Kundan Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

    0
    40
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Kundan Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

    Author: Sandeep Kumar

    Bench: Sandeep Kumar

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73625 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2025 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran
                     ======================================================
                     Kundan Sah S/o Manoj Sah R/o Village - Madhurap, P.S - Phenhara, District -
                     East Champaran At Present R/o Village - Pakaridayal, P.S - Pakaridayal,
                     District - East Champaran
    
                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                           Versus
               1.    The State of Bihar Bihar
               2.    Ragani Kumari W/o Kundan Sah D/o Late Dinanath Prasad, R/o -
                     Pakaridayal, Near Girja Vivah Bhawan, P.S - Pakaridayal, District - East
                     Champaran
    
                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Anuj Kumar
                     For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Parmanand Prasad
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    3   09-03-2026

    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

    counsel for the Informant and learned APP for the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

    with Pakhridayal P.S. Case No. 315 of 2025 registered for the

    offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(4), 76, 85, 92, 109,

    352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code and under section ¾

    of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

    3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is

    accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for demand of

    dowry.

    4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for

    the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73625 of 2025(3) dt.09-03-2026
    2/3

    been implicated in this case.

    5. Learned counsel for the State and learned

    counsel for the informant has opposed the application of the

    petitioner.

    6. Considering the aforesaid facts along with the

    submission of the parties and in view of the law laid down by

    the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs.

    State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, this application of

    grant of anticipatory bail is allowed.

    7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

    his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within

    six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail

    bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

    like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial

    Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari/concerned Court below

    in connection with Pakhridayal P.S. Case No. 325 of 2025,

    subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the

    Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

    8. As a condition of this order, the petitioner is

    directed to pay a maintenance amount of Rs. 10,000/- from the

    month of March, 2026 to the informant and the maintenance for

    the month of March, 2026 shall be paid to the informant within
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73625 of 2025(3) dt.09-03-2026
    3/3

    ten days of pronouncement of this order and thereafter the

    maintenance amount from the month of April, 2026 shall be

    paid to the informant every month before the 10 th day of the

    month and if the petitioner fails to pay the maintenance amount

    to the opposite party no. 02 then his bail bonds shall be

    cancelled by the Court below.

    9. It is made clear that the aforesaid maintenance

    order will be subject to the outcome of any order of concerned

    Court below passed in maintenance proceedings, if any.

    (Sandeep Kumar, J)
    Vikas/-

    U



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here