAR
AGED 62 YEARS
R/AT NO 542 SRIVARI,
9TH MAIN HEMAVATHI SCHOOL ROAD
T K ALYOUT, 4TH STAGE,
MYSORE SARASWATHI PURAM
MYSORE 570009
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
21. B S VIJAYALAKSHMI
W/O SUBRAMANYA BHATT T S
AGED 73 YEARS
R/AT NO 13, 5TH MAIN ROAD,
SRI KANTESHWAR NAGAR
NANDINI LAYOUT POST
133 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
MAHALAKHMI LAYOUT BANGALORE 96
SINCE DEAD BY LRS
21(a). SMT B N KALPANA
W/O B V NAGARAJ
D/O T S SUBRAMANYA BHATTA AND
SMT B S VIJAYALAKSHMI
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/AT NO.13, 5TH MAIN ROAD,
SRI KANTESHWAR NAGAR,
BANGALORE NORTH NANDINI LAYOUT
BENGALURU-560096
21(b). SMT T S PUSHPA
W/O B S RAMESH
D/O T S SUBRAMANYA BHATTA AND
SMT B S VIJAYALAKSHMI
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/AT NO.13, 5TH MAIN ROAD,
SRI KANTESHWAR NAGAR
BANGALORE NORTH NANDINI LAYOUT,
BENGALURU-560096
21(c). SMT T S ROOPA
W/O S SRIDHAR
D/O T S SUBRAMANYA BHATTA AND
SMT B S VIJAYALAKSHMI
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT NO.263, 5TH MAIN ROAD,
2ND CROSS, NEAR INDUS WEST
SIDE HOSPITAL,
JANANABHARATHI 1ST BLOCK
BENGALURU-560096
22. IRAPPA B GOLAPPANVAR
S/O BASAPPA V
AGED 52 YEARS
R/AT NO 2 BELAKU FIRST CROSS
APC LAYOUT,
THINDLU VIDYARANYAPURAM
BANGALORE 560097
23. SHEELA
W/O K S SUBRAMANYA
134 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AGED 68 YEARS
R/AT 108C 7TH A MAIN, 3RD BLOCK
DASAPPA GARDEN CHAMRAJPET
BANGALORE-560018
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
24. USHA M G
D/O M S GUNDU RAO
AGED 71 YEARS
R/AT 108C 7TH A MAIN
3RD BLOCK
NEAR DATTATREYA TEMPLE
THAYGARAJANGAR
BANGALORE SOUTH 560078
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
25. ANDAL KANNAPPA
W/O KANNAPPA
AGED 72 YEARS
R/AT NO 793, 12TH B CROSS
2ND PHASE, J P NAGAR
BANGALORE 560078
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
26. LALITHA MOHAN
W/O N CHANDRA MOHAN
AGED 70 YEARS
R/AT NO 145 VAIBHAVA,
5TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK
VISHWAPRIYA NAGAR
BEGURU, BANGALORE 560068
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
27. RUKMINIYAMMA
W/O M B HONNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO 3/1, 2ND CROSS,
MUNIREDDY PALYA, UPPAVANALLI
VENKATAPPA BLOCK, BANGALORE 560006
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
28. G SOMESHWARI
W/O M PURVA LINGAM,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
135 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
RESIDING AT NO 17,
NORTH POST LANE,
ITI COLONY DOORVANINAGAR,
BANGALORE 560016
SINCE DEAD BY LRS
28(a) SHASHI KUMAR P
S/O M M POORVALINGAM
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT 10 12TH CROSS,
RAMAMURTHY NAGAR,
LITTLE FLOWER HOSPITAL ROAD,
BANGALORE NORTH
DOORVANINAGAR
BENGALURU-560016
29. SHIVA PRASAD
SON OF LATE H S BASAVARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.2,
BYRAVESHWARA NILAYA,
LOTTEGOLLA HALLI,
NEAR RAILWAY COLONY,
RMV EXTENSION 2ND STAGE,
4TH CROSS, ANJANA MURTHY LAYOUT,
BANGALORE-560094.
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
30. SHANTHA K M
WIFE OF SIDDARAMU,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
BASAVESHWAR HBCS LAYOUT,
VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560040.
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
31. R SUBHADRA VISWAN
W/O LATE K.P.VISHWAMBHARAN,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.520, 15TH MAIN,
15TH CROSS, NEAR GANESHA TEMPLE,
MANJUNATH NAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR,
BANGALORE-560010.
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
136 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
32. C S PRAMILA
W/O VENKATASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/AT NO.71/A, 6TH CROSS,
JYOTHINAGAR CHANDRA LAYOUT,
BANGALORE SOUTH-560085
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
33. GIRISH M
S/O MARIGOWDA A S
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT NO.314/5, 1ST H CROSS,
BEHIND AT GARAGE
SUBBANNA GADEN VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE-560040
34. SATISH AKKUR MARIGOWDA
S/O MARIGOWDA A S
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
R/AT NO 683 MILANA
9TH MAIN ROAD 11TH CROSS
OPPOSITE TO HMR INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
ARCH HBR LAYOUT, 4TH BLOCK
BANGALORE-56004
35. PRAMILA VAIDHYA
W/O S NAGARAJA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
R/AT NO.002 SAPTAGIRI
1ST MAIN ITTOMADU EXETENSION
BSK 3RD STAGE
BANGALORE SOUTH-560085
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
36. H.VGURURAJA
LATE H N VASUDEV RAO
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
R/AT NO.411 SRI.TIRUMALA SYMPHONY
APT.CHIKKA TOGUR ROAD
ELECTRONIC CITY
BANGALORE-560100
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
137 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
37. K G UNNIKRISHNAN
S/O LATE GOVINDAN NAIR V
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
R/AT 160, SRINIKET 7TH CROSS
4TH BLOCK NEAR K.NE TRUST COLLEGE
DODDABOMMASANDRA
BANGALORE NORTH
BANGALORE-560097
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
38. V L RAMAKRISHANA
LATE V LAKSHMAN RAO
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
R/AT 62, 1ST MAIN SINGAPURA
VIDARANYAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560097
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
39. ROSHAN K
S/O D KESHAVAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS BEL LAYOUT
BHARATH NAGAR, BANGALORE-560056
40. GAUTAM B K
S/O D KESHAVAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.42/45 SRISHTI
ULLAL MAIN ROAD
JNANJYOTHI NAGAR
BANGALORE-560056
41. SHANTHI P
W/O S N PARTHASARTHY
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT NO.802/1 A MAIN
1ST STAGE INDIRANAGAR
BANGALORE-560038
42. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDL.
CHIEF SECRETARY AND PRINCIPAL
VIKASA SOUDHA,
138 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560001,
43. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURES PVT LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
NO.1 MILDFORD GARDEN
OFF MG ROAD-560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R42;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R43)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04.07.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN W.P.No. 6439/2023 (LA-KIADB) AND
CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS W.P No. 6439/2023, ETC.
IN WA NO. 2097/2025
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.14/3 RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH
BUILDING NRUPTHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURUP-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS,
4TH AND 5TH FLOOR EAST WING,
KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU.560001
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
139 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BMICP NRUPTHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD(BMICP)
NO.14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
NRUPTHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE-560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. ASHOK N NAYAK., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI.K V SHIVAKUMAR
S/O LATE K VISHWANATH
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED
RESIDING AT NO.3, CHURCH ROAD,
BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE-560004
2. SRI SHREYAS K SHIVAKUMAR
S/O K V SHIVAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.3,
CHURCH ROAD,
BASAVANAGUDI
BANGALORE-560004
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDL.
CHIEF SECRETARY AND
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560001,
4. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURES PVT LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS CONSTITUTED
140 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ATTORNEY NO.1 MILDFORD GARDEN
OFF MG ROAD-560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH, SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R3;
SRI. NITING PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 04/07/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP NO.6144/2021 AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS
WP NO.6144/2021, ETC.
IN WA NO. 2109/2025
BETWEEN:
1. THE KAKRNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO 49, KHANIJA BHAVAN
EAST WING, 4TH FLOOR,
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER
NOTE: THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
No.49, KHANIJA BHAVAN,
EAST WING, 4TH FLOOR,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER -1
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
141 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
1ST FLOOR SC AND ST DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION BUILDINGS
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
NOTE: THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAD
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
No.14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M/S A M R HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
AT 305/66, II FLOOR, 40TH CROSS,
ABOVE SBM BANK 8TH BLOCK,
JAYANAGAR BENGALORE 560011
REP BY MANAGING DIRECTOR
SRI. P MANJUNATHA REDDY
2. BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT
N.R.SQUARE, HUDSON CIRCLE,
BANGALORE-560002
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER
BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
BOMMANAHALLI ZONE,
BEGUR MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE-560068.
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
142 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND INDUSTRIES, VIKAS SOUDHA,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560001.
REPRESENTED BY
ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS,
COMMUNICATION AND BUILDINGS,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560001.
REPRSENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
6. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED,
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001,
BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,
D.RAVISHANAKAR.
7. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED,
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001,
BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRIHARI.A.V, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R3;
SRI.NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R7;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATI, ADVOCATE FOR R6)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.50634/2014 BY THE LEARNED
143 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 16/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE MEMBER SECRETARY
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
NOTE : THE PRESENT ADDRESS
AND CORRECT DESIGNATION
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT
BOARD, (BMICP) NO. 3/2, KINI BUILDING,
GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU 560009
NOTE : THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT
BOARD (BMICP), NO 14/3,
1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR., AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
144 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. SUNDEEP AURORA
S/O KRISHNA KUMAR AURORA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/AT ADARSH NO. 411,
KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU 560034.
REP BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
MR. NOSHIR B SHROFF
S/O. BUJOR D SHROFF,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/AT PHARMED GARDENS,
WHITEFIELD ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 048.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
DEPT. OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU 560001
4. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LTD.,
01, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDEN, M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560001
KARNATAKA
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT
FOR R2 AND R3;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
145 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.63768/2016 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 17/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO.14/3
RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH,
2ND FLOOR
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001,
REP. BY
SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
1 ST FLOOR, MARASHI ARAVIND
BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING,
146 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. S GAYATHRI
AGED 68 YEARS
R/A NO.3, RAJATHA,
CHURCH ROAD,
BASAVANAGUDI,
BENGALURU-560 004.
2. B M SUHAS
S/O B P MAHABALA
AGED 52 YEARS
3. B M SUNIL
S/O B P MAHABALA
AGED 55 YEARS
4. SUNITHA S
W/O B M SUNIL
AGED 51 YEARS
R2 TO R4 ARE R/A NO.91,
RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.
5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT) M.S BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001.
6. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LTD.,
NO.1 FORD GARDENS,
OPP M.G. ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001,
147 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
REP. BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
(REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT)
7. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LTD.,
NO.1. MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS, OFF. MG ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
REP. BY THE AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
(REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT).
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R5;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R6;
SRI NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 16447/2024 (LA-KIADB) BY
THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 33/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
(KIADB), NO.14/3, II FLOOR,
MAHARSHI,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001,
REP BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
NOTE: THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO 2 2/1 AND 2/3 ,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR,
148 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BENGALURU 560009
REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 1
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, (BMICP),
1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVINDA,
BHAVANA ROAD,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
NOTE: THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR, MAHARSHI
ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PRURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. RAJASHEKARA REDDY V
S/O VENKATARAMANA REDDY @
VENKATARAMANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/AT NO.57/3A, 3RD MAIN,
5TH CROSS,
BEHIND ANUGRAHA HOSPITAL,
KONAPPANA AGRAHARA,
G.S. PALYA ROAD,
ELECTRONIC CITY POST,
BENGALURU 560 100.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND
149 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
INDUSTRIES, VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
3. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE
REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
OFFICE AT NO.1,
MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G. ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2;
SRI. T.P.VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.2642/2025 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 76/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA IDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KANIJA BHAVAN,
BENGALURU-560009
NOTE: THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG,
150 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER.
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
(LAND ACQUISITION),
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 14/3,
1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI.P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI H JAYARAMA REDDY
SON OF LATE HANUMAPPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
R/A NO. 2/1B,
NEAR INFOSYS GATE NO.6,
KONAPPANA AGRAHARA,
151 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ELECTRONIC CITY POST,
BENGALURU 560 100.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPTD. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
3. THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
4. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
5. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT. FOR R2 AND R3;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.11618/2025 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
152 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 103/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO. 14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH
2ND FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
RERPESENTED BY SPECIAL
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NOTE : THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR,
MARASHI ARVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001.
NOTE: THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
153 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. SMT JAYAMMA
D/O LATE CHIKKA GANGAPPA
AGED 65 YEARS
R/A CHIKKAKODIGEHALLI VILLAGE
KODIGEHALLI POST
YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMET) M S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
3. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LTD.,
NO.1 FORD GARDENS, OPP M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REP BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR.
4. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LTD.,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN ROAD
M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560001
REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT FOR R2;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.10234/2022 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
154 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 577/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
REPTD. BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER.
KHANIJA BHAVAN,
BENGALURU 560 009.
NOTE: THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
(BM KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
NOTE- THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS THE
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT
BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
(LAND ACQUISITION), KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1 FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
155 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI T JAGANNATHA
SON OF LATE THIMMA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
R/A FLAT NO. G-06, B BLOCK,
JYOTHI G.T. ENCLAVE APARTMENT,
CHIKKAKANNAHALLI, SARJAPUR ROAD,
BENGALURU 562 125.
2. SMT. VISHALA,
WIFE OF LATE T. VIJAY KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/A FLAT NO. G-06, B BLOCK,
JYOTHI G.T. ENCLAVE APARTMENT,
CHIKKAKANNAHALLI,
SARJAPUR ROAD,
BENGALURU 562 125.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPTD. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU560 001.
4. THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
DEPT. M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
5. M/S. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
156 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
6. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN, OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R3 & R4;
SRI. MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R5 & R6)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 13420/2025 (LA-KIADB) BY
THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 586/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD(KIADB)
NO. 14/3, 2ND FLOOR,
RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH BUILDING,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO 49,
KHANIJA BHAVAN EAST WING,
4TH FLOOR, RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (K.I.A.D.B)
157 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
1ST FLOOR, MAHARSHI ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT SUMAN BANSAL
W/O SUBHASH CHANDER BANSAL,
AGED 46 YEARS,
R/AT NO.62, I.PS COLONY,
RIVER VIEW AVENUE, MANAPAKKAM,
CHENNAI-620 125.
