For Petitioners : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate
For Respondents No. to 3 : Mr. Gary Mukhopadhya, Additional
Advocate General
For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate
For Respondents No.5 to 8 : None though served.
S.B.: Hon’ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
CAV Order
1. Petitioners, who are applicants in the recruitment process
initiated by respondent State for appointment of Constables of
different trades, have filed this writ petition pleading therein that
at the time of conducting Physical Efficiency Test (for short
‘PET’), respondent No.4-agency deputed by the respondent
State for conducting PET, had completed PET by adopting
corrupt means, benefiting some candidates and thereby there
was irregularity in the selection process. They also pleaded that
written examination was also not conducted in a fair and
transparent manner. Hence, prayed for following reliefs:-
