Lakhindra Kumar @ Lakhindra @ Lakhindra … vs The State Of Bihar on 13 July, 2026

    0
    8
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Lakhindra Kumar @ Lakhindra @ Lakhindra … vs The State Of Bihar on 13 July, 2026

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 42866 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2012 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East
                                                           Champaran
                     ======================================================
                     Lakhindra Kumar @ Lakhindra @ Lakhindra Sah S/o Raghubir Sah @
                     Raghubir R/o Village - Hariyan Chhapra (Amar Chhatauni), P.S - Chhatauni,
                     District - East Champaran.
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                     The State of Bihar.
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                     For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, APP
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    2   13-07-2026

    Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

    petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing

    SPONSORED

    on behalf of the State.

    2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in

    connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 162 of 2012 registered

    for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447,

    448, 436, 425, 427, 323, 324, 325, 307, 395, 354, 506, 504 of

    the Indian Penal Code.

    3. While making submissions of learned counsel for

    the petitioner, the Court noticed that petitioner has approached

    this Court for anticipatory bail after a delay of 14 years from the

    date of lodging of the FIR. On this ground alone, this Court is

    not inclined to grant the benefit of anticipatory bail.

    4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 42866 of 2026(2) dt.13-07-2026
    2/2

    petitioner is rejected

    5. However, if the petitioner surrenders and seeks

    regular bail, then his prayer for regular bail shall be considered

    on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order.

    (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J)
    veena/-

    U         T
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here