M/S Ugro Capital Limited vs Tarkeshwar Arts And Ors on 3 August, 2026

    0
    5
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Learned Counsel for the petitioner alleges default in repayment of the

    said loan, pursuant to which the petitioner issued a Loan Recall Notice

    SPONSORED

    dated 03.09.2025. It is further stated that the petitioner has duly invoked

    the arbitration clause contained in the Loan-cum-Hypothecation Agreement

    by issuing a valid notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration and

    Conciliation Act, 1996, dated 19.09.2025.

    2

    It is an admitted position that the Arbitral Tribunal stands constituted,

    that the arbitral proceedings have concluded, and that the matter is

    presently reserved for pronouncement of the award.

    In this factual backdrop, this Court finds no justification to entertain

    the present petition at this stage. The legislative scheme is explicit that once

    an Arbitral Tribunal is constituted, the Court ought not to exercise its

    jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Act, except where the remedy under

    Section 17 is shown to be inefficacious.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here