Koosa Mallaiah vs The Special Collector, L.A. Srsp on 9 July, 2026

    0
    7
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Telangana High Court

    Koosa Mallaiah vs The Special Collector, L.A. Srsp on 9 July, 2026

        IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
                        AT HYDERABAD
    
        THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
    
                     WRIT PETITION No.8039 of 2010
    
                             DATED : 09.07.2026
    
    Between:
    Koosa Mallaiah, S/o. Ramaiah and 17 others
                                                              ...     Petitioners
                                       AND
    The Special Collector,
    L.A. SRSP and JCRGLIP,
    Tarnaka, Hyderabad and 2 others
                                                          ...         Respondents
    
                                 :: O R D E R :

    :

    This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of

    India seeking the following relief/s:-

    “to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one
    in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Draft
    Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition
    Act of 1894 vide proceedings No.SRP019 dated
    22.07.2009 and Draft Notification Under Section 6 of
    the Land Acquisition Act vide proceedings No.SRP020
    dated 23.07.2009 issued by the 1st respondent by
    invoking the urgency clause under section 17 (4) of the
    Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as amended from time to
    time and dispensing with the procedure contemplated
    under Section 5-A of the Land Acquisition Act, is illegal,
    arbitrary, unjustified and violative of Articles 14, 21 and
    300-A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to
    the Judgments render by this Hon’ble Court as well as
    the Hon’ble Apex Court insofar as dispense with the
    enquiry under Section 5-A of the Land Acquisition and
    to pass…”

    2

    SPONSORED

    2. Heard Sri Sravan Kumar Purella, learned counsel appearing

    for the petitioners, who appeared virtually and learned Government

    Pleader for Land Acquisition, appearing for the respondents.

    3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, pursuant

    to the orders of this Court in the present writ petition, the

    compensation has already been paid to the petitioners. Thus, the

    cause in the present writ petition no longer survives for

    adjudication and seeks to dismiss this Writ Petition as infructuous.

    4. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for

    the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

    There shall be no order as to costs.

    Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

    ____________________________________
    VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, J

    Date: 09.07.2026
    dpm



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here