Mithu Ghosh vs The State Of West Bengal on 16 July, 2026

    0
    7
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Leave granted.

    SPONSORED

    2. We have a strange situation here, where the case of

    two accused who had not petitioned the High Court, was

    considered by the High Court in the petition filed under

    Section 482 for quashing the FIR by the other accused.

    3. The High Court having dealt with two

    petitioners/appellants herein found that the charge against

    the appellants under Section 3(1)(s) of the Schedule

    Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,

    19891 would stand quashed but the proceedings under

    Section 3(1)(r) of the said Act would be continued.

    1 For brevity, “the SC&ST Act”



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here