REPRESENTED THROUGH HER G.P.A. HOLDER
SRI SUBHASH BANSAL,
S/O LATE MOHANLAL BANSAL
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560001
3. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED,
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001,
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
4. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED,
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001,
REP. BY ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
158 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN W.P NO.34138/2016 (LA-KIADB) BY
THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 621/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
NOTE: THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
NOTE: THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
159 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR., AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT D C ANUPAMA
D/O D.L.CHANDRA SHEKAR,
W/O. LOKESH KUMAR.N,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/AT GONIPURA VILLAGE,
KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU
SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 082.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
3. M/S. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED,
A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY,
OFFICE AT NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF M.G.ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR.
4. M/S. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED,
A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY,
OFFICE AT NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS, OFF M.G.ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
160 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR.
5. BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY
(BMICAPA)
OFFICE AT No.2, ANJANEYA BUILDING,
5 LOOP ROAD, RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560009.
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. MATHAPATHI AND VEENA R HIREMATH, ADVOCATE
FOR R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 9485/2025 (LA-KIADB) BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 626/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
NO.32 KINI BUILDING M S BUILDING
GANDHINAGAR,
BANGALORE-560009
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
161 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE DIRECTOR SPECIAL LAND
ACQUISITION OFFICE-1
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN
CPC BUILDING,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
FOR LAND ACQUISITION KARNATAKA
INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE-560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR., AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. RATHNA NAGARAJ
W/O MR M S NAGARAJ RAO
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
REPRESENTED BY HER
GPA HOLDER A V RAMAMOORTHY
S/O LATE ANANTHA SASTRY
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
R/AT NO.632,13TH CROSS,
8TH MAIN, J P NAGAR, IIND PHASE
BANGALORE-560078
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001
162 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
NANDHI INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY
NEW KIDS KEMP ROAD,
M G ROAD, BANGALORE MYSORE INTEGRATED
CORRIDOR PROJECT (BMICP)
BANGALORE
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.14633/2017 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 629/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPTD. BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KANIJA BHAVAN,
BENGALURU - 560 009.
NOTE: THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO 2, 2/1 2/3, ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU 560009
REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
163 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NOTE: THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
(LAND ACQUISITION), KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 14/3,
1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR., AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI A KRISHNAPPA
S/O AGADURAPPA
AGE ABOUT 83 YEARS
R/A NO 55/3A, KONAPPANA AGRAHARA
GOVINDASHETTY PALYA ROAD
ELECTRONIC CITY POST
BENGALURU 560100
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPTD. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
3. THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE DEPT.
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
164 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
4. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
5. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001.
REP BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA ROA, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R5;
SRI. MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 12013/2025 (LA-KIADB) BY
THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HONBLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 655/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO. 14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH
2ND FLOOR, NARUPTHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
NOTE : THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP).
NO.2, 2/1 & 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG,
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
165 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER.
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR, MARASHI ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
NOTE: THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
No.14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ERAMMA
W/O LATE REVANNA SIDDAIAH @
REVENA SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
R/A NO.116, GONIPURA VILLAGE
GOLLAHALLI POST, KUMBALAGODU,
KENGERI HOGBLI,
BENGALRUU-560 060.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT
OF INDUSTREIES AND COMMERCE
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPJENT)
M S BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001
166 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS
OFF. MG ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY.
4. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
NO.1, FORD GARDENS OPP
M.G. ROAD BENGALURU 560 001
REP BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2;
SRI. HIREMATH PRAVEEN SHEKHARAYYA, ADVOCATE
FOR R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.16027/2024 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 656/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 14/3, RASHTROTHANA
PARISHATH 2ND FLOOR,
BENGLAURU 560 001
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
REP. BY SPCIAL DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER.
NOTE : THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.2, 2/1 AND 2/3
167 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR, MARASHI ARAVIND
BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND P
RESENT ADDRESSTHE SPECIAL
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. D PADHAMAVATHI
D/O D. DEVARAJ
AGED 56 YEARS
2. S. VASANTHA
S/O D. DEVARAJ
AGED 66 YEARS
3. D. ANBALAJI, D/O D. DEVARAJ
AGED 68 YEARS
4. KUMAR
S/O D. DEVARAJ
AGED 65 YEARS
168 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
5. SHYAMARAJ
S/O D. DEVARJ
AGED 64 YEARS
R1 TO R5 ARE R/AT NO. 113,
LALBHAGH ROAD, K.S. GARDEN
WILSON GARDEN,
BENGALURU 560 027.
6. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT
OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT)
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU 560001.
7. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
NO.1, FORD GARDENS
OPP M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001
REP BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
8. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF. MG ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R6;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R7 & R8)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.18824/2024 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
169 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 660/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.2, 2/1 AND 2/3
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN,
CFC BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
170 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. SMT. D C ANUPAMA
D/O D.L.CHANDRA SHEKAR,
W/O. LOKESH KUMAR.N,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/AT GONIPURA VILLAGE,
KENGERI HOBLI,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
BENGALURU-560082.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND
INDUSTRIES VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
3. M/S. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED,
A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY,
OFFICE AT NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS, OFF M.G.ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY
ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
4. M/S. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LIMITED,
A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY,
OFFICE AT NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF M.G.ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR.
5. BANGALORE-MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY
(BMICAPA) OFFICE AT NO.2,
ANJANEYA BUILDING,
5 LOOP ROAD,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHINAGAR,
171 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BENGALURU-560 009.
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 9441/2025 (LA-KIADB) BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 663/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR
EAST WING KHANIJA BHAVAN
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIARMAN.
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG 1ST MAIN
ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
VITC BUILDINGS IST FLOOR
VISVESWARAIAH MUSEUM
BUILDING KASTURBA ROAD,
172 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
BANGALORE-560 001
REPRESENTED BY THE
SPEICAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT
BOARD (BMICP), NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. MR. M THYAGARAJ
SON OF LATE MR B MUNISWAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.32/1,
KONANAKUNTE, BANGALORE-560 062.
2. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE-560 001
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY.
3. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
NO.1, FORD GARDENS OPP M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
REP BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
173 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 5468/2021 (LA-KIADB) BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 672/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
NO.14/3, MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVANA,
1ST FLOOR NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
NOTE : THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 2, 2/1 & 2/3 ACHARYA TULASI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.14/3,MAHARSHI ARAVINDA
BHAVANA 1ST FLOOR,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
NOTE : THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING,
174 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.14/3,
MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVANA,
1ST FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. GOWRAMMA
W/O LATE VENKATESH,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT NO.29, VASANTHAPPA GARDEN,
DOOPANAHALLI SHANTHINAGAR,
H.A.L. II STAGE, BENGALURU-560 008
2. SRI MUNIVENKATAPPA
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
R/AT NO.01,
SANJAY GANDHI NAGAR,
OLD BAIYAPPANAHALLI,
MARUTHI SEVANAGAR
BENGALURU-560 033
3. SRI THYAGARAJU
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
R/AT NO.34,
NEAR KARUMMARIYAMMA TEMPLE,
IMMEDIHALLI,
BENGALURU EAST TALUK,
BENGALURU-560 066
4. SRI MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
175 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
5. SRI CHINNAPPA
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
6. SRI MUNIYAPPA
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
7. SRI JAYAPPA
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
8. SRI MARIYAPPA
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
R4 TO R8 ALL ARE
R/AT CHIKKATHOGUR VILLAGE,
DODDATHOGUR MAIN ROAD,
NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE,
ELECTORNIC CITY POST,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
BENGALURU-560 100
9. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001
10. THE NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES
BENGALURU MYSORE
INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR,
REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
MIDFORD HOUSE, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G.ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
176 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R9;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R10)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.4363/2019 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 679/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPTD. BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KANIJA BHAVAN,
BENGALURU-560 009.
NOTE- THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001.
NOTE- THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
177 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
(LAND ACQUISITION),
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. K T NARAYANASWAMY
S/O LATE THOUTAREDDY,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/A NO. 28/116, 4TH CROSS,
6TH MAIN, CAUVERY NAGAR
MAIN ROAD, BSK III STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560085.
2. SMT. SUGUNA,
WIFE OF SRI. K.T. NARAYANASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/A NO. 28/116, 4TH CROSS,
6TH MAIN,
CAUVERY NAGAR MAIN ROAD,
BSK III STAGE,
BENGALURU 560085.
3. SMT. K.M. SHASHIKALA,
WIFE OF LATE SHIVARAM,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
R/A NO.185, 7TH CROSS ROAD,
BAPUJI LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 040.
178 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPTD. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
5. THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE DEPT.
M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
6. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
7. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
REP BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R4 & R5;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R6 & R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.11063/2025 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
179 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 718/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO. 14/3,
RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH,
2ND FLOOR, NRUPTHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001,.
REP BY SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NOTE: THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG,
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU 560009,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER.
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP), 1ST FLOOR,
MARASHI ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001
NOTE: THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO. 14/3 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN,
CFC BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
180 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. N SHEKAR
S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA,
AGED 63 YEARS,
2. G N MUNENDRA
S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA,
AGED 56 YEARS,
3. G N BALA KRISHNA
S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA,
AGED 54 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
GOTTIGERE VILLAGE,
KEMBATHANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
BEHIND APPOLO PHARMACY,
BENGALURU - 560 083
4. SMT G N PADMA BAI
W/O GIRIAPPA NAGAPPA ASHIVAD,
AGED 62 YEARS,
5. SRI G N RAMESH
S/O GIRIAPPA NAGAPPA ASHIVAD,
AGED 54 YEARS,
R4 AND R5 ARE RESIDING AT NO.3,
JAMUNAGIRI, 2ND CROSS,
LAKSHMI ROAD,
SHANTHINAGAR,
WILSON GARDEN,
BENGALURU - 560 027
6. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE,
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT) M S BUILDING,
BENGALURU 560 001.
REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
7. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LTD
181 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NO. 1 FORD GARDENS, OPP M G ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
8. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
NO. 1 MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS, OFF MG ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R6;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R7 & R8)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.35635/2024 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HONBLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 719/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
(A GOVERNMENT F KARNATAKA UNDERTAKING)
NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR,
R.P. BUILDING NURPATHUNGA
ROAD BENGALURU 560001
BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER
NOTE: THE PRESENT ADDRESS AND
CORRECT DESIGNATION
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.2,2/1 AND 2/3.
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
182 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO.3/2, KINI BUILDINGS 1ST CROSS,
GANDHINAGAR
BENGALURU 560009.
NOTE: THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR., AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P AIDTHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. PARAVEEN KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
S/O LATE MANCHALAL THANMAL
NO.129, 28TH CROSS,
JAYANAGAR 7TH BLOCK
BENGALURU 560011
REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY
NITESH BHANDARI
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
S/O MANOHARLAL BHANDARI
NO.431, 7TH B MAIN ROAD
JAYANAGAR 4TH BLOCK,
BENGALURU 560011.
2. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
183 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND INDUSTRIES
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU BY ITS
PRINCIPLE SECRETARY
3. M/S. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LTD
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDEN
OFF M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU
BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
4. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LIMITED.,
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDEN, OFF M.G.ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2;
SRI. S.B. MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO. 18209/2013 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 839/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 009.
184 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO 2,
2/1 AND 2/3, ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(BMICP) KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL ARERAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD 14/3,
1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560001.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD 14/3,
1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR., AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT VINATHA M REDDY
W/O SHRI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT NO.82, ALAHALLI,
ANJANAPURA POST, JP NAGAR,
185 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
9TH PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 062.
REP. BY HER POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER
2. SHRI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY
S/O LATE SHRI S.P.NAGI REDDY
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
R/AT NO.82, ALAHALLI,
ANJANAPURA POST, JP NAGAR,
9TH PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 062.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRSENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001.
4. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
REPRSETNED BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRSENTED BY THE SECRETARY
TO INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
6. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO 1, MIDFORD GARDEN
OFF MG ROAD BENGALURU - 560001.
7. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIODR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN
OFF M G ROAD, BENGALURU 560001.
8. BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIODR AREA PLANNING AUTHROITY (BMICAPA)
186 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NO.2, ANJANEYA BUILDING
5 LOOP ROAD, RACE COURSE ROAD
35 GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 009.
BY ITS CHAIRMAN
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R3, R4 & R5;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R6 & R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.10037/2024 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 848/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPEMENT BOARD
NO.14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH,
2ND FLOOR, NRUPTHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
REP BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER
NOTE- THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.2 2/1 AND 2/3
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
FOR LAND ACQUISITION KIADB (BMICP),
187 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
1ST FLOOR,
MARASHI ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
MEMBER SECRETARY
KIADB 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR,
EAST WING, KHANIHA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVCOATE
ALONG WITH P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR., AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI CHANNABASANAGOUDA PATIL
S/O LATE SHIVARUDRAPPAGOUDA PATIL,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
R/AT NO.9/10, BCMC LAYOUT,
RAGHUVANAHALLI,
THALGHATAPURA POST,
BANGALORE 560109
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY CHIEF SECRETARY,
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU 560001
188 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES,
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT),
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU 560001
4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
PUBLIC WORK DEPARTENT,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU 560001,
REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
5. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
NO.1 MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MG ROAD, BENGALURU 560001,
REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
REG. UNDER COMPANY
REGISTRATION ACT, 1980
6. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
NO.1 MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS OFF MG ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001,
REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
REG. UNDER COMPANY
REGISTRATION ACT, 1980
7. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES
LIMITED NO.1, MID FORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDEN, OFF MG ROAD,
BANGALORE 560001,
REP BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY,
MR SRINATH MANGALORE
REG. UNDER COMPANY
REGISTRATION ACT, 1980
8. BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA
PLANNING AUTHORITY NO.5
2ND FLOOR, LOOP LANE,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
189 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU 560009
REP. BY CHAIRMAN
9. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE HOUSE
COMMITTEE REGARDING NICE PROJECT
KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU 560001
10. THE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
OF THE CABINET SUB COMMITTEE
CONSTITUTED UNDER THE OFFICIAL
MEMORANDUM DATED 05-10-2021
BEARING NUMBER SHAMSHA 33 CSC 2021
VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2, R3 AND R4;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R5, R6 & R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.1357/2024 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 866/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPTD. BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KANIJA BHAVAN, BENGALURU-560 009.
