Manav Singh vs The State Of Telangana on 21 May, 2026

    0
    12
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Telangana High Court

    Manav Singh vs The State Of Telangana on 21 May, 2026

          IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
                               AT HYDERABAD
    
            THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
    
                  CRIMINAL PETITION No.7849 of 2026
                              DATE: 21.05.2026
    
    
    BETWEEN:
    
    
    Manav Singh
    
    
                                            .....Petitioner/accused No.5
    
    
                                    And
    
    
    The State of Telangana.
                                                        .....Respondent
    
    
                                   ORDER
    

    The petitioner-accused No.5 filed the present application

    under Sections 480 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

    SPONSORED

    2023, seeking to grant bail to him in Crime No.9 of 2026 of

    Dhoolpet, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under

    Sections 8c r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

    Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act‘).
    2

    TMD,J
    Crl.P.No.7849 of 2026

    2. The case arose out of the contraband seized by the

    prosecution, i.e., 30.15 kgs of dry ganja. Due to which, the

    petitioner was arraigned as accused No.5.

    3. Heard Mr. Umesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner

    and Mr. Vivekananda Reddy, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor

    appearing for the respondent-State.

    4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

    petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case.

    The petitioner was apprehended and he is not having criminal

    antecedents. Hence, learned counsel prayed this Court to enlarge

    the petitioner on bail.

    5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor

    opposed for grant of bail stating that the allegations leveled

    against the petitioner are serious in nature. Further, the

    investigation is not yet completed. Hence, he prayed the Court to

    dismiss the criminal petition.

    6. In the light of the submissions made by both the learned

    counsel and a perusal of the material available on record, it
    3
    TMD,J
    Crl.P.No.7849 of 2026

    appears that the contraband seized 30.15 kgs of dry ganja, which is

    a commercial quantity. Further, in view of rigour of Section 37 of

    NDPS Act, the petitioner is not entitled for the bail. Hence, this

    Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and the same is

    liable to be dismissed.

    7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

    Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

    closed.

    ____________________
    JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

    Date: 21.05.2026
    gms/ggd
    4
    TMD,J
    Crl.P.No.7849 of 2026

    THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

    CRIMINAL PETITION No.7849 of 2026

    DATE: 21.05.2026

    Gms/ggd



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here