Advertisement
Advertisement

― Advertisement ―

Applications Open | 12th Youth Leadership Workshop on GCED

The UNESCO Asia-Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding (APCEIU), in collaboration with UNESCO MGIEP and the GCED Youth Network, is inviting applications...
HomeMohammad Yaqoob Beigh vs Union Territory Through Police Station on 5 March,...

Mohammad Yaqoob Beigh vs Union Territory Through Police Station on 5 March, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

CRM(M) 640/2025

1.The investigation in case FIR No. 119/2022 under Sections 8/15 and 29

SPONSORED

of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

(hereinafter referred to as the „NDPS Act‟ for short) and Section 207

of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, of Police Station, Kulgam

culminated into a final report/charge-sheet against three accused

persons, including the present petitioner namely Mohammad Yaqoob

Beigh S/o Mohammad Abdullah Beigh R/o Jan Mohalla, Shopian,

under the aforesaid sections of law.

2.The accused, except the petitioner, came to be arrested during

investigation and, as such, they have been facing the trial right from

the beginning. That the present petitioner, as an accused in the case,

could not be arrested by the Police Station concerned during the

investigation of the case on account of the alleged fact of his going

1 Bail App 13/2026 c/w CRM(M) 640/2025
missing without his whereabouts being immediately known. The

Police Station concerned, accordingly, made a prayer in the final

report/challan that proceedings in terms of the provisions of Section

299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (erstwhile Central Code,

now repealed but applicable in the case and hereinafter referred to as

the „Code‟ for short), corresponding to the provisions of Section 325

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surkasha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred

to as the „BNSS‟ for short) may be initiated as against the petitioner-

accused. At the presentation of the charge sheet, the statement of the

IO of the case came to be recorded and the ld. Trial Court proceeded

at the trial of the case.



Source link