Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Mangilal vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:13946) on 24 March, 2026
Author: Praveer Bhatnagar
Bench: Praveer Bhatnagar
[2026:RJ-JD:13946]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11196/2024
Mangilal S/o Binjaram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Kervi, Rajiv
Nagar, P.s. Sanchore, Dist. Sanchore, Raj. (Lodged In Sub Jail,
Sanchore)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12627/2025
Bhanwar Singh S/o Sohan Singh, Aged About 40 Years, Resident
Of Bangdi, P.s. Sanderav, District Pali. Currently Head Constable
53, Police Line Sanchore, District Sanchore (Raj.). Presently
Lodged In District Jail Jalore
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. BR Bishnoi
Mr. Chaturbhuj
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
24/03/2026
1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section
483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused-
petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.
100/2019 registered at Police Station Sanchore, District Jalore for
the offences under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act.
(Uploaded on 25/03/2026 at 11:08:39 AM)
(Downloaded on 26/03/2026 at 08:49:21 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:13946] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11196/2024]
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the
accused-petitioner have falsely been implicated in this case for the
offences under Section 8/15, 25 and 29 of NDPS Act. It is
contended that the recovery of contraband article was effected
from an abandoned vehicle and the petitioners name has been
mentioned by other co-accused Kamlesh @ Kama and Mithalal
who have been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this
court vide orders dated 14.11.2025 and 24.09.2025 respectively.
The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long and the
trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail
application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail
application and submitted the FSL report which shows that the
article recovered from the petitioners was found to be
mephedrone and the quantity of mephedrone recovered from the
petitioners’ possession is below commercial quantity.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for
the petitioners and the fact that similarly placed co-accused have
been granted bail and looking to the fact that the accused-
petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may
take considerable time, therefore, without commenting anything
on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the
accused-petitioners on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 BNSS is
allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Mangilal
S/o Binjaram and Bhanwar Singh S/o Sohan Singh, in
connection with FIR No. 100/2019 registered at Police Station
(Uploaded on 25/03/2026 at 11:08:39 AM)
(Downloaded on 26/03/2026 at 08:49:21 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:13946] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11196/2024]
Sanchore, District Jalore shall be enlarged on bail provided each of
them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with
two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned
trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all
the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
103, 105-amit/-
(Uploaded on 25/03/2026 at 11:08:39 AM)
(Downloaded on 26/03/2026 at 08:49:21 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)