NOTE- THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.2, 2/1 AND 2/3
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
190 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
RESPONDENT -4 APPELLANT
BENGALURU - 560 001.
NOTE- THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, (LAND
ACQUISITION),
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR., AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. SARASWATHAMMA
WIFE OF P.V. GOPALA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
R/A NO.198, SUDHARSHAN NILAYA
KONAPPANA AGRAHARA
ELECTRONIC CITY POST,
BENGALURU 560 100.
191 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPTD. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
3. THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE DEPT. M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU560 001.
4. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
5. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
REP BY THE
MANAGING DIRECTOR
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2 AND R3;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.12011/2025 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 870/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
192 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
RASHTRODHANA BUILDINGS
N.R.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.
NOTE- THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, (BMICP)
No.3/2, KHENY BUILDING, 1ST CROSS,
GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009.
NOTE- THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.1, MID-FORD HOUSE,
MID-FORD GARDENS, OFF MG ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.K SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI.PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI D HANUMANTHASA
S/O LATE SRI MUNISWAMISA,
AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS,
193 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. SRI D H ISWARASA
S/O LATE SRI D HANUMATHASA,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
3. SRI D H NARAYANASA
S/O LATE SRI D HANUMATHASA,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
R1 TO R3 ARE REP BY
THEIR GPA HOLDER
SRI M G SRINIVASA
S/O SRI D GANGADHARSA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 27, C.K.CHENNAPPA LAYOUT,
MISSION ROAD CROSS,
BENGALURU - 560 027.
4. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
5. M/S NANDI INFRASTURCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LTD.
NO.1, MID-FORCE HOUSE,
OFF M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R4;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 51369/2016 (LA-KIADB) BY
THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
194 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 874/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER BMICP,
KANIJA BHAVAN, BENGALURU-560009.
NOTE- THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.2, 2/1 AND 2/3
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
(BMICP) THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
14/3, IST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001.
3. THE SPEICAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(LAND ACQUISITION)
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BMICP 14/3, IST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA PA DITHYA, ADVOCATE)
195 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. SMT SUNANDAMMA
W/O LATE CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
2. RANI MANJUNATH ARADHYA
D/O LATE CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
3. LATHA C
D/O LATE CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
4. C KALAVATHI
D/O LATE CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
5. JAYASHARI
D/O LATE CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R1 TO R5 ARE R/A NO.617
GAGADHARESHWARA NILAYA
MAGADI MAIN ROAD
GANESHA LAYOUT,
ANJANA NAGARA
VISHWANEEDAM
BENGALURU-560091.
6. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
MS BUILDING,
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001.
7. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA, M S BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
196 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
8. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED,
REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001,
COMPANY INCOPTATED UNDER
COMPANIES ACT 1956
9. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001,
10. BANGALORE-MYSOER INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY
(BMICAPA) NO.2, ANJANEYA BUILDING
5 LOOP ROAD, RACE COURSE ROAD
GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560009
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARAR RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R6 AND R7;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R8 AND R9)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.24420/2023 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 875/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO. 49, KHANIJA BHAVAN,
EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR,
197 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 2,2/1 AND 2/3
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 49, KHANIJA BHAVAN,
EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. T. MUNIYAPPA
S/O LATE THAYAPPA,
AGE 59 YEARS.
2. SRI. MUNIRAJU.S
S/O LATE T SANJEEVAPPA,
AGE 41 YEARS,
198 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. SRI. SHANKAR.S
S/O LATE T SANJEEVAPPA,
AGE 36 YEARS,
4. SMT. MANJULA.S
D/O LATE T SANJEEVAPPA,
AGE 32 YEARS,
5. SRI. MUNIYAPPA
S/O LATE MUTTAPPA AND
SMT NANJAMMA
AGE 59 YEARS,
6. SRI. MARIYAPPA
S/O LATE MUTTAPPA AND
SMT NANJAMMA
AGE 57 YEARS,
R1 TO R6 ARE RESIDING AT NO. 79/A/1,
VIDYAPEETHA ROAD, 2 ND MAIN ROAD,
KOTE KENGERI, BANGALORE-560 060.
7. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE,
M S BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VRMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARTH BABU RAO SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.14154/2023 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS TE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
199 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 876/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KHANIJA BHAVAN
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 009
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 2,2/1 AND 2/3
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISIITON
OFFICER -1 (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMETN BOARD 14/3
1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
200 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(BMICP) KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
14/3 1ST FLOOR ARAVIND BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR., AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA PA DITHYA ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SHRI B SURESH
S/O LATE SHRI BYRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
RA/T NO. 73, 6TH CROSS
KATHRIGUPPE VILLAGE
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE
BENGALURU 560 085
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDAH
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001
3. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
VIKASA SOUDHA
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO
INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
201 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
5. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN
OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
6. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
REPRESENTED BYITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.1 MIDFORD GARDEN
OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALORE 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
7. BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING
AUTHORITY (BMICAPA )
NO.2, ANJANAJEYA BUILDING
5 LOOP ROAD,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU 560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARAR RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2, R3 AND R4;
SRI. HIREMATH PRAVEEN SHEKHARAYYA, ADVOCAE FOR
R5 AND R6)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.12964/2024 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
202 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 881/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER
BMICP, KHANIJA BHAVAN
BENGALURU-560 009
REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER
NOTE THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENG BOARD
NO. 2/ 2/1 AND 2/3
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUIITION
OFFICER -1(BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1ST FLOOR ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001.
NOTE : THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(LAND ACQUISITION)
203 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD BMICP
14/3, 1ST FLOOR ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P V CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. K. KANNAN
S/O. KUPPUSWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
2. SMT. K. LAKSHMI
W/O. KANNAN,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.19,
2ND E MAIN,
RAMAIAH LAYOUT,
KACHARAKANAHALLI,
BENGALURU-560 084.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
M S BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
MS BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
5. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
204 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN OFF M G ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REG. UNDER COMPANIE ACT
6. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M G ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001
REG. UNDER COMPANIES ACT.
7. BANGALORE-MYSORE
INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR AREA
PLANNING AUTHORITY (BMICAPA)
NO.2, ANJANEYA BUILDING
5 LOOP ROAD,
RACE COURSE ROAD
GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 009
REP. BY MEMBER SECRETARY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R3 & R4;
SRI. S.B. MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R5 AND R6)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 14924/2024 (LA-KIADB) BY
THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 885/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER
BMICP, KHANIJA BHAVAN
BENGALURU 560 009.
205 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-1 (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 14/3,
1ST FLOOR ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(LAND ACQUISITION) KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD BMICP 14/3,
1ST FLOOR ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI SUBRATA GHOSH
S/O SUBHAS CHANDRA GHOSH
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
R/O A-22 PATTERNS GOOD
206 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
EARTH MALHAR KUMBALGODU
KAMBIPURA, BENGALURU - 560 074.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA, MS BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES
VIDHANA SOUDHA, MS BUILDING
AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
4. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LTD
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN OFF M G ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001
REG. UNDER COMPANIES ACT.
5. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
REP. BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF MG ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001
REG. UNDER COMPANIES ACT.
6. BANGALORE-MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY (BMICAPA)
NO.2, ANJANEYA BUILDING,
5 LOOP ROAD, RACE COURSE ROAD
GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU 560 009
REP. BY MEMBER SECRETARY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A.AHMED, AAG AND SIDDHARTH
BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT. FOR
R2 AND R3;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)
207 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.206/2024 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 887/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
NOTE: THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P V CHANDRASHEKAR., AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI SEENAPPA
S/O LATE RANGIAH,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
2. SMT. KENCHAMMA
W/O KARIKENCHAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
R/A LINGAPURA VILLAGE,
208 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
TIPPUR DAKHALE K GOLLAHALLI POST
KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH
TALUK-560 060
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES
VIDHANA SOUDHA
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001
REPRESETNED BY ITS SECRETARY
4. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE MIDFORD GARDEN.
OFF MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001,
BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,
D. RAVISHANAKAR.
5. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED,
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001,
REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R3;
S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 56809/2017 (LA-KIADB) BY
THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
209 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
IN WA NO. 890/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER KIADB OFFICE-2,
NO.14/3 IST FLOOR, MAHARSHI
ARAVINDA BHAVAN C F C BUILIDNG,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE-560009
NOTE:THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO. 2,2/1 AND 2/3
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. LAKKAMMA
W/O LATE MUNITHIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
R/AT THALAGHATTAPURA VILLAGE
UTTARAHALLI HOBLI
KANAKAPURA ROAD
BANGLAORE 560062
2. STATE BY DEPARTMENT
OF REVENUE MS BUILDING,
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560 001
REP BY ITS SECRETARY
3. MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA
PUBLIC LAND CORPORATION LTD
210 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2ND FLOOR,
AT DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS BUILDING,
NEAR CITY CIVIL COURT,
KEMEPEGOWDA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560009
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 15728/2016 (LA-KIADB) BY
THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 891/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER
BMICP, KHANIJA BHAVAN
BENGALURU - 560 009..
NOTE- THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUIVE
OFFICE AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER-1(BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 14/3,
1ST FLOOR
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
211 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001.
NOTE- THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(LAND ACQUISITION)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL
AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD BMICP
14/3, 1ST FLOOR ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SHRI B PARASHURAMAPPA
S/O LATE BASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
R/O 54/3, MUNISWAMAPPA GARDEN
APORVA ROAD, 6TH CROSS,
6TH MAIN CHAMARAJPET,
BENGALURU-560 018.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA, M S BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
212 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
M S BUILDING,
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU- 560 001.
4. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LTD
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN OFF
M G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001
REG. UNDER COMPANIES ACT.
5. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M G ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001
REG. UNDER COMPANIES ACT.
6. BANGALORE-MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY (BMICAPA)
NO.2, ANJANEYA BUILDING
5 LOOP ROAD, RACE COURSE ROAD
GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009
REP. BY MEMBER SECRETARY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A. AHMED, AAG AND
SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT FOR R2 & R3;
S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 9805/2024 (LA-KIADB) BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 894/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
213 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER
BMICP, KHANIJA BHAVAN
BENGALURU 560 009.
NOTE: THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 2, 2/1 AND 2/3
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER-1(BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 14/3,
1ST FLOOR ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
NOTE: THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
(LAND ACQUISITION)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD BMICP
14/3, 1ST FLOOR ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
214 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. SRI. B. N LAKSHMINARAYANA
S/O LATE C G NARAYANASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/O NO.228, 5TH 'C' MAIN,
REMCO LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 040
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA, MS BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU560 001.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES
AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
MS BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU560 001.
4. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR NO.1,
MIDFORD GARDEN, OFF MG ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001
REG. UNDER COMPANIES ACT
5. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
REP. BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR NO.1,
MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF M G ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001
REG. UNDER COMPANIES ACT.
6. BANGALORE-MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY
(BMICAPA)
NO.2, ANJANEYA BUILDING,
215 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
5 LOOP ROAD, RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 009
REP. BY MEMBER SECRETARY
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A. AHMED, AAG AND
SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2 AND R3;
SRI. NITIN PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 9793/2024 (LA-KIADB) BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 895/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARANATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND MEMBER SECRETARY,
1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARABIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
216 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
1ST FLOOR, MAHARSHI
ARABIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARABIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI A M SHARATH CHANDRA
S/O. SRI. A. C. MUNIVENKATA GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
M/S. DUO ASSOCIATES,
NO.18, G-1,
ROYAL HERITAGE,
MAGARATH ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 025.
2. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND
INDUSTRIES,
217 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
M.S. BUILDING,
DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU-560 001.
3. M/S. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE
MIDFORD GARDEN OF M.G. ROAD
BENGALURU
BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
4. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LIMITED,
NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDEN,
OFF MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001,
BY ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY, SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R2;
SRI. S.B. MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 2641/2021 (LA-KIADB) BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 896/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
FOR LAND ACQUISITION
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
218 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO.2,2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
1 ST FLOOR, MAHASHRI
ARAVINDA BHAVANA,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI SRI SRI TIRUCHI MAHASWAMIGALU
BY HIS SUCCESSOR,
SRI. JAYENDRAPURI SWAMIJI,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
SRI. KAILASH ASHRAM,
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR,
BANGALORE.
219 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
2. SRI. R. SHANKARAPPA
S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/A NO.31, KENCHANAHALLI,
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR,
BANGALORE-560 098.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE, M.S.BUILDING,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560 001.
4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY
BANGALORE MYSORE INTEGRATED
CORRIDOR PROJECT,
BANGALORE - 560039.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMRA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R3)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 61418/2016 (LA-KIADB) BY
THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HONBLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 904/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560009
220 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO. 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG,
1ST MAIN ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE
AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER - 1 (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT
BOARD, 14/3, 1ST FLOOR
ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT
BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN,
CFC BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT
BOARD 14/3,
1ST FLOOR ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P V CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
221 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
AND:
1. SHRI ANEL KUMAR M K
S/O SHRI M. KRISHNAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/AT NO. A4-110,
GOKULAM APARTMENT,
KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD,
DODDAKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU 560 062
2. SHRI KANDIKUNTA CHIDANANDA
S/O SHRI K V THIMMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT NO. FLAT NO.0005,
GROUND FLOOR,
MALLIKARJUNA RESIDENCY,
80 FEET ROAD SUBRAMANYAPURA POST,
BENGALURU-560 061
3. SMT. KANDIKUNTA MALAVIKA
W/O SHRI ABHISHEK MAYAKUNTIA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
R/AT PLOT NO.3-546, FLAT 304,
DEVI NILAYAM STREET NO.8,
NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE,
AYYAPPA SOCIETY MADHAPUR,
KV RANGAREDDY
TELENGANA-500081
4. SHRI VINAYAKA I ANAND
S/O SHRI ANAND I D
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/AT FLAT NO.403,
HOUSE NO.29/2,
SAHAJA PRIDE APARTMENT,
6TH CROSS,
DEAD END BALAJI LAYOUT,
NEAR TO HUYSALA COMMANDER
RETREAT APTS,
KODIGEHALLI
BENGALURU 560 092
222 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
5. SMT. RADHA R
W/O SHRI LG RAMAKANTHA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 89, NEW NO. 204
RAGHAVENDRA NILAYAM,
MSR NAGAR, MSRIT,
BENGALURU 560054
6. SHRI MANJUNATH BABU R
S/O SHRI RAMAIAH SHETTY SR
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/AT NO.7, MANJUNATHA NILAYA
2ND FLOOR, 1ST CROSS,
4TH MAIN,
VENKATAPPA LAYOUT,
NEAR DAFFODILS SCHOOL,
SANJAYNAGAR,
RMV EXTENSION
2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560 094
R2 TO R6 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
SHRI ANEL KUMAR M. K.
