Md. Sahmud @ Sahmud vs The State Of Bihar on 19 May, 2026

    0
    32
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Md. Sahmud @ Sahmud vs The State Of Bihar on 19 May, 2026

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22454 of 2026
                              Arising out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2024 Thana- PALASI District- Araria
                     ======================================================
                     Md. Sahmud @ Sahmud Son of Belal R/o Village-Farsadangi, Ward No11,
                     P.S-Palasi, District-Araria Bihar
    
                                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                              Versus
                     The State of Bihar
    
                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Madhav Jha, Adv.
                     For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    3   19-05-2026

    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

    Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. The petitioner seeks bail in Palasi P.S. Case No. 142

    of 2024 dated 18.04.2024, registered for offences punishable

    under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 302, 504 of

    IPC.

    3. The allegation is against 14 persons of assaulting

    the family members of the informant. The father of the

    informant passed away due to injury. Two other persons were

    also injured. The informant has made allegation against 14

    named persons.

    4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

    there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. He has no

    criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 28.11.2025.
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22454 of 2026(3) dt.19-05-2026
    2/2

    5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State

    has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

    6. Considering the absence of specific allegation,

    absence of criminal antecedent and period of custody, this Court

    is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

    7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released

    on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

    thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

    the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional

    Sessions Judge-IV, Araria, in connection with Palasi

    P.S. Case No. 142 of 2024.

    8. It is made clear that any observation made

    herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for

    the purpose of adjudication of the present bail

    application. Such observations shall not be construed

    as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not

    influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

    manner.

    (Ansul, J)
    Vikash/-

    U      T
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here