1) The appeal arises out of an order dated
May 14, 2026, passed in W.P.A. 11099 of 2026.
2) By the order impugned, the learned Court
found that balance of convenience and
inconvenience, did not tilt in favour of the
appellants, so as to warrant an interim
protection.
3) His Lordship was of the, prima facie, view
that, in the absence of any illegality or
arbitrariness in the action of the tendering
authority, the interim protection sought for in
the writ petition could not be granted.