S/O SHRI M. KRISHNAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT NO. A4-110,
GOKULAM APARTMENT,
KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD,
DODDAKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU - 560062
7. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001
8. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001
223 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
9. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BENGALURU-560001
10. M/S. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LTD.,
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
14/3, 1 FLOOR ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001
REGISTERED BY ITS COMPANIES ACT
11. M/S. NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR NO.1,
MIDFORD GARDEN OFF M.G.ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560001.
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT
12. BANGALORE-MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY (BMICAPA)
NO.2 ANJANEYA BUILDING,
5 LOOP ROAD,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR,
BENGALURU 560 009
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R7 TO R9;
SRI. S.B. MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R10 & R11)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.18770/2024 BY THE LEARNED
224 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 913/2026
BETWEEN:
1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
NO 14/3,
RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH
2ND FLOOR, NRUPTHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
REP. BY SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
NO 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG
1ST MAIN ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP)
1ST FLOOR, MARASHI ARAVIND
BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND
PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP),
NO 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING
225 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. K V SHIVA KUMAR
S/O K VISHWANATHAIAH SETTY,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO 217,
15TH MAIN,
NEAR INDIAN BANK,
BANASHANKARI, 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU 560004
2. K S SINDHU
D/O K V SHIVAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO 217,
15TH MAIN,
NEAR INDIAN BANK,
BANASHANKARI
2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU 560004.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF
INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
(INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT)
M S BUILDING,
BENGALURU 560001.
4. M/S NANDI INFRASTURCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISE LTD
NO 1, FORD GARDENS,
OPP M G ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
REP BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
(REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT)
226 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
5. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD
NO 1, MIDFORD HOUSE,
MIDFORD GARDENS,
OFF MG ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001.
REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGANTORY
(REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. MALLAHARA RAO, AAG AND
RAVINDRA V REDDY SPL. COUNSEL FOR STATE GOVT.
FOR R3;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04.07.2025 PASSED IN WP No. 16444/2024 (LA-KIADB) BY
THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND
CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WA NO. 915/2026
BETWEEN:
1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
REPTD. BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER,
KANIJA BHAVAN, BENGALURU 560 009.
NOTE - THE PRESENT AND
CORRECT ADDRESS
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO. 2, 2/1 AND 2/3,
ACHARAYA TULISI MARG, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560009
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHIEF EXECUIVE OFFICE AND
EXECUTIVE MEMBER
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (BMICP)
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
227 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,
ARAVIND BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
NOTE - THE CORRECT AND PRESENT ADDRESS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP), NO 14/3,
1ST FLOOR, MAHARSHI ARAVANDA BHAVAN
CFC BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU 560001
3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
(LAND ACQUISITION),
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT
BOARD, 14/3, 1ST FLOOR,ARAVIND BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE
ALONG WITH SRI. P V CHANDRASHEKAR AND
SRI PURUSHOTHAMA P ADITHYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT M GAYATHRI
WIFE OF LATE G. VENKATESH REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
R/A NO.1/13, KONAPPANA AGRAHARA,
ELECTRONIC CITY POST, BENGALURU 560 100.
2. SMT M NEELAMMA
WIFE OF LATE G. CHANDRA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/A NO.266,
VENKATESH REDDY LAYOUT,
NEAR INFOSYS GATE NO.7,
KONAPPANA AGRAHARA POST,
BENGALURU560 100.
3. SRI G. NAGARAJ,
SON OF GURAPPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,R/A NO.1/13,
KONAPPANA AGRAHARA VILLAGE,
ELECTRONIC CITY POST,
BENGALURU - 560 100.
228 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPTD. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
5. THE SECRETARY TO INDUSTRIES AND
COMMERCE DEPT., M.S. BUILDING,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
6. M/S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD., REPTD. BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN, OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU 560 001.
7. M/S NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
ENTERPRISES LTD.,
REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NO.1, MIDFORD GARDEN, OFF M.G. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
REP BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
...RESPONDENTS
(BY PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
ALONG WITH SRI. S.A. AMED, AAG AND
SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, SPL. COUNSEL FOR
STATE GOVT FOR R4 AND R5;
SRI. S.B.MATHAPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R6 & R7)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
04/07/2025 PASSED IN WP NO.12014/2025 BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
THESE APPEALS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED
FOR JUDGMENT ON 24.03.2026, COMING ON FOR
PRONOUNCEMENT THIS DAY, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
D.K. SINGH PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:
229 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
I. PREFACE:
1. The present batch of writ appeals arise out of a common
judgment and order dated 04.07.2025 passed by the learned
Single Judge in W.P.No.50634/2014 and connected matters
concerning the lands acquired under the provisions of the
Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (for short
‘the KIAD Act‘). The land acquisitions were intiated pursuant to
the Framework Agreement (FWA) dated 03.04.1997 executed
between the Government of Karnataka and the appellant-Nandi
Infrastructure Corridor Enterprises Limited (NICE) for
implementation of Bengaluru-Mysuru Infrastructure Corridor
Project (BMICP). Some of the writ appeals are filed by the NICE
and the others are filed by the Karnataka Industrial Areas
Development Board (KIADB) challenging the aforesaid
judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge.
230 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
II FACTS OF THE CASE:
2. The BMICP was conceived as a major infrastructure
project intended to provide connectivity between Bengaluru and
Mysuru through construction of:
• Five townships;
• An Expressway of approximately 111 kilometres together
with interchanges and toll plazas;
• A Peripheral Road of approximately 41 kilometres; and
• A Link Road of approximately 9.8 kilometres.
3. For implementation of the said project, extensive extents
of land measuring 20,193 acres situated in Bengaluru Urban
and surrounding areas were notified for acquisition under
Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act between the years 1998 and
2009. The final declarations under Section 28(4) were
subsequently issued between the years 2003 and 2009.
4. The petitioners before writ Court are the owners of
various extents of land situated in different villages notified for
acquisition under the KIAD Act. Though the final notifications
were issued between the years 2003 and 2009, no awards have
been passed in respect of the petitioners’ lands even till date.
231 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
5. The BMICP and the land acquisition proceedings have
been the subject matter of several rounds of litigation before
this Court and the Supreme Court. The legality of the project,
the FWA, the public purpose underlying the acquisition and the
power of the State to acquire lands for the project were upheld
by the Supreme Court in a series of decisions including in the
case of STATE OF KARNATAKA vs ALL INDIA
MANUFACTURERS ORGANISATION [(2006) 4 SCC 683]
and in the case of M. NAGABHUSHANA vs STATE OF
KARNATAKA [(2011) 3 SCC 408]. Consequently, the validity
of the acquisition notifications and the public purpose
underlying the project attained finality.
6. Notwithstanding the conclusion of the earlier litigations,
several landowners, whose lands had been notified for
acquisition, approached this Court by filing the aforesaid writ
petitions. Their grievance was not directed against the legality
of the acquisition notifications or the validity of the BMICP
itself. Instead, they contended that although several decades
had elapsed after issuance of the acquisition notifications, the
acquiring authorities had failed to pass awards determining
compensation in respect of their lands. As a consequence, the
acquisition proceedings had remained incomplete for a period
232 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
of more than 23 years since compensation had neither been
determined nor paid.
7. The petitioners asserted that such a prolonged inaction on
the part of the acquiring authorities had placed them in an
extremely prejudicial position. Their lands continued to remain
under acquisition, thereby substantially restricting them from
alienating, developing, cultivating, mortgaging or otherwise to
deal with their lands. At the same time, the State had failed to
discharge its statutory obligation of determining compensation.
The petitioners asserted that compulsory acquisition of their
lands without determination of award or payment of
compensation for decades rendered the acquisition proceedings
arbitrary, oppressive and contrary to the rights guaranteed
under Article 300A of the Constitution of India.
8. The petitioners further contended that several parcels of
lands acquired from them had not been utilised for the core
components of the BMICP viz., the expressway, peripheral
road, link road, toll plazas or interchanges. It was specifically
urged that despite acquisition of vast extents of land,
substantial portions remained unutilised for the said project for
which they had originally been acquired.
233 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
9. Upon consideration of the above submissions, the learned
Single Judge has held that though more than two decades had
elapsed from the date of issuance of the acquisition
notifications, however, no award has been passed. Placing
reliance upon the decisions of the Division Bench of this Court
in the case of KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS
DEVELOPMENT BOARD vs K.H. SHIVANNA
[W.A.No.557/2017] as also in the case of SPECIAL LAND
ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB vs SMT. M.
SHAKUNTHALAMMA AND OTHERS [W.A.No.6763/2017]
which was affirmed by the Supreme Court in SLP(C)
No.3767/2024, wherein prolonged delay in passing awards had
been held fatal to acquisition proceedings, the learned Single
Judge concluded that the acquisition proceedings could not be
permitted to remain pending indefinitely. Accordingly, the
acquisition notifications were quashed insofar as they related to
the lands belonging to the petitioners.
10. Aggrieved by the said order dated 04.07.2025, the
appellant-NICE has preferred the present batch of writ appeals.
III SALIENT FEATURES OF THE FWA:
11. Integrated Infrastructure Corridor: The FWA envisages
the BMICP as an integrated infrastructure development project
234 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
and not merely as a road construction scheme. The project was
conceived with the objective of facilitating the orderly
development of Bengaluru by decongesting traffic, improving
connectivity between Bengaluru and Mysuru, promoting
industrial and commercial growth, generating employment and
creating planned urban centres along the corridor. The FWA,
therefore, treats the transportation infrastructure and urban
development as inseparable components of a single integrated
project.
12. Components of the Project: The FWA contemplates that
the project would comprise not only construction of the
expressway, peripheral roads and link roads, but also
construction of 5 self-sustaining townships together with
supporting infrastructure such as, power generation, water
supply, sewage treatment, telecommunications, waste
management and other civic amenities. The acquisition,
finance, design, construction and implementation of all these
components collectively constitute the infrastructure corridor
envisaged under the FWA.
13. Construction of 5 Self-Sustaining Townships: The FWA
specifically contemplates construction of 5 self-sustaining
townships viz., Township Nos.1, 2, 4, 5 and 7 at the
235 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
demarcated locations identified in the Project Technical Report
(PTR). The original proposal for 7 townships was reduced to 5
in the final FWA to ensure planned and orderly regional
development. Each township was assigned a distinct functional
character such as, Corporate Centre, Industrial Centre, Eco-
tourism Centre, Heritage Centre and Commercial Centre and
was required to be developed only within the extent of land
earmarked for that purpose. The townships were conceived as
integral components of the infrastructure corridor and not as
independent real estate developments. The PTR envisages the
5 townships with distinct functional identities, the salient
features of which are as follows:-
i) Township No. 1 – Corporate Township (2,792 acres):
Situated on the outskirts of Bengaluru along both
sides of the Expressway near the Outer Ring Road,
Township No.1 was conceived as a Corporate
Township. It was intended to house research and
development centres, business establishments,
hotels, a golf course and residential areas together
with hospitals, educational institutions and other civic
infrastructures. The township was designed as a self-
contained urban centre with due regard to
236 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
environmental protection through green belts and
planned development.
ii) Township No. 2 – Commercial Township (1,868 acres):
Located approximately 10 kilometres from the
Bengaluru urban boundary, Township No.2 was
envisaged as a Commercial Township aimed at
reducing urbanisation pressures on Bengaluru. The
township was planned around a central commercial
and institutional hub comprising of business centres,
hotels, hospitals, educational institutions and public
offices, with self-contained residential neighbourhoods
supported by parks, schools, health care facilities and
environmentally sustainable transport system.
iii) Township No. 4 – Industrial Township (1,660 acres):
Situated approximately 36 kilometres in the west of
Bengaluru along the proposed Expressway, Township
No.4 was planned as an Industrial Township. It was
intended to accommodate various industrial
establishments with supporting public infrastructure,
green buffers and environmental safeguards, while
providing modern industrial facilities with direct
access to the Expressway.
237 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
iv) Township No. 5 – Cultural and Residential Township
(2,700 acres):
Located near State Highway No.17 and the existing
railway line, Township No.5 was conceived as a
Cultural and Residential Township. The proposal
included a fully equipped medical centre, hospitals,
institutions for study of various systems of medicines,
centres for religious and vedic studies together with
residential development and supporting civic
infrastructure.
v) Township No. 7 – Eco-Tourism Township (4,010 acres):
Situated approximately 3 kilometres from the Mysuru
city and close to Kaveri River, Township No.7 was
conceived as an Eco-Tourism Township. It was
proposed to include amusement parks, golf courses,
hotels, residential neighbourhoods, commercial
establishments and public infrastructure, with the
overall objective of promoting eco-tourism through
planned urban development.
14. Nature and Composition of the Townships: The FWA
envisages that each township would be a self-sustaining urban
settlement and not merely a housing layout. Accordingly, every
238 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matterstownship was required to include not only residential
development, but also schools, hospitals, shopping complexes,
parks, open spaces, roads, water supply, electricity, sewage,
conservancy and other socio-economic infrastructures. The
objective was to ensure that each township function as a
complete urban centre capable of supporting residential,
commercial and industrial activities without depending on the
existing urban infrastructure of Bengaluru.
15. Mandatory compliance with the FWA and PTR: The FWA
mandates that every component of the project be implemented
strictly in accordance with the specifications contained in the
FWA read with the PTR. The land acquired for the project is
required to be utilised only for the purposes contemplated
therein and the project proponents are not at liberty to alter
the location, nature or extent of the project components
unilaterally. Any deviation from the approved land use,
specifications or scope of work is permissible only upon
obtaining the prior approval of the State Government.
