Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Manoj Kumar Dhaka S/O Shri Dharam Dev … vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jp:17742) on 27 April, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:17742]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7668/2026
Manoj Kumar Dhaka S/o Shri Dharam Dev Singh, Aged About 59
Years, 11 Months R/o. 1/392, Rajasthan Housing Board,
Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School
Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Joint Secretary Education (Gr-Ii) Department, Govt.
Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan.
3. Director, Secondary Education Bikaner, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Mathur
For Respondent(s) :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN
Order
27/04/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the
action of the respondent No.3 in not complying the directions
of the Appellate Tribunal constituted under Rajasthan Civil
Services (Service Matters Appellate Tribunals) Act, 1976
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1976’).
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that initially, the petitioner
was suspended by the competent authority vide order dated
19.05.2025 (Annex.1) and the said order has been assailed
before the Appellate Tribunal and vide order dated
17.11.2025 (Annex.2), the Appellate Tribunal set aside the
impugned suspension order.
(Uploaded on 27/04/2026 at 02:26:49 PM)
(Downloaded on 27/04/2026 at 11:44:00 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:17742] (2 of 2) [CW-7668/2026]
3. It is also his grievance that the said order of the Appellate
Tribunal has attained finality as there is no challenge to the
said order.
4. This Court having gone through the Act of 1976 and rules
framed thereunder, prima facie finds that the only recourse
is to seek implementation of that order by invoking the
present proceedings. When the Appellate Tribunal set aside
the suspension order, the third respondent is duty-bound to
comply the said order of reinstatement as there is no appeal
against said order and, therefore, the same is an enforceable
order. According to the petitioner the said order attained
finality.
5. In the said circumstances, the present writ petition is
disposed of, directing the respondent No.3 to implement the
order dated 17.11.2025 (Annex.2) and the decision shall be
taken before the retirement of the petitioner.
6. The petitioner is at liberty to communicate a copy of this
order to the concerned department.
7. All the pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(MUNNURI LAXMAN),J
architp/23
(Uploaded on 27/04/2026 at 02:26:49 PM)
(Downloaded on 27/04/2026 at 11:44:00 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
