Mehraj Ahmad Dar vs Through: Mr. M. Younis Hafeez on 28 July, 2026

    0
    9
    ADVERTISEMENT

    28-07-2026

    01. Through the medium of the present application, the

    SPONSORED

    applicant/appellant is seeking suspension of sentence.

    02. The appellant has challenged the impugned judgment of conviction

    dated 23.10.2025, passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Shopian, in a

    case arising out of FIR No. 150/2022, registered with Police Station Zainapora,

    for the commission of offences under Sections 366 IPC and 3/4, 17 of the POCSO

    Act. Vide the impugned judgment, the appellant has been convicted for the

    commission offences under Section 363 IPC and Section 17 of the POCSO Act.

    In proof of the offence under Section 363 IPC, the appellant has been sentenced

    to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of

    ₹5,000, whereas in proof of the commission of offence under Section 17 of the
    POCSO Act, he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period

    of five years and to pay a fine of ₹10,000. Both the sentences have been directed

    to run concurrently.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here