16. Binding Nature of the obligations under the FWA: The
Supreme Court has recognised that the rights of the project
proponents to implement the BMICP flow primarily from the
FWA and that the FWA defines both the scope of the project
239 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Mattersand the obligations of the parties. It was held that neither the
supplementary agreements executed in the years 1999 and
2000 nor the Tripartite Agreement dated 09.08.2002 have
diluted or modified the obligation to establish 5 self-sustaining
townships at the designated locations. Consequently, the
project proponents remain bound to execute the project only in
the manner envisaged under the FWA read with the PTR and
any departure therefrom can be undertaken only with the
approval contemplated under the FWA.
IV FINDINGS OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE:
17. The learned Single Judge held that the issue arose in the
writ petitions was no longer res integra in view of the
judgments of the Division Bench of this Court in the cases of
K.H. SHIVANNA (supra) and SMT. SHAKUNTHALAMMA
(supra), wherein it was held that the acquisition proceedings
were liable to be quashed on account of inordinate delay in
passing the awards. The learned Single Judge further held that
the judgment in SHAKUNTHALAMMA (supra) was affirmed by
the Supreme Court and had, therefore, attained the finality. It
was also held that the delay in passing the awards in the case
on hand is far more than the delay considered in the cases of
K.H.SHIVANNA (supra) and SHAKUNTHALAMMA (supra).
240 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
The learned Single Judge, therefore, concluded that the
acquisition proceedings had remained incomplete for an
unreasonably long period and could not be permitted to
continue indefinitely.
18. While considering the objection raised by the NICE
regarding the earlier judgments of the Supreme Court
upholding the BMICP, the learned Single Judge has held that
the present challenge was not directed against the validity of
the project, the FWA or the acquisition notifications, instead,
the challenge was to the subsequent failure on the part of the
authorities to pass the awards despite lapse of decades.
19. Placing reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in
the case of ANIL KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE OF BIHAR AND
OTHERS [(2012) 12 SCC 443], wherein it was held that the
acquisition proceedings may give rise to fresh and distinct
cause of action at different stages, the learned Single Judge
held that the cause of action in the case on hand arose from
prolonged inaction on the part of the acquiring authorities in
passing the awards and not from the original acquisition
notifications.
241 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
20. The learned Single Judge has observed that the lands in
question had not been utilised for expressway, peripheral road,
link road, toll plazas or interchanges forming part of the BMICP.
21. The learned Single Judge observed that the petitioners
had been subjected to acquisition proceedings for decades
without determination of compensation and the prolonged
pendency of the acquisition proceedings had adversely affected
their rights and kept them under uncertainty for an
unreasonable length of time. Therefore, the learned Single
Judge quashed the acquisition proceedings insofar as the
petitioners’ lands were concerned.
V. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT-NICE:
22. The learned Senior Counsels Mr. D.L.N.Rao, Mr. Dhyan
Chinnappa and Mr. Vikram Huilgol appearing along with
Mr. S.B. Mathapati and Mr. Gopal Shankar Narayan, appearing
along with Mr. Nitin Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant-
NICE have contended that the impugned order passed by the
learned Single Judge is contrary to the statutory scheme of the
KIAD Act, the binding judgments of the Supreme Court
concerning the BMICP and the settled principles governing the
acquisition proceedings.
242 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
23. The learned Senior Counsels have submitted that the
lands in question form part of the BMICP, which had been the
subject matter of extensive litigations before the High Court as
well as the Supreme Court and had attained finality long ago.
Mr. D.L.N. Rao, learned Senior Counsel further submitted that
the validity of the FWA, the BMICP Project, the public purpose
underlying the acquisition, the acquisition notifications issued
under the KIAD Act and the authority of the State Government
to acquire lands for the project have been upheld by the
Supreme Court in the case of STATE OF KARNATAKA vs ALL
INDIA MANUFACTURERS ORGANIZATION [(2006) 4 SCC
683]. Even after the said judgment in ALL INDIA
MANUFACTURERS ORGANIZATION (supra), the petitioners
once again approached this Court in several rounds of litigation
concerning the very same acquisition notifications which got
culminated before the Supreme Court in the case of M.
NAGABHUSHANA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS
[(2011) 3 SCC 408]. He has, therefore, submitted that once
the acquisition proceedings has been upheld by the Supreme
Court, the landowners could not be permitted to re-open the
matter by raising fresh grounds at a subsequent stage. It is
submitted that permitting repeated challenges to the same
243 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
acquisition proceedings would undermine the doctrine of finality
of litigation and frustrate the implementation of large public
infrastructure projects.
24. The learned Senior Counsels have submitted that the
learned Single Judge has failed to appreciate that the
petitioners were indirectly attempting to achieve what had
already been rejected in the earlier proceedings. A substantial
portion of the arguments of the appellants was directed
towards the legal effects of vesting under the KIAD Act. Once a
declaration under Section 28(4) is issued and possession is
taken in terms of Section 28(5) and (6) of the KIAD Act, the
acquired lands vest absolutely in the State Government free
from all encumbrances. Such vesting is complete, absolute and
irreversible. Under such circumstances, the title of the original
landowners stands extinguished, all encumbrances stand
removed, the land becomes the property of the State and the
acquisition proceedings cannot thereafter be invalidated.
25. It is further submitted by the learned Senior Counsels
that unlike Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the
KIAD Act does not provide for any statutory period for passing
an award. Therefore, the delay by itself cannot invalidate the
acquisition and no automatic lapse can be inferred, and that the
244 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
Courts cannot apply limitation provisions into the KIAD Act
where the legislature has consciously chosen not to prescribe
one.
26. It is submitted that without appreciating the peculiar facts
of the present case, the learned Single Judge has proceeded
solely on the basis of the judgment in SMT. M.
SHAKUNTHALAMMA (supra) which judgment cannot be
treated as laying down an inflexible proposition that the
acquisition proceedings automatically become invalid after a
particular period. The learned Single Judge has also failed to
independently examine the effects of statutory vesting under
Section 28(5) and (6) of the KIAD Act.
27. The learned Senior Counsels submitted that the BMICP is
one of the largest infrastructure projects undertaken in the
State of Karnataka. The project was conceived to improve
regional connectivity, reduce traffic congestion and promote
industrial and economic development. However, the acquisition
proceedings relating to the BMICP had remained heavily
tangled in extensive litigations for several years. The repeated
challenges raised by the landowners had substantially impeded
the progress of the acquisition proceedings and therefore, the
authorities could not be faulted entirely for the delay in passing
245 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
the awards. The delay was occasioned by circumstances
beyond the control of the acquiring authorities and ought not to
have been treated as a ground for nullifying the acquisition
proceedings itself.
VI. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE STATE:
28. Prof. Ravivarma Kumar, learned Senior Counsel along
with Mr. S.A.Ahmed, AAG and Mr. Siddharth Babu Rao,
Speacial Counsel appearing for the State have submitted that
the land acquisition process under the KIAD Act comprises of
several distinct stages, each giving rise to an independent
cause of action as held in ANIL KUMAR GUPTA (supra). It
was further submitted that Section 28 of the KIAD Act
contemplates different stages of acquisition and also a separate
procedure for taking possession as held in the case of SMT. S
JALAJA AND OTHERS vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
[W.P. Nos.11209-11212/2019]. It is further submitted that
the statutory steps as per the KIAD Act such as, issuance of
notice to deliver possession under Section 28(6), taking
possession by force under Section 28(7), transfer of possession
to the beneficiary under Section 28(8), payment of
compensation either by agreement or by passing an award
under Section 29 etc., are yet to be taken.
246 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
29. It is further submitted on behalf of the State that the land
acquisition process cannot be treated as complete without
determination of award and payment of compensation nor can
the possession be taken as held in the cases of K.T.
PLANTATION PRIVATE LIMITED vs STATE OF
KARNATAKA [(2011) 9 SCC 1], TUKARAM KANA JOSHI vs
MIDC [(2013) 1 SCC 353] and KOLKATA MUNCIPAL
CORPORATION vs BIMAL KUMAR SHAH [(2024) 10 SCC
533].
30. It is submitted that the question as to whether an award
under the KIAD Act is required to be passed within a
reasonable time is no longer res integra. This legal position is
settled by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in
the case of SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB
vs SMT. SHAKUNTHALAMMA [W.A.No.6763/2017] which
was affirmed by the Supreme Court in SLP (C) No.3767/2024
and reiterated by this Court in the case of KIADB AND
OTHERS vs K.H. SHIVANNA AND OTHERS
[W.A.No.557/2021], wherein it has been held that although
the KIAD Act does not prescribe a specific period for passing an
award, the statutory power must nevertheless be exercised
247 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
within a reasonable time and any unexplained delay in passing
the award would vitiate the acquisition proceedings.
31. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the State has
produced various documents relating to implementation of the
BMICP that highlight serious violations of the FWA. Referring to
the Gazette Notifications dated 18.12.2008, 01.01.2010,
29.05.2010, 05.02.2011 as also the newspaper publications
dated 06.07.2017, 30.06.2022, 30.06.2023, 30.06.2024,
30.06.2025, it is submitted that the appellant-NICE had revised
the toll fees on several occasions without obtaining prior
approval of the State Government as contemplated in the FWA.
It was submitted that the lakes and tank-bed lands of various
villages have been handed over to the appellant-NICE for the
BMICP in violation of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the
case of HINCHLAL TIWARI vs KAMALA DEVI AND OTHERS
[(2001) 6 SCC 496], wherein it is held that the material
resources of the community like forests, tanks, ponds, hillock,
mountain etc., are nature’s bounty and they need to be
protected.
32. It is further submitted on behalf of the State that one of
the contentions urged by the appellant-NICE is that the
Government has not given/acquired the extent of land as
248 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
required under the FWA and therefore, the Government has
been in violation of the FWA which has resulted in non-
completion of the project in 25 years. However, the said
contention of the appellant-NICE is not only false, but incorrect
which is evident from the affidavit filed on behalf of the State in
Contempt Petition (Civil) No.139/2012, that 554 acres of
excess land had been handed over to the appellant-NICE for
the said project. The said affidavit was accepted and on the
basis of the said affidavit, the contempt proceedings were
closed by the Supreme Court vide order dated 13.07.2012.
VII SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE KIADB:
33. Mr. Shashi Kiran Shetty, learned Senior Counsel
appearing along with Mr. P.V. Chandrashekhar, the learned
counsel for the KIADB has submitted that now the acquisition
cannot be set aside and that, any grievance of petitioners-
landowners should be addressed through compensation rather
than quashing the whole acquisition process. It is further
submitted that the acquisition proceedings has been upheld as
valid in three separate rounds of litigation over nearly three
decades both by this Court as well as by the Supreme Court
and therefore, the subsequent proceedings are barred by the
principles of res judicata.
249 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
34. It is submitted that the impugned judgment and order
passed by the learned Single Judge contradicts the Supreme
Court’s directions in M. NAGABHUSHAN (supra). It is further
submitted that the land cannot be divested once it is vested in
the State under Sections 28(4) and (5) of the KIAD Act. Once
the land vests in the State, the only right of the erstwhile
landowners is to receive the compensation. The KIADB merely
acquires the land under the directions of the State. The KIADB
itself lacks the legal power to restore the acquired land to the
owners.
35. The KIAD Act is a self-contained code which does not
prescribe a time limit for passing of the awards. The Act
contains no provision causing the acquisition to lapse because
of delay. The landowner is entitled to payment of fair market
value in cases involving delay and laches in payment of
compensation as held in the case of BERNARD FRANCIS
JOSEPH VAZ AND OTHERS vs GOVERNMENT OF
KARNATAKA AND OTHERS [(2025) 7 SCC 580]. It is
further submitted that a larger public interest must prevail and
the acquisitions undertaken for public purposes should not be
interfered with, particularly when they form part of a major
infrastructure initiative. In support of this contention, the
250 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
learned Senior Counsel has placed reliance on paragraph 27 of
the judgment in the case of GIRIAS INVESTMENT (P) LTD.
vs STATE OF KARNATAKA [(2008) 7 SCC 53] and
paragraph 10 of the judgment in the case of RAMIKLAL
BHUTTA V STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [(1997) 1 SCC 134].
VIII SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE LANDOWNERS:
36. Mr. K.N. Phanindra, learned Senior Counsel appearing
along with Smt. Vaishali Hegde, learned Counsel,
Mr.H.N.Shashidhara, learned Senoir Counsel appearing along
with Mr. H.S. Suhas, learned counsel and Smt. Maitreyi
Krishnan, the learned counsel appearing for the landowners
have supported the impugned judgment and order passed by
the learned Single Judge and contended that no grounds are
made out for interference by this Court in exercise of the
appellate jurisdiction.
37. The learned Senior Counsels have submitted that
although the preliminary notifications were issued between the
years 1998 and 2009 and the final notifications between the
years 2003 and 2009, admittedly, no awards have been passed
in respect of the lands belonging to the petitioners. The delay
ranges from approximately 11 years to 23 years. It is
contended that the power of compulsory acquisition cannot be
251 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
exercised in a manner that permits the State to keep the
acquisition proceedings pending indefinitely.
38. Learned Senior counsels submitted that the authorities,
having failed to perform their statutory obligations for decades,
cannot be permitted to justify their own inaction to defeat the
rights of the landowners. The present case is squarely covered
by the judgments of this Court in the cases of K.H. SHIVANNA
(supra) and SHAKUNTHALAMMA (supra). It is submitted that
in K.H. SHIVANNA (supra), a delay of approximately 9 years
in passing the award was held fatal to the acquisition
proceedings and likewise in SHAKUNTHALAMMA (supra), a
delay of approximately 11 years resulted in quashing of the
acquisition proceedings. Thus, the present case stand on a
much stronger footing since the delay extends up to 23 years
and the learned Single Judge has merely applied a binding
precedent and committed no error warranting interference.
39. It is further submitted that even though the KIAD Act
does not prescribe a limitation period for passing of the awards,
the law is well settled that every statutory power must be
exercised within a reasonable time. In support of their
submission, reliance is placed upon the judgments of the
Supreme Court in the cases of Dr.N. LAKSHMIPATHI BABU
252 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
vs GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS [2016
SCC OnLine Kar 4526] and KOLKATA MUNCIPAL
CORPORATION AND ANOTHER vs BIMAL KUMAR SHAH
AND OTHERS [2024 SCC OnLine SC 968]. It is, therefore,
submitted that a delay extending beyond two decades can
never be regarded as reasonable and the authorities have failed
to offer any satisfactory explanation for such an inordinate
delay.
