Manipur High Court
M/S Koireng Food Imphal Represented By … vs The Regional Institute Of Medical … on 18 April, 2026
Author: Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Bench: Ahanthem Bimol Singh
LAISHRA Digitally signed
by LAISHRAM
M DHAKESHORI
DHAKESH DEVI
Date: 2026.04.20 Item Nos. 41
ORI DEVI 12:23:37 +05'30' IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
1. WP(C)) No. 145 of 2025
M/S Koireng Food Imphal represented by its proprietor namely Shri
Leisel Ngamshing Koireng, aged about 44 years old S/o L. Sonsorang
Koireng, a permanent resident of Longa Koireng, Senapati, P.O. Langjing
& P.S. New Keithelmanbi, Senapati District, Manipur - 795113.
...Applicant/s
-Versus-
1. The Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal (RIMS in
short) represented by its Director having its office at Regional
Institute of Medical Sciences Complex, P.O. & P.S. Lamphel,
Imphal West, Manipur- 795004.
........Official Respondents
-B E F O R E-
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
For the Petitioner :: Mr. N. Jotendro, Sr. Advocate
Md. Abdul Baquee Khan, Advocate
For the Respondents :: Mr. S.Vijayanand Sharma, SPC
Dates of Hearing :: 18-04-2026
Date of Order :: 18-04-2026
O R D E R (O R A L)
Heard Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel assisted by
Md. Abdul Baquee Khan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
Page 1
WP(C) No. 145 of 2025
and Mr. S. Vijayanand Sharma, learned senior panel counsel appearing
for the respondents.
[2] At the outset, learned senior counsel appearing for the
petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been hospitalized and
undergoing medical treatment due to his illness. It has been further
submitted that at present, the petitioner is at Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
and his doctor has given advise for carrying out surgical operation of the
petitioner. In that view of the matter, learned senior counsel submitted
that the petitioner will not be in a position to run the canteen now and
that the present writ petition can be closed by giving one week’s time to
the dependents/family members of the petitioner to voluntarily vacate
the said canteen in question.
[3] Mr. S. Vijayanand Sharma, learned senior panel counsel
appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that he has no objection
in disposing of the present writ petition as proposed on behalf of the
petitioner. However, the learned counsel submitted that a fix time frame
be given by this Court for vacation of the said canteen voluntarily and in
the event of failure to do so within the time frame, the authorities may
be permitted to vacate the same unilaterally.
Page 2
WP(C) No. 145 of 2025
[4] In view of the submission made above, the present writ
petition is disposed of with the following directions :-
(i) The petitioner or any of his dependent/family members
are at liberty to voluntarily vacate the premises of the
canteen in question within a period of one week from
today.
(ii) In the event, the dependent/family members of the
petitioner failed to vacate the occupation of the canteen in
question within the aforesaid period of one week, the
respondents are at liberty to vacate the same unilaterally.
[5] With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition is
disposed of.
JUDGE
Dhakeshori
Page 3
WP(C) No. 145 of 2025
