Md. Janhagir @ Janhagir vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

    0
    62
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Md. Janhagir @ Janhagir vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

    Author: Sandeep Kumar

    Bench: Sandeep Kumar

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53235 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-657 Year-2019 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                             Purnia
                     ======================================================
                     Md. Janhagir @ Janhagir S/o Md. Kalam @ Kalam R/o Vill.- Kamlapur
                     Colony, PS- Raniganj, PO- Pachira, Distt.- Araria, Bihar
    
                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
               1.    The State of Bihar
               2.    Jubeda Khootan W/o Md. Janhagir, D/o Md. Usman R/o Vill.- Bharkona,
                     PS- Mirganj, Distt.- Purnia, Bihar
    
                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha
                     For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam
                                                    Mr. Kumar Jay
                                                    Mr. Hazique Shams Ali
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    5   09-03-2026

    Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

    2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

    SPONSORED

    with Complaint Case No. 657 of 2019 for the offence under

    Sections 498A, 314, 307, 379, 120B, 494 of the Indian Penal

    Code and Section ¾ of the DP Act.

    3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and

    others are accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for

    demand of dowry.

    4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

    petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been

    implicated in this case.

    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53235 of 2025(5) dt.09-03-2026
    2/3

    5. Learned APP for the State and the learned counsel

    for the O.P. No. 2. have opposed the application of the

    petitioner.

    6. Considering the submission of the parties and in

    light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the

    case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8

    SCC 273, this application for grant of anticipatory bail is

    allowed.

    7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his

    arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four

    weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

    bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

    the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

    Judicial Magistrate, Purnea/concerned Court below in

    connection with Complaint Case No. 657 of 2019 subject to the

    conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

    Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS and with further

    condition that:

    (I). The petitioner is directed to pay
    a maintenance amount of Rs. 7000/- from the
    month of March 2026 to the
    complainant/informant. The maintenance for the
    month of March 2026 shall be paid to the
    complainant/informant within ten days from
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53235 of 2025(5) dt.09-03-2026
    3/3

    today, and thereafter, the maintenance amount
    shall be paid to the complainant/informant
    every month before the 10th day of each month.

    8. It is made clear that the order of maintenance

    passed by this Court shall be subject to the outcome of the

    maintenance case in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court

    concerned, if any.

    9. Needless to state that, if the petitioner fails to abide

    by the terms and conditions, as stated hereinabove, the State

    shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application, before the

    learned concerned Court below for cancellation of bail granted

    to the petitioner.

    10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

    Principal District & Sessions Judge, Purnea through FAX for its

    compliance forthwith.

    (Sandeep Kumar, J)
    Shishir/-

    U       T
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here