40. The learned Senior Counsels have strongly disputed the
contention of the KIADB that mere vesting of land under
Section 28(5) of the KIAD Act concludes the acquisition
process. It is further submitted that compulsory acquisition is
founded upon two inseparable elements viz., (i) acquisition for
public purpose; and (ii) payment of compensation. The State
cannot rely upon vesting while indefinitely postponing
determination of compensation and the vesting contemplated
under Section 28(5) cannot be viewed in isolation from the
remainder of the acquisition process, particularly the statutory
obligation to determine the compensation and complete the
acquisition proceedings in accordance with the law.
41. The learned Senior Counsels for the landowners have
placed reliance on the judgments in the cases of K.T.
253 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
PLANTATION PVT. LTD. vs STATE OF KARNATAKA
[(2011) 9 SCC 1]; VIDYA DEVI vs STATE OF HIMACHAL
PRADESH [(2020) 2 SCC 569] and HARI KRISHNA
MANDIR TRUST vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [(2020) 9
SCC 356] to submit that although the right to property is no
longer a fundamental right, it remains a constitutional right
protected under Article 300A of the Constitution of India.
42. It is further submitted that many of the lands acquired
from the petitioners-landowners have not been utilized for the
expressway, interchanges, toll plazas, peripheral roads or link
roads forming part of BMICP. It is also submitted that despite
lapse of several years, the appellant-NICE has failed to place
any material demonstrating utilization of the lands of the
petitioners-landowners for the intended public purpose. Despite
such prejudice, neither award has been determined nor
compensation has been paid and thus, the acquisition process
is incomplete and that equity cannot permit the State to take
advantage of their own prolonged inaction.
43. Mr. H.N. Shashidhara, learned Senior Counsel has
produced the Research Report of the Institute for Social and
Economic Change (ISEC), registered Sale Deeds, Sale
Agreements, Joint Development Agreements and the Annual
254 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
Reports of the appellant-NICE and submitted that these
documents disclose the manner in which the project has been
implemented over the years. The ISEC report records
deviations from the FWA, while the registered documents and
the Annual Reports of the appellant-NICE indicate the
transactions relating to the acquired lands, capitalization of
completed project assets and revenue generated through the
sale of land and toll collections and these subsequent
developments are relevant while examining whether the
acquisition continues to satisfy the requirement of public
purpose under the KIAD Act.
IX POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION:
44. Having considered the aforesaid submissions, the
following points arise for consideration in the present appeals:
1. Whether the acquisition proceedings, though validly
initiated under the provisions of the KIAD Act and
culminating in statutory vesting, can nevertheless be
sustained when the acquiring authorities have failed
to determine the compensation by passing the awards
for over two decades?
2. Whether the material placed on record regarding
implementation of the BMICP disclosing deviations
255 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Mattersfrom the FWA is sufficient to disentitle the appellant-
NICE from seeking interference with the order passed
by the learned Single Judge in exercise of the
appellate jurisdiction?
3. Whether the earlier judgments of the Supreme Court
upholding the validity of the BMICP and the
acquisition proceedings thereon, operate as a bar to
challenge the acquisition on the principles of res
judicata and doctrine of finality of litigation?
X ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS:
45. Re. Point No.1: The acquisition of the petitioners’ lands
forms part of the BMICP, a project conceived for the
development of an integrated infrastructure corridor connecting
Bengaluru and Mysuru. The acquisition was undertaken under
the provisions of the KIAD Act for implementation of the project
in furtherance of a public purpose. The FWA dated 03.04.1997
executed between the State Government and the NICE-project
proponent constituted the basis upon which the project was
conceptualized, delineating the scope of the project, the
obligations of the project proponent and the broad manner in
which the project was to be implemented.
256 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
46. At the outset, it is necessary to ascertain the actual
dispute which requires consideration in the present appeals.
Much emphasis has been laid by the learned Senior Counsels
appearing for the appellant-NICE on the legal consequences
flowing from sub-section (4), (5) and (6) of Section 28 of the
KIAD Act. It has been repeatedly asserted that once the final
declaration is issued under Section 28(4) and possession is
taken in accordance with the KIAD Act, the land vests
absolutely in the State Government free from all encumbrances
and such vesting is complete and irreversible. It is further
submitted that the KIAD Act does not prescribe any period
within which an award is required to be passed and, therefore,
mere delay in determining the compensation cannot invalidate
the acquisition proceedings.
47. The above submission, though plausible at the first
glance, proceeds on the assumption that statutory vesting is
the culmination of the acquisition process. In our considered
opinion, this argument overlooks an equally significant facet of
compulsory acquisition i.e., the constitutional obligation of the
State to determine and pay the compensation within a
reasonable period. The question before us is not whether the
acquisition notifications were validly issued or whether the
257 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
lands stood vested absolutely in the State Government under
the KIAD Act. Those issues have attained finality in the earlier
rounds of litigation. The real question which arises in the
present appeals is whether the State, having invoked the power
of eminent domain and deprived the citizens of their property,
can indefinitely postpone the determination of compensation
without any explanation and still insists that the acquisition
must remain operative solely because vesting has taken place.
The distinction assumes considerable importance. The
grievance projected by the petitioners-landowners is entirely
different. It is founded upon the admitted failure of the
acquiring authorities to complete the acquisition proceedings by
determining the compensation despite lapse of extra-ordinarily
long period after issuance of the acquisition notifications.
48. The fact of non-passing of the award by the acquiring
authorities is not in dispute. As mentioned above, the
preliminary notifications under Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act
came to be issued between 1998 to 2009, while the
corresponding final declarations under Section 28(4) were
issued between 2003 and 2009. The lands belonging to the
petitioners formed part of these notifications. Despite passage
of time ranging to more than 23 years, admittedly, no awards
258 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
determining the compensation have been passed in respect of
the lands belonging to the petitioners. The learned Single Judge
has specifically recorded these undisputed facts which have not
been disputed before us either by NICE or the KIADB.
49. The consequence of such prolonged inaction cannot be
underestimated. From the date of issuance of the notifications,
the petitioners have remained under continuous disability in
relation to their properties. Their rights stood severely
restricted and their ability to alienate, develop, cultivate,
mortgage or otherwise to deal with the lands became
substantially impaired. At the same time, payment of
compensation, which constitutes indispensable consequence of
compulsory acquisition, remained undetermined. Thus, while
the State asserts that the lands have vested absolutely in it,
the landowners have neither retained the ownership nor
received the compensation which the law contemplates as the
inevitable corollary of compulsory acquisition. Such a state of
affairs, if permitted to continue indefinitely, would reduce the
constitutional rights guaranteed under Article 300A to a mere
formality.
50. It is true that the KIAD Act does not prescribe a specific
period within which an award is required to be passed.
259 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
However, the absence of an express statutory limitation cannot
be construed as conferring an unrestricted licence upon the
acquiring authority to postpone the passing of the award
indefinitely. It is a settled principle of the administrative law
that whenever a statute confers power upon a public authority
without prescribing any period for its exercise, such power
must nevertheless be exercised within a reasonable time.
Reasonableness is an inbuilt limitation and the public
authorities cannot keep such power in abeyance indefinitely to
the prejudice of the citizens. The acceptance of contrary
proposition would result in the State initiating acquisition
proceedings, depriving the landowners from enjoying their
properties and thereafter, postponing determination of
compensation for decades merely because the statute does not
expressly prescribe the limitation period. Such an interpretation
would be wholly inconsistent with the constitutional governance
and the rule of law.
51. The Supreme Court, while interpreting Article 300A of the
Constitution, has consistently emphasised that deprivation of
the property of the landowner cannot be sustained merely by
reference to the statutory authority. The procedure adopted by
the State must also satisfy the requirements of fairness,
260 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
reasonableness and non-arbitrariness. The right to property,
though no longer a fundamental right, continues to enjoy the
constitutional protection under Article 300A. The power of
compulsory acquisition is, therefore, accompanied by a
corresponding obligation to ensure that the owner receives just
compensation through a fair and expeditious process. The
constitutional balance lies not merely in the power to acquire,
but equally in the obligation to compensate the landowner.
52. In the case of K.T. PLANTATION PVT. LTD. vs STATE
OF KARNATAKA [(2011) 9 SCC 1], the Constitution Bench of
the Supreme Court recognized that Article 300A embodies a
constitutional limitation upon the State’s power to deprive a
person of his property. Likewise, in the case of VIDYA DEVI vs
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [(2020) 2 SCC 569], the
Supreme Court reiterated that the right to property remains a
valuable constitutional right and that the State cannot
appropriate the private property except in accordance with a
just, fair and reasonable procedure. Again, in the case of HARI
KRISHNA MANDIR TRUST vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
[(2020) 9 SCC 356], it has been held that the State cannot
deprive the citizens of their property by adopting procedures
which are arbitrary or unfair. These authorities demonstrate
261 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
that compulsory acquisition is not merely a statutory exercise
of power, but one must conform to the constitutional standards
of fairness throughout.
53. This Court, in the case of SRI MUKESH KUMAR vs
STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS
[W.A.No.4647/2013], has explained the process of
acquisition and disposal of lands as provided under Sections 28
and 29 of the KIAD Act. The relevant paragraphs of the said
judgment are extracted hereunder:
“18. The acquisition and disposal of land is
provided in Chapter VII of the KIAD Act.
Sections 28 and 29, which are relevant,
are extracted hereunder:-
“28. Acquisition of land.- (1) If at any
time, in the opinion of the State
Government, any land is required for the
purpose of development by the Board, or
for any other purpose in furtherance of the
objects of this Act, the State Government
may by notification, give notice of its
intention to acquire such land.
(2) On publication of a notification under
subsection (1), the State Government shall
serve notice upon the owner or where the
owner is not the occupier, on the occupier
of the land and on all such persons known
or believed to be interested therein to
show cause, within thirty days from the
date of service of the notice, why the land
should not be acquired.
262 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
(3) After considering the cause, if any,
shown by the owner of the land and by
any other person interested therein, and
after giving such owner and person an
opportunity of being heard, the State
Government may pass such orders as it
deems fit.
(4) After orders are passed under sub-
section (3), where the State Government
is satisfied that any land should be
acquired for the purpose specified in the
notification issued under sub-section (1), a
declaration shall, by notification in the
official Gazette, be made to that effect.
(5) On the publication in the official
Gazette of the declaration under sub-
section (4), the land shall vest absolutely
in the State Government free from all
encumbrances.
(6) Where any land is vested in the State
Government under sub-section (5), the
State Government may, by notice in
writing, order any person who may be in
possession of the land to surrender or
deliver possession thereof to the State
Government or any person duly authorised
by it in this behalf within thirty days of the
service of the notice.
(7) If any person refuses or fails to comply
with an order made under sub-section (5),
the State Government or any officer
authorised by the State Government in
this behalf may take possession of the
land and may for that purpose use such
force as may be necessary.
(8) Where the land has been acquired for
the Board, the State Government, after it
has taken possession of the land, may
transfer the land to the Board for the
263 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
purpose for which the land has been
acquired.
29. Compensation- (1) Where any land is
acquired by the State Government under
this Chapter, the State Government shall
pay for such acquisition compensation in
accordance with the provisions of this Act.
(2) Where the amount of compensation
has been determined by agreement
between the State Government and the
person to be compensated, it shall be paid
in accordance with such agreement.
(3) Where no such agreement can be
reached, the State Government shall refer
the case to the Deputy Commissioner for
determination of the amount of
compensation to be paid for such
acquisition as also the person or persons
to whom such compensation shall be paid.
(4) On receipt of a reference under sub-
section (3), the Deputy Commissioner
shall serve notice on the owner or occupier
of such land and on all persons known or
believed to be interested herein to appear
before him and state their respective
interests in the said land.”
19. Section 28 provides a complete
machinery in respect of the method and
manner in which the land can be acquired
by the State Government, non-compliance
of any of the provisions would render the
acquisition invalid, illegal and fraud on
statute. Sub-section (1) of Section 28
specifically provides that the State
Government may acquire the land for the
purpose of development by the Board or
for any other purpose in furtherance of the
objects of the Act. If the land is not
acquired either for the purpose of
264 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
development by the Board or for any other
purpose in furtherance of the objects of
the Act, such acquisition is nothing but a
mala fide and illegal and colourable
exercise of power and a fraud on statute
and Constitution in exercising the eminent
domain by the State.
20. Sub-section (2) of Section 28 provides
an opportunity for filing objections by the
landowners or other interested persons
and sub-section (3) provides for
considering the objections and affording an
opportunity of hearing to them. After the
aforesaid exercise is undertaken, then only
the final notification is to be issued under
sub-section (4) of Section 28 of the Act.
Under sub-section (5), it is provided that
on publication of the final notification
under sub-section (4), the land vests
absolutely in the State Government free
from all encumbrances, but sub-section
(6) requires the Government Authorities to
serve a notice in writing and order on the
person who is in possession of the land to
surrender or deliver the possession thereof
to the State Government within thirty days
of the service of the notice. Sub-section
(7) provides that if such a person refuses
or fails to comply with the order made
under sub-section (5), the State
Government may take possession of the
land by using the force as may be
necessary.
21. Under Section 29 of the KIAD Act, the
Government is under a statutory and
constitutional obligation to pay adequate
compensation in accordance with the
provisions of the Act for the land acquired,
and if the landowner is not satisfied with
the compensation, the reference has to be
made to the Deputy Commissioner for
265 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
determination of the amount of
compensation to be paid for such
acquisition. Before deciding the reference,
the Deputy Commissioner is required to
serve a notice on the owner and on all
such persons who are interested in the
land, to appear before him and to state
their respective interests in the land so
acquired.
22. Thus, Sections 28 and 29 provide a
complete mechanism for acquiring the land
under the provisions of the KIAD Act i.e.,
issuing the notification under Section
28(1), filing the objections, considering
the objections, providing opportunity of
hearing, issuing the final notification under
Section 28(4), issuing notice to surrender
or deliver possession of the land to the
State Government and thereafter, for
payment of compensation. All the steps
are to be taken in the manner as provided
for in the statute and if time has not been
granted for filing the objections or the
objectors have not been heard or no notice
has been issued for surrendering
possession or no compensation has been
paid, then the land acquisition proceedings
cannot be said to be complete and would
be susceptible to be declared illegal and
ultra vires the statute and the Constitution
of India being in violation of Articles 14, 21
and 300A of the Constitution.”
