Lovepreet Singh vs Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, … on 13 July, 2026

    0
    8
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of

    invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition

    SPONSORED

    under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing

    of the order dated 31.05.2018 (Annexure P-7), passed by respondent

    No.2, whereby services of the petitioner have been terminated, and the

    order dated 10.12.2018/08.01.2019 (Anneuxre P-9), passed by

    respondent No.1, whereby his appeal against termination order has been

    rejected.

    2. The undisputed facts of the case are that the petitioner,

    who is stated to be a handicapped person, was appointed as a Store Boy

    on compassionate grounds, vide appointment letter dated 13.11.2017

    (Annexure P-1), upon demise of his father (Sh. Sukhminder Singh),

    who was working as a Sub Inspector, and unfortunately died on

    01.10.2013. Since the said post required matriculation along with two

    years experience, the petitioner furnished an experience certificate

    dated 02.08.2017 issued by his former employer certifying that he had

    worked as an Assistant Helper from June, 2015 to July, 2017. It is the

    case of the petitioner that right from the date of his appointment, he has

    performed his duties to the best of his ability to the satisfaction of the

    Corporation, however, on verification of his experience certificate, it

    was found that the petitioner had only worked for two months with his

    former employer. Consequently, the petitioner was issued a show cause

    notice dated 14.05.2018 (Annexure P-4) as to why his services should

    not be terminated. The petitioner submitted his reply dated 30.05.2018

    (Annexure P-6) (wrongly stated as 30.05.2015), wherein he had taken

    the following stand :-



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here