Khambham Vamshee Dileep Alias Vamshi vs The State Of Telangana on 21 May, 2026

    0
    23
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Telangana High Court

    Khambham Vamshee Dileep Alias Vamshi vs The State Of Telangana on 21 May, 2026

          IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
                             AT HYDERABAD
    
            THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
    
                  CRIMINAL PETITION No.7797 of 2026
                            DATE: 21.05.2026
    
    
    BETWEEN:
    
    
    Khambham Vamshee Dileep @ Vamshi
    
    
                                             .....Petitioner/accused No.2
    
    
                                   And
    
    
    The State of Telangana, Through PS Raidurgam,
    Through the Public Prosecutor, High Court
    High Court for the State of Telangana.
                                                         .....Respondent
    
    
                                  ORDER
    

    The petitioner-accused No.2 filed the present application

    under Sections 480 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

    SPONSORED

    2023, seeking to grant bail to him in Crime No.1472 of 2025 of

    Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad, registered for the offences

    punishable under Sections 8c r/w 20(b)(ii)(A), 22(c), 27 and 29 of
    2
    TMD,J
    Crl.P.No.7797 of 2026

    the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for

    short ‘NDPS Act‘).

    2. Heard Mr. Kodari Mallikarjuna, learned counsel for the

    petitioner and Mr. Vivekananda Reddy, learned Assistant Public

    Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.

    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

    petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case.

    The petitioner was apprehended and remanded to judicial custody

    on 22.12.2025 and he is not having any criminal antecedents.

    Hence, learned counsel prayed this Court to enlarge the petitioner

    on bail.

    4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor

    opposed for grant of bail stating that the allegations leveled

    against the petitioner are serious in nature as the seized

    contraband is commercial quantity. Further, the investigation is

    not yet completed. Hence, he prayed the Court to dismiss the

    criminal petition.

    3

    TMD,J
    Crl.P.No.7797 of 2026

    5. In the light of the submissions made by both the learned

    counsel and a perusal of the material available on record, it

    appears that the contraband seized 12 grams of MDMA and 8.06

    grams of OG Kush, which is a commercial quantity. Further, in

    view of rigour of Section 37 of NDPS Act, the petitioner is not

    entitled for the bail. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail

    to the petitioner and the same is liable to be dismissed.

    6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

    Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

    closed.

    ____________________
    JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

    Date: 21.05.2026
    gms/ggd
    4
    TMD,J
    Crl.P.No.7797 of 2026

    THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

    CRIMINAL PETITION No.7796 of 2026

    DATE: 21.05.2026

    Gms/ggd



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here