54. It is one thing to hold that vesting is complete whereas, it
is altogether another to hold that once vesting takes place, the
State is relieved of its continuing statutory and constitutional
obligation to determine and pay the compensation within
reasonable time. The concept of vesting cannot be expanded to
266 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
obliterate the corresponding duty cast upon the acquiring
authority. Vesting answers the question of title. It does not
answer the question whether the State can indefinitely
postpone payment of compensation after depriving the citizens
of their property.
55. If the submissions advanced on behalf of the appellant-
NICE were to be accepted, it would result in startling
consequences. This means that although the State acquires
the property compulsorily and the owner loses all effective
incidents of ownership, the determination of compensation
could be deferred indefinitely without any legal consequences.
Such an interpretation would render the constitutional right
guaranteed under Article 300A entirely illusory and would
permit arbitrary deprivation of property without temporal
limitation. We are unable to attribute such an intention either
to the Legislature or to the constitutional scheme.
56. No satisfactory explanation has been placed on record
justifying such an inordinate delay. The only explanation given
is that the project was embroiled in prolonged litigations. While
the earlier litigation may explain the delay during a particular
period, it cannot constitute a blanket justification for decades of
inaction, particularly after the legality of the project and the
267 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
acquisition had been upheld by the Supreme Court. Once the
impediments arising from the litigation stood removed, the
statutory authorities were expected to proceed with expedition
in determining the compensation. The failure on the part of the
authorities to do so cannot now be justified by relying upon the
very delay occasioned by their own inaction.
57. The Division Bench of this Court, in K.H. SHIVANNA
(supra), has considered a delay of approximately 9 years in
passing the award and held that such a delay is unreasonable.
Subsequently, in M. SHAKUNTHALAMMA (supra), the delay of
11 years in passing the award was considered and the
acquisition proceedings were quashed, which decision has
admittedly been affirmed by the Supreme Court. However, the
delay involved in the present batch of appeals is substantially
greater i.e, beyond two decades.
58. The absence of an express limitation cannot be equated
with the absence of a legal obligation. A statutory authority is
expected to exercise every statutory power diligently, fairly and
within a reasonable period, more particularly when the exercise
of such power has a direct bearing upon the constitutional
rights of citizens. The doctrine of “reasonable time” is not an
external principle sought to be engrafted upon the statute; it is
268 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
an inherent limitation upon every statutory power unless the
Legislature expressly provides otherwise. The Supreme Court
has repeatedly held that where a statute is silent as to the time
within which a power is to be exercised, the authority is
nevertheless required to act within a reasonable period. The
requirement of reasonableness thus permeates every
administrative action. This principle assumes even greater
significance in matters of compulsory acquisition, where the
State exercises the extraordinary power of eminent domain.
59. The paragraphs of the judgment of the Constitution
Bench in the case of K.T. PLANTATION (supra) which is
revelant for the case on hand is extracted hereunder:
“Public purpose
180. Deprivation of property within the meaning
of Article 300A, generally speaking, must take
place for public purpose or public interest. The
concept of eminent domain which applies when a
person is deprived of his property postulates that
the purpose must be primarily public and not
primarily of private interest and merely
incidentally beneficial to the public. Any law,
which deprives a person of his private property
for private interest, will be unlawful and unfair
and undermines the rule of law and can be
subjected to judicial review. But the question as
to whether the purpose is primarily public or
private, has to be decided by the legislature,
which of course should be made known.
181. The concept of public purpose has been
given fairly expansive meaning which has to be
justified upon the purpose and object of the
269 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Mattersstatute and the policy of the legislation. Public
purpose is, therefore, a condition precedent, for
invoking Article 300A. Compensation
182. We have found that the requirement of
public purpose is invariably the rule for depriving
a person of his property, violation of which is
amenable to judicial review. Let us now examine
whether the requirement of payment of
compensation is the rule after the deletion of
Article 31(2).
183. Payment of compensation amount is a
constitutional requirement under Article 30(1- A)
and under the second proviso to Article 31-A(1),
unlike Article 300- A. After the Forty-fourth
Amendment Act, 1978, the constitutional
obligation to pay compensation to a person who
is deprived of his property primarily depends
upon the terms of the statute and the legislative
policy. Article 300A, however, does not prohibit
the payment of just compensation when a
person is deprived of his property, but the
question is whether a person is entitled to get
compensation, as a matter of right, in the
absence of any stipulation in the statute,
depriving him of his property.
189. Requirement of public purpose, for
deprivation of a person of his property under
Article 300-A, is a precondition, but no
compensation or nil compensation or its
illusiveness has to be justified by the State on
judicially justiciable standards. Measures
designed to achieve greater social justice, may
call for lesser compensation and such a limitation
by itself will not make legislation invalid or
unconstitutional or confiscatory. In other words,
the right to claim compensation or the obligation
to pay, though not expressly included in Article
300-A, it can be inferred in that article and it is
for the State to justify its stand on justifiable
grounds which may depend upon the legislative
policy, object and purpose of the statute and
host of other factors.
190. Article 300-A would be equally violated if
the provisions of law authorizing deprivation of
property have not been complied with. While
enacting Article 300-A Parliament has only
270 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Mattersborrowed Article 31(1) (the “Rule of law”
doctrine) and not Article 31(2) (which had
embodied the doctrine of eminent domain).
Article 300-A enables the State to put
restrictions on the right to property by law. That
law has to be reasonable. It must comply with
other provisions of the Constitution. The
limitation or restriction should not be arbitrary or
excessive or what is beyond what is required in
public interest. The limitation or restriction must
not be disproportionate to the situation or
excessive.
191. The legislation providing for deprivation of
property under Article 300-A must be “just, fair
and reasonable” as understood in terms of
Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 26(b), 301, etc. Thus in
each case, courts will have to examine the
scheme of the impugned Act, its object, purpose
as also the question whether payment of nil
compensation or nominal compensation would
make the impugned law unjust, unfair or
unreasonable in terms of other provisions of the
Constitution as indicated above. 192. At this
stage, we may clarify that there is a difference
between “no” compensation and “nil”
compensation. A law seeking to acquire private
property for public purpose cannot say that “no
compensation shall be paid”. However, there
could be a law awarding “nil” compensation in
cases where the State undertakes to discharge
the liabilities charged on the property under
acquisition and onus is on the Government to
establish validity of such law. In the latter case,
the court in exercise of judicial review will test
such a law keeping in mind the above
parameters.
193. Right to property no more remains an
overarching guarantee in our Constitution, then
is it the law, that such a legislation enacted
under the authority of law as provided in Article
300-A is immune from challenge before a
constitutional court for violation of Articles 14, 21
or the overarching principle of the rule of law, a
basic feature of our Constitution, especially when
such a right is not specifically incorporated in
Article 300-A, unlike Article 30(1- A) and the
second proviso to Article 31-A(1)”
271 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
60. The aforesaid principles have been reiterated by the
Supreme Court in the case of KOLKATA MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION AND ANOTHER vs BIMAL KUMAR SHAH
AND OTHERS [(2024) 10 SCC 533] and further held that the
right to property has to be given broader and meaningful
interpretation. The right to property has seven sub-rights and it
does not limit to twin components of public purpose and
compensation. The seven sub-rights or strands constituting the
right to property, which are non-exhaustive, have been
enumerated as under:-
“(i) The duty of the State to inform the person
that it intends to acquire his property – the right
to notice,
(ii) The duty of the State to hear objections to
the acquisition – the right to be heard,
(iii) The duty of the State to inform the person of
its decision to acquire – the right to a reasoned
decision,
(iv) The duty of the State to demonstrate that
the acquisition is for public purpose – the duty to
acquire only for public purpose,
(v) The duty of the State to restitute and
rehabilitate – the right of restitution or fair
compensation,
(vi) The duty of the State to conduct the process
of acquisition efficiently and within prescribed
timelines of the proceedings – the right to an
efficient and expeditious process, and
(vii) The final conclusion of the proceedings
leading to vesting – the right of conclusion.”
272 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
61. In view of the aforesaid discussions, we are of the
considered view that although the lands stood vested in the
State under the provisions of the KIAD Act, such vesting does
not dispense with the statutory and constitutional obligation of
the acquiring authorities to determine and pay the
compensation within a reasonable time. The admitted failure on
the part of the authorities to pass the awards for more than
two decades coupled with the absence of any satisfactory
explanation for such an inordinate delay renders the acquisition
proceedings unsustainable. The learned Single Judge has,
therefore, committed no error in quashing the acquisition
proceedings insofar as they relate to the petitioners’ lands.
Hence, the point No.1 answered in affirmative and against the
appellants.
62. Re. Point No.2: While deciding point No.1, we have held
that the inordinate and unexplained delay extending over two
decades in passing the awards is by itself sufficient to sustain
the conclusion reached by the learned Single Judge. However,
the matter does not rest there. The petitioners have produced
considerable material to demonstrate the manner in which the
BMICP has been implemented which has materially deviated
273 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
from the public purpose for which the lands were originally
acquired. Since the appellant-NICE has repeatedly urged that
the acquisition must be protected on the ground that it forms
part of a major public infrastructure project, it becomes
necessary to examine whether the material now placed before
this Court lends support to that submission.
63. It is well settled that a party seeking equitable relief
before the Court must demonstrate fairness in implementing
the project. Where the conduct of the acquiring authorities or
the beneficiary of the acquisition gives rise to a substantial
doubt regarding the adherence to the very public purpose for
which compulsory acquisition was undertaken, the Court cannot
ignore such circumstances while exercising the appellate
jurisdiction, under the Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
64. In the case of BANGALORE MYSORE
INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING
AUTHORITY & ANR. vs NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LTD. & ORS. [(2021) 18 SCC
401], the Supreme Court has critically evaluated whether a
project proponent could unilaterally modify the structural terms
of the FWA and held that the BMICP was governed strictly by
the FWA and PTR, which explicitly mandated the creation of 5
274 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
self-sustained townships at specified locations. The Supreme
Court emphasized that under Article 7.1 of the FWA, any
deviation or modification from the agreed upon plan requires
prior written approval from the State Government or its
designated Empowered Committee. Bypassing this hierarchy to
seek building permission directly from the BMICP Authority
rendered the application legally non-existent (non est).
Furthermore, the Supreme Court has addressed the argument
regarding land use permissions under the Outline Development
Plan (ODP) or Master Plan. It was held that the classification of
land as residential under the Master Plan does not, by itself,
permit the project proponent to develop standalone residential
projects on the land acquired for the specific purpose of
implementing the BMICP under the FWA. The Supreme Court
concluded that land use classifications in an ODP cannot
override the contractual obligations and intended spatial design
set out in the FWA and PTR.
65. Mr. H.N. Shashidhara, learned Senior Counsel appearing
for the landowners has produced before this Court, a report
prepared by the Institute for Social and Economic Change
(ISEC) which is an All India Institute for Interdisciplinary
Research and Training in the Social Sciences getting grant-in-
275 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
aid from the Government of Karnataka and which works with
the Central, State and Local Governments as well as
international agencies. He has also placed before us several
registered sale deeds, sale agreements, Joint Development
Agreements, annual reports and financial statements of the
appellant-NICE covering the period from 2008-09 to 2023-24.
However, the principal submission of the appellant-NICE is that
these materials are irrelevant since the legality of the
acquisition already stands concluded. We are unable to accept
such a broad proposition.
66. The relevance of these documents does not lie in re-
opening the legality of the acquisition notifications. Rather,
they throw light upon the manner in which the lands were
acquired by invoking the power of eminent domain and whether
the implementation of the project has remained consistent with
the public purpose originally projected before the Court. One of
the principal circumstances emerging from the ISEC Report
relates to the extent of land acquired for implementation of the
project. The FWA contemplated acquisition of 20,193 acres of
land for the BMICP. Out of this, 6,999 acres were earmarked
for road components viz., Expressway, Peripheral Road and
Link Road, while 13,194 acres were earmarked for 5 proposed
276 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
townships. The report, however, records that the subsequent
planning documents, particularly the Outline Development Plan
dated 12.02.2004 has altered this distribution by increasing the
land requirement for the road components to 9,471 acres,
while correspondingly reducing the land earmarked for the
township component by 2,472 acres. However, no satisfactory
explanation has been furnished for this substantial re-
distribution of land between different project components and
the excess acquisition of land. Further, the affidavit filed by the
State before the Supreme Court in Contempt Petition (C)
No.139/2012 states that ‘554 acres of excess land has been
handed over to the appellant-NICE’ (emphasis supplied).
The said affidavit was accepted and on the basis of the said
affidavit, the contempt proceedings were closed by the
Supreme Court vide order dated 13.07.2012.
67. The report further records that acquisition proceedings
ultimately extended to a substantially larger extent in several
villages situated in Bengaluru Urban and Ramanagara districts
than what was originally contemplated under the FWA.
According to the report, such enlargement facilitated
availability of additional parcels of land possessing significant
commercial value. Whether this conclusion ultimately withstand
277 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
the judicial scrutiny is not the immediate issue before us.
Nevertheless, these findings undoubtedly constitute relevant
circumstances while examining the question whether the
acquisition proceedings which have remained incomplete for
decades ought to be sustained or not.
68. The landowners have also relied upon several registered
transactions executed by the appellant-NICE in respect of the
lands forming part of the project. The documents placed before
this Court disclose Joint Development Agreements dated
31.03.2011 executed with Umang Realtech Private Limited
covering 10 acres 21 guntas situated at Madavara Village and
with Dhammanagi Developers Private Limited covering 20 acres
33 guntas situated at Kengeri Village. These agreements
pertain to multiple survey numbers that contemplate
commercial development of substantial extents of project land
through private developers.
