Manjoor And Others vs State Of Uttarakhand on 21 July, 2026

    0
    3
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Uttarakhand High Court

    Manjoor And Others vs State Of Uttarakhand on 21 July, 2026

                     Office
                     Notes,
                    reports,
                   orders or
                 proceedings
    SL.
          Date         or                   COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
    No.
                  directions
                      and
                  Registrar's
                  order with
                  Signatures
                                UKHC010038812026
                                ABA/88/2026
    
                                Manjoor and Others
                                                                    --Applicants
                                                    Versus
                                State Of Uttarakhand
                                                                  --Respondent
    
                                Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
    

    Mr. Vinod Kumar Jemini, Advocate for
    the applicants.

    2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, A.G.A. for the
    State.

    SPONSORED

    3. By means of the present application, the
    applicants seek anticipatory bail in
    connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 154 of
    2015, registered at Police Station Gangnahar,
    District Roorkee, for the offences punishable
    under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 332,
    341, 353/34, 427 of IPC and 7 Criminal Law
    and Amendment Act
    and Section 2 National
    Flag Defamation Prevention Act, 1971.

    4. In this case, an FIR was lodged against
    unknown person. After investigation,
    chargesheet was submitted under Sections
    147
    , 148, 149, 307, 323, 332, 341, 353/34,
    427 of IPC and 7 Criminal Law and
    Amendment Act
    and Section 2 National Flag
    Defamation Prevention Act, 1971.

    5. Learned counsel for the applicant would
    submit that applicant has falsely been
    implicated in the case; that no specific role
    has been assigned to him; that there are ten
    co-accused persons in the chargesheet, out of
    which, seven co-accused persons have been
    granted bail. It is also submitted that since
    chargesheet has been filed, there is no
    requirement of custodial interrogation. On
    this ground, learned counsel for the applicant
    has prayed that if applicant surrenders before
    the Trial Court concerned, he may be given
    liberty to avail the remedy available to him in
    accordance with law by moving an appropriate
    application before the learned Magistrate
    concerned.

    6. Heard learned counsel for the parties
    and perused the record.

    7. Having considered the submissions
    under the facts and circumstances of the
    case, this Court thinks it appropriate and
    directs that if the applicant surrenders before
    the Trial Court concerned and files his bail
    application, the Trial Court concerned shall
    consider and decide his bail application
    sympathetically and in an expeditious
    manner, as per law.

    8. With the above observation, the present
    anticipatory bail application stands disposed
    of.

    9. Pending applications, if any, also stand
    disposed of.

    (Alok Mahra J.)
    21.07.2026
    Ujjwal



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here