69. Similarly, the material includes a registered Sale Deed
dated 14.01.2015 executed in favour of SBK Properties Private
Limited relating to 12 acres situated at Pillaganahalli Village
and a Sale Agreement dated 15.04.2015 executed with
Darshita Housing Private Limited covering 13 acres 30 guntas
in the very same village. Further, 3 Sale Agreements dated
278 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
16.07.2008 were executed with Ajmera Housing Corporation
relating to the lands situated in Varahasandra, B.M. Kaval and
KengeriGollahalli Villages covering an aggregate extent of
approximately 54 acres. Collectively, the documents placed
before this Court relate to approximately 110 acres of land
spread across Madavara, Kengeri, Pillaganahalli, Varahasandra,
B.M. Kaval and KengeriGollahalli Villages. It is not the
execution of these transactions alone which assumes
significance. Their cumulative effect indicates that the lands
acquired for implementation of a public infrastructure project
were subsequently made the subject matter of registered
conveyances, Joint Development Agreements and commercial
arrangements with the private developers. The financial
disclosures contained in the annual reports of NICE reinforce
this position.
70. The annual reports produced before us reveal that as
early as the financial year 2008-09, the Company disclosed
income from sale of land. By 2010-11, the Company had
disclosed receipt of advances towards sale of land and Joint
Development Agreements entered into with various parties. The
Annual Report for the year 2013-14 records that the Company
intended to mobilise financial resources through disposal of
279 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
developed land parcels and development of land on a Joint
Development basis. During the financial year 2014-15, the
Company disclosed receipt of approximately Rs.2,706.3 million
from the sale of developed land as against toll collections of
approximately Rs.1,879.2 million. Likewise, during 2015-16,
the financial statements disclose approximately Rs.27.48 crores
received from sale of developed land, while toll revenue stood
at approximately Rs.219.82 crores. Even in 2016-17, the
Company separately disclosed the income of approximately
Rs.16 crores from sale of the land. The subsequent balance
sheets consistently disclose the advances received towards the
sale of land and the Joint Development Agreements ranging
between Rs.36 crores and Rs.48 crores under non-current
liabilities together with advances of approximately Rs.56 crores
under other liabilities. These financial disclosures are not
isolated entries. They depict a continuing commercial pattern
extending over several financial years wherein sale of
developed land, Joint Development Agreements and
monetisation of project lands constituted recurring sources of
revenue alongside toll collections. Though these disclosures
may not by themselves determine the legality of every
transaction, they undoubtedly constitute relevant materials
280 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
while appreciating the manner in which the project has been
implemented.
71. The report also refers to several mortgage transactions,
lease arrangements and Joint Development Agreements
executed in respect of the acquired lands and records that the
project lands were utilised as security for raising finance from
banks and financial institutions. It further records that the
acquired lands became the subject matter of extensive
commercial development involving residential layouts,
commercial complexes, technology parks, hotels and other
revenue generating assets. These facts prima facie indicate that
developable land constituted an important commercial asset
forming part of the financial model adopted for implementation
of the BMICP.
72. The landowners have further placed reliance upon the
extracts from the Company’s Annual Reports showing that
completed portions of the Link Road and Peripheral Road were
capitalised as assets in the financial statements of the
Company. The significance of such disclosures lies not in
conclusively establishing any illegality, but in appreciating
whether the implementation of the project has remained
confined to the public purpose for which compulsory acquisition
281 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
was undertaken. In our view, it is a fraud on the statute and
Constitution. The State authorities are accomplice in this fraud
and gross breaches and violations of the FWA. The proposed
project has not done any public good or served any public
purpose except to benefit the project proponent in
unimaginable properties. The project was though conceived for
public purpose, but it has served only private interests of the
project proponents.
73. Further, the appellant-NICE has violated the FWA by
increasing the toll fees on various occasions without seeking
the prior approval of the State which is evident from the
documents submitted by the State itself. The lakes and tank-
bed lands of various villages have been handed over to the
appellant-NICE in violation of the judgment of the Supreme
Court in the case of HINCHLAL TIWARI vs KAMALA DEVI
AND OTHERS [(2001) 6 SCC 496], wherein it was held that
the material resources of the community like forests, tanks,
ponds, hillock, mountain etc. are nature’s bounty. They
maintain delicate ecological balance. They need to be protected
for a proper and healthy environment which enables people to
enjoy a quality life which is the essence of the guaranteed right
under Article 21 of the Constitution. Viewed together, these
282 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
facts become relevant while considering whether the acquisition
continues to satisfy the public purpose for which the power of
eminent domain was invoked.
74. Another fact which cannot be ignored is the finding
recorded by the learned Single Judge that the landowners
specifically contended that many of the acquired lands had not
been utilised for the Expressway, Peripheral Road, Link Road,
toll plazas or inter-changes and that such submission remained
substantially undisputed by the otherside. The learned Single
Judge has taken note of this fact while appreciating the
prejudice caused to the landowners.
75. This Court cannot altogether ignore the material which
prima facie indicates that the lands acquired through
compulsory acquisition have, over a period of years, become
inter-twined with substantial commercial transactions extending
beyond construction of road infrastructure.The appellant-NICE
seeks to set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge
primarily on the premise that the acquisition formed part of a
project conceived in larger public interest. However, the
implementation of that very project is accompanied by
commercial exploitation of acquired lands, alteration of land
utilisation, execution of Joint Development Agreements, sale
283 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
transactions and capitalisation of project assets. The material
produced before this Court lends support to the conclusion that
the order passed by the learned Single Judge does not call for
interference. We are, therefore, of the considered view that the
appellant-NICE has failed to establish any ground warranting
interference in exercise of the appellate jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we answer point No.2 against the appellants.
76. Re. Point No.3: The principal submission advanced on
behalf of the appellant-NICE is that the writ petitions were
liable to be rejected at the threshold since the acquisition
proceedings forming part of the BMICP have already been
upheld in the earlier rounds of litigation culminating in the
judgments of the Supreme Court. It is submitted that the
legality of the FWA, the public purpose underlying the
acquisition, the notifications issued under the KIAD Act and the
competence of the State Government to undertake acquisition
for implementation of the BMICP have all attained finality.
Consequently, according to the appellant, the landowners
cannot be permitted to reagitate these issues which stand
concluded by competent Court.
77. There is no dispute with the legal proposition that the
doctrine of res judicata is founded upon considerations of public
284 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
policy. A litigation must attain finality and parties cannot be
permitted to repeatedly re-open the issues which have already
been conclusively adjudicated by the Courts of competent
jurisdiction. The judgments of the Supreme Court rendered in
earlier rounds of litigation bind all the Courts.
78. However, the applicability of the doctrine depends not
merely upon the identity of parties but, more importantly on
the identity of the issue which is directly and substantially in
dispute. This principle does not prohibit every subsequent
proceedings arising out of the same transaction. It bars only
those proceedings in which the very issue already adjudicated
is sought to be re-opened. Where the subsequent events give
rise to an independent and distinct cause of action, the doctrine
has no application.
79. In ALL INDIA MANUFACTURERS ORGANISATION
(supra), the Supreme Court has examined the legality of the
FWA, the public purpose underlying the BMICP, the authority of
the State Government to undertake acquisition under the KIAD
Act and the overall validity of the project. Thereafter, in
M.NAGABHUSHANA (supra), the Supreme Court once again
considered the challenges to the very same acquisition
proceedings and upheld the legality of the acquisition. Thus,
285 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
the legal position that the acquisition notifications were validly
issued and that the project subserved a public purpose
undoubtedly has attained finality.
80. The present proceedings, however, do not seek
reconsideration of any of those issues. The landowners have
not challenged the competence of the State Government to
acquire the land for industrial purposes nor have they sought a
declaration that the preliminary or final notifications were void
on the grounds urged in the earlier litigations. The grievance of
the landowners is that although the acquisition proceedings
commenced between 1998 and 2009, despite lapse of two
decades, the acquiring authorities have failed to perform the
statutory obligation of determining the compensation by
passing the award. This prolonged inaction gave rise to a fresh
and independent cause of action, distinct from the legality of
the acquisition itself.
81. The validity of an acquisition is one issue. The legality of
continuing acquisition proceedings indefinitely without
determining the compensation is an altogether different issue.
Similarly, the compulsory acquisition originally undertaken for a
public purpose is one question, and whether, after acquisition,
the project has been implemented consistently with that public
286 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
purpose over the succeeding years is altogether another
question.
82. These questions could not have been possibly adjudicated
in the earlier rounds of litigation because the factual foundation
itself had not arisen then.
83. The Supreme Court, in the case of ANIL KUMAR GUPTA
(supra), while dealing with successive causes of action arising
from the acquisition proceedings, has recognized that different
stages of acquisition may furnish separate and distinct causes
of action. A challenge founded upon subsequent statutory
defaults cannot be rejected merely because an earlier challenge
to the acquisition notifications had failed. The learned Single
Judge has rightly relied upon the said principle while holding
that the present proceedings arise from the admitted failure to
pass awards over an extraordinarily long period and not from
the original acquisition notifications.
84. If every subsequent challenge was to be treated as
barred merely because the acquisition notifications had once
been upheld, the acquiring authority would be rendered
immune from judicial scrutiny irrespective of its conduct. If the
awards were not passed for several decades, compensation
287 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
remained unpaid indefinitely or statutory obligations were
persistently ignored, the landowners would be left remediless
solely because the original acquisition had survived judicial
review. Such a proposition cannot be accepted. The doctrine of
finality cannot be expanded to protect the subsequent
administrative inaction of statutory and constitutional frauds. It
protects judicial determinations and it does not immunise
future statutory defaults and criminal and civil liability.
85. The appellant-NICE has contended that permitting
repeated litigations would seriously impede the implementation
of public infrastructure projects. We are unable to accept this
submission in the facts of the present case. The delay
complained of by the landowners is not of few months or few
years. Such prolonged failure to complete the statutory
obligations cannot be characterised as an inevitable
consequence of litigations alone. Once the legality of the
acquisition stood affirmed by the Supreme Court way back in
2006 and 2011, it became incumbent upon the authorities to
proceed with reasonable expedition in determining the
compensation. Their subsequent omission cannot now be
shielded behind the doctrine of finality.
288 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
86. Besides the afore, the sale deeds, Joint Development
Agreements, annual reports, financial reports are all pertaining
to the events occurring after execution of the FWA and, in
several instances, years after the earlier litigation had
concluded. These materials were neither available for
consideration nor adjudicated upon in the earlier rounds of
litigation. Their relevance, therefore, cannot be excluded
merely by invoking the doctrine of res judicata.
87. We are, therefore, of the view that the present case do
not seek to re-open the findings recorded by the Supreme
Court regarding the validity of the BMICP, the acquisition
notifications or the land acquisition. They are founded upon a
subsequent and continuing failure of the acquiring authorities
to discharge their statutory obligations concerning the
implementation of the project. These constitute independent
causes of action which were neither directly nor substantially in
issue in the earlier rounds of proceedings, and protected under
Article 300A of Constitution. We answer this point too against
the appellants.
XI CONCLUSION:
88. The facts as disclosed would clearly suggest that there is
nothing nice about the NICE project except that the farmers
289 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
have been robbed of their lands and livelihood of generations
without payment of compensation as mandated under Article
300A of the Constitution of India. We have been informed that
out of 111 kms Expressway, the NICE has constructed only
5 kilometres Expressway in the last 25-26 years as per the
affidavit dated 28.07.2026 filed by Mr. Anjum Parwez,
Additional Chief Secretary, PWD. The NICE is sitting over huge
land bank of more than 20,000 acres, and the land and the
assets have been alienated and capitalized to its benefit as
stated above against the Supreme Court judgment in
BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR
AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY (supra) and in violation of the
terms of FWA. The State cannot be a party in concentrating
wealth in a private person, by exercising eminent domain at the
cost of the innocent citizens/farmers, as the same goes against
the Rule of law. This Court exercising its extra-ordinary
Jurisdiction cannot become a silent spectator, and allow any
illegality to perpetuate only on the ground that the earlier
challenges attained finality, when different circumstances were
placed.
89. By constructing the peripheral roads, putting up toll
plazas and collecting huge tolls, increasing the toll without prior
290 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
approval of the State in violation of the Framework Agreement
etc., the NICE is earning huge profits without fulfilling the
obligations under the FWA. The State itself has pointed out
several violations committed by the NICE in its operations.
90. The lakes, water bodies, waterbed liners have been
transferred to the NICE damaging the environment, ecology
and in detriment to the water supply chain of Bengaluru
particularly, and the neighbouring areas.
91. It appears that this BMICP may be one of the biggest
scam in the State of Karnataka and it demonstrates how a
State, which is the trustee of the natural resources on behalf of
the citizens, can allow the private interest to flourish in utter
violation of the constitutional mandate and the law to the
detriment of environment, ecology and against the public
interest for questionable considerations. One of the contentions
urged by the appellant-NICE is that the Government has not
given/acquired the extent of land as required under the FWA
and therefore, the Government has been in violation
of the FWA which has resulted in non-completion of the
project in 25 years. However, the said contention of
the appellant – NICE is not only false, but incorrect
291 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
which is evident from the affidavit filed on behalf of the State in
Contempt Petition (Civil) No.139/2012 that 554 acres of excess
land had been handed over to the appellant-NICE for the said
project.
92. We fail to understand why the State is not reviewing the
project or cancelling the same as the NICE has utterly failed in
its objective i.e., developing 5 Townships and Expressway of
approximately 111 kms., between the two major cities of
Karnataka i.e., Bengaluru and Mysuru to decongest the city of
Bengaluru and provide and create opportunities for
employment and growth alongside the Expressway.
93. The NICE project has done nothing but to benefit its
proponents in an astronomical way at the expense of the
landowners and the public interest in general. This is a fit case
where an independent assessment and investigation be carried
out by the special team of experts by conducting forensic audit
of its accounts and for committing fraud and other criminal acts
of commissions and omissions. However, we have doubt that
such an exercise will ever be taken up as the State itself is
accomplice in allowing the project proponents to earn huge
profits illegally by diverting the lands against the FWA,
capitalizing the assets, drying up the lakes, collecting huge toll
292 WA No. 1214 of 2025
AND Connected Matters
in violation of the FWA and sitting over the huge land bank
without payment of compensation etc. We, therefore, dismiss
these appeals filed by both the NICE and the KIADB and affirm
the judgment and order dated 04.07.2025 passed by the
learned Single Judge.
In view of dismissal of the appeals, pending IAs, if any,
do not survive for consideration and accordingly, they stand
disposed of.
Sd/-
(D K SINGH)
JUDGE
Sd/-
(T.M.NADAF)
JUDGE
BKV
